User talk:Bruin2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Started pageBruin2 (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_New_Orleans#How_does_one_add_to_project_page_list.3F WhisperToMe (talk) 23:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Vasco Road (California) article

I have drafted a new article ([User:Bruin2/Vasco_Road_(California)]) and would appreciate some feedback regarding its suitability for upload. I realize that it needs a map, at least, but I have no capability to produce one.


{{helpme}}
I followed your recommendation. The proposed article was moved on September 1. There have been no comments to date. I would like to move it to the main area, since there will be links to several other articles. Please advise how to proceed. Thanks.
Bruin2 (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ref. Wikipedia:AFC/User:Bruin2/Vasco Road (California)  Chzz  ►  14:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]
Hi there.
Could you please edit the page, and put the following code as the first line, then save it;
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
That will mark it for a review, which should happen within a few days. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  14:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now in
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vasco Road (California) and awaiting review.  Chzz  ►  17:27, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

File source problem with File:USS Mississippi (BB-41) 1947-48.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:USS Mississippi (BB-41) 1947-48.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vasco Road (California). If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  23:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

Vasco Road (California)
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  17:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback notice

Hello, Bruin2. You have new messages at Arxiloxos's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at
Articles for creation

William G. Skelly
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
  • The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's
    grading scheme
    to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to
    create articles yourself
    , and don't have to post a request.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

[[CharlieEchoTango]] 01:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some Tulsa article suggestions

Thank you very much for your efforts on Tulsa-related articles; it was certainly a pleasure to see William Skelly come to life this week. If sports topics interest you, one article that is screaming out for help is Tulsa Golden Hurricane football, in which there is currently a four-decade gap between 1968's infamous 100-6 loss to Houston and the record-breaking win in the 2008 GMAC Bowl. More generally, the history of the University of Tulsa is a topic in need of elaboration--this came to my attention after the death of Ben Graf Henneke, and while I was writing an article about him, I collected some sources on other TU presidents, but now I don't have as much research and writing time as I would like, so I would be more than happy to share the research with you if you're interested. Best regards, --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your post. It's good to hear that somebody noticed.

I'd be pleased to collaborate with you on this or other Tulsa articles. I would defer to others on the Golden Hurricane history. The period you indicated occurred after I moved away from the area, so I have nothing special to contribute. However, I have begun collecting factoids about the early history when TU was formed from the old Kendall College. So, one of my current interests is to expand the Tulsa University History section. Maybe we could move the Tulsa University article up another notch on the quality scale. Bruin2 (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fair enough, and thanks for the response. The Oklahoma Encyclopedia article about TU is a useful outline, but I have a feeling that there are some significant gaps in its recounting of the school's history. Some months ago (while working on the article about Henneke), I collected a bunch of links to articles about TU's history since the presidency of C.I. Pontius, and then ran out of time to do more heavy research. I've put all of that on a workpage, User:Arxiloxos/University of Tulsa history references, and you should feel free to make use of this material as you see fit. (Technical note: The "formatted references" in the bottom section are displayed the way they are -- with a $ sign in lieu of the correct opening symbol < -- so that you can see the content of the footnote; otherwise they wouldn't display on the page. When you want to use one of those footnotes in an article, just copy it and change the $ back to a < and it should work.) Best, --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi Arxiloxos. Thanks for offering me an opportunity to use your Tulsa University notes to move the article along. It's taken a long time, but I wanted to fill in a more complete list of former presidents of the university. That's done, although information about each individual's significance to the school is pretty sparse for most of the earlier ones. Please take a look at the article and let me know what you think. Bruin2 (talk) 14:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thank you for the note and for your efforts; I am glad to see those sources being put to some use. Your continuing efforts on Tulsa topics are most appreciated. I have much less time to spend on Wikipedia these days, and am glad to see you (and hopefully others) carrying the load. Best,--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! 129.49.72.78 (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W. R. Holway

I noticed your User:Bruin2/W. R. Holway (Engineer) article since it's already listed in several categories. If you don't want the article to appear in categories before it's ready, put a colon in after the square braces and before the word Category, e.g. [[:Category:Massachusetts Institute of Technology alumni]]. You'll still get a blue link to validate the category, but it won't get listed in the cat. Take that colon out when you move the article to the main space.

