Kangchu system
The Kangchu system was a socio-economic system of organisation and administration developed by Chinese agricultural settlers in Johor[fn 1] during the 19th century. The settlers organised themselves into informal associations (similar to the Kongsi organisations found in other Chinese communities), and chose a leader from among themselves.
In Chinese, "Kangchu" (
The Kangchu system traces its origins from the 18th century when Chinese coolies settled in Penang and Riau and set up gambier and pepper plantations there. The sovereign rulers of Johor, Temenggong Daeng Ibrahim and his son and successor, Sultan Abu Bakar, took up the Kangchu system during the first half of the 19th century to provide a more organised form of administration as Chinese immigrants began to settle in the state in great numbers and developed the state's agricultural economy.
The term "Kangchu" became widely used during the 19th century, as Chinese immigrants began to settle in and around Johor state and set up gambier and pepper[fn 3] plantations. The social and economic welfare of the early Chinese settlers came under the charge of local Chinese leaders, who were responsible for running these agricultural plantations, which were situated along the river banks.[4] In 1917, the British colonial government in Johor implemented an act which abolished the Kangchu system in the state, and the value for gambier declined during the early 20th century.[5]
Variants of the Kangchu system thrived in other parts of
History
Early years
The origins of the Kangchu system dates back to the mid-18th century, when early Chinese settlers in Penang[7] experimented in cash crop plantations with various types of crops, including pepper, gambier, betelnut and clove. The plantations were abandoned by the late 18th-century, as Penang experienced wars from Buginese seafarers that resulted in many gambier plantations being destroyed; contributing to the decline in plantations was the growing popularity of the spice trade that reaped much greater profits.[8] At the beginning of the 19th century, these Chinese settlers began to look south to Malacca and Singapore, where gambier and pepper plantations had also been established.
In the late 1820s, Chinese settlers from Singapore also began to look towards Johor for gambier and pepper cultivation at the encouragement of Temenggong Abdul Rahman and his successor, Daeng Ibrahim.[9] As more Chinese settlers established gambier and pepper plantations in Johor during the 1840s, Temenggong Daeng Ibrahim formed a bureaucracy made up of Malay officials to oversee administrative affairs upon the Kangchu.[10] He began issuing official permits, known as Surat Sungai (transliterated as "river documents") in Malay, to the Kangchu (leaders of the settlers) which permitted them to establish these plantations along the river banks. In turn, the Kangchu were required to pay taxes from the profits generated by the gambier and pepper farms and the Surat Sungai, which had to be renewed after a specified period of time.[4]
Mid to late-19th century
The first gambier and pepper plantations appeared in Southern Johor, notably Skudai. Lau Lib Keng, a Chinese settler based in Skudai, was the first person to receive a Surat Sungai, whereby the river banks of Skudai were leased to Lau for the cultivation of gambier and pepper.
The crop produce from these plantations were generally exported to other countries from Singapore with the assistance of Chinese merchants based in that city. From the 1860s onwards, many of these Kangchu chalked up debts and began to sell their property rights to these merchants or to larger business magnates (Kongsi in Teochew) based in Singapore,[1] who were known to the locals as Tuan Sungai (literally Masters of the River). The Kangchu then were often hired as supervisors or managers by the merchants to keep watch on the day-to-day operations of the gambier and pepper plantations. Temenggong Abu Bakar began to issue contract-style letters of recognition to these Kangchu; the letters were known by their Malay name Surat Tauliah.[15]
As the gambier and pepper plantations expanded in the 1870s, the more established Kangchu were entrusted with larger blocks of farms and made contracts with Chinese merchants from Singapore. The profits generated from harvests of these plantations formed the bulk of Johor's economy,
Decline
At the end of the 19th century, Johor's economy began to diversify from gambier and pepper plantations to other agricultural crops. Starting with
The British had long frowned upon the Kangchu because of their links with secret societies in Singapore as well as their indulgence in social vices such as
Role of the Kangchu
The Temenggong of Johor (later
The Kangchu acted as the middleman in the bulk purchase of the settlement's commodities through suppliers based in Singapore. In particular, opium was highly popular among the coolies, although frowned upon by the British who took strong measures to suppress its distribution. The Kangchu formed illegal opium syndicates which had links to Chinese leaders from Singapore and other Malay states in the north, particularly
Variants outside Johor
Singapore
Chinese settlers began migrating from the
In the 1850s and 1860s, many Kangchu abandoned their plantations in Singapore as gambier produce declined due to over farming of the soil, and began to establish new gambier and pepper plantations in neighbouring Johor.
