Lithornithidae

Lithornithidae Temporal range: Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Possible Cretaceous record
Pseudocrypturus cercanaxius fossil cast, Zoologisk Museum, Copenhagen
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Aves
Infraclass:	Palaeognathae
Clade:	Notopalaeognathae
Order:	†Lithornithiformes Houde, 1988
Family:	†Lithornithidae Houde, 1988
Genera
See text

Lithornithidae is an extinct, possibly

Lithornithids had long, slender, bills for probing. They closely resembled modern tinamous, aside from more developed wings. They possessed a rhynchokinetic skull with relatively unfused cranial bones, a weakly fused pygostyle and a splenial. The unguals were more curved than in tinamous and probably allowed better perching in trees.

The order Lithornithiformes was erected by Dr. Peter Houde in 1988. Initially, only three

Lithornithiformes Houde, 1988[6]^[7]

• †Lithornithidae Houde, 1988 (False tinamous)
  • †
    Calciavis grandei
    Nesbitt, 2016
  • †Fissuravis weigelti Mayr, 2007
  • †Paracathartes howardae Harrison, 1979 (Early Eocene of WC US)
  • †Pseudocrypturus cercanaxius Houde, 1988
  • †
    Promusophaga Harrison & Walker, 1977; Pediorallus Harrison, 1984; Parvigyps
    Harrison & Walke,r 1977] (Paleocene – Early Eocene)
    • †
      L. celetius
      Houde, 1988
    • †
      L. plebius
      Houde, 1988
    • †
      L. promiscuus
      Houde, 1988
    • †
      L. nasi (Harrison, 1984) Houde, 1988 [Pediorallus nasi
      Harrison, 1984]
    • †
      L. hookeri (Harrison, 1984) Houde, 1988 [Pediorallus hookeri
      Harrison, 1984]
    • †
      L. vulturinus Owen, 1840 [Parvigyps praecox Harrison & Walker, 1977; Promusophaga magnifica Harrison & Walker, 1977; Pediorallus barbarae
      Harrison & Walker, 1977a] (London Clay Early Eocene of England)

Several studies have shown conflicting status on the monophyly of the group. Some studies recover them as a paraphyletic assemblage leading to modern paleognaths,[1] but more recent examinations group them in a single, natural group basal to the rest of Palaeognathae.^[8] Of issue is Paracathartes, which differs radically from other lithornithids and has been suggested to be more closely related to extant paleognaths,^[9] though it is recently recovered as a derived lithornithid.^{[10][note 1]}

Lithornis itself may be paraphyletic in relation to Paracathartes and Pseudocrypturus.^[10]

Paleobiology

In a study about ratite endocasts, Lithornis ranks among the taxa with well developed olfactory lobes. This is consistent with a nocturnal, forest-dwelling lifestyle, though as much all volant birds it retains large optical lobes.^[11]

Unlike modern tinamous, at least Lithornis has toe claws and reversed halluxes that allow for efficient perching.^[1] Also unlike modern tinamous most lithornithids were capable flyers, with their wings and sterna comparable to those of storks and vultures^[12] some even able to perform long distance migrations.^[13] The exception is Paracathartes which was similar to modern tinamous and fowl in its sternum and wing proportions and likely was a burst flyer as well.^[14]

Several egg fossils have been attributed to lithornithid birds.^[1] Both Lithornis and Paracathartes have entire nests assigned to them.^[15] Their eggshells are, perhaps unsurprisingly, noted as being "ratite-like".^[16]

Studies on lithornithid feathers shows that some species had gloss similar to that of

Lithornithids, much like modern paleognaths, ibises and shorebirds, had a vibrotactile bill tip organ, suggesting the development of this feature in the Cretaceous.[18]

Notes

References