User talk:Winged Blades of Godric: Difference between revisions
→Tech News: 2018-14: new section Tag: |
Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 3,206 edits →In Appreciation: new section |
||
Line 1,199: | Line 1,199: | ||
</div></div> <section end="technews-2018-W14"/> 19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
</div></div> <section end="technews-2018-W14"/> 19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=17894791 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=17894791 --> |
||
== In Appreciation == |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | [[Image:Allaroundamazingbarnstar.png]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''All-Around Amazing Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | The high degree of sincerity and enthusiasm that you bring to maintaining this website's editorial standards is appreciated. [[User:And Adoil Descended|And Adoil Descended]] ([[User talk:And Adoil Descended|talk]]) 05:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 05:51, 3 April 2018
|
Note also that I had the opportunity to meet and talk with Katherine Maher recently. She said quite plainly that "I am an inclusionist" and so such action is supported at the highest level....
— Andrew Davidson
...Arguments from authority rarely convince people on this project. It's nice that WMF's ED is pro-inclusionism but unless the WMF officially intervenes in such matters, it is merely one person's opinion....
— SoWhy...Our core principles of
WP:ORare grounded in the idea that we should cite authorities rather than independently reasoning for ourselves. Katherine Maher's position obviously gives her power, influence and a bully pulpit....— Andrew Davidson
I am Introduction .
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm always happy to help. Alternatively, type Resources
Finding your way around:
Need quick help?
Let's get a bit more detailed
How you can help:
Do's and Dont's
Final reminders
|
Please sign your message.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Shankar_(poet)Dear sir- I am writing as a new wiki editor because I have added important, cited details to above mentioned page but there has been someone vandalized many people's comments on this page called an editor ScrapIronIV. Sir, I suggest you please allow the news of the award won by R. Shankar and P. Chabira for Muse India Translation Award on page as it is major award for translation of goddess Andal. Also, magazine started by R. Shankar very influential. I suggest to suspend ScrapIron IV privilegs as he continues to make false changes to page and not respect satya. Thank you. S. Saastri
Request on 18:58:22, 5 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Cougarsurf
Hey there! Thanks for the feedback on my draft, Draft:Evan Goldstein. Just wanted to get some added clarification on what you think the priorities items should be. It sounds like it was an issue of sources in the first part of your note, but you also commented on the language. Do you think the latter needs some tweaking? It may be a little robotic, I was just trying to mimic the language of some other doctor pages I found. Thanks! Cougarsurf (talk) 18:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello! I've made some edits to my draft based on your feedback. I found a few useful medical journals, made some changes to the language to be more encyclopedic and deleted the sources I believe you marked as irrelevant or less credible. If you could, would you mind taking a look? Thanks! ~~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cougarsurf (talk • contribs) 18:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Arbitration case openedYou had recently provided a statement regarding a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Joefromrandb and others. This case will address the behaviour of Joefromrandb and editors who have interacted poorly with them. However, on opening, who those editors might be is not clear to the committee. Before posting evidence on the talk) 18:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC) ]
Self note
TC)
ALok BabuHI , We need to add extra information in early life and carreer to this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alok_R._Babu. When we tried to do it. You have reverted to old version. Could you please let me know ,how can we proceed with this. Thanks and Regards, J.Lohith — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiranpz (talk • contribs) 07:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here .
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
Dimitrios KalogerakosYes, looks to meet ]
I don't doubt for a moment that you know more about Indian law schools than I do- but just to put the record straight, my comments are generally as careful as a lawyer's, while all the time still being capable of a clean sense of humour. I'm neither a deletionist nor an inclusionist, and I just use the tools that the community wanted to give me. I would hesitate to brand any particular individual of being either (that would not be good faith), unless of course they need to be warned for a tendentious spree of either mass passing articles at NPP as OK that have no place at all on Wikipedia, or mass placing deletion tags on perfectly acceptable pages. But I do believe it to be perfectly acceptable to point out that something is a not policy when it it isn't - I learned a lot here through people putting me right on things I had misuderstood.
Civility in infobox discussions case openedYou were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC) Poor adviceNo, don't tell Legacypac to violate their topic ban. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2018News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC) Govt. Degree College,Khumulwngyour approach here and your ping is much appreciated. Maybe we can even find some degree of agreement . The people with opposing positions on schools pretty much have to, because neither side is going away. DGG ( talk ) 10:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. PAKHIGHWAY block reviewThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Yamla (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
HelpGood morning I would like to ask for your help in editing the Draft: Israel lucas Gois, the article is very good, could you help me put it on the air? I waited for return — Preceding unsigned comment added by André Luiz nogari (talk • contribs) 13:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
hi, tanksgood tar, I am not receiving anything, I believe there is some mistake, here in Brazil Mr. Gois is well known in the capital market, and I am from the capital market and he is a reference for us in the Brazilian financial market, I would like to Your Help For Article Release — Preceding unsigned comment added by J.SAFRA65265 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Aks 2001 Film Hindi1. Did You ever watch [Aks 2001 Hindi Film] involving Manu(Actor Amitab) & Raghavan(Actor Manoj Bajpai)? 2. Did Raghavan's corpse Even get Burnt into Ashes before Spirit unfortunately entered Manu?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)).
