Aryan race

Page semi-protected
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Aryan race is an obsolete historical race concept that emerged in the late-19th century to describe people who descend from the Proto-Indo-Europeans as a racial grouping.[1][2] The terminology derives from the historical usage of Aryan, used by modern Indo-Iranians as an epithet of "noble". Anthropological, historical, and archaeological evidence does not support the validity of this concept.[3][4]

The concept derives from the notion that the original speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language were distinct progenitors of a superior specimen of humankind,[5][6] and that their descendants up to the present day constitute either a distinctive race or a sub-race of the Caucasian race, alongside the Semitic race and the Hamitic race.[7] This taxonomic approach to categorizing human population groups is now considered to be misguided and biologically meaningless due to the close genetic similarity and complex interrelationships between these groups.[8][9][10]

The term was adopted by various racist and antisemitic writers during the 19th century, including Arthur de Gobineau, Richard Wagner, and Houston Stewart Chamberlain,[11] whose scientific racism influenced later Nazi racial ideology.[12] By the 1930s, the concept had been associated with both Nazism and Nordicism,[13] and used to support the white supremacist ideology of Aryanism that portrayed the Aryan race as a "master race",[14] with non-Aryans regarded as racially inferior (Untermensch, lit.'subhuman') and an existential threat that was to be exterminated.[15] In Nazi Germany, these ideas formed an essential part of the state ideology that led to the Holocaust.[16][17]

History

Debates on linguistic homeland

In the late 18th century,

descendant language—belonged to the same proto- or parent-language in the language family—that is PIE, as the other Indo-European languages,[21] in his Third Anniversary Discourse on the Hindus (1786).[22] However, the linguistic homeland of the original speakers of Proto-Indo-European was a politicized debate among the archaeologists and comparative historical linguists since the start, entangling in chauvinistic causes.[19][23][24] Some European nationalists and dictators, most notably the Nazis, later attempted to identify the Proto-Indo-European homeland in their country or region as racially superior.[25][26]

According to

Leon Poliakov, the concept of the Aryan race was deeply rooted in philology, based on the work of Sir William Jones' claiming that Sanskrit was related to Greco-Roman (European) languages. Other thinkers invented secularized origins for European civilization that were not based on the biblical genealogies from which Europe's aristocracy had long claimed descent.[27][28]

Romanticism and Social Darwinism

The influence of Romanticism in Germany saw a revival of the intellectual quest for "the German language and traditions" and a desire to "discard the cold, artificial logic of Enlightenment".[29] After Darwin's 1859 publication of On the Origin of Species and publicization of the theorized model of Proto-Indo-European language (PIE), the Romantics convicted that language was a defining factor in national identity, combined with the new ideas of Darwinism.[30] The German nationalists misemployed the scientific theory of natural selection for the rationalization of the supposed fitness of some races over others, although Darwin himself never applied his theory of fitness to vague entities such as races or languages.[30] The "unfit" races were suggested as a source of genetic weakness, and a threat that might contaminate the superior qualities of the "fit" races.[30] The misleading mixture of pseudoscience and Romanticism produced new racial ideologies which used distorted Social Darwinist interpretations of race to explain "the superior biological-spiritual-linguistic essence of the Northern Europeans" in self-congratulatory studies.[31][32] Subsequently, the German Romantics' quest for a "pure" national heritage led to the interpretation of the ancient speakers of PIE language as the distinct progenitors of a "racial-linguistic-national stereotype".[33][34]

Invention of the Aryan race

Racial association of the term Aryan

The term "

