Talk:History of Brazil

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brazil: History Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the History of Brazil task force (assessed as Top-importance). Portugal High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: edit history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Like some other Brazil-related articles, this one has repeated references to "miscegenation." Currently this term is considered offensive, according to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.143.146.234 (talk) 04:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a mistake to call them "stone age" as this is a term applying to a chronological period, and its use here is Social Darwinian. Whilst Tupi-Guarani language emerged later as the major family, the decimation of Indian populations leaves us ignorant as to which was originally numerically preponderant. John D. Croft (talk) 21:09, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilians have great appetites. Say what?! I don't think that this is appropriate for an encyclopedia; it is appropriate for a late night talk show. If I'm mistaken about the humorous nature of this sentence, then what is its meaning?

The low social indicators and the huge national debt are by no means a result of the Fernando Henrique administration. The national debt was acquired during the dictatorship, and has been a growing problem ever since, and the social indicators actually rose quite a bit between 1995-2001. I've corrected this. --Paraiba 04:52, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Have you looked at the figures? The national debt at the end of the dictatorship was about US$ 100 billion, and decreased under the following governments -- until FHC's. It skyrocketed again under FHC (to over US$ 450 billion), because of his economic policies which aimed at fighting inflation at all costs. In particular, he borrowed massive amounts of money at extremely high interest rates in order to sustain the 1R$ = 1US$ illusion. It was FHC, not his predecessors, who created the present "unpayable" debt -- and that was only one of his many disastrous "achievements". Let's give credit (or rather debt 8-) where credit is due.
Jorge Stolfi 05:42, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Don't be fooled by statistics. The federal administration assumed the state's debts and broken regional banks as a measure to contain inflation and improve national accountability. Check the "Fiscal Responsability Law". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.19.222.161 (talk) 03:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Thanks to vast natural resources and cheap labor, Brazil is today South America's largest economy, the world's ninth largest economy, and fifth most populous nation." oh boy... where did this come from?

Brasil was not the only country of the New World to effectively establish a monarchic state; Mexico did it twice; though the first one was short-lived, the second one re-arragned the country adminsitratively and politically. --

True, and one of its Monarchs was actualy a cousin of D. Pedro II of Brazil. Daniel

yes and Pedro died in a killing he lifed 1825-1891 also Genarl Manuel D. da. Fresca was or put himself in a place of honor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessekisser23 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. For starters,

Saint Vicent and the Grenadines are all "New World" countries that happen to be monarchies. 187.34.78.211 (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The view of seminomadic hunters and tribes living off the wilderness of the the Amazon jungle has been challenged since the 1990ies. I am not an expert on that and refer to the article "1491" in "Atlantic Monthly | March 2002" (http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200203/mann). Author Charles C. Mann refers to recent research by archeologist Anna C. Roosevelt of the Chicago Field Museum of Natural History and several botanologists and geographers. They indicate that the indigenous population before 1491 had created the rain forest ecosystem by systematically planting trees and shrubs and ameliorating the soils. The Amazon Rain Forest -if this hypothesis stands- is not a wilderness but the result of human activity. I think this idea should be mentioned. --Kipala 11:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1491 hello also pedro the 2nd was killed by a general and lived for 1825 - 1891 jessekisser23 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessekisser23 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was on the main page and I started reading and on the 5th paragraph, the first line, some of the text is blocked and I can't read it. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia so could somebody else please move the picture slightly so it is readable. This is a realatively minor problem

Thanks Nelson

I'm not sure what generic solution there is for this, but if you make your browser window bigger, it should solve it. Mlewan 17:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or make the words smaller.

heru|nar 04:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

That wasn't Jango, that was Quadros, a completely different guy. So, only as a precaution, I'll add a "citation needed" thing to the rest of the paragraph. Also, would you mind reading a book about the subject before writing it on the wikipedia? I don't go around writing that Lincoln wrote the declaration of independence of the United States. --200.222.30.9 20:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right. Unfortunately, there are only 4 or 5 active editors in Brazilian topics right now and we're all busy going after a GA status on Brazil. I guess this is a good place to have the next WikiProject Brazil collaboration.--Dali-Llama 21:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that. Only on my second read I noticed that problem, so I fear there might be other crazy stuff around there, and a less prepared reader could take them as truth. I'm specially concerned that the thing on military dictatorship mentions little of the US role on the events apart from the Escola Superior (not even a mention of operation Brother Sam, for instance). Ignoring that is like ignoring the role of the British Empire on the war of Paraguay, or North-American role for the end of Vargas dictatorship. History is too important a thing to be forgotten. But anyways, best of luck. --200.222.30.9 22:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the Infobox up to the "abstract" (introductory) section. It still needs some better-ification from someone who's familiar with Template Editing... cheers201.27.222.29 23:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added a POV to that section, as it really lacks a NPOV, more like a newspaper article then an encyclopedia entry. 200.196.123.49 (talk) 04:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like a style rather than content issue. Please specify biased statements. - RoyBoy 20:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This section says that Goulart was in favor of the Bay of Pigs; yet another unreferenced Wiki article says the opposite.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Brazil — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.210.115.111 (talk) 20:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think, this article has almost no information on the dictatorship in 80s and transition to direct elections of presidents. It would be great if some one can fill in this gap. I'm unable to do this. 178.0.1.141 (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Oleg.[reply]

I've deleted this phrase, because without explanation, it's implausable that indians crossing the Bering strait in Alaska walked (?) all the way to Brasil. We need at least a few paragraphs to cover what happened there. Why not also cover geologic history, before humans arrived (i.e. the separation of South America from western Gondwana, the spread of rainforests and the rise of the Andes mountains?) This article is really about Portuguese/European history of Brasil, and starts with what little we discovered about Brasilian indians when Europeans got there.Sbalfour (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous monarchy is not an adequate term for the Brazilian monarchy, considering that the monarchs descended from two of the most traditional European royal houses. And the country itself saw itself as a continuation of the Portuguese monarchy in the Americas. 200.250.25.114 (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian speak brasilianease 43.231.29.148 (talk) 09:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]