Request on 12:12:32, 7 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Jbharakda
Jbharakda (talk) 12:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you but you have deleted and stripped so much text , consensus is not fact , plus you are talking about Sonu Nigam's sister being the sibling helps I guess newspapers approach her rather than her having to, is there anyway to get this text back or is it due to the reason that you believe its paid for ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbharakda (talk • contribs) 17:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Arbitration case reminderYou had recently provided a statement regarding a request for arbitration. We would like to remind you that the case is still open and evidence will be accepted until 11 February. Evidence may be posted at talk) 12:42, 7 February 2018 (UTC) ]
Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Love A ChildHello Winged Blades of Godric. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Love A Child, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not too horrendous, especially for a draft. . Thank you. GedUK 16:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello Winged Blades of Godric, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Urgent: About SSAEL Speedy DeletionHi Winged Blades, I have sent you this by mail as well. I'd like you to know that this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shri_Shakti_Alternative_Energy_Limited_(SSAEL)) has come to you for review after a lot has been said and done with another editor Chetsford. I understand your view is your view but could you humor me and look at it from my perspective? I'm copying below my first talk with Chetsford and request your reply in the light of the same:
PLEASE Winged Blades, let's get me started. Or tell me why RenewPower [11] is ok. Thanks, Snathcb (talk) 10:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Sandeep
Blacklists etcSince you seem to understand the convolutions of getting sites blacklisted etc at this place, perhaps you could find some time to look at whether or not newpakhistorian should be added? It is operated by a former WP contributor who also seems to have contributed to jatland. - Sitush (talk) 13:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal attacksI believe you know that personal attacks are not allowed as per ]
Shocking Exposures UpdatedHi again Godric. Please take a look on the updated version of my draft with third party sources added about the documentary Shocking Exposures. Thanks In my solitude (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC) In my solitude (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi again Godric. Please take another look. I've added a magazine review :) In my solitude (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC) In my solitude (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes later this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. makes me gald I don;t close AfD's. I'd be laughing and crying right now. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
18:09:02, 15 February 2018 review of submission by Tony.bourached
Deletion: Draft:Rosa_BerardoHello there, I think that this page should not be deleted because Rosa Berardo is a well known and respected movie maker and photographer in Brazil. Her pioneer work on movies in Goiás State, central Brazil, is a mark of woman in cinema. She's the first woman in Goiás State to produce and direct a film in the latest 1989. Her film Andre Louco, is considered the first professional film made in the State of Goiás and is mentioned at the Brazilian film Dictionary written by Antonio Leão da Silva Neto, Edições Loyola, 2006. From the point of view of gender and feminism studies, Rosa Berardo is an important character and inspiring source fro Brazilian woman. She also has created the firs Cinema and Film Studies School in her state, Goiás, in the your 2000. There were any film school in the capital of the State, Goiania, neither in the State in general, so no movie makers to represent the local culture in a film made by local people. The school has forme about 30 new film makers that actually represent the state in many nacional and international film festivals . She's considered as the Mother of Goiás State film production. her name has an important whole in last and actual Brazilian film history as the possibility of self representation in cinema in Brazilian communities and states as Goiás, that are not in the main production front line as Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo. It is very very important for a democratic use of cinema as a mean of communication. So woman and local cultures are represented by Rosa Berardo as a piopneer the has gone trough all kind of prejudices and machism against woman to have her place as the first woman to work in films in very import and big region of the country, the Central Region of Brazil. Hope those arguments are enough to highlight the importance for Brazilians to have her name in Wikipedia as a symbol of work, dedication and pioneer in feminist films .
NETO SILVA, Antonio Leao. Dicionário de filmes brasileiros de Curta e media metragem, Edições Loyola, 2006
--AndressaMartins14 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Reminder - ArbCom threaded discussionsHey! Just thought I'd drop you a reminder that the workshop page on the ArbCom case regarding Joefromrandb is operating in a threaded discussion, meaning each user should post under their own heading. You're recent edit there appears to have been made under another users section, so has been removed as a clerk action - however, feel free to restore it in your own section. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 21:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Socks at |
A plate of Mixed vegetable biryani for you | ||
Here is a plate of Mixed vegetable biryani for you. Biryani is a rice-based dish made with spices, rice (usually basmati), and mixed with chicken, mutton etc. But, the plate being served is vegetable biryani. Thank you. Titodutta (contact) 03:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC) |
- @Titodutta:--Yummy! Many thanks for the barnstar and it's always nice to meet a fellow Bengali-pedian:) Godric trails off whilst feeding on the biryani.......~ Winged BladesGodric 16:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Help with IP editor on Draft:Steve Negron
Hey Godric, I hope things are going well in Kolkata!