Rig Veda and Avesta within the Indo-Iranian branch of Indo-European language family—Sanskrit and Iranian, who lived in ancient India and Iran.[35] Although the Sanskrit ā́rya- and Iranian *arya- descended from a form *ā̆rya-, it was only attested to the Indo-Iranian tribes.[36][37] Benjamin W. Fortson states that there may have been no term for self-designation of Proto-Indo-Europeans, and no such morphemes has survived.[37] J. P. Mallory et al. states although the term "Aryan" takes on an ethnic meaning attesting to Indo-Iranians, there is no grounds for ascribing this semantic use to the Proto-Indo-European reconstruction of lexicon *h₂eryós i.e. there is no evidence that the speakers of proto-language referred to themselves as "Aryans".[38] However, in the 19th century, it was proposed that ā́rya- was not only the tribal self-designation of Indo-Iranians, but self-designation of Proto-Indo-Europeans themselves, a theory rejected by modern scholarships.[36][37] "Aryan" then came to be used by scholars of the 19th century to refer to Indo-Europeans.[36] The now-discredited and chronologically reconstructed North European hypothesis was endorsed by such scholars who situated the PIE homeland in northern Europe,[36] which led to the association of "Proto-Indo-Europeans", originally a hypothesized linguistic population of Eurasian PIE speakers, with a new, imagined biological category: "a tall, light-complexioned, blonde, blue-eyed race" - supposed phenotypic traits of Nordic race.[39][40][41][42] The anglicized term "Aryan" then developed into a purely racialist meaning implicating Nordic racial type.[42][36] However, modern scholarship of Indo-European studies use "Aryan" and "Indo-Aryan" in their original senses referring to Indo-Iranian and Indic branch of Indo-Europeans.[43]

Classification of human races based on the now-pseudoscientific study of phenotypical differences developed during the nineteenth century and evidence in support of such theories were sought from the study of language and reconstructions of language families.[44] Scholars of this era established the ethnological term "Aryan" as the race that had spoken the Proto-Indo-European language, and in this context, the term was often used as a synonym for "Indo-Europeans".[44]

Scholars point out that, even in ancient times, the Aryan identity as asserted in the Rig Veda was cultural, religious, and linguistic, not racial; nor do the Vedas contemplate racial purity.[45][46][47] The Rig Veda affirms a ritualistic barrier: an individual is considered Aryan if they sacrifice to the right gods, which requires performing traditional prayer in the traditional language, and does not connote a racial barrier.[46] Michael Witzel states that term Aryan "does not mean a particular people or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)".[47] Scholars state that the historical Aryans, the Vedic period Bronze Age tribes who lived in Iran, Afghanistan, and the northern Indian subcontinent—composers of the Rig Veda and Avesta—were unlikely to be blond or blue-eyed, contrary to the proponents of Aryanism and Nordicism.[24][48]

North Europe hypothesis and archaeological affirmation

The racial interpretation of Aryans stems from the now-discredited

diffusionist model of culture, and emphasised the racial superiority of Germanic peoples over Romans (Roman Empire) and French, whom he described as destroyers of culture as compared to Germanics.[54] Kossinna's ideas have been heavily criticised for its inherent ambiguities in the method and advocacy for the ideology of a Germanic master race.[55]

Earliest utilization of Aryan race

Hamites. Aryans are subdivided into European Aryans and Indo-Aryans (for those now called Indo-Iranians).[56][57]

Vedic passages based upon his editing of the Rigveda from 1849 to 1874.[60] He postulated a small Aryan clan living on a high elevation in central Asia, speaking a proto-language ancestral to later Indo-European languages, which later branched off in two directions: one moved towards Europe and the other migrated to Iran, eventually splitting again with one group invading north-western India and conquering the dark-skinned dasas of Scythian origin who lived there.[61] The northern Aryans of Europe became energetic and combative, and they invented the idea of a nation, while the southern Aryans of Iran and India were passive and meditative and focussed on religion and philosophy.[62]

Though he occasionally used the term "Aryan race" afterward, Müller later objected to the mixing of the linguistic and racial categories,[63] and was "deeply saddened by the fact that these classifications later came to be expressed in racist terms".[64] In his 1888 lecture at Oxford, he stated, "[the] science of Language and the science of Man cannot be kept too much asunder [...] it would be as wrong to speak of Aryan blood as of dolichocephalic grammar",[63] and in his Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas (1888), he writes, "[the] ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes, and hair, is a great sinner as a linguist [...]".[65]

European scholars of 19th century interpreted the Vedic passages as depicting battle between light-skinned Aryan migrants and dark-skinned indigenous tribes, but modern scholars reject this characterization of racial division as a misreading of the Sanskrit text,[66] and indicate that the Rig Vedic opposition between ārya and dasyu is distinction between "disorder, chaos and dark side of human nature" contrasted with the concepts of "order, purity, goodness and light",[66] and "dark and light worlds".[67][45] In other contexts of the Vedic passages the dinstiction between ārya and dasyu refers to those who had adopted the Vedic religion, speaking Vedic Sanskrit, and those who opposed it.[47][68]

