Talk:Early life of Cleopatra

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Top-importance). Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Ancient Egypt Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list: edit history watch purge Needed articles. We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have. Cleanup. To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates? Standardize the Chronology. A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563) Stub sorting Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . . Data sorting. This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library. Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Egypt High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Biography / African / Classical This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force African military history task force Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD) Africa High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 3 June 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This review is

Talk:Early life of Cleopatra VII/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 17:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

• No DAB links Y
• No dead links Y
• No missing citations Y

Prose Suggestions

Please note that all of these are suggestions, and can be implemented or ignored at your discretion.

Lede

• to the reigning pharaoh Ptolemy XII Auletes and an unknown mother, lasting until her accession to the throne by March 51 BC. suggest to the reigning pharaoh Ptolemy XII Auletes and an unknown mother, and lasted until her accession to the throne by March 51 BC.

Reign of Ptolemy XII and Roman interventionism

• but one that was loathed by contemporary Greeks who considered it to be scandalous. suggest but one that was considered by contemporary Greeks to be scandalous.
• By the reign of Cleopatra VII, however, it was considered a normal arrangement for Ptolemaic rulers. suggest Despite early opposition, by the reign of Cleopatra VII, it was considered a normal arrangement for Ptolemaic rulers.
• @PericlesofAthens: That is all my comments. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iazyges: cool! Thanks for carrying out the review in such a timely manner. I have amended the article according to each of your suggestions here. I hope that you find it suitable enough now to pass it as a GA article. Best wishes, Pericles of Athens^Talk 14:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we move it to "Early life of Cleopatra". True, there were 6 earlier Cleopatras, but they were obscure characters compared to the one we all know about. Her own article is simply "Cleopatra", so this one looks at first glance like it's about the early life of a different person. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 00:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JackofOz: Well, if you can somehow get enough people to vote and form a consensus on the matter, then by all means, we can move the page. I don't think many people visit this article on a daily basis, though, and even less so the talk page. To be frank, I'm surprised you discovered this article at all! You from the guild of those copyeditors? I posted a link to this page over there recently. Pericles of Athens^Talk 02:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I range far and wide, deep and high in my travels. I was thinking of just being bold and doing it. I might still do that. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 05:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

Reign of Cleopatra VII, I would appreciate it if you would create a new section on the talk page for the main article Cleopatra, since that is where you will attract the most attention to this issue. Why don't you gather the opinions of other reviewers there first, before such a drastic move? Especially for articles that have obtained "Good Article" status. Pericles of Athens^Talk 08:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Reign of Cleopatra VII, which is now Reign of Cleopatra. Regards, Pericles of Athens^Talk 11:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Well done. Thank you, Pericles. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 22:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article recently went through an FAC nomination that was closed within weeks. Perhaps the now retired PericlesofAthens (who still does make edits on a less frequent basis) should be co-nominator of the article. But I wish to hear your opinions, Pericles and FunkMonk, and those of anyone else who might have something to helpfully comment about the article. Векочел (talk) 05:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be up to the main writers to decide what to so with this. FunkMonk (talk) 09:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about her early life, yet her ruling dates from 51 BC to 30 BC are listed right next to her name, to me this comes of as potentially confusing, I would not be surprised if many readers just glanced and assumed that the dates refered to her early life. ★Trekker (talk) 10:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@StarTrekker Thanks for pointing that out. Would you rather I change it to her life dates, of her early life dates? Unlimitedlead (talk) 10:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Unlimitedlead: Yes I think putting the dates for the period covered in the article or her entire life would be more prudent. Thank you for your swift reply!★Trekker (talk) 11:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that her early life dates are already in the first sentence, so stating them twice might be redundant. Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]