Talk:Vladimir Obruchev

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Central Asia Low‑importance Vladimir Obruchev is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Soviet Union High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Language & literature / Science & education / Physical geography Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force. This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force. This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force. Palaeontology: Paleontologists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the paleontologists taskforce.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 03:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How could Plutonia follow the pattern of The Lost World? It was published seven years before Doyle's novel. Glatisant (talk) 11:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost World was released in 1912, Plutonia in 1915. Zdrak2 (talk) 03:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem with it? I thought stamps are not copyrighted. There is a free license on the file. GreyHood ^Talk 23:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing about stamps in the license. Even if something is copyright-free in Russia, it does not follow that it is free in the United States as well. And the Foundation is based in Florida, as I'm sure you know. --Ghirla^-трёп- 04:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is on commons, it's free and can be used on all wikies. GreyHood ^Talk 13:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And even if Ghirla's right, this discussion belongs on the Commons anyway. The whole point of the Commons is to provide images which can be used in any wiki, so those wikis wouldn't have to expend time and energy on doing the same checks over and over again. Here, we are only concerned with the copyright status of the images stored locally.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 16, 2011; 14:15 (UTC)