However, increasing number of Western writers of this era, especially among anthropologists and non-specialists influenced by Darwinist theories, contrasted Aryans as a "physical-genetic species" rather than an ethnolinguistic category.[69][70]

Encyclopedias and textbooks of historiography, ethnography, and anthropology from this era, such as

A Short History of the World, John Clark Ridpath's Great Races of Mankind, and other works reinforced European racial constructions developed on now-pseudoscientific concepts such as racial taxonomy, Social Darwinism, and scientific racism to classify human races.[56][71][72][73]

Theories of racial supremacy

The term Aryan was adopted by various

Indo-European language family by this time.[42] The inequality of races and the notion of a "superior race" was universally accepted by the scholars of this era, therefore race was referred to "national character and national culture" beyond biological confinement.[75]

In 1853, Arthur de Gobineau published An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races, in which he originally identified the Aryan race as the white race,[76] and the only civilized one, and conceived cultural decline and miscegenation as intimately intertwined.[3] He argued that the Aryans represented a superior branch of humanity,[77] and attempted to identify the races of Europe as Aryan and associated them with the sons of Noah, emphasizing superiority, and categorized non-Aryan as an intrusion of the Semitic race.[62] According to him, northern Europeans had migrated across the world and founded the major civilizations, before being diluted through racial mixing with indigenous populations described as racially inferior, leading to the progressive decay of the ancient Aryan civilizations.[2][3]

In 1878, German American anthropologist Theodor Poesche published a survey of historical references attempting to demonstrate that the Aryans were light-skinned blue-eyed blonds.[40]

In 1899, Houston Stewart Chamberlain published what is described as "one of the most important proto-Nazi texts", The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, in which he theorized an existential struggle to the death between a superior German-Aryan race and a destructive Jewish-Semitic race.[78]

In 1916, Madison Grant published The Passing of the Great Race, a polemic against interbreeding between "Aryan" Americans, the original Thirteen Colonies settlers of British-Scots-Irish-German origin, with immigrant "inferior races", which according to him were, Poles, Czechs, Jews, and Italians.[42] The book was a best-seller at the time.[42]

While the Aryan race theory remained popular, particularly in

occultists and esoteric ideological systems of this era, such as Helena Blavatsky,[79] and Ariosophy.[80]

Nazism

Subhuman and inferior races in Nazi Germany

The

mixed "Aryan" and non-Aryan, such as Jewish, ancestry) and black people.[84][85]

Connotation of the term Aryan in Nazi racial theories

A definition of Aryan that included all non-Jewish Europeans was deemed unacceptable, and the Expert Committee on Questions of Population and Racial Policy of 1933 brought together important Nazi intellectuals Alfred Ploetz, Fritz Thyssen, and Ernst Rüdin to plan the course of Nazi racial policy, defining an Aryan as one who was "tribally related to the German blood and descendant of a Volk".[86][87] The term "Volksdeutsche" was used by Nazis to indicate "ethnic Germans" who did not hold German Reich citizenship;[88] Volksdeutsche further consist of "racial groups"—minorities within a state—who are descendants of a Volk domiciled in Europe in a closed tribal settlement and are closely related to German racial community.[89][86] The Nazi concept of "Volksgemeinschaft" racially unified ethnic Germans, including those living outside the German Reich, propounding only the members of the racial community be considered Aryan.[90][91]

Members of the

Germanic people being the "master race" (German: Herrenrasse).[96]

Historical revisionism

After the death of Kossinna,

Social Darwinist concepts of Ernst Haeckel such as higher evolution (German: Höherentwicklung), struggle for existence (German: Existenzkampf), selection (German: Auslese), struggle for life (German: Lebenskampf), in his Nazi racial ideology, which is the central theme in the chapter "Nation and Race" of Mein Kampf.[99] Haeckel's Social Darwinism was also praised by Alfred Ploetz, founder of the German Society for Racial Hygiene, who made him an honorary member of the eugenic organization.[100]