I've been doing some work on the AfC backlog and I need help in a particular situation.
- @Bkissin:--Things are quite pleasant, over here:) I'll surely take a look at the draft.And, how's life going at your end?!~ Winged BladesGodric 16:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
159
I recall your offer to run AWB over the onefivenine linkspam etc and me saying that I'd rather go through it the hard way so that I could fix numerous other issues - overlinking, other non-RS, Indic scripts, no project on talk page etc. Just so you know, I am getting there. I appear to have had some help - Reyk has popped up in my searches on a few occasions - but we're now down to about 1520 from an original > 2400. Gosh, it is boring!
Did you ever manage to work out the issue about a census village/town that I mentioned at
- Can confirm: very boring! Reyk YO! 07:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Sitush:Hmm..I will be shortly getting to the article discussed at the at AFD:) On a side-note, I did run AWB from my alt-account to clean the refs but it hardly sped up the process.While AWB is quick enough to capture, remove the refs and substitute with a cn tag, allmost the entire articles are so blatantly spammy that it's very hard to just remove the refs and let the spam stay.At the end of the day, editing the entire article through the normal interface seemed a much better alternative!~ Winged BladesGodric 16:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
- Lourdes†
- AngelOfSadness • Bhadani • Chris 73 • Coren • Friday • Midom • Mike V
- † Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.
- The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
- Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
- A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
- A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.
- CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
- The edit filter has a new feature
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.
- Following the 2018 Steward elections, the following users are our new stewards: -revi, Green Giant, Rxy, There'sNoTime, علاء.
- Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.
List of Other Backward Classes in Sikhism
This shall serve as a reminder to never ever indulge with AD anywhere anytime.~ Winged BladesGodric 14:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||
|
- P.S.--See this t/p thread.~ Winged BladesGodric 16:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Notes My contributions
- Firstly yes i want explanation on a per-source basis.
- i am film lover and as you mentioned i am not getting any form of remuneration (direct or indirect) from writing the articles on them, my happiness is only that i am sharing part of knowledge with world. and wanted to support 'for the people by the people' policy.
- Sorry but i am not doing it for remuneration that's the main problem, because of my edits may be someone will not able to earn the money, and there is possibility these agencies who takes charges for creating Wikipedia pages will contacted you to demotivate peoples like me who does it for interest, and instead of helping them the administrators like you will remove all the work person has did in past some years, and the thing is i learned Wikipedia editing just by watching others edits, and by seeing that articles i edited these, still there are so many articles like me are presented, delete it if possible so that at least they will get the knowledge how not to edit.
- I am Very Much Disappointed by fifth point you raised may be its correct by your point of view, but without any consideration someone is working and you are blaming him that you are working for money ??.
- i respect your contribution to Wikipedia, and my motive to come here on Wikipedia is share the knowledge and information with world.
- as i mentioned above i learned editing by watching others edits, its failure of the Wikipedia administrators (peoples) like you to keeping all that articles on Wikipedia still and the new comers like me will learn from them and get the deletion notice after long time of creation. let it be.
Thank you very much for much more spending time in spending on my edits ! and i am not going to appose any deletion notice given by you, indirectly i came to that conclusion instead to giving knowledge and spreading awareness that anyone can edit Wikipedia, the peoples like you are indirectly supporting to them who edit Wikipedia for money. and as you mentioned that previous administrator gave me the notice to revoke the access, the answer is he did not replied yet of my questions and the reasons which i asked him on his talk page.
Shrinivas G Kulkarni 16:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher)Shrinivaskulkarni1388-First off Winged Blades of Godric is not an administrator, neither does he support (in fact he opposes) paid editing. I have certain advice for you which you must follow so that you become better at editing Wikipedia:
- Stop editing mainspace atleast for the time being
- Accept Titodutta's offer and read-up the linked pages in the comment on your talk page
- Untick the Treat the above as wiki markup. box in Special:Preferences
- Finally try not to edit pages of subject to which you are close to as it has been proven by research that even if you are extremely careful you may end up writing what looks like a fan page to other people which may be thought of by other people as paid editing. Hope you have a smooth Wiki-journey from now on — Rdl 03:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Correcting callRdl 03:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Correcting call
Article notability request - BlueChilli
Greetings Godric! Thank you for being a volunteer editor, and for taking the time to reply to people above. I recently created the article Draft:BlueChilli. I declared my COI (I worked there) and sought help in the chat from User:Vermont before submitting, you recently rejected the article for reasons of notability. I would like to seek your guidance to understand what you would look for before I seek resubmission. Thank you in advance! Sebeckmas (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Request on 15:30:13, 5 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Lunarfantom
- Lunarfantom (talk · contribs)
I was told the "Times of India" was though? (on the Wiki live chat)
Lunarfantom (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Lunarfantom:--
- We need significant coverage about the subject in multiple sources, over a prolonged time-span.
