User talk:138.162.0.44

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Radio. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Manway (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Glane23, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 17:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Roy Belton, you will be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michigan Wolverines football, you will be blocked from editing. Jweiss11 (talk) 02:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Norview High School. ActivExpression^Sign! 03:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kyle Busch. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Why Not A Duck 21:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Solder, you will be blocked from editing. Wizard191 (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please see the discussion of this at Talk: RLC circuit#Natural frequency and resonant frequency, SpinningSpark 17:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Hugo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rami R 15:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mark May. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. January (Cassandra 73) ^talk 18:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cosmetic dentistry, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greenbackville, Virginia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pilch62 (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brown bear, you may be blocked from editing. CutOffTies (talk) 13:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ike Taylor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — DeeJayK (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of

If this is a

shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account

for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Use_of_classified_documents Hello71 (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brandon Dubinsky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Resolute 15:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brandon Dubinsky, you may be blocked from editing. Mdann52 (talk) 16:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm

Hello, I'm Trusilver. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kevin Kelly (politician), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Trusilver 17:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Norfolk Naval Shipyard because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chester W. Nimitz, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yaush (talk) 22:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm O.Koslowski. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Armadillo, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, O.Koslowski (talk) 16:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 138. I saw your post on Jimbo's page, and I don't know about anyone else, but I do want to investigate this, so I'm cross-posting this on your talk page from Jimbo's. My initial thought is that you're misreading the edit history, but please correct me if I'm wrong. The thing is that the IP does have a post between F&A's and Resolute's, but you can see from the edit summary that the post was made to the section called "Electoral Commission RfC Closure", right above "Wikipedia:Bold". If you go to that section, you can see that the IP's comment is still there. I guess my question is: did you actually see the IP's comment in "Wikipedia:Bold", or are you just going on the edit history? If the latter, then I think the IP's edits are all accounted for, but if the former, then some dev somewhere has some 'splaining to do. (And of course, one way or another, it's neither your nor the original IP's fault!) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and I am glad to ses that someone appears to be taking the issue seriously rather than assuming that I am just some IP that doesn't know what I am talking about. Just as a general note, this is a proxy used by about 2/3rds of the US navy so if there are some bizarre edits or something strange appearing thats likely why. I clearly see the edit history and the string of about 25 revisions that Risker deleted. All of which are apparently missing from the associated discussions on Jimbo's talk page but of course I cannot prove that because I do not have access. All I know is that earlier today I saw a comment from another IP that caught my eye and then was gone so when I looked at the history I could see where Risker deleted it. The IP posted twice. Once to the "Electoral Commission RfC Closure" section and again to the "Wikipedia:Bold" section. You are correct that the IP does have a couple comments there but not enough. If you look at the page history and count the times that the IP edited, the number doesn't match the posts in the discussion. To answer your question more directely, yes I actually saw the edit and I can also tell by the edit history that there are things missing by counting the number of posts by section for the user. I also want to note that Jimbo's page is just a very high visibility example. It happens whenever a rev del is perfomed across multiple revisions that affects multiple discussions.

Basically the rev del tool is crap, it always has been and needs to be redesigned. When its used to delete a single revision it works pretty well but when its used to delete multiple revisions as was done on Jimbo's page it generally also causes collatoral damage to other discussions and comments that were done in between. When a rev del is performed the performer needs to review the edit history and restore the comments that do not meet the violation in a followup edit, but this rarely happens and isn't required. To answer the likely bewilderment in your thoughts, Yes I have edited for a long time, yes I am familiar with how these tools work, no I do not want to start editing actively again and no I do not want to login or create a new account. The only reason I even brought this up is because I have seen it a number of times and no one has mentioned it and I got tired of seeing nothing being done to fix it. 138.162.0.42 (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I believe you. Sorry for explaining in what's probably far too much detail for you at Jimbo's talk page; I assumed, and you know what they say when you assume. :P I gotta run this moment, but I'll take a closer look, comparing bytecounts and the like, when I next get a chance. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem thanks for looking into it. Like I said I really don't have a dog in the fight (to pun Michael Vick) but thought I would bring it up. Frankly if I had known it would require this much an investment in time I probably wouldn't have. 138.162.0.46 (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, 138.162.0.44. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm ChrisGualtieri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Romeo Santos because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:22, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, United States Fleet Forces Command, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kevin Kelly (politician), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kevin Kelly (politician), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kevin Kelly (politician), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.