Talk:UnitedHealth Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Lobbying information

User:Lewcm
, thanks for helping with many of my recent requests.

On behalf of UHG, I’d like to start addressing issues with the Criticism and controversies section, which has multiple warning banners. Following is a request regarding the Lobbying subsection.

Issue Placement
  • The text in this subsection is not about a controversy or negative criticism of the company, so I would like to propose that this information be moved out of the Criticism and controversies section. Perhaps it could be relocated as a separate section below the Finance section.
Issue Inaccurate data
  • When checked against the cited sources, I found that some of the dollar amounts in the text are inaccurate. The number of lobbying firms hired by UnitedHealth Group also does not match the cited source.
Issue Unsourced text
  • I would also like to propose that the phrase and the company went on to pull in $78,692 million in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2021 alone. be removed, as it is unsourced.
Issue Unrelated text
  • I would also like to propose that the text QSSI, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group is one of the 55 contractors hired by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to work on the HealthCare.gov web site. be deleted, as it is unrelated to UnitedHealth Group’s lobbying activity.
Updated text
  • Here is the corrected text I am proposing for the relocated Lobbying section.

In 2009, according to OpenSecrets, people affiliated with UnitedHealth Group gave $4.77 million to political candidates and groups.[1] The Affordable Care Act was being discussed in Congress at the time and was subsequently passed in the first quarter of 2010. In 2010 UnitedHealth Group hired nine different lobbying firms to work on its behalf.[2] In addition, its corporate political action committee, called United for Health, spent an additional $1 million on lobbying activities.[3] UnitedHealth Group subsequently spent $3.09 million to $4.94 million from 2011 to 2021.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b "OpenSecrets Lobbying Activity-UnitedHealth Group". OpenSecrets.
  2. ^ "UnitedHealth Group". OpenSecrets.
  3. ^ "UnitedHealth Group". OpenSecrets. December 26, 2011. Retrieved February 4, 2011.

Thank you for making this correction to the Lobbying subsection! Barbara at UHG (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Shadow311 (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Shadow311, Thanks for your response, however, I do not see any changes to the article based on my request, or feedback from other editors on the talk page. Would you or other editors please take another look at this request?

Again, thank you for your help. Barbara at UHG (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: Barbara at UHG, I have done the last two requests, but please double check the figures you provided in the rest of the edit request. Additionally, I can't locate where in the source it says that nine lobbying firms were hired. Once you have completed changes, please reopen this edit request. Thanks, ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 15:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ARandomName123: Thanks for your help. I've double-checked and found an error on my part. Sorry! Here are the stats and sources I was attempting to note:

  • 2009 contributions to political candidates and groups
    • Here, I see $4.77 million, which agrees with my original request
  • Lobbying firms hired by UnitedHealth Group in 2010
    • Here, I count 9, which agrees with my original request
  • Spending from 2011 to 2021
    • Here, I'm seeing $4.11 million to $4.75 million, which does not match my original request.

Based on the above information, here is the revised text for the Lobbying subsection.

  • In 2009, according to OpenSecrets, people affiliated with UnitedHealth Group gave $4.77 million to political candidates and groups.[1] The Affordable Care Act was being discussed in Congress at the time and was subsequently passed in the first quarter of 2010. In 2010 UnitedHealth Group hired nine different lobbying firms to work on its behalf.[2] In addition, its corporate political action committee (PAC), called United for Health, spent an additional $1 million on lobbying activities.[3] UnitedHealth Group subsequently spent $4.11 million to $4.75 million from 2011 to 2021.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b "OpenSecrets Lobbying Activity-UnitedHealth Group". OpenSecrets.
  2. ^ "UnitedHealth Group". OpenSecrets.
  3. ^ "UnitedHealth Group". OpenSecrets. December 26, 2011. Retrieved February 4, 2011.

Sorry for any confusion. I'm reopening this request with the hope that this explanation helps. Thanks! Barbara at UHG (talk) 20:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Encoded Talk to me! 07:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

taxes

need taxes info 68.99.0.237 (talk) 12:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there @68.99.0.237, and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, this is not the place to ask for tax information. If you're in need of assistance, I would contact United Health Group directly. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 00:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update to History section

Thank you for making the correction to the Lobbying subsection. I would now like to request an update to information in the History section.

The History section highlights our October 2012 acquisition in Brazil. We have recently sold our operations in Brazil. I would like to propose the following update be added to the 2020s-present subsection in the History section.