- I don't think that any IRC-guy has told you that
A single TOI source will get the article live
but if that is the case, he was mistaken.
- I don't think that any IRC-guy has told you that
- And, frankly, I think you have chosen a poor job.Chances are negligible that the subject wll be ever notable per our guidelines of inclusion.Money seldom buys notability.~ Winged BladesGodric 15:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- We need significant coverage about the subject in multiple sources, over a prolonged time-span.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now make longer edit summaries. [37]
Changes later this week
- You can notify users in edit summaries. They will get a ping just as if they had been mentioned on a wiki page. [38]
- On Special:AbuseLog you can now choose to list only actions that actually made an edit. Other actions are when the filter warned the editor or blocked the edit from being made. There are also more search options. [39][40]
- Wikis can enable Citoid to provide automatic reference look-up in the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor, but it is complex. The tool will now warn in the JavaScript console if the configuration isn't correct. Soon Citoid will disable itself if the configuration isn't correct. Check that your wiki is configured correctly. You can ask for help if you need it. [41]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 March. It will be on all wikis from 8 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 6 March at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 7 March at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- In the future you will be able to use global preferences. This means you could change a preference for all wikis instead of having to change it every time for each wiki. You can now test global preferences and give feedback.
- You can now read about planned works on maps during 2018. This will be done by June. You can give feedback on the planned maps work.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
12:28:33, 9 March 2018 review of submission by Saveydude
Hello sir i have updated the articles it has come in deccan chronicle request to re review and approve.
Saveydude (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- I am not highly convinced and will recuse, for the time-being.It looks like a borderline candidate to me, which may go either way at a deletion discussion.Please wait for another reviewer and in case, it takes an extraordinarily high time, I will probably accept it.And, please try to add more comprehensive sourcing, to bolster the draft.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 05:32, 10 March 2018 (UTC)]
Reverting Admin closes
Do it again and I'll block you for disruption. If you don't like the outcome go to DRV. Non-admins and nominators don't get to overrul admin closes without a consensus.
- @Spartaz:--Ha! The warning would have surely made much more sense, iff you wouldn't have closed the AFD after an administrator had already relisted it.~ Winged BladesGodric 06:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Also, now explain, what gives you the authority to unilaterally overrule V93's relisting, 5 minutes prior to your closure?~ Winged BladesGodric 06:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Doesn't matter. I saw a consensus and Admins are allowed to take different stances as there is some wriggle room in interpreting closes. You should have have raised it with me instead of reverting too and you may well have got a better outcome then just being plain rude. You know where DRV is if you disagree. Spartaz Humbug! 06:51, 10 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Absolutely.Doubts become firmer as to your ability at closing AFDs.~ Winged BladesGodric 06:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Charmed I'm sure. Spartaz Humbug! 07:08, 10 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Me too!~ Winged BladesGodric 07:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- And, I can't but laugh as I contrast Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagyashree Mote and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shivani_Rangole.Sigh....~ Winged BladesGodric 07:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Charmed I'm sure.
- Absolutely.Doubts become firmer as to your ability at closing AFDs.~ Winged BladesGodric 06:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter. I saw a consensus and Admins are allowed to take different stances as there is some wriggle room in interpreting closes. You should have have raised it with me instead of reverting too and you may well have got a better outcome then just being plain rude. You know where DRV is if you disagree.
Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018
Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018
Milestone for mix'n'matchAround the time in February when Wikidata clicked past item Q50000000, another milestone was reached: the mix'n'match tool uploaded its 1000th dataset. Concisely defined by its author, Magnus Manske, it works "to match entries in external catalogs to Wikidata". The total number of entries is now well into eight figures, and more are constantly being added: a couple of new catalogs each day is normal. Since the end of 2013, mix'n'match has gradually come to play a significant part in adding statements to Wikidata. Particularly in areas with the flavour of digital humanities, but datasets can of course be about practically anything. There is a catalog on skyscrapers, and two on spiders. These days mix'n'match can be used in numerous modes, from the relaxed gamified click through a catalog looking for matches, with prompts, to the fantastically useful and often demanding search across all catalogs. I'll type that again: you can search 1000+ datasets from the simple box at the top right. The drop-down menu top left offers "creation candidates", Magnus's personal favourite. m:Mix'n'match/Manual for more. For the Wikidatan, a key point is that these matches, however carried out, add statements to Wikidata if, and naturally only if, there is a Wikidata property associated with the catalog. For everyone, however, the hands-on experience of deciding of what is a good match is an education, in a scholarly area, biographical catalogs being particularly fraught. Underpinning recent rapid progress is an open infrastructure for scraping and uploading. Congratulations to Magnus, our data Stakhanovite !
Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- 3D models can now be uploaded to Commons. [42]
- Page Previews has been updated to use HTML for previews. This has fixed many issues. An A/B test was done on English and German Wikipedia to measure how it is used. Other changes were also made. [43]
- Some edits have to be checked against too many conditions before they can trigger an abuse filter. If that is the reason no filter is triggered the edit will be tagged for review. [44]
- Auto-saving has been added to the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor. Right now it is meant to help if your browser crashes or if you accidentally close a tab. [45]
Problems
- The abuse filter did not tag all edits that should have been tagged after last week's MediaWiki version had come to the wikis. It was fixed on 9 March (UTC). [46]
Changes later this week
- You can notify users in edit summaries. They will get a ping just as if they had been mentioned on a wiki page. This was originally planned to happen last week. [47]
- It is now possible to specify the block parameters for each filter in Special:AbuseFilter. The parameters include block duration and if the user should be blocked from editing their own talk page. The block duration is separate for anonymous and registered users. [48][49]
- A hundred Wikimedia wikis will switch to use the Remex parsing library. This is to replace Tidy. It will happen on 13 and 14 March. Other wikis will be recommended to switch soon when they have fixed the errors that must be fixed. Tidy will be removed in the middle of 2018. [50][51][52]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 March. It will be on all wikis from 15 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 13 March at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 14 March at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Wording for edits made to Y&R ANZ
Hi, I'd like to discuss the wording used in your edit to Y&R ANZ. In the "Controversy" section, you've written "given that many of the social media posts by GPYR were sexually and politically obscene". This is untrue and was fabricated by the original article's author. Can you please read the following articles (Article 1, Article 2) and revise the wording accordingly? Thanks. --Peacenik162 (talk) 21:54, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Please explain your reasoning
[53] Please explain why you believe that every member of one Wikiproject should be required to tell people in AFDs they participate in that they saw it listed in their Wikiproject, when none of the other many Wikiprojects on Wikipedia are required to do that. Dream Focus 04:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Dream Focus: Please look up "should" and "must" in the dictionary and try to understand the difference. There appears to be a unanimous consensus among everyone except you and Andrew Davidson (both of whom are clearly upset that your weak arguments in the YPT AFD are not being taken seriously) that the amendment is an improvement and is in accordance with the project-wide canvassing guidelines. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:04, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- ↑↑Wot he sez↑↑.Cheers!~ Winged BladesGodric 12:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Help : review article
Hi Let me introduce myself. I am Felix and I’m a novice in Wikipedia ! I wrote an article recently, it’s a biography of a french-american journalist : Laura Haim. Now, I’m waiting for validation from wikipedian reviewer. Would you be able to help me? I have no idea how long it could take… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Laura_Haim Many thanks for your help. Best
Felix Billybon (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Not an area of my comfort.Please don't mass-spam user-talk-pages, again.~ Winged BladesGodric 07:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
ACTRIAL - next steps for the Future of AfC & NPP
Hello Winged Blades of Godric, thank you for your efforts reviewing New Page and AfC submissions and your support for the ACTRIAL initiative.
The conclusion to the ACTRIAL report commissioned by the Wikimedia Foundation strongly reiterates our long-time on going requirements for the NPP and AfC processes to be improved. Within minutes of the trial being switched off, the feed was swamped with inappropriate creations and users are being blocked already.
This is now the moment to continue to collaborate with the WMF and their developers to bring the entire Curation system up to date by making a firm commitment to addressing the list of requirements to the excellent suite of tools the WMF developed for Curation. Some of these are already listed at Phabricator but may need a boost.
The conclusions also make some recommendations for AfC.
A place to discuss these issues initially is here where you are already a task force member.
Wikipedia:The future of NPP and AfC. To opt-out of future mailings, go here. From MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Gurjar
Can you work out what has gone on at Gurjar in the last few hours? It is a mess and I can't make my mind up whether it is copy/paste or something else. - Sitush (talk) 08:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Sitush:-Not much of a coherent idea but given the mess, reverting is always the best option.My edit-summary was wrong in the sense that he made some changes (transposing sections, copy-edits etc.) but heavily duplicated parts of the article from the article itself, probably in error.I will try to re-insert his edits, if any of them are helpful.~ Winged BladesGodric 08:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- And, additions like these, being based on unreliable sources ought not be executed.~ Winged BladesGodric 08:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Talkback
Could you just check out if the GA notice is AGF —
- I will wait a day or so to check if that was any editor, in good-standing, editing logged-out.Otherwise, I'm afraid that I've to persuade the IP to refrain.Regards~ Winged BladesGodric 13:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Deletion review for Template:Video game music
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Video game music. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Liontamer (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- WP:DRVPURPOSE states]
Deletion Review should not be used, when you have not discussed the matter with the administrator who deleted the page/closed the discussion first, unless there is a substantial reason not to do this and you have explained the reason in your nomination
.~ Winged BladesGodric 07:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- On March 12 early morning UTC, the number of 503 error messages increased due to an issue on esams datacenter. It has been fixed. [54]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 20 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 21 March. It will be on all wikis from 22 March (calendar).
