Tribus circiter
| Tribus circiter Latin for 'Circumscribed tribes'Mariavites | |
|---|---|
| Number | 7 of 17 of the pontificate |
| Text | |
Tribus circiter is
History of the Mariavites
According to Tribus circiter, the Holy See was informed, c. 1901, that priests, "especially among the junior clergy of" the Warsaw, Płock, and Lublin dioceses "founded, without permission from their lawful superiors, a kind of pseudo-monastic society, known as the Mariavites or Mystic Priests;" and, that the members turned "from the obedience they owe the bishops... and became vain in their thoughts."[1]: n.2
The association's members proclaimed Kozłowska "to be most holy, marvelously endowed with heavenly gifts, divinely enlightened about many things, and providentially given for the salvation of a world about to perish, they did not hesitate to entrust themselves without reserve, and to obey her every wish".[1]: n.2
"Relying on an alleged mandate from God," the association's members promoted "without discrimination and of their own initiative among the people frequent exercises of piety", which Pius called "highly commendable when rightly carried out," and they particularly promoted
Condemnation of the Mariavites
On September 4, 1904, Pius issued a decree "suppressing the above-named society of priests, and commanding them to break off... all relations with" Kozłowska: "But the priests in question, notwithstanding that they signed a document expressing their subjection to the authority of their bishops and that perhaps they did,... partly break off their relations with" Kozłowska, but they did not disband or "renounce sincerely the condemned association. Not only did they condemn" the bishops'"exhortations and inhibitions, not only did "many of them sign as audacious declaration in which they rejected communion with their bishops, not only... did they incite the deluded people to drive away their lawful pastors, but, like the enemies of the Church, asserted that she has fallen from truth and justice, and hence has been abandoned by the Holy Spirit, and that to themselves alone, the Mariavite priests, was it divinely given to instruct the faithful in true piety".[1]: n.4 Porter wrote that Pius recognized that what they did "was unimpeachable on the surface" but "undermined by their attacks on the hierarchy".[2]: 28
Kowalski and Próchniewski
Some weeks before the encyclical was given at Rome, two Mariavite priests
Pius believe that Kowalski and Próchniewski "were blinded... by ignorance and delusion," so he urged them:
- "to put away the deceits of vain revelation"
- "to subject themselves and their works to the... authority of their superiors"
- "to hasten the return of the faithful of Christ to the safe path of obedience and reverence towards their pastors"
- "to leave to... the Holy See and the other competent authorities the task of confirming" pious customs
- "to admonish any priests who were found guilty of speaking abusively or contemptuously of devout practices and exercises approved by the Church"
Porter believed, "The vital doctrinal point [was that Mariavites] were accused of demanding that priests be morally pure, and they refused to recognize the authority of anyone in the hierarchy who fell short of their rigorous moral standards. They were, in effect, repudiating the ecclesiological validity of the clergy by implicitly denying that the Church's sacramental power alone was adequate to legitimate a priest".[2]: 31 According to Porter, Honorat Koźmiński, who was at one time Kozłowska's confessor, described, in Prawda o "Maryawitach",[3] "how some minor doctrinal errors in Kozłowska's thinking grew over time into 'Satanic delusions'". Porter wrote that Koźmiński argued that a principal element of their movement "was an ecclesiological error: 'The rebellious priests taught in a heretical manner that those bishops and priests who did not live in accordance with what [the Mariavites] considered to be appropriate rules for a chaplain lost the power to govern [their subordinates].'"[2]: 30 The Church has opposed revivals of Donatism, which is a principal element of the Mariavites, for centuries.[2]: 30–31 Porter explains that while it was acceptable to confine criticism to individual priests, it was unacceptable to express "a systematic critique of the clergy" in a way which "undermined the holiness of the Church" or "challenged the validity of the sacraments".[2]: 32
According to Tribus circiter,[1]: nn.6–7 Kowalski and Próchniewski resolved in a written statement, the following:
- to revoke their February 1906 declaration of separation from Vincent Theophilus Popiel, archbishop of Warsaw
- to profess their "wish to be... united with" their "bishops, and especially with" Popiel
- to profess their "obedience and subjection in the name... of all the Mariavites", including the Mariavites of Płock, "who, for the same cause as the Mariavites of Warsaw, handed their bishop a declaration of separation from him" and "all the Adorers of the Most Holy Sacrament"
- to profess "love and obedience to the Holy See, and" Pius
- to "ask pardon for any pain" they "may have caused" Pius
- to work "to restore peace between the people and their bishops immediately"
Pius believed that after their pardon, Kowalski and Próchniewski would return to Poland and act on their promises. Thus, Pius advised the bishops "to receive them and their companions, now that they professed... obedience to your authority,... to restore them legally, if their acts corresponded with their promises, to their faculties for exercising their priestly functions".[1]: n.8
Pius was aware at the time Tribus circiter was promulgated that Kowalski and Próchniewski had relapsed and "again opened their minds to lying revelations" and had not demonstrated "the respect and obedience they promised, but... they have written to their companions a letter... opposed to truth and genuine obedience."[1]: n.8
Pius pointed out the vanity of a "profession of fidelity" when those who profess "do not cease to violate the authority of their bishops. For 'by far the most august part of the Church consists of the bishops,... hence, whoever resists them or pertinaciously refuses obedience to them puts himself apart from the Church.... On the other hand, to pass judgment upon or to rebuke the acts of bishops does not at all belong to private individuals.... At most, it is allowed in matters of grave complaint to refer the whole case to the Roman Pontiff'."[1]: n.9
Pius called Kowalski's exhortation "to his companions in error on behalf of peace... idle and deceitful" while Kowalski "persists in his... incitements to rebellion against legitimate pastors and in brazen violation of episcopal commands."[1]: n.10
Pius wrote "that the faithful of Christ and all the so-called Mariavite priests who are in good faith may no longer be led astray by" Kozłowska and Kowalski's delusions. He reconfirmed the suppression and condemnation of the group, which he wrote was "unlawfully and invalidly founded", and Pius also reconfirmed that all priests are prohibited "to have anything whatever to do on any pretext with" Kozłowska.[1]: n.11 [a]
Concluding words
Pius exhorted the bishops "to embrace" those priests who "sincerely repent" "and not to refuse to" recall them "to their priestly duties, when they have been duly proved worthy". About those priests who reject the bishops' "exhortations and persevere in their contumacy", Pius will "see that they are severely dealt with". Pius instructed the bishops "to lead" those faithful "who are now laboring under a delusion that may be pardoned... back to the right path" and to foster approved pious practices in their dioceses.[1]: n.12
Notes
References
Further reading
- Stasiewski, Bernhard (1981). "Catholicism in the Slavic World until 1914". In Aubert, Roger; Bandmann, Günter (eds.). The Church in the industrial age. History of the Church. Vol. 9. Translated by Margit Resch. New York: Crossroad. ISBN 0824500121.
