Talk:Caroline of Ansbach

	Caroline of Ansbach is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 15, 2012.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 31, 2011 Good article nominee Listed September 10, 2011 Featured article candidate Promoted
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 22, 2016, October 22, 2019, and October 22, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as High-importance). project's importance scale .

England Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

inactive .Lower SaxonyWikipedia:WikiProject Lower SaxonyTemplate:WikiProject Lower SaxonyLower Saxony articles

United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Added some material to this page -- please note the genealogical sources are contradictory, some assigning Caroline an extra pregnancy[1]. They tend to list William Augustus twice, once with only a death date. I have corrected this in the article.--Marysunshine 05:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Her husband was not created Duke of Cambridge until 1706, and they were married in 1705. What was her title in the intervening year? It is not listed. TysK 06:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HSH Hereditary Princess Caroline of Hanover, Duchess of Brunswick and Lunenburg would be my guess, however, titles of that era are iffy at best. Charles 06:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or would it be HSH Caroline, Hereditary Princess of Hanover, Duchess of Brunswick and Luneburg? That would be more in keeping with her husband's title at the time. TysK 05:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'm looking more into it, and it seems Hanover wasn't an official title --- I could be wrong though. Another guess would be HSH Caroline, Hereditary Princess of Brunswick-Lunenburg, which was the name of the entire territory called Hanover. Charles 05:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What languages did Caroline speak? It would improve the article if her language abilities were included. As she was German born, one might assume some form of German and French which was customary at that time. What was her level of English?--TGC55 (talk) 07:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TGC55:. The answer to your question is that she spoke all three languages: German, French and English.

She was brought up in Ansbach, then part of the German-speaking Holy Roman Empire, so her native language was German. As a member of the nobility, she spoke French, which was very much a lingua franca at that time. There are many surviving letters that she wrote in French, including some to her own children.

When she became betrothed to George Augustus of Hanover (the heir presumptive to the British throne) she deliberately set out to Anglicise herself as much as possible. While still in Hanover, she encouraged British visitors, she read extensively about English and British history and politics, and she even started drinking tea. Most of all, she set out to learn to speak and write in English.

"She employed a Miss Brandshagen to talk and read to her every day in English, unaware that the thickness of the latter’s German accent would leave her with a heavy Hanoverian burr for the remainder of her life. Her English was never perfect, although one commentator credited her with mastering the language 'uncommonly well for one born outside England'".

The above quote is from Matthew Dennison's biography, The First Iron Lady.

Sorry to have taken ten years to answer this question. I'll do my best to answer more promptly another time.

-- Mike Marchmont (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just heard on BBC Radio 4 that Queen Caroline died due to medical maltreatment of an umbilical hernia. She'd developed the hernia after childbirth, and it had gone untreated until a loop of bowel protruded through the hernia (but still under the skin, no doubt). Today a doctor would push the bowel in and patch the hernia, but her physicians *cut* the protruding bowel. And repeated the procedure each day until she died (about 10 days).

Hence the verse from Alexander Pope:

Here lies, wrapt up in forty thousand towels, The only proof that Caroline had bowels. - Alexander Pope, Epitaph on Queen Caroline. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.91.210 (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I recently watched an episode of "The Georgians", a historical tv series, presented by Dr Lucy Worsley which discussed Caroline's death. It has set me wondering about the accuracy of the account presented here, as according to Worsley she died as a result of the snipping through of the strangulated section of bowel. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 21:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There were Julian/Gregorian changes around her time. Are her vital date given in the Julian or Gregorian calendar? -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 13:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What should we do with dates? I've kept them as they were, which is predominantly Old Style, though the table of Children is in New Style. For events in Hanover after 1700, I've put both.

One allied question: What's Frederick's birthday? Weir says 2/3 November (OS), which would match his article (13 November NS) but Van der Kiste says 20/31 October. DrKay (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

London Gazette announces the birth was "a little before Six a Clock in the Evening" on the 2 November OS [2]. DrKay (talk) 14:43, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I've never liked those instances where a male consort is indicated as the last person to hold the title of Queen consort! I don't think we should say "untitled" either, as he did have some titles, though not related to his position as consort.