Meetings
- There is no Editing team meeting this week.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 21 March at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- From April 4, the autopatrol status of edits will only be accessible in the Recent Changes database table, so only for 30 days. [55][56]
- In-Context Help and Onboarding is a new project, aiming to improve retention of new wiki editors. The goal is to give them short tutorials and other training experiences based on their activity. Collaboration team is expecting feedback and comments on the project talk page, especially from people working with newcomers.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
no notification of move review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello. I was not notified about the move review, doesnt the policy say the person who closed the move should be notified? —usernamekiran(talk) 18:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yep. ~ Winged BladesGodric 18:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- He was informed. Please don't feed this bullshit. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 05:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- @diff about yours' or anybody else informing Kiran, in a crystal-clear manner, as mandated by MRV guidelines and I will gladly strike that out.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 05:47, 23 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Under what definition of "crystal clear"? Anything less than a formal templating, otherwise I worked in bad faith? This is no more than retaliation from usernamekiran for being reprimanded, and the drahmah does not need a feeding. He was informed. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't seek the template, as highly necessary.Anything, clear-cut, in the likes of
I am initiating a MRV as to your close of this RM....
would have been good enough.~ Winged BladesGodric 06:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)- Here you go: "Wikipedia:Move review requires me to bring this up with you before opening a move review." Followed by me opening a move review, which was then followed by usernamekiran altering the close rationale, indicating he was aware of the Move Review. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't agree that your statement could be automatically construed as a direct notification of a MRV initiation.~ Winged BladesGodric 06:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- He was notified, and his actions demonstrate he was aware of the Move Review. This is nothing but drahamah. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 12:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Usernamekiran:--This edit of yours ought to show that you are aware of the MRV.Or, did you miss the banner?!~ Winged BladesGodric 06:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Godric, and Curly Turkey: I honestly missed the banner. Bur the notification was not my issue anyway. I just wanted to let Curly Turkey know that they should have notified me, or at least pinged me when the false accusation was made. This is the point. I want to know on what basis he stated in the move review, and I am quoting:
I contacted the closer directly, and they confirmed that they closed on a mere show of hands and "merely stated what a lot of editors expressed" re WP:COMMONNAME.
This is the comment special:diff/830009227 from where the accusation arises. With what logic can anybody interpret from this comment that I "confirmed that they [I] closed [the move] on a mere show of hands"? —usernamekiran(talk) 17:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)- No false accusation was made—you knew of the review, and it confirmed that you made a bad close. Just drop the drahmah. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 21:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- if it wasnt false accusation, then provide the evidence. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- I already have—now stop falsely accusing me of not having informed you. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 04:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- if it wasnt false accusation, then provide the evidence. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- No false accusation was made—you knew of the review, and it confirmed that you made a bad close. Just drop the drahmah. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 21:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Godric, and Curly Turkey: I honestly missed the banner. Bur the notification was not my issue anyway. I just wanted to let Curly Turkey know that they should have notified me, or at least pinged me when the false accusation was made. This is the point. I want to know on what basis he stated in the move review, and I am quoting:
- I don't agree that your statement could be automatically construed as a direct notification of a MRV initiation.~ Winged BladesGodric 06:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Here you go: "Wikipedia:Move review requires me to bring this up with you before opening a move review." Followed by me opening a move review, which was then followed by usernamekiran altering the close rationale, indicating he was aware of the Move Review. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't seek the template, as highly necessary.Anything, clear-cut, in the likes of
- Under what definition of "crystal clear"? Anything less than a formal templating, otherwise I worked in bad faith? This is no more than retaliation from usernamekiran for being reprimanded, and the drahmah does not need a feeding. He was informed. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- @
Interesting
See this. 19939090.Ha!!~ Winged BladesGodric 15:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- To pull under 255 bits...
My first article was deleted
please help me. my article was removed for no reason. I did everything right. I even wrote the sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entergirls (talk • contribs) 15:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
No reason
is wrong by a mile.You were informed of the precise deletion-reasons, at your talk-page.If you choose to remove them, without reading the linked policies, you ought to feel helpless/clueless.Please read aboutgeneral notability guideline, in the meantime.And, in a nutshell, if a Wikipedia article would be the best media-exposure/coverage, your subject has ever recieved, till-date, he/she is damn non-notable and by a mile.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 15:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)]
SJS
Since you think Hindwiki was more competent than the rest. —SpacemanSpiff 07:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Gosh... Facepalm...That was an unblock request par-excellence:) I scrutinized HW's editing patterns for long and in my opinion, he basically skirted around the lower(??) ranges of CIR, but I will gladly strike my wordings, given I'm not so well aquainted with this farm sans HW....~ Winged BladesGodric 07:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- Some of the interface icons and text sizes will change slightly, as part of the updates for improved accessibility and consistency. These icons are used in many features, including Notifications, Recent Changes, Beta Features, Visual Editor, 2017 Wikitext Editor, Code Editor, and others. While editor toolbars, dialogs, and menus will appear slightly bigger; elements on special pages will be slightly smaller. Functionality will not change. [57] [58]
- The deprecated #toc and #toctitle CSS ids have been removed. If your wiki was still using these for fake Tables of Content (ToC) then these might lose their styling. They can be replaced with .toc and .toctitle classes where appropriate. [59]
- TemplateStyles will be deployed to the Wikivoyages on 28 March 2018. [60]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 27 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 28 March. It will be on all wikis from 29 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 27 March at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be one hour earlier than usual on 28 March at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- From 9 April, the sort order of categories will be distorted for a short time. We are upgrading versions of an internationalisation library (ICU) and using a maintenance script to update existing database entries. This will last anywhere from a few hours to a few days, depending on wiki size. Read more details. [61]
- Changes are coming to search for Serbian projects. Cyrillic and Latin variants of a word and different grammatical forms of a word will be able to find each other. Read more on MediaWiki in Serbian or English.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Removing comments of other editors
Don't remove others comments from user talk pages other than your own.[62] Read
- For what it's worth, the edit has been removed again, and by the page's owner this time. Primefac (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
- My Lord, do not preach me policy. Whilst, I appreciate your desire to enforce policies, I'm afraid that with contributions, an order of magnitude greater than you, I know what I'm doing, very well.Best, ~ Winged BladesGodric 17:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC) ~ Winged BladesGodric 17:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Chopping off this and that, here and there....