Nazi eugenics and Nordic supremacy

In 1938, the

concentration camps.[105]

Ethnic cleansing and the Holocaust

The culmination of Nazi eugenicist and racial hygiene programs of sterilization and extermination aimed at creating an "

Jewish Question.[111] The state-sponsored persecution systematically murdered over 6 million Jews,[112] 5.7 million Slavs,[113] 1.8–3 million Poles,[114] 270,000 disabled people,[115] among other victims, including children through mass shooting, gas chamber, gas van, and concentration camps, in the process known as the Holocaust.[116][117] The ethnic Germans considered Volksdeutsche joined the local SS organizations under NSDAP/AO and participated in Nazi-sponsored pogroms in eastern and central Europe during the Holocaust, including seizures of Jewish property.[88][118] The Aryan race belief was used by the Nazis to justify the persecution, depicting the victims as the "antipode and eternal enemy of the Aryans".[109]

White supremacy

Following

Germanic peoples being the most "racially pure".[119][120][121] However, in the United States, most white nationalists define whiteness broadly as people of European ancestry, and some consider Jews to be white although this is controversial within white nationalist circles.[122]

Many white supremacist neo-Nazi groups and prison gangs, notably in the United States, view themselves as part of an Aryan race, including the Aryan Brotherhood, Aryan Nations, Aryan Guard, Aryan Republican Army, White Aryan Resistance, Aryan Circle, Aryan Brotherhood of Texas, and others.[123][124]

Neo-pagan movements

Indo-European history, real and feigned, plays a significant role in various neo-pagan movements.[24]

Russian neo-paganism

Kolovrat", the most common symbol of Slavic Neopaganism. According to its practitioners, it is an ancient Slavic symbol; however, the historic usage of such iconography is not attested in authentic sources.[125][126]

The

Goddess movement

With the rise of first-wave feminism, various authors of the Goddess movement cast the ancient Indo-Europeans as a "patriachal, warlike invaders who destroyed a utopian prehistoric world of feminine peace and beauty" in various archaeological dramas and books such as Riane Eisler's The Chalice and the Blade (1987) and Marija Gimbutas's Civilization of the Goddess (1991).[24]

