Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 00:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
Hi Briannemartindale! I am wondering about the large number of ancestry snippets you are adding today. Is there a consensus that all these are necessary? I notice that several times you have been reverted by Ealdgyth and maybe others, reason being that it's too much detail and unsourced. I suggest, under the circumstances, it might be best for you to seek some agreement from the community that going back to someone's great great grandparents is worthwhile (i suspect it isn't, and i also suspect i'm not the only person to think so). Any questions, please feel free to ask! Happy days ~ LindsayHello 22:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
i primarily work as genealogist as a hobby
some pages have them and some don't and i am contributing my part that i know well
i will soon be adding pages of missing people for nobility and royalty
i know that other people who work on their family tree on different sites use ancestry snippets and wiki pages in general for ready access and easy information without having to look at many different websites or books
with the recent death of elizabeth ii of england and her son charles iii taking the throne there are more people now taking more interest in royalty and nobility especially in england
if we were all interested in the same thing the world would be boring
each person contributes a different part to create a wiki world and i am just doing my part because i believe in giving my gifts and talents for free so other people may enjoy them as well
i am now fixing any source issues but my ancestry tables are not the only ones with unsourced sections which i am also fixing as well
there are bigger issues of unsourced and misinformation on many medical pages including the pgad persistant genital arousal disorder page among other medical pages Briannemartindale (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
many people don't care about the genealogy of a prime minister of england or a president of a country so i am not doing that ether
many people do care about the genealogy of royalty and nobility
if i am worried about what other people think of me then there is something wrong with me
i have given my answers but i will not continue to answer to the critics when i have already answered the topic from others
thank you for understanding brianne martindale Briannemartindale (talk) 16:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, i think you are entirely missing the point. Yes, you must "continue to answer to [
WP:CONSENSUS. Otherwise, i fear, you may find yourself blocked through your unwillingness to participate in the community and by our standards. Happy days ~ LindsayHello 17:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
if there is an issue with ahnentafel s then all should be removed and banned or quit removing people's knowledge and work and they need to be left up to be fair or else it is discrimination where only some people earn an ahnentafel and some people are not good enough to earn one
if you disagree with me please speak to me directly and i will leave wiki for good knowing that people don't like my help and years of knowledge and my degree in library technology
if there is an issue with ahnentafel s then all should be removed and banned or quit removing people's knowledge and work and they need to be left up to be fair or else it is discrimination where only some people earn an ahnentafel and some people are not good enough to earn one
if you disagree with me please speak to me directly and i will leave wiki for good knowing that people don't like my help and years of knowledge and my degree in library technology
There is not an issue with ahnentafel tables ~ personally i like them, i find them easy to read, and genealogy is one of my true loves. The issue is with the way that you are editing; i don't think you have read ~ certainly not taken to heart ~ anything that Kansas Bear or i have written here, and that will cause you trouble. No one wants you to quit or leave WP for good; what we want is for you to join the community, accept our standards, and edit productively as part of that community. The result of not doing so would be a pity. Happy days ~ LindsayHello 19:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is a steep learning curve here, we know that and try to work around it and help newcomers; that's why you were given a welcoming template above with a large number of very helpful links for you to follow. We want you to succeed, but you have to do your part. Please, ask, here or at my talk page, and i will do my best to help, as will others. Happy days ~ LindsayHello 19:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
due to everyone's behavior i am thinking about leaving because only two people have given me a warm welcome and i do not wish to stay where i am not fully welcomed
i am also adding sources to the ahnentafel 's but even the sourced ones are getting removed
plus if people are going to constantly remove my work then that tells me i am not welcome here and that i need to leave
i am willing to contribute but i am only going to contribute what i know and what my expertise is in which means i will not contribute to an article on plasma or tigers but will contribute to robert ii of france and james iv of scotland