Some comments on the article:

  • I'd move the notable achievements earlier in the intro, and move the routine bio to later sections.
  • Also I'd rename the article w/o the "(Engineer)". Parenthetical titles are to be used for disambiguation and I couldn't find another W.R. in wikipedia to worry about.

Couple more thoughts:

  • Add {{
    WPBIO
    |living=no}}
    to the article's discussion page, with suitable additional parameters.
  • I see there are a few unlinked references to W. R. already in Wikipedia that will need linking.

--J Clear (talk) 00:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


    • Thanks for your helpful comments. I'm ready to move the article to AfC.I think I have addressed all of them except the parenthetical addition to the title. I have no objection to removing that, but I think the action has to be taken by a Wikipedia administrator.Bruin2 (talk) 14:46, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming you're able to move the article from the User: space, you should be able to rename it at the same time and eliminate the (). Never used AfC, so don't know if there's something different about that process. If you have a good article and you feel it doesn't violate any of the pillars (too much), then you could just move it to the mainspace directly. Be bold, as they say. --J Clear (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice job on this article by the way. It was a redlink the day I created Pensacola Dam but not the next day.--NortyNort (Holla) 09:59, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W. R. Holway, and a note about notes

Very nice work on Holway. I've massaged the article somewhat, to fit various obscure criteria at places like

MOS:BIO, and I added a little bit of additional information. I'd also echo what User:J Clear
said above: now that you're an established editor, I'm not sure that there's any particular benefit in your putting your new articles through the extra step of AfC: you can just take them directly from your user space to mainspace when you feel they're ready.

I also wanted to ask you about the footnote format you're using, with all of the external links placed at the end of the cites rather than linked directly in the footnote text. Is there a reason you prefer to do it this way? If you look around in the footnotes of other articles, you'll note that they're usually done so that the reader can click directly on the name of the source to get to the external link.

For example:

rather than

  • Davis, Kirby Lee. The Journal Record (Oklahoma City). "These Walls: Spavinaw watershed in Tulsa" July 24, 2009.[1]

This also has the benefit the double numbering of the footnotes (one at the beginning, one at the end, sometimes with different numbers), which some readers may find distracting. I don't think there's any rule that requires one of the other, just something to consider. You might also want to look at the footnote generator available at http://toolserver.org/~magnus/makeref.php There's no rule that you have to use the templates generated by that engine (and I personally find them a bit annoying at times), but many experienced editors do use them and find them helpful.

Again, great work. Best, --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of user subpages

Hiyas there Bruin2!

I just removed the User talk:Bruin2/William G. Skelly page you marked for removal. If you need more userpage deletions, it may be more convenient to tag them with the {{db-u1}} template. This will place the article in the relevant deletion categories so that it can easily be spotted by people currently doing cleanups. The template equally saves you the hassle of having to type an explanation along with the helpme template(helpme based deletion request are fine as well, but the DB template is likely more convenient). Just to let you know :). Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 17:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here:

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pierce Block (Tulsa), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

Pierce Block, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
  • You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
    Articles for Creation
    .
  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 Chzz  ►  09:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Olahoma

This has been sent to you requesting that you respond to whether or not you are still an active member of

Here
By following the instructions.

--Dcheagle 09:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Dcheagle. Thanks for your message. I thought I was already on the Oklahoma active list. Apparently not, so I have readded my name. I have primarily worked on Tulsa Task Force topics, and have not paid close attention to broader Oklahoma issues. Bruin2 (talk) 17:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shearonink (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bruin2. You have new messages at Shearonink's talk page.
Message added 12:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Shearonink (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma Hall of Fame

I see that you are greatly expanding the Oklahoma Hall of Fame article and adding information about being inducted to the inductees' wiki pages. However, I see that in many places, instead of sourcing your addition, you are simply directly linking to a .pdf file.