See also

References

Notes

  1. JSTOR 18253
    .
  2. ^ a b Arvindsson 2006, pp. 13–50.
  3. ^ a b c Arvindsson 2006, p. 45.
  4. S2CID 145756604
    .
  5. ^ Pereltsvaig & Lewis 2015, p. 11.
  6. ^ Anthony 2007, p. 2.
  7. ^ Mish, Frederic C., Editor in Chief Webster's Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary Springfield, Massachusetts. 1994 – Merriam-Webster See original definition (definition #1) of "Aryan" in English. 0. 66
  8. . ... the answer to the question whether races exist in humans is clear and unambiguous: no.
  9. .
  10. . American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
  11. ^ .
  12. ^ Anthony 2007, pp. 13–40.
  13. JSTOR 273538
    .
  14. ^ a b Bryant 2001, pp. 33–50.
  15. .
  16. ^ .
  17. ^ "Aryan". Holocaust Encyclopedia, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  18. ^ Bryant 2001, p. 20.
  19. ^ a b Anthony 2007, pp. 4–5.
  20. ^ Anthony 2007, p. 6.
  21. ^ Anthony 2007, p. 7.
  22. ^ Santucci 2008, p. 40.
  23. ^ a b Zvelebil 1995, p. 34.
  24. ^ a b c d e f Anthony 2007, p. 10.
  25. ^
    JSTOR 24987446
    .
  26. ^ Anthony 2007, p. 5.
  27. ^ Leoussi, Athena (2001). Encyclopedia of Nationalism. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 11. The process was further assisted by a romanticism which gloried in the exotic and encouraged the idea that the greatest civilizational achievements of Europe could be attributed to the stimulus of ancient Aryan tribal movements...Historians seemed increasingly bent on discovering in each case a vigorous national past from which could be projected an even greater future. Scholars searching for Aryan pedigree also availed themselves of such newer disciplines as ethnology and anthropology.
  28. ^ Judaken, Jonathan (6 March 2024). "Leon Poliakov, Philosophy, and the Secularization of Anti-Judaism in the Development of Racism". Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal. 35 (1): 193–195. It seemed as in the Europeans of the scientific age, having freed themselves from the conventional Noachian genealogy and rejected Adam as a common father, were looking around for new ancestors but were unable to break with the tradition which placed their origin in the fabulous Orient. It was the science of linguistics which was to give a name to these ancestors by opposing the Aryans to the Hamites, the Mongols—and the Jews.
  29. ^ Anthony 2007, pp. 7–8.
  30. ^ a b c Anthony 2007, p. 8.
  31. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 1992, pp. 12–14.
  32. ^ Anthony 2007, pp. 8–9.
  33. ^ Anthony 2007, pp. 8–10.
  34. ^ Mish, Frederic C., Editor in Chief Webster's Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary Springfield, Massachusetts: 1994. Merriam-Webster p. 66
  35. ^ Anthony 2007, pp. 9–10.
  36. ^ a b c d e Fortson 2011, p. 209.
  37. ^ a b c Fortson 2011, p. 22.
  38. .
  39. ^ .
  40. ^ a b c Mallory 2015, p. 268.
  41. ^ a b Arvindsson 2006, p. 43.
  42. ^ a b c d e f Anthony 2007, p. 9.
  43. ^ Fortson 2011, p. 209-210.
  44. ^ .
  45. ^ a b Bryant 2001, pp. 60–63.
  46. ^ a b Anthony 2007, p. 11.
  47. ^ a b c Witzel 2008, p. 21.
  48. ^ Witzel 2008, pp. 10–11.
  49. ^ Koch, John T. (2020). "Celto-Germanic: Later Prehistory and Proto-Indo-European vocabulary in the North and West" (PDF). University of Wales, Centre for Advanced Welsh and Celtic Studies. p. 14. Archived from the original on 12 April 2022. Retrieved 6 April 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  50. ^ Zvelebil 1995, pp. 42–44.
  51. ^ Arvindsson 2006, p. 143.
  52. ^ Jones 1997, p. 2.
  53. ^ Arvindsson 2006, pp. 142–143.
  54. ^ Arnold, Bettina (July–August 1992). "The Past as Propaganda: How Hitler's Archaeologists Distorted European Prehistory to Justify Racist and Territorial Goals". Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America: 30–37.
  55. .
  56. ^ .
  57. ^ "Meyers Konversationslexikon: Volume 11: Luzula – Nathanael". The Retro Library (in German). Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 15 April 2022.
  58. ^ "Aryan". Etymonline. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  59. ^ Bryant 2001, p. 33.
  60. ^ Bryant 2001, p. 60.
  61. ^ Thapar 1996, pp. 5–6.
  62. ^ a b Thapar 1996, p. 5.
  63. ^
    S2CID 181387481
    .
  64. . In later years, especially before his death, he was deeply saddened by the fact that these classifications later came to be expressed in racist terms
  65. .
  66. ^ .
  67. .
  68. .
  69. .
  70. ^ Arvindsson 2006, p. 61.
  71. S2CID 145003887
    .
  72. .
  73. .
  74. ^ a b Kaufman & Sturtevant 2020, pp. 57–58.
  75. ^ Santucci 2008, pp. 40–41.
  76. ^ "Aryan". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 24 April 2022.