Unlike its counterpart in Johor, the Ngee Heng Kongsi (also called "Ghi Hin Kongsi" in
The existence of the Kangchu was not recognised by the British colonial government, even though they exercised a similar degree of autonomy as their counterparts in Johor.[4] Nevertheless, the Kangchu in Singapore had easy access to forested land in Singapore compared to their counterparts in Johor, as the British colonial government adopted a laissez-faire attitude to the Kangchu and imposed very little regulation on their agricultural activities.[29] However, the British were wary of the fact that many Kangchu in Singapore were members of the Ngee Heng Kongsi, which was illegal in Singapore and enjoyed monopoly rights over the regional opium trade. The British appointed a Chinese official among the Kangchu to oversee the social and economic affairs of the gambier and pepper plantations in Singapore and to act as the intermediary.[39]
Riau Islands
The first gambier and pepper plantations appeared in the Riau Islands in the 1730s,
Gambier and pepper farming were mainly confined to the
Sarawak
The first Chinese immigrants settled along the coastal regions of
Charles Brooke encouraged the immigration of the Chinese coolies, beginning in the 1860s, to expand the state's gambier and pepper industry. Chinese settlers in neighbouring
Legacy
The Kangchu system facilitated the growth of the gambier and pepper plantations and developed Johor's and Singapore's economies in the 19th century. The development of Johor's inland towns were attributed to the efforts by the various Kangchu, who were responsible for drawing the settlement plan for the coolies living within the plantation they were working on, from which new towns were formed.
The Teochew dialect became the
See also
- Muar (town)#History
- Sultan Abu Bakar
- Muhamad Salleh bin Perang
- Kapitan Cina
- List of place names of Kangchu system origin
- Kongsi federations
Footnotes
- ^ "Johor" as a state or Sultanate had existed since the 14th century. This system was also practised in Singapore and Riau when the Johor Sultanate still ruled over them. The state of Johor later became part of the Federation of Malaya (later Malaysia) from 1957 onwards.
- ^ "Kangchu" is a Chinese term and is correctly used in this form in both singular and plural contexts. Some Western literary texts refer to "Kangchu" as "Kangchus" in its plural form.[2]
- ^ The gambier and pepper species planted in Singapore, Johor and the other Malay states were of the Uncaria Gambir and Piper Nigrum types respectively.[3]
- List of place names of Kangchu system origin)[29]
- ^ Pepper was cultivated as a Cover crop in gambier and pepper plantations to reduce soil erosion.[34]
- ^ In 1893, there were 210,000 Chinese and 50,000 Malays in Johor, out of a total population of 300,000.[49] In 1931, the Chinese and Indians collectively formed 52.3% of Johor's population.[50]
References
- ^ a b c Andaya (1984), p. 140
- ^ a b Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1975), p. 132
- ^ Corfield & Corfield (2006), p. 175.
- ^ a b c d e Ooi (2004), p. 710
- ^ 猶如酋長擁有特權港主百年風光不再: 系列2, 15 July 2000, Sin Chew Daily (in Chinese)
- ^ Lim (2002), p. 46
- ^ Mak (1995), p. 156
- ^ Hussin (2007), p. 119
- ^ Gambe (2000), pp. 82-3
- ^ Hooker (2003), p. 108
- ^ Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1975), p. 11
- ^ a b c Ahmad & Liok, p. 310
- ^ Radio Televisyen Malaysia (1987), p. 27
- ^ Ahmad & Liok (2003), p. 308
- ^ Ahmad & Liok (2003), p. 311
- ^ a b Ahmad & Liok (2003), p. 313
- ^ Trocki (1979), pp. 134, 136, 158, 179
- ^ Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1966), p. 16
- ^ a b Ahmad & Liok (2003), p. 316
- ^ Andaya (1984), p. 214
- ^ Jackson (1968), p. 49
- ^ Andaya (1984), p. 211-2
- ^ Tate (1971), p. 198
- ^ Ahmad & Liok (2003), pp. 316-7
- ^ Ahmad & Liok (2003), pp. 317-8
- ISBN 978-9971-69-376-3
- ^ Lim (2002), p. 79
- ^ Trocki (1979), p. 90
- ^ a b Chia, Mengtat Jack, Beyond Riots: Chinese Businessmen and Secret Societies in Singapore 1819-1890 Archived 12 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine, NUS History Society e-journal, pg 7-8
- ^ Trocki (1979), p. 137
- ^ a b Yan (1986), p. 120
- ^ Ownby & Heidhues (1993), p. 101
- ^ Corfield & Corfield (2006), p. 206
- ^ a b Havinden & Meredith (1996), pp. 40-1
- ^ Ownby & Heidhues (1993), p. 99
- ^ Ownby & Heidhues (1993), p. 116
- ^ Ownby & Heidhues (1993), p. 90
- ^ a b Trocki (2006), pp. 90-1
- ^ Ownby & Heidhues (1993), p. 102
- ^ Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1975), p. 133
- ^ Andaya (1984), p. 94
- ^ Trocki, (1979), p. 113
- ^ Ownby & Heidhues (1993), p. 98
- ^ Gerber (2006), p. 176
- ^ Gerber (2006), p. 173
- ^ a b Swets & Zeitlinger (1971), p. 210
- ^ Tate (1971), p. 264
- ^ Tregonning (1964), p. 140
- ^ Sidek (1970), p. 22
- ^ Andaya, p. 244
- ^ Blythe (1969), p. 41
- ^ Pan (1999), pp. 173-4
- ^ Chua, Soo Pong, Teochew Opera in Singapore: Continuity and Change Archived 7 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Chinese Opera Institute of Singapore, retrieved 10 May 2009
Bibliography
- Ahmad, Abu Talib; Liok, Ee Tian (2003). New Terrains in Southeast Asian History. Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-89680-228-0.
