User talk:138.163.106.72

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

talk · contribs ) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, gate2-bremerton.nmci.navy.mil (138.163.106.72), is registered to Navy Network Information Center (NNIC) (Bremerton, Washington, United States) and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Older warnings and blocks
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.163.106.72) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 20:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] June 2008 introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 14:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply ] Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Phil Collins, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 20:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] introduction to editing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply ] talk) 16:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply ] July 2008 talk) 19:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply ] Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Xenu, you will be blocked from editing. Lradrama 19:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Xenu. SchfiftyThree 19:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] talk) 19:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply ] You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Lradrama 19:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] Your edits to December 31 Dear 138.163.106.72, Some of your edits on the page December 31 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are: The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page. If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on talk) 20:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply ] July 2008 talk) 01:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Boston Red Sox. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SchfiftyThree 22:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] August 2008 welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. -- 10:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Lowry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 09:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply] talk) 21:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply ] Anon editing temporarily blocked due to continued vandalism username (if you have one) and IP address in your email. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Infrogmation (talk) 02:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply ] August 2008 talk) 20:09, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply ] username (if you have one) and IP address in your email. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Infrogmation (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply ] September 2008 If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  ■ MMXXtalk  11:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply ] Vandalism warning talk) 16:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply ] October 2008 Please do not remove correct, factual information from articles as you did at Amen. If you do so again you may be blocked from editing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] November 2008 introduction to editing. Thank you. Thingg⊕⊗ 15:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply ] This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I always strive to add useful content to wikipedia. I know that others sometimes do not, But I thing that is deplorable. I do not recall what it is that I put as an edit to the Creation Science page, but I can assure you, anything I added was designed to be as objective and helpful as possible. Creation Science is a hot-button issue for many, and I presume I saw an inappropriately perjorative assertion in the topic, and tried to make it more objective. If I did that, I would expect that the individual who added the biased assertion took umbrage, and complained. But I feel I have been wronged. Please contact me at <email redacted for your privacy>. If you will unblock me, I will register to make contentions like this in the future easier to resolve. I am sure wikipedia would like to serve ALL individuals who come here for information, which will require that some controversial text will need to be contained in some topics. That is not an indication of a problem, but the interplay of differeing viewpoints in the marketplace of ideas. (In my opinion...) Decline reason: Deleting whole sections of pertinent, sourced content is WP:NPOV. —  Sandstein  22:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply ] If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I am astonished at your statement, "Deleting whole sections of pertinent, sourced content is vandalism." If I did such a thing it was a complete accident -- I would never do that intentionally; I am not a censor. I recognize full well that "what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." If I can delete what others say, others could equally easily delete what I say. Your statement, "which you also warred about," is equally astonishing to me--I mean, when I read the things that you wrote I could only marvel, and say "What?!? When? How?!?" I presume that "warring" refers to back and forth editing and reediting by two or more individuals, and I don't recall ever having done that, either. Now, I know you’re busy (we all are--welcome to the 21st century...), but gee!, I really would like to see what it is that you saw that has brought us to this point either here or at <email redacted for your privacy>. Perhaps I did do what you are saying, and have forgotten about it; if this is the case, seeing the details would remind me. I am eager not to be thought a vandal (or to be a vandal in reality!). Additionally, I generally am the sort of person who would try to get rules I disagreed with changed, rather than just ignoring them. But I read in the the pages this incident has brought me to see, that I otherwise would not have read, that it is possible for others to be associated with the same IP address. If this is something done by others, that I had no hand in, I want to clear my reputation. So seeing what you are referring to might serve that purpose as well. Decline reason: You may not be aware of it, but all edits you, or others, make under this IP address are logged at a/c) 16:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply ] If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. {{unblock|Thank you for that link to activity by this IP address. Most of the articles that have activity are articles I have never even looked at. I looked back over this IP address as reported here, seeing that the addr has been blocked before for vandalism. In those earlier blockings, there were some details, which, again, left me with my chin in my lap in astonishment. I am at a US Naval facility, and I am presuming that the IP address is that of a router, rather than my workstation. (Not much I can do about that!) I would like to create an account. It seems to me that I tried that following this current block for vandalism, and was prevented. Is there a way that I can be rescued from this charge of vandalism (and from association with this vandal behvior) so that I can create an account? I, myself, found the edits I saw (and I only looked at a few) to be testy, peevish, and doctrinaire, and I do not want to be associated with that sort of behavior. The edits reminded me of nothing so much as a young man (younger than 25), thinking that he has all the answers. I am more than twice that age, and I do not behave in that way! I have strong views, which is what I feel all thinking individuals ought to do. But I hold my view because I believe they are right. Therefore, I believe that they will "win the day" through being presented, not through censoring others. As I said earlier, I recognize that if I can censor others, others will be able to censor me. So I am waiting on tenter hooks to hear whether you can provide me with a means to solidly separate my reputation from that of the vandal who has been so busy at this IP address. Again, thank you for the link to see what this is all about. Very illuminating.}} Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): I have changed the settings on your block to allow you to create an account. One thing i will point out though is that having strong views is great, but they should not come across in articles you edit. Also, remember, that you will not always be right, be willing to listen to what others have to say. Good luck, and happy editing--Jac16888 (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply] Request handled by: Jac16888 (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply] January 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1985. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Graymornings(talk) 00:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. February 2009 talk) 19:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply ] April 2009 introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply ] talk) 18:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply ] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mister Rogers' Neighborhood, you will be blocked from editing. C.U.T.K.D T | C 09:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] May 2009 introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 20:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply ] June 2009 welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. tedder (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply ] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pink (singer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sky, you will be blocked from editing. Graham87 14:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] September 2009 introduction to editing. Thank you. Intelligentsium 18:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply ] This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: kindly stop blocking the entire NMCI from making useful edits because of some morons Decline reason: Sorry. With a block log like that, your best bet is to create an account at home and use it instead. TNXMan 14:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. April 2010 Deaths in 2010. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 22:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply ] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. Navy/Marine Corps Intranet, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot . Please use block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism . Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here , remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: talk) 16:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply ] talk) 16:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States Marine Corps, you will be blocked from editing. 19:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page VFA-32. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy2010 20:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] August 2010 G.  ツ 00:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Microsoft, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ryan Norton 22:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Please stop blocking the entire NMCI network just because of some morons who can't control themselves. Decline reason: Problem is, we can't tell who is using the ip from one moment to the next, and we can't just block the disruptive users of a shared ip, there is just no way to do it. You can avoid this problem by talk) 20:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply ] If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. September 2011 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply ] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Bouyon music, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Caribbean music vandal. Binksternet (talk) 07:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Estanislao López— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brussels sprout has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Deadly force seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Badass with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kevin Kelly (politician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 16:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 20:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.