  • In February 2024, UnitedHealth Group completed the sale of its operations in Brazil.[1]

References

  1. ^ "Form 8-K". U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. February 6, 2024.

Thank you for making this addition to the History section! Barbara at UHG (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Encoded Talk to me! 22:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

== LHI graphic ==°

On behalf of UHG, I would like to request removal of the graphic of the LHI buildings that is posted in the History section.

This graphic includes not only a photo of the former LHI buildings, but when a user clicks to expand the photo, they can scroll to additional pages that display the UnitedHealthcare and UnitedHealth Group logos.

Issue Inappropriate and misleading logo
  • UnitedHealthcare is not associated with LHI, so the UnitedHealthcare logo that is part of the graphic is misleading and inappropriate.
Issue Outdated information
  • The photo and caption are outdated, as LHI is now part of Optum and has been renamed Optum Serve. As a result, the photo seems irrelevant.

Thank you for removing this graphic from the History section. Barbara at UHG (talk) 21:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Barbara at UHG, please see my response to the edit request.
Additional pages
This graphic includes not only a photo of the former LHI buildings, but when a user clicks to expand the photo, they can scroll to additional pages that display the UnitedHealthcare and UnitedHealth Group logos.
I'm not sure what you mean by this? Please could you send me a link and I'll be happy to look into this.
Inappropriate and misleading logo
UnitedHealthcare is not associated with LHI, so the UnitedHealthcare logo that is part of the graphic is misleading and inappropriate.
I'm not sure which graphic you are referring to or where it is. If you're referring to the former LHI buildings, I cannot see a logo in it? Please could you clarify where this is.
Outdated information
The photo and caption are outdated, as LHI is now part of Optum and has been renamed Optum Serve. As a result, the photo seems irrelevant.
I do not believe this image is irrelevant as they compliment the text in the article "In September 2014, the office buildings where LHI is based were sold to UnitedHealth Group for $45 million". Even though it is now called Optum Serve, it was LHI, I'd be happy to change the caption to "Former LHI (now Optum Serve) buildings" or something similar?
Many thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 17:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Encoded, thanks for reviewing my request!

To answer your questions:

Issue Logos

When I click on the image in the live UnitedHealth Group article, the image expands and I see an arrow on the right side of the image and also on the left side of the image. When I click on the arrow on the right side of the image, it displays the UnitedHealthcare logo. If I click on the arrow on the left side of the image, it displays the UnitedHealth Group logo.

After further examination, I realize the arrows are directing users to other images displayed within the article. For example, users can toggle to the image of the company's logo in the infobox, as well as the UnitedHealthcare logo in the Organizational structure section. I apologize for misunderstanding the graphic!

Issue Caption

I think your suggested edit for the caption sounds good.

Thank you for your patience and for making the update to the caption! Barbara at UHG (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Barbara at UHG, I've updated the caption :) No need to apologise for the misunderstanding - I have only just realised there's arrows there at all haha, I've never noticed them before. Many thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 19:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Key people in infobox

On behalf of UHG, I'd like to request an update to the key people listed in the infobox.

Dirk McMahon retired on April 1, 2024, and should be removed from the infobox.

John Rex has assumed an expanded role. He is now President, CFO.

A news source to support these updates is this Fierce Healthcare article.

Thanks for making these updates! Barbara at UHG (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Foundations section

On behalf of UHG, I would like to address an issue involving misplaced and inaccurate text in the Foundations section.

Issue Misplaced text
  • The second and fourth paragraphs in the Foundations section are both highlighting the same UHF initiative. The third paragraph is misplaced between them, as it highlights the UHCCF, a separate foundation affiliated with UnitedHealth Group.
Issue Incorrect text
  • The text in the fourth paragraph refers to the UHF initiative as a global initiative providing scholarships to international students, which is incorrect and not supported by the cited source. The paragraph also needs a few edits to help clarify the text.

Based on the issues listed above, I am proposing that editors consider:

  • Combining the second and fourth paragraphs.
  • Clarifying and correcting the new combined paragraph with the changes as indicated below:

UHF pledged $100 million over ten years to fund scholarships and workforce development programs focused on increasing ethnic and racial diversity within the health care industry. UHF's investment will support 10,000 physicians from underrepresented communities: 5,000 students with a primary care focus and 5,000 physicians who want to advance careers in mental health, nursing, midwifery and medicine. The work of this fund is part of a broader initiative in which UnitedHealth Group has teamed up with nine organizations to provide scholarships to more than 3,000 students through the Diverse Scholars Initiative.

Thank you for helping to clarify this information! Barbara at UHG (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]