Talk:Aliqoli Jadid-ol-Eslam

Aliqoli Jadid-ol-Eslam has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 27, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Islam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion: Interfaith Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive. Iran Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: edit history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Aliqoli Jadid-ol-Eslam/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 18:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 18:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

   I like the prose and you comply with the MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism

   ):

   Well referenced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Well-written article about an interesting person, I'm happy to pass as a GA. I left a couple comments below but those are the only issues I found. --Cerebellum (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Lead: The phrase "major polemicist" should have a reference per GA criterion #2.b (direct quotation). I'm guessing it's from Amanat but that's not clear from the footnote at the end of the paragraph. I removed the phrase so as not to hold up the review, if you'd like to add it back just add a reference.
• Works: You mention Esbat ol-nabovva in footnote b but not in the list of works, wouldn't hurt to add it to the list. --Cerebellum (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Cerebellum: Thank you very much for your time. Excuse me for my belated response. I didn't add it (Esbat ol-nabovva) to the list on purpose as academics express uncertainties about the work. They also refrain from providing any in-depth information about the work (date of completion, etc.) unlike the listed works. Hence I felt a footnote was going to be sufficient, at least until new scholarly material is published. Cheers, - LouisAragon (talk) 20:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]