Talk:Patrick Cannon
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Michael Barnes (American politician)
- I disagree. There comes into the question of "what level of politician is inherently notable?" Generally, state legislators are considered notable just because they are state legislators. That being said, it could be argued that a state legislator in a small district in a small state is less notable than a long-standing member of the city council of a major city. Frankly, it’s a gray area and I err on the side of there being an article for him isn’t hurting anything. Eric Cable | Talk 12:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- I too disagree for similar reasons as EricCable. Plus, as a matter of history, he was "acting mayor" of a large city for more than a week. That's not going to change. He was, and remains, the highest-ranking city council official and could run for mayor in the next election. 02:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- I too disagree, although I can see your reasoning. One possibility is that the investigation into Cannon spreads so big that an article is created on the controversy/investigation itself, in which case Michael Barnes (American politician) could become a section and redirect within that new article. --Smokefoot (talk) 16:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- On that note if the investigation into Cannon spreads so big that an article is created on the controversy/investigation itself then Barnes could be a "major character" in that article which would add to his notability and reinforce him having his own article. Eric Cable | Talk 13:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
It is not disrespectful to call a felon a felon.
The current opening paragraph is accurate.
Patrick Damon Cannon (born November 27, 1966) is a an American felon and former politician. A member of the Democratic Party, Cannon served on the City Council of Charlotte, North Carolina from 1994-2013 and was subsequently elected the city's 56th Mayor in November of 2013. On March 26, 2014, he was arrested on charges of accepting over $48,000 in bribes from undercover FBI agents posing as businessmen wanting to work with the city. Cannon resigned as mayor later that evening, and was later sentenced to 44 months in prison.
It is not "disrespectful" to call a person who has plead guilty to one or more felonies in Federal court a 'felon.' Pat Cannon knew what he was doing was wrong. He continued to do it. He defrauded the people of Charlotte. He got what he deserved. Eric Cable ! Talk 16:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think any experienced Wikipedia editor would suggest that Cannon should be given a free pass for what he did. Wikipedia articles, however, are not a place to attempt WP:UNDUE. It seems much more encyclopedic to word the lead sentence as something like "Patrick Damon Cannon is an American politician who served as mayor of Charlotte, North Carolina from November 2013 until he resigned from office in March 2014 after being arrested for accepting bribes from undercover FBI agents." This is just one suggestion, but there's an entire category of article written about use politicians who have been convicted of crimes (Category:American politicians convicted of crimes) which can be used as a guide for developing a more suitable version of the lead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)]
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131112145152/http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/11/05/4442483/charlotte-mayor-patrick-cannon.html to http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/11/05/4442483/charlotte-mayor-patrick-cannon.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
Inmate number, etc.
I don't the inmate number is needed for the reader to understand that Cannon was convicted and sentenced to prison. The reader's understanding is significantly approved by the inclusion of such information; not everything that is true needs to be included per
In addition, to the above "Inmate locator" citation seems to be a primary source of little value so it does not seem to be needed per