<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.oklahomaheritage.com/HallofFame/ByName/tabid/89/Default.aspx | title=Oklahoma Hall of Fame | accessdate=November 16, 2012}}</ref>

That markup is a reference to the list of hall of fame inductees, accessed on November 16, 2012. Adding that, or something similar, would be great. ZybthRanger (talk) (contribs) 17:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Fred S. Clinton

I'm about to review Fred S. Clinton is there anything that you would like me to point at for improvement.--Dcheagletalkcontribs 18:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. If you have questions or comments about the Clinton article, please add them below. I recall seeing a little more description about Clinton's role in the Sue Bland oil well, but I don't have it at hand right now. It's not really relevant to his medical practice, but it helps show his widespread involvement in Tulsa's early history and development. Bruin2 (talk) 22:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Tablet edit) Ive compiled a list of things that could be done to improve the article which I will post here once I return to my home computer. For now I have up'd the page to start class.--Dcheagletalkcontribs 22:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Devil's Backbone

What evidence do you have that the location of this site is now in Oklahoma? I cannot find anything to substantiate that claim. Backspace (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Backspace. You are correct. I haven't relocated such a source and don't recall why I didn't put in a citation at the time. I conclude it was a gross error on my part and apologize for that. Thank you for catching it and letting me know. I appreciate that. I deleted the incorrect statement and the link to category "Oklahoma in the American Civil War." Bruin2 (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kilopi (talk) 11:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question Regarding Overton James Article

I have raised a question at Talk:Overton James regarding the article you helped create on former Chickasaw Nation Governor Overton James relating to the article I previously created on current Chickasaw Nation Governor Bill Anoatubby. Please feel free to read my comments on the aforementioned Talk page for more details. --TommyBoy (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Doaksville, Choctaw Nation

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi I'm about to review Isparhecher. I'm just stopping by to ask if there is anything you are looking for it this review.--Dcheagletalkcontribs 06:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dcheagle,
Thanks for volunteering to review Isparhecher. I don't know whether the person who added the banner had something specific in mind for the subject page, as there was no further information. I have not been successful finding much about Isparhecher's early life, so if you can find anything, that would be a big help. Bruin2 (talk) 14:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger of Oklahoma Territory's at-large congressional district into Oklahoma Territory article

Hi Okheric, Thanks for your comments on my proposal to merge the two subject articles. I'm glad to see that some Wikipedian has taken an interest. I plan to move forward on this, though it may take a couple of weeks to do so, because I have some other commitments right now. Bruin2 (talk) 22:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here:

Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 07:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

John Ross (Cherokee chief)

The Good Article rejection notes are on the talk page and at least one objective hasn't been met, which is to expand the lead. For a large article like this, a larger lead is needed to reflect the article's full content. Okheric (talk) 00:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments on the subject article. I have expanded the summary section. I think it covers Ross' life, but I hope I didn't go overboard and make the section too long. Please have another look and let me know whether it now seems to satisfy the requirements. I appreciate your help. Bruin2 (talk) 04:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Much better. Thanks. I am not sure whether or not it is too long now, but it certainly is no longer too short. You might use the peer reviewer tool on it once before submitting it for Good Article status again. Okheric (talk) 01:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/History of Texas City, Texas, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request

Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13
. Thank you for your attention.
talk) 17:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Overton James Follow Up

Following up on our March, 2013 discussion at Talk:Overton James, I recently came across information on the Chickasaw Nation Governor's website which seems to suggest that he served as Governor until 1987. Please see the aforementioned Talk page for more details. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Evolution of Tulsa's Skyline has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notably topic lacking citations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dcheagletalkcontribs 19:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your excellent Oklahoma articles.
talk) 21:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]


Possible GA nomination ofJohn Ross (Cherokee chief)

I just noticed that you asked about getting John Ross (Cherokee chief) GA nominated again. I have however after looking over the article found a few issues that would need to be fixed before s possible nomination could pass. If you would like I can list the issues I've found so they can be fixed. Once the issues are fixed I think John Ross could strongly pass a GA review.--Dcheagletalkcontribs 04:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your posting your list of issues, so this article can move forward. Thanks for your review. Bruin2 (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok let me go over the article with once more to make sure I don't miss anything and then I will post the list where would you like me to post the list here or on articles talk page?--Dcheagletalkcontribs 17:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two history sections in Coalgate

