Talk:Australian white ibis

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. Australia: Biota Low‑importance Australian white ibis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

The contents of the Solomons white ibis page were merged into Australian white ibis on 1 August 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

A fact from Australian white ibis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,237 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the Australian White Ibis (pictured) has invaded Sydney and other urban centres of Australia's east coast since 1978, and is now commonly seen in parks and garbage dumps? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/June.

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 31, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-05-31. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

The Australian white ibis (Threskiornis moluccus) is a wading bird of the ibis family, Threskiornithidae. Found in much of Australia, the species has become increasingly urban since the 1970s; this specimen was photographed in Perth.Photograph: JJ Harrison

Archive – More featured pictures...

The ibis moved into the urban areas well before the late 1970s. They arrived in the mid to late 1960s. I first observed them in 1965 in Outer Western Sydney, during the drought, along with Spoonbills and other species that we didn't usually see on the Nepean. By 1967 a pair of ibis had built a nest and raised young on the top of the disused eagles cage at Taronga Zoo. By the early '70s the colony was well established in the palm trees on the island in the pool of the Royal Botanic Gardens and the birds were a common sight in Hyde Park, Sydney, and the Domain.

I cannot reference this. It is my own observation. But it was the result of the drought in the late '60s. During the winter of 1966 a huge flock of galahs flew into Sydney and settled in the bare Plane Trees by the ramp to Central Railway Station, turning the trees completely pink. It was spectacular. This rare event was not recorded in the pre-mobile phone days, and I tried in vain to get a Fairfax editor to take the event seriously enough to send a photographer a few hundreds yards down the street to capture it. Amandajm (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I only came here to copy/paste some of the taxonomy bit for another article, but see I can't as some editors are so ridiculously offended by the common name. I am thinking a bunch of people don't understand how common names work -it is simply the most commonly used colloquial name for the organism in whatever language used. "Bin chicken" is by far the most popular name for this bird as reflected in Google hits. "Australian white ibis" is rather silly anyway, it was suggested by guide books & ornithologists in the 1990s when this bird was recognised as a separate species, before then it was known as the 'sacred ibis' -but it seems after a run of a two decades the English language hasn't really adopted it in favour of 'bin chicken'. Wikipedia shouldn't be mandating how people speak or call things in/use the English language, or any language for that matter. I very much doubt the bird will be offended if you call it whatever, you don't need to defend it's honour on it's behalf, or at least, not like this. Is SJW for birds really necessary? If a bunch of Yindjibarndi want to call it 'mardungurra', well good on them, right?! For all I know 'mardungurra' translates as 'horrible pile of dung', would you then force them to call it otherwise? This is what scientific nomenclature in Latin is for (among other things).

'Bin chicken' should be in bold next to or in front of 'Australian white ibis' as in the second to last revision ...and some people should get over themselves. As long as a majority of Australians continue to call it 'bin chicken', editors are going to continue to row against the tide here. Leo 86.83.56.115 (talk) 10:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: The karyotype thing, ref.9, the study referenced does not support the statement in Wikipedia (taxonomy part). Leo 86.83.56.115 (talk) 10:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australian white ibis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/DPI/nreninf.nsf/9e58661e880ba9e44a256c640023eb2e/eca25163a519edfaca256e7200224149/$FILE/FF0005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

It was introduced to Western Australia in 1978. This appears to be indigenous retcon. Retcon of this nature detracts from indigenous history as small incorporated groups tend to fabricate things and make it up as they go - damaging the reliability of indigenous oral tradition rendering it untrustworthy. 121.210.33.50 (talk) 08:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've popped {{Dubious}} onto that statement - no pronounciation on factual value. Do you have access to the cited book? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Someone removed that section in the

talk) 05:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Support Birdlife International does not recognise it as a separate species so I believe that is should merge HaraldW1954 (talk) 7 June 2022

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 07:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

does anyone really think it's from Egypt? Irtapil (talk) 01:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is native to Australia Ibisczarnopiory (talk) 21:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]