Harshrathod50 is accorded the distinction of being the second person to be banned from my talk-page.Please do not post here, unless policy mandates you to do so, necessarily.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 06:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
A discussion had started about your recent hasty edits. Now explain each and everything you did with justification. You just increased your own problems. This is not gonna end soon. Harsh Rathod 11:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Again, a discussion had started about your use of language to ask questions to other editors. As I told you, this is not gonna end soon. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 15:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Responding to your note regarding financial interest
Hola oh Winged One!
You put a note on my talk page about having an interest (financial) in the article I was editing. I have an interest, it is not financial. I just kinda like Charlie the Tuna and some of the other iconic characters used in marketing. I confess I don't buy StarKist because it is too expensive. I buy either the Aldi brand canned tuna or BumbleBee. As I explained to Bri and put on the talk page, I really think Charlie, the Maytag dude and the Jolly Green Giant should maybe have their own section. Anyway, I just started this Wiki editing thing to pass time as I recovered from surgery and it is almost addicting. If you know any other pages that need help because they are flagged for having problems, let me know. I'm just stumbling around trying to make sad pages better. Speaking of better, wow your page is loaded with information and I am sure I will be back and use it as a reference if you don't mind. Have a good day and good luck with your studies.Not Wilkins (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- @non-neutral prose. Anyways, wishing you a speedy recovery and feel free to ask for any Wikipedia-related-help, as you may require.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 06:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)]
ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GiantSnowman 15:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! But, a tad too late to the party:) ~ Winged BladesGodric 16:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Help
Hi, Winged Blades of Godric
Please help me move
- @completely uncontroversial move and I will thus abstain from granting it unilaterally.Please initiate a move-request at the talk-page, pending which, the move may be granted or not.Fell free to ask me, if you face any difficulties in setting up the RM.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 06:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)]
New Page Review Newsletter No.10
ACTRIAL:
- (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feedagain, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.
Paid editing
- Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COINif necessary.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
- The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFOREnominating an article for deletion.
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
- While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.
News
- The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-upthat will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
AfDs
Hi Godric, I usually don't ask people to chime in at AfD's I initiate, but today would be exception and I would like to draw your attention towards at least 3 Pakistan-related AfDs which I initiated (Amb Jogi, Iqbal Jogi and Google Tech Mela) and I'm seeking your genuine judgement over there because I believe all three AfDs have merely keep !votes rather than strong arguments. Thank you. --Saqib (talk) 13:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Saqib:--
- Whilst I believe that I will be able to opiniate in a canvassed venue, without any bias, it's my principle that I rarely participate in any of such discussions, where I'm invited to, (unless in exceptional circumstances), on grounds of being labelled as a canvassed participantet al.
- But, that being said, I'm going to prune the article-sourcing, so that there are no more !votes of the like
So many sources.....How can anyone even think of deleting this?!
. - And, I will be further keeping a watch on the progress of all the 3 AfDs.For the time being, there's nothing to worry about, for all the !votes are standard textbook cases of dis-countable arguments.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 16:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I respect your principal, and as I said I too usually don't invite people to comment on AfDs involve me even when my own creations are nominated for deletion such as this. But lately I realised that people often throw keep !vote without providing any solid arguments and the articles resulted kept such as this one. Personally I'm a fan of the arguments made by you and @Johnpacklambert: on Pakistan related AfDs and therefore thought I let you know about these 3 canvassed AfDs and seek your genuine opinion. --Saqib (talk) 16:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- As to my opinions:--
- I'm a bit curious, as to why you did not tag Google Tech Mela for G11.It was clear-cut promo-spam and, I can't think of any of our most conservative sysops declining a tagging, which would have ended the hassle, a lot easily.Anyways, clear delete.