The article you are working on Coalgate, Oklahoma, has two history sections. Okheric (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality ratings are not "C"

The articles that you are marking as "C" rating...are not "C" rated, because they don't meet the first sentence of the "C" description, which is "The article is substantial". Those articles are NOT substantial! See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Oklahoma/Assessment#Quality_scaleSbmeirowTalk • 13:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline for guideline for US City articles. Notice how little those Oklahoma articles have compared to this guideline....thus is why they aren't "substantial" nor "C" rated. • SbmeirowTalk • 13:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

City articles

I notice you are working on the county articles and thought I would offer an idea. Instead of listing the cities, it seems like the preference in terms of how they are treated in GA and FA articles is paragraph form with a bit more detail under a subsection entitled Communities under Geography. What do you think of trying to do this in the county articles? I have done it for one or two, but thought I would seek your input before going further. Okheric (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for soliciting my input on your suggestion. I see no downside to listing communities contained by the county under the Geography section. I have some reservations about the paragraph format, since many counties have quite a few communities. I do favor subdividing the community list into Cities and towns; Unincorporated communities; Census designated places and Ghost towns or former communities. See Cherokee County, Oklahoma for example. You said that you had tried the paragraph form for a few counties, so could you send me a link for these. I want to be sure I understand what you are recommending. Cheers. Bruin2 (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ames crater

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 23:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK nomination of Robert Galbreath, Jr.

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK review

Aye Bruin2, thanks for your review of Template:Did you know nominations/1930 Graf Zeppelin stamps and your kind words about the article. Just thought I'd pass on some advice about reviewing. Instead of outlining all the various points, in full wording and in list form, you might want to summarize things a bit and just make the statement with a couple of sentences. e.g. Instead of saying:

  • It was nominated within 5 days of completion;
  • It exceeds the minimum 1500 characters length requirement.;
  • The hook is short enough and meets formatting guidelines;
  • etc...

You could have said:
Article is long enough, hook is interesting, short enough and sourced. Was expanded fivefold less than five days before nomination. No MOS issues, images all check out, no copyvios and no duplicate or disambig links. Good to go.
You also don't have to mention "neutral and does not comment negatively on living people" unless they are issues that need to be corrected. This is the way most reviewers do it, and it takes up much less space. That's my opinion anyway. Again, much thanks for your time and effort. GREATLY appreciated. All the best. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC for Media Viewer

Opinions are needed at RfC about Media Viewer being the default image viewer. Please help in the effort and pass this notice on. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK review

Hello, and thanks for reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/United States Custom House (San Ysidro, California). There may be a problem with your review, though: part of the review process is to approve the hook, especially to verify that the hook is cited in the article. You approved the nomination, but you also expressed some doubts about the hook: whether it was cited, or whether it was even true. I suspect they will raise questions about that when they come to move the DYK into the queue, because right now it is confusing. Could you please take a look at my comment at the nomination, and then either indicate that the hook is OK, or else change your review from "approval" to something less than approval - something that acknowledges you have questions about the hook? Thanks, and sorry to have to bother you about this! (P.S. Any additional comments from you should be added below my comment; you shouldn't change your initial review.) --MelanieN (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Woodward Park (Tulsa)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert Galbreath, Jr.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK review, again

Looks like I need to ask you to take one more look at Template:Did you know nominations/United States Custom House (San Ysidro, California). Several alternate hooks have been proposed; people need to know if you approve the alt hooks. It would be helpful if you would state a preference for which hook you like the best, although if you don't have a preference, you can leave the choice of a hook up to the person who promotes the article to the queue. Thanks! --MelanieN (talk) 18:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Never move a page from article space to your own userspace. If you want to work on the page with editing the actual page, then copy, not move it. Bgwhite (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Philcade Building

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 05:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 14:04, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work! You are welcome to create articles outside of AfC of course! --j⚛e deckertalk 14:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Carnegie Library (Guthrie, Oklahoma)

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Please see new note on DYK template. Yoninah (talk) 21:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Philcade Building