Talk:Bill Ayers
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bill Ayers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Bill Ayers. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Bill Ayers at the Reference desk. |
This article must adhere to the inactive . |
![]() | Biography: Science and Academia | ||||||
|
![]() | Chicago Low‑importance | ||||||
|
![]() | Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance | ||||||
|
![]() | Education Low‑importance | ||||||
|
![]() | Terrorism Low‑importance | ||||||
|
![]() | United States Low‑importance | ||||||
|
![]() | Socialism | ||||||
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bill Ayers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914090704/http://www.woodsfund.org/about/staff to http://www.woodsfund.org/about/staff
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/902213%2CCST-NWS-ayers18.article
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Bill Ayers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090120231052/http://www.chicagopolice.org/MailingList/PressAttachment/Haymarket.pdf to http://www.chicagopolice.org/MailingList/PressAttachment/Haymarket.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101230234116/http://salon.glenrose.net/default.asp?view=plink&id=8935 to http://salon.glenrose.net/default.asp?view=plink&id=8935
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080930164535/http://education.uic.edu/directory/faculty_info.cfm?netid=bayers to http://education.uic.edu/directory/faculty_info.cfm?netid=bayers
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821150215/http://blogs.trb.com/news/politics/blog/2008/04/daley_dont_tar_obama_for_ayers.html to http://blogs.trb.com/news/politics/blog/2008/04/daley_dont_tar_obama_for_ayers.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
I edited the lead
{{BLP noticeboard}}
Per the ping from BLP/N noticeboard here....
I've BOLDLY edited the header to remove the LABEL as both UNDUE and contrary to BLPCRIME. Basically the last year version looked much better as a concise summary of the article per
William Charles Ayers (
opposed US involvement in the Vietnam War. He is known for his 1960s radical activism and his later work in education reform, curriculum and instruction.
References
- ^ "Weather Underground Organization (Weatherman)" (PDF). FBI. 20 August 1976. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-18.
Cheers Markbassett (talk) 00:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- BLPCRIME does not apply to the question of "terrorism", which is not a US Federal crime but (in this case) an investigative and administrative classification used by the FBI. The language previously in the lede was that Ayers was a leader of the Weathermen, and that the Weather Underground was classified as a terrorist group by the FBI. Ayers wrote an entire book about the first, and the second has nothing to do with Ayers, it is an assessment of the Weatherman group that stands or falls independent of BLP's of group members.
- Ayers is known, in roughly descending order of notability, for leading the Weathermen, being a fugitive (his autobiography is titled Fugitive Days), his connections to Obama in Chicago, and being an education professor/author. The last item has gotten orders of magnitude less publicity than the others, and is academic notability rather than general notability. To exclusively describe him as an educationist in the first sentence is some kind of joke and ledes of that flavor that avoid describing his past as a fugitive (from what?) or are evasive about the nature of the Weathermen will probably keep getting reverted. 73.149.246.232 (talk) 06:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- I find the lede funny in extreme. Bill Ayers is not primarily known as "American elementary education theorist". It is the last item that would bring someone to his page. Both his Weatherman leadership and his connection to Obama are more notable. It's definitely a whitewash of a controversial BLP. But there is no sense in even trying make a more balanced edit. I know from experience on Wikipedia that articles with a favorable leftist tinge are brutally defended from any improvement. Seki1949 (talk) 04:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Assume good faith and stick to commenting on content, not editors. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)]
- To be accurate, I was referring to the first sentence. Also I referred to a "leftist tinge" and not to a "leftist fringe". Seki1949 (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- MuboshguHow is it a whitewash? The lead in describes a founder and leader of a terrorist group first as an "elementary education theorist"--again, what he is least noted for, which should not come first--and then rosily claims that the Weatherman Underground terrorist was merely opposed to the Vietnam war. This is incredibly unserious Sachem131 (talk) 12:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- ]
- Again it is what he is least known for, and therefore should not be the introductory sentence. He is more notable both for his connection to President Obama and as a leader of the terrorist group, the Weatherman Underground — as mention by @Seki1949. Giving preeminence to his less noteworthy engagements clearly whitewashes the more controversial elements of his career, and what he is best known for.
- As a Wikipedia editor, I hope you are aware that "rosily" is a word. Although it appears you utilized it incorrectly, perhaps in an attempt to mock me. Sachem131 (talk) 15:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Changed lead paragraph to give emphasis to his Weatherman activities in the 60's as his most notable activity. Seki1949 (talk) 07:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- "Is known for" is not how we start biographies. I gave "rosily" the [sic] because the tense was wrong, hence a typo. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Reverted your edit. Ayers is best known as a member of the Weatherman in the 60's. That should be the lead. Most people coming to this article are looking for information on this aspect of his life. I am not unsympathetic to the argument that some level of violence may have been necessary to stop the Vietnam War. That he may have done good work later in life as an educational theorist is to his credit, but I dont' know if he would qualify for a Wikipedia article on this basis. This article certainly would not be heavily visited on that basis. Please discuss proposed changes to the lead paragraph on the talk page. ]
- "Is known for" is not how we start biographies. I gave "rosily" the [sic] because the tense was wrong, hence a typo. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- ]
- MuboshguHow is it a whitewash? The lead in describes a founder and leader of a terrorist group first as an "elementary education theorist"--again, what he is least noted for, which should not come first--and then rosily claims that the Weatherman Underground terrorist was merely opposed to the Vietnam war. This is incredibly unserious Sachem131 (talk) 12:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- I find the lede funny in extreme. Bill Ayers is not primarily known as "American elementary education theorist". It is the last item that would bring someone to his page. Both his Weatherman leadership and his connection to Obama are more notable. It's definitely a whitewash of a controversial BLP. But there is no sense in even trying make a more balanced edit. I know from experience on Wikipedia that articles with a favorable leftist tinge are brutally defended from any improvement. Seki1949 (talk) 04:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic Content
"Though his past may be controversial, many find him warm and accessible." I'm sure that many do, but this is not really encyclopedic material. I will be deleting this after allowing a period for any discussion. Seki1949 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like someone beat me to it. Article is better now. Seki1949 (talk) 17:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- This needs to be changed too, it sounds like a defense of Ayers instead of NPOV:
“The bombings, which caused no fatalities, resulted in Ayers being hunted as a fugitive for several years, until charges were dropped due to illegal actions by the FBI agents pursuing him and others. The bombings, which caused no fatalities, resulted in Ayers being hunted as a fugitive for several years, until charges were dropped due to illegal actions by the FBI agents pursuing him and others.”2600:1700:EDC0:3E80:8901:6F6A:D3B2:26BA (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)