Talk:Chiquinha Gonzaga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2020 and 9 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camillabass.

Above undated message substituted from

talk) 17:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Alto Flute Solo

I am playing one of her pieces in recital named "Nao, insistas, rapariga!" Do Not insist, girl This Brazilian polka is fun to play and will feature the alto flute nicely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.14.17 (talk) 02:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 13:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Terrible grammar

Wow, who wrote this? Here's one sentence out of many that sounds like a 5th grader wrote it,

"As Chiquinha could not accept his extra-marital betrayals, she splits and again loses a daughter".

"Splits"? Surely you could've gotten out the thesaurus or at least had someone edit it that could write a decent sentence. The whole article just goes on and on like this. Here's more: "She was 52 years old and John the Baptist, has only 16". LOL! John the Baptist? I'm guessing it's not the guy who baptized Jesus. If Wikipedia wants to be taken seriously as a credible source then its editorial staff needs to clean this type of incredible mess up.