- As to Amb Jogi, that's again a clear delete.
- I'm still on the fence about Iqbal Jogi, given his reputation about the last master player for the instrument.I will try to dig up some sources about him, if feasible.~ Winged BladesGodric 16:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- That was unambiguously promotional. Many sysops are not comfortable deleting articles, which is at an AfD.PingingTonyBallioni, for his take on the CSD-ability of the article. ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- And, by the way, the de-tagger got his flag removed. ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- I would have G11’d it, but it’s at AfD now with keep !votes so not eligible anymore. You can !vote to delete on those grounds though. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: Unforutnately, a convassed AfD with biased votes. Many users who voted there, here and here never participated in AfDs before. --Saqib (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- I guess that there has been definitely some off-wiki canvassing, as to the AfDs, which has brought some near-inactive contributor(s).Anyways, after some discussion with other folks, I think your notification was sufficiently neutral, to be not held as a breach of our canvassing guidelines.Thus, I've recorded my !votes.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 04:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: Unforutnately, a convassed AfD with biased votes. Many users who voted there, here and here never participated in AfDs before. --Saqib (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- I would have G11’d it, but it’s at AfD now with keep !votes so not eligible anymore. You can !vote to delete on those grounds though. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- And, by the way, the de-tagger got his flag removed. ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
hi
[63] the individual responsible for recent disruptions at WTMED has posted a very detrimental comment(irrespective of April fools day) on the page( I would delete it but do not want a confrontation) since you are a administrator it would carry more weight, I would appreciate it--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- someone[64] removed it, not sure if their an admins., but good enough, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Y'know, there constantly seem to be these invisible RfAs that I miss.. :P Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Galobtter, I won't blame you at all, for the RFA of Alexander the Great was so soooper-sekreeet, that no one other than Alexander himself knew of the event......
- In the meantime, Integer has responded to the clarion call for a administrator and (IMHO, quite rightfully) reverted the addition.~ Winged BladesGodric 13:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Insert "Well—that escalated quickly" meme :D —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap shit room 15:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
- 331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG
- Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando
- Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
- Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
- The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
- The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.
- There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.
- The Arbitration Committee WP:ARCA.
- The Arbitration Committee
- A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
- The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Template Wizard script available for testing. It will show up as a puzzle-piece icon in the 2010 WikiEditor. You can click on the icon to insert a template.
- The Wikimedia Communities and Contributors survey is to be sent to participants around the world this week. If you are volunteer developer, and have contributed code to any pieces of MediaWiki, gadgets, or tools, please take 20 to 40 minutes to complete the survey.
Problems
- MediaWiki deployment train has been rolled back to version 1.31.0-wmf.26 on week 13, due to a multiplication of lost connections during MySQL queries. Some of the recent changes may have not been applied. They will be deployed next week. [65][66][67]
- The Notifications badge icons were overlapping other links. This has been fixed. [68]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 3 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 4 April. It will be on all wikis from 5 April (calendar).
- User subpages ending in
.json
will now be protected from other people editing them, like.js
and.css
pages already are. If you have a tool that stores static configuration, you can now use a subpage likeUser:Example/mygadget.json
to do this without concerns. [69] - Tidy will be replaced by RemexHtml on the next set of wikis. On April 4, we plan to turn off Tidy on all Wikiquotes (except frwikiquote) and Wikimedia chapters and user groups wikis. 23 wikis will have Tidy replaced this time. [70][71][72]
- AbuseFilter will transition to use OOUI starting April 4, and the rule editor will also be changed to a CodeEditor (ACE) similar to what is found on user JavaScript pages. The move to OOUI will continue over the next few weeks. [73] [74]
- In Special:Preferences, the preference "Reload the watchlist automatically whenever a filter is changed (JavaScript required)" is now only visible for users who have opt-out the New Filters for the Watchlist. [75]
- You can see names of individual abuse filters in Special:AbuseLog. Now if the name of an abuse filter contains some wikisyntax like links, it will not change to a link when displayed. [76]
- You can now search through filter patterns at Special:AbuseFilter. You may specify either a plain string or a regular expression and the matching filters will show a snippet of their pattern with the match highlighted. [77]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 3 April at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 4 April at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- If you're using, creating or improving Lua modules, you can give your feedback to help harmonizing the modules across wikis and add more useful functions.
- On April 11th, we plan to turn off Tidy on all wikis with less than 50 entries in all high priority linter categories. About 60 wikis will have Tidy replaced. Currently about 600 wikis have had Tidy replaced and we have another 300 wikis to go. We plan to finish this transition from Tidy to RemexHtml by end of June 2018. Please follow T175706 to monitor progress of Tidy replacement. [78][79]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
In Appreciation
All-Around Amazing Barnstar | ||
The high degree of sincerity and enthusiasm that you bring to maintaining this website's editorial standards is appreciated. And Adoil Descended (talk) 05:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC) |