- Andaya, Barbara Watson (1984). A History of Malaysia. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-312-38121-2.
- Blythe, Wilfred (1969). The Impact of Chinese Secret Societies in Malaya: A Historical Study. Royal Institute of International Affairs, Oxford University Press.
- Chia, Mengtat Jack (2008). "Beyond Riots: Chinese Businessmen and Secret Societies in Singapore 1819-1890" (PDF). NUS History Society e-Journal. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 October 2008.
- "Imprints In Time : The History of Teochew Opera in Singapore" (PDF). pp. 243–255.
- Corfield, Justin J.; Corfield, Robin (2006). Encyclopedia of Singapore. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 0-8108-5347-7.
- Gambe, Annabelle R. (2000). Overseas Chinese Entrepreneurship and Capitalist Development in Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-312-23496-1.
- Gerber, James; Guang, Lei (2006). Agriculture and Rural Connections in the Pacific, 1500-1900. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 0-7546-3978-9.
- Havinden, Michael Ashley; Meredith, David (1996). Colonialism and Development: Britain and its Tropical Colonies, 1850-1960. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-12308-9.
- Hooker, Virginia Matheson (2003). A Short History of Malaysia. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 1-86448-955-3.
- Hussin, Nordin (2007). Trade and Society in the Straits of Melaka: Dutch Melaka and English Penang, 1780-1830. NIAS Press. ISBN 978-87-91114-88-5.
- Jackson, James C. (1968). Planters and Speculators: Chinese and European Agricultural Enterprise in Malaya, 1786-1921. University of Malaya Press. OCLC 435014.
- Lim, Pui Huen (2002). Wong Ah Fook: Immigrant, Builder and Entrepreneur. Times Edition. ISBN 981-232-369-4.
- Mak, Lau-Fong (1995). The dynamics of Chinese dialect groups in early Malaya. Singapore Society of Asian Studies. ISBN 9971-9901-6-4.
- Ooi, Keat Gin (2004). Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 1-57607-770-5.
- Ownby, David; Heidhues, Mary F. Somers (1993). "Secret Societies" Reconsidered: Perspectives on the Social History of Modern South China and Southeast Asia. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 1-56324-199-4.
- Pan, Lynn (1999). The Encyclopedia of the Chinese Overseas. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-25210-1.
- Radio Televisyen Malaysia (1987). Hari Ini Dalam Sejarah. Jabatan Percetakan Negara.
- Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1966). "Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society". Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society.
- Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1975). "Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society". Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society.
- Sidek, Fadzil (1970). Sejarah Orang China di-Tanah Melayu. Pustaka Aman Press.
- Swets; Zeitlinger (1971). "Journal of Southeast Asian Studies". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. Cambridge University Press.
- Tate, D.J.M (1971). The Making of Modern South-East Asia (Vol II). Oxford University Press.
- Tregonning, K.C. (1964). A History of Modern Malaya. University of London Press.
- Trocki, Carl A. (1979). Prince of Pirates: The Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore 1784-1885. NUS Press. OCLC 4836297.
- Trocki, Carl A. (2007). Prince of Pirates: The Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore 1784-1885 (2nd ed.). NUS Press. ISBN 978-9971-69-376-3.
- Trocki, Carl A. (2006). Singapore. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-26386-7.
- Yan, Qinghuang (1986). A Social History of the Chinese in Singapore and Malaya, 1800-1911. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-582666-1.