Talk:Đavolja Varoš

Archives

Serbia High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Đavolja Varoš is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expert needed - verification

Can someone fluent in Serbian and English look through the current references? Are they reliable sources? It's pretty obvious there are some translation problems, combined with information being used written by non-experts. --

talk) 19:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Expert needed - geology

While I recognize these rock structures, I don't know what they are called nor recall enough to do a useful search. I'm guessing that the "pyramid" label is the result of poor translations of poor source material. --

talk) 19:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I found hoodoo and linked it in, along with geology categories. --

talk) 21:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

UNESCO tentative listing

It's a tentative listing at UNESCO: http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/1700/ This is probably worth a mention and can definitely be used as a source. --

talk) 21:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. I wikified the article somewhat, but it needs further expansion. I suppose tags are not necessary anymore -- there's plenty of references to work with, just if someone finds some time.

No such user (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Peculiar removal of "peculiar"

@

WP:OR

, you get a crippled sentence such as Đavolja Varoš is a rock formation, located in south Serbia on the Radan Mountain near Kuršumlija. So why would Wikipedia have an article about a goddam rock?

Surely I can find a reference for "peculiar" wording, such as [1]. If you want even more reliable sources, its UNESCO tentative inscription uses attributes such as "unique" and then goes on to even more colorful ones like "bizarre appearance", "miraculous world". Just, I identified your exception as an

No such user (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

"Goddamn rock", very nice, thanks. The "goddamn rock" was nominated as a NATURAL wonder of the world yet you prefer undue terminology to begin the article. Ridiculous. I'm done here. Not engaging with someone like you. Revert the change. Don't ping me again. Hy Brasil (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Đavolja Varoš. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]