I'd prefer using one of the below (or similar). DrKay (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vacant Title last held by George of Denmark as consort of Queen Anne	Consort of the British monarch 1727–1737	Vacant Title next held by Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz as Queen consort
Vacant Title last held by Mary of Modena as Queen consort of England, Scotland and Ireland	Ireland 1727–1737	Vacant Title next held by Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz

I am in favour of the second. We do not list Madame de Maintenon as successor of Maria Theresa of Spain; George, while not married to the Queen morganatically, was in a position more similar to Madame de Maintenon's than to a queen consort's, since he held no title derived from his marriage to the Queen. Surtsicna (talk) 19:08, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would also suggest removing the "Electress consort of Hanover" box. What purpose does it serve? She is notable for having been queen, not an electress. Surtsicna (talk) 13:54, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By May of the following year, Caroline thought herself pregnant....

Had to smile when I read this. "Thinking oneself pregnant" sounds like mind over matter, or a miracle. Anyhow, the rest of the sentence shows that indeed she was pregnant. Nowadays I think most people would say "Caroline discovered she was pregnant." Sca (talk) 14:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right but I don't think she could have discovered it. There was no way pregnancy could be proven in its early stage back then. Mary I of England thought herself pregnant too yet it turned out to be a deadly tumor. How about "Caroline realised she might be pregnant"? That part is not really neccessary anyway, since, as you say, she was indeed pregnant and eventually gave birth. Surtsicna (talk) 14:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your fomulation would be fine, but maybe the whole sentence is irrelevant? Sca (talk) 01:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article titled "Caroline of Ansbach" when the first sentence of the article tells us that she is "Caroline of Brandenburg-Ansbach"? —Lowellian (reply) 19:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it's because an overwhelming majority of sources refer to her as Caroline of Ansbach, while "Caroline of Brandenburg-Ansbach" is technically more correct. Surtsicna (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then the article intro should explain that; otherwise, the article looks misnamed. I've gone ahead and added a small note. —Lowellian (reply) 05:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DrKay oops, sorry about ec. for me uncited sources are still sources, but change it back if you prefer, i also used the cite ODNB rather than citation. 198.24.31.112 (talk) 20:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

She is the first Princess of Wales to go directly to being Queen Consort. Should this be mentioned somewhere? Robin S. Taylor (talk) 12:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not without a source. Not because it's wrong, but because we don't include every fact about her. We only include the pertinent facts that any summary biography of her would contain. DrKay (talk) 16:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking at the several recent edits, mainly to the second para in this article. There is clearly some confusion about the status of her father and that of the principality where she was born. In fact, Ansbach (or Brandenburg-Ansbach to give it its full name) was part of the Holy Roman Empire - not Prussia. Her father was John Frederick, the Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach. He died when Caroline was three. The Elector Frederick III of Brandenburg became Caroline's guardian and gave her a temporary home in Berlin. When Caroline was 11, her mother married Elector John George IV of Hanover, who became Caroline step-father.

Also, I don't think it's correct to refer to Caroline as a Margravine. Her mother was a Margravine before her first husband's death, and became an Electress after her second marriage. Caroline eventually became Electress of Hanover, but as a result of her marriage to George Augustus.

I hope the above might help with the aforementioned edits. My main source for this is Matthew Dennison's The First Iron Lady (Harper Collins). -- Mike Marchmont (talk) 12:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article states that she was the first crowned queen consort since Anne of Denmark, but the article about Mary of Modena says that the latter was crowned too. Surtsicna (talk) 11:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that looks wrong. Mary was crowned twice it seems: once in Catholic rites on 22 April at Whitehall and then again with Anglican rites the following day in Westminster Abbey. DrKay (talk) 11:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]