  77. ^ a b Orsucci, Andrea (10 March 2002). "Ariani, Indo-Germanic, stirpi mediterranee: aspetti del dibattito sulle razze europee (1870–1914)" (in Italian). Cromohs Journal, University of Florence. Archived from the original on 10 March 2002.
  78. ^ Arvindsson 2006, p. 155.
  79. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 1992, pp. 20–21.
  80. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 1992, pp. 227.
  81. ^ Connelly 2008, pp. 4–11.
  82. OCLC 610166248
    .
  83. .
  84. ^ Reichsführer-SS (1942). Der Untermensch "The subhuman". Berlin: SS Office. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
  85. .
  86. ^ .
  87. .
  88. ^ .
  89. ^ Lumans 1993, p. 23.
  90. .
  91. ^ Volksgemeinschaft at the Encyclopædia Britannica, March 2021. Accessed 28 April 2023
  92. The Great Courses
    . Event occurs at 09:05-10:14. Retrieved 17 April 2023.
  93. ^ Lumans 1993, p. 31-32.
  94. .
  95. ^ Barrowclough, David (2017). Digging for Hitler: The Nazi Archaeologists Search for an Aryan Past. Fonthill Media; University of Cambridge. p. 110.
  96. .
  97. ^ Jones 1997, pp. 2–3.
  98. .
  99. ^ Weikrt 2013, p. 541.
  100. .
  101. ^ Weikrt 2013, p. 542.
  102. ^ a b Weikrt 2013, pp. 543–544.
  103. ^ a b Weikrt 2013, p. 544.
  104. .
  105. ^ Goering, Sara; Zalta, Edward N. (2 July 2014). "Eugenics". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  106. ^ Schaefer 2008, p. 473.
  107. S2CID 11860826
    .
  108. ^ Schaefer 2008, pp. 473–474.
  109. ^ a b Schaefer 2008, p. 637.
  110. ^ Michae, James; Burgos, Adam. "Race". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 9 March 2022. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  111. ^ "Final Solution". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  112. .
  113. ^ "Documenting Numbers of Victims of the Holocaust and Nazi Persecution". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
  114. ^ "Polish Resistance and Conclusions". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Archived from the original on 2 January 2018. Documentation remains fragmentary, but today scholars of independent Poland believe that 1.8 to 1.9 million Polish civilians (non-Jews) were victims of German Occupation policies and the war. This approximate total includes Poles killed in executions or who died in prisons, forced labor, and concentration camps. It also includes an estimated 225,000 civilian victims of the 1944 Warsaw uprising, more than 50,000 civilians who died during the 1939 invasion and siege of Warsaw, and a relatively small but unknown number of civilians killed during the Allies' military campaign of 1944–45 to liberate Poland.
  115. ^ "The Danish Center for Holocaust and [Genocide Studies]". Holocaust-education.dk. 1 September 1939. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2015.
  116. .
  117. ^ Schaefer 2008, pp. 636–637.
  118. ^ "Origins of Neo-Nazi and White Supremacist Terms and Symbols: "Blood and Soil"". Washington, D.C.: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
  119. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2002, pp. 663–671.
  120. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2002, pp. 221.
  121. .
  122. Intelligence Report
    . Retrieved 22 February 2018.
  123. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2002, pp. 232–233.
  124. ISSN 1745-9133
    .
  125. ^ Pilkington, Hilary; Popov, Anton (2009). "Understanding Neo-paganism in Russia: Religion? Ideology? Philosophy? Fantasy?". In George McKay (ed.). Subcultures and New Religious Movements in Russia and East-Central Europe. Peter Lang. p. 282. ISBN 9783039119219.
  126. .
  127. .
  128. ^ Laruelle 2008, pp. 284–285.
  129. ^ a b Laruelle 2008, p. 285.
  130. S2CID 51303383
    . The urbanized bookish Neo-Paganism is constructed by people of high educational standards. They do not restrict themselves to an oral tradition and are searching for earlier cultures reconstructed by scholars. It is on this ground that the Russian Neo-Pagans forge their versions of the Neo-Pagan belief system: some of them emphasize an Indo-Iranian heritage ('Aryan', 'Vedaic'), others are more fascinated with Zoroastrianism, still others are adherents of the 'Runic Magic'
  131. ^ Laruelle 2008, pp. 285–286.
  132. S2CID 219456430
    .
  133. ^ Oleh, Kotsyuba (2015). "Rules of Disengagement: Author, Audience, and Experimentation in Ukrainian and Russian Literature of the 1970s and 1980s". Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Science: 22.
  134. .
  135. ^ Shizhensky, Roman (2009). "Neo-pagan myth about Prince Vladimir". Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, Cultural Studies (in Russian) (6): 250–256.
  136. ^ Laruelle, Marlène (25 March 2010). "Арийский миф — русский взгляд / Translation from French by Dmitry Bayuk. 25.03.2010". Vokrug sveta.

Bibliography