User:Noah Hickman (BYU)/sandbox

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Poetry of Czesław Miłosz

Stalin. During this final period, Miłosz worked as a diplomat in Paris, where he eventually defected and received asylum in France. In 1960, he moved to the United States to work as a visiting lecturerer at the University of California, Berkeley[4]
where he met many of the poets with whom he would work to translate his poetry into English. He lived and worked in the U.S. until returning to Poland in 2000 before his eventual death in 2004.

Miłosz's work enjoyed wide recognition in Poland (both before and after his defection) despite governmental disavowal and state-sanctioned subversion of his writing.[3] Miłosz's receipt of the Nobel Prize in 1980 marked the beginning of his wider international fame. Publishers issued reprints of his prose works, but the public at-large tended to treat his poetry as a monolith until the mid-1980s when scholars, some of them students of Miłosz, published specific treatments of his poetry.[5]

Miłosz's writing (specifically his poetry) evolved over the course of his career from the political surrealism of the Catastrophists into writing broadly interested in metaphysics and polyphony.[1] The wartime violence of the early and mid 20th century in Poland, particularly the extreme violence of World War II, deeply and irrevocably imprinted on Miłosz, especially in his earliest writings.[6]

Background

Miłosz became actively involved with literature as a law student at the University of Vilnius where he studied from 1930-1934. In 1931 he helped found the short-lived poetry group Żagary (Lithuanian for "brushwood")[7] alongside likeminded left-leaning poets, such as Jerzy Zagórski, Teodor Bujnicki, and Jerzy Putrament.[2] These three poets have been subsequently labeled as the Catastrophist school of poets, defined by their surreal, dreamlike content and apocalyptic anxieties regarding the future of Europe and the Earth.[8][9] The young Miłosz held and often vocalized strong opinions that the work of Żagary should be foremost of social and political import rather than self-consciously formal and preoccupied with aesthetics.[10]

In 1931, Miłosz briefly visited Paris where he met his cousin

collective awareness necessary for truly great poetry.[13]

Following his graduation in 1934 and the informal dissolution of Żagary, Miłosz spent a year in Paris where he was introduced into several of the then-major Parisian artistic cohorts.

anti-intellectual
trend against art. In 1939, he wrote,

"Reading articles by young Marxists, one suspects that they really wish for this period to herald a future which sees the total demise of art and artistry. They are preoccupied solely with sniffing out betrayal and class desertion, and are so zealous in poking around to establish whether someone had written 'God' with a capital 'g'. In this great revisionist utopia, there will be nothing left to read except a few books by Wanda Wasilewska."[16]

Despite his disavowal of the mainstream Polish-communist movement, Miłosz was labeled a communist sympathizer (probably due to his engagement with

T.S. Eliot (who he began to translate), William Blake, Emanuel Swedenborg, and Joachim Boehme.[18]

It was also during this period of time that Miłosz met Janina (Janka) Dłuska who would become, in the near future, his wife (though she was married at the time). The confluence of these factors in 1938-1939 - his new and influential friendships, his growing affection for the woman to whom he would be loyally bound for half a century, the intensifying animus prescient to the start of World War II - prompted a fundamental change in Miłosz. Miłosz's misanthropy (he had theretofore thought of humans as "beasts")[19] softened into a deep sympathy for individual people ("small souls") lost or forgotten within enormous political apparatuses. [20] In 1938, he published in quick succession two articles, "Almost the Dusk of the Gods" and "The Lie of Today's Poetry," which argued that poets had scrubbed all the humanity from their art by refusing to reveal their inner life and by being too concerned with art for art's sake. Miłosz viewed art that was only interested in itself as unethical, negligent, and self-defeating, and he held that an artist had a fundamental, ontological obligation to engage directly with the human condition.[20]

TO BE CONTINUED

Poetry

Subject Matter

Miłosz's poems perennially reflect the pain and destruction of his wartime experience, but they also orbit Miłosz's concern about the absence of moral law in his contemporary landscape.[3]

Form

Critical Reception

  1. ^ a b Baranczak, S. (1993). In Preminger A., Brogan T. V. F., Warnke F. J., Hardison Jr O. B. and Miner E.(Eds.), Polish Poetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from https://byu.idm.oclc.org/login/?url=https://www.proquest.com/encyclopedias-reference-works/polish-poetry/docview/2137909271/se-2
  2. ^ a b c Czaykowski, Bogdan. "Czesław Miłosz (30 June 1911-)." Twentieth-Century Eastern European Writers: First Series, edited by Steven Serafin, vol. 215, Gale, 1999, pp. 236-249. Dictionary of Literary Biography Vol. 215. Gale Literature: Dictionary of Literary Biography, link.gale.com/apps/doc/TNRKGA958353770/DLBC?u=byuprovo&sid=bookmark-DLBC&xid=a6d536d3. Accessed 25 June 2024.
  3. ^ a b c "Czeslaw Milosz". poetryfoundation.org. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
  4. OCLC 982122195
    .
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. ^ Bereś, Stanisław. "Czesław Miłosz's Apocalypse." Between Anxiety and Hope: The Poetry and Writing of Czesław Miłosz, edited by Edward Możejko, The University of Alberta Press, 1988, pp. 30-87. ISBN 0888641273
  9. .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. .
  13. .
  14. .
  15. .
  16. ^ Miłosz, Czesław (20 January 1936). "List do obrońców kultury (Letters to the Defenders of Culture)". Poprostu., quoted in MiŁosz: a biography, Franaszek, Andrzej; Parker, Aleksandra; Parker, Michael (2017), Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, p. 159.
  17. .
  18. .
  19. ^ Miłosz, Czesław (2003). Przygody młodego umysłu. Krakow: Znak. p. 218.
  20. ^ .