Talk:Aryan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aryan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Aryavarta
Where do the Vedas mention Āryāvarta? As far as I can see, it's mentioned in the smriti, specifically the Dharmashastras, not in the Vedas. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Darius the Great
Doesn't Darius the Great of Persia specifically refer to himself as Ariya-ciča meaning "Aryan Bread"? Shadzad (talk) 10:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- can 5.47.72.119 (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Which is to say it absolutely was used to refer to ones genes, ie race? Shadzad (talk) 10:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- You mean "bred"? Even if that's the case, it could mean caste, tribe, or similar, which is not equivalent. FunkMonk (talk) 09:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Why
Copied from User talk:Joshua Jonathan#Why
To answer the question you asked here. I would mention that the lead was written after long discussion per here by multiple experienced editors and probably you were there too. I was only restoring this edit. The lead was unilaterally modified recently on here with a dubious edit summary. This is why I restored established lead version.
Can you restore my edit?
End of copied part
- Well, you also reverted corrections to the lead, with your wholesale revert. The discussion from november 2015 was about Mallory; what you reinserted was the following about de Gobineau's ideas:
Drawing on misinterpreted references in the
Nazi racial ideology which saw the "Aryan race" as innately superior to other putative racial groups.[1] The atrocities committed in the name of this racial ideology have led academics to avoid the term "Aryan", which has been replaced in most cases by "Indo-Iranian", with only the South Asian branch still being called "Indo-Aryan".[2]
References
- ^ Anthony 2007, pp. 9–11.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Witzel2012
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
- That's quite a long piece for the lead, almost as long as the info in the body of the article. With other words, WP:UNDUE. But the lead seems to miss, indeed, info on the modern usage, including the racist fallacies. And the article itself is messy. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)]
- I've re-ordered the info, in line with the clean-up tags and the inline-comments; I'll leave it to more knowledgebale editors to remove the doublures. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Huge improvements to the article, Joshua Jonathan. Thanks for your work. Generalrelative (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks; glad you appreciate it. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Huge improvements to the article, Joshua Jonathan. Thanks for your work. Generalrelative (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)