User talk:IkbenFrank

Greetings...

Hello, IkbenFrank, and

To get started, click on the green welcome.

I hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! RashersTierney (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IkbenFrank. I'm going to revert a few of your recent edits (Lifford and Strabane as examples) as you can't just add a link to a timetable in the body of an article nor is Wikipedia and place for links. What you did at Portrush is better as at least it is in some context but again I will be removing the direct link but leave the text. Bjmullan (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Lough Foyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greencastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

First Great Western (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Cardiff railway station

Northern Ireland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sydenham railway station

Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Cotswolds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheltenham railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article

Hi, this navbox that you've been adding to lots of station articles - why is it not set up as a template? That way, the code needs to be in only one place, and for an amendment, you don't need to go through every article all over again. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seeing as you didn't reply, I've fixed them all up. The template is {{Commuter Stations: Cardiff Local Lines run by Arriva Trains Wales}} - the name was kind of forced on me because you had used |name=Commuter Stations: Cardiff Local Lines run by Arriva Trains Wales.

Please see: (i)

WP:FOOTERS on where navboxes should be placed. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you

		The Original Barnstar
		I just wanted to say, after looking through your recent edits, thank you for your work improving countless Northern Ireland rail related articles. Keep it up! NorthernCounties (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Derry

Hi IkbenFrank, just to make you aware that on Wikipedia the city is known as

Hello, IkbenFrank. You have new messages at Redrose64's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Redrose64 (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dangerous Road for Pedestrians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited A46 road (Northern Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belleek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from

This is an automated message from

I noticed that too. Please see

WP:CUTPASTE. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A5 road (Northern Ireland) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aughnacloy

Armstrong Whitworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bascule

Belfast–Derry railway line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Bascule

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Diamond, Donegal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lagan Canal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ballymacarrett railway station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bangor and Mainline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Haarlem railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NS

Oostende railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scottish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why did you create

Oh, never mind,

Wenduine, Belgium redirect to Wenduine? SPQRobin (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amiens Street, Dublin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Liffey

Berck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norse

Blankenberge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NMS

Eeltsje Boates Folkertsma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to

Frisian language

Geart Aeilco Wumkes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to

Frisian language

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re edits like this, this, this, this, this and others - please do not use a space as the sort key unless the article is the

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Privatisation of British Rail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grand Central

Transport in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stirling railway station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Transport in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Glasgow Central and Wigan railway station

Ballycotton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dark Ages

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Class 421, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guildford railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holyhead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breakwater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IkbenFrank, I've noticed (and support) the mileage you added to A48 road. The normal way of doing this is to use the convert template which keeps a uniform style and prioritises mileage in UK/US articles. It also supports many other units of measure. The syntax I have used on your edit is:

{{convert|27|mi|adj=on}}

which reads as 27-mile (43 km). The adj parameter deletes the "s" from "miles", for normal expressions of length you would simply use:

{{convert|27|mi}}

which reads as 27 miles (43 km). Hope you find this useful in your editing! Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 12:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Easter Rising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Irish Regiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the status of railways and stations unless you can source the changes. An organization may be "working towards" a re-opening but unless you include a reliable source for these changes they are liable to reversion. Britmax (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oxford Bus Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drybrook Road railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coleford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Outline of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Church of Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Belfast–Larne railway line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Single track

Double track (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Gare de Lille

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herefordshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welsh Newton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cairnryan Harbour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

Port of Belfast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited York railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Rail Class 43 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why the arbitrary removal of {{UK road}} and the inexplicable promotion of road names to the same level as station names? Useddenim (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've more or less reverted all of IkbenFrank's changes to this diagram.

However, I've also removed the road badges, following this discussion about them. Bluebird207 (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Network Rail is an infrastructure company, National Rail is the railway network. I am reverting your changes. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Curragh Racecourse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nurney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia Water, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mendip Vale railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wells

South West England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wells

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited County Cavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tralee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |coauthors= |year=1968 |publisher=Mercier Press |location= |isbn= |page= |pages=216–217 Appendix II) |url= |accessdate=}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Manchester Piccadilly station

added a link pointing to Carlisle

Stranraer

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Mary's Cathedral, Tuam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please stop adding images to United Kingdom without gaining support from other editors on the article's talk page. The question of which images to use on that important page has been much discussed over time and it is no use one editor arbitrarily adding more pictures without consultation. Thanks, Alarics (talk) 09:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please add new categories with the existing cats - at the bottom (but before any stub templates), per

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia Water, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Guildford railway station and Kingston railway station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mutt Lunker. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yes Scotland because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Salthill. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Charles (talk) 13:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Cheltenham Spa railway station, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 09:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I know it's 6 months late, but I just noticed and removed your addition of Irish ferry information from Bristol Parkway railway station. While I have no doubt what you added is accurate, it's not particularly relevant - your statement seems to be that with two changes, you could be in Ireland. The same could be said of France and Belgium via Eurostar, or pretty much any country in the world by getting a train to Paddington, changing for a Heathrow Express, then getting on a plane. Generally in a station article I'd be wary of even mentioning places you can get to by a single change (although I make an exception for branch line stations). Anyway, this is all old news, but I thought I should clarify my thinking on this. Thanks for making UK rail articles better! -mattbuck (Talk) 18:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Inishowen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 09:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding Category:Railway stations opened by British Rail indiscriminately. The category is not for reopenings, but for stations that were first opened between 1 January 1948 and 31 March 1994. For stations first opened outside that period, other categories exist, and most of the station articles that you have edited were already in one of those. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to draw your attention again to my note of six months ago; in particular, any station first opened on or after 1 April 1994 was not opened by British Rail but by one of its successor organisations. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of a section heading to the lede of the Euston article was reverted, but you added it again (so I reverted it again). Please read

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Omagh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[A5 road (Northern Ireland)|A5]] (Northbound) (Omagh – Strabane [and from here north-west to Letterkenny, via [[Lifford]] on the [[A38 road (Northern Ireland)|A38]],

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Merseyrail may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• office "Abellio Group Head Office" Group corporate website, Abellio, Utrecht, Netherlands, Undate].<Retrieved 19 June 2015.</ref>, and is formed of two electrified lines of the [[National Rail]]
• (Figures shown are attributable to ''Merseyrail Electrics 2002 Ltd'', (who operate the Northern and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Langport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Rail Class 43. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dublin Bus Route 53 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a travel guide or whatever. There is no reason given why this particular bus route is in any way notable. Buscruft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dundalk, Newry and Greenore Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlingford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Causeway Coast and Glens, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages North Channel and Ballycastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Monmouth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• station|Monmouth Troy]] to {{stnlnk|Chepstow}}, [[Ross-on-Wye railway station|Ross-on-Wye]] (thence to either {{stnlnk|Hereford}} and {{stnlnk|Gloucester}}.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Wales, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British Rail Class 43 and Arable. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating

Wikipedia editor Zppix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Awesome

To reply, leave a comment on Zppix's talk page.

Learn more about

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heathrow Airport Holdings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pennine Way may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of England".<ref>Poucher, page 9</ref> Although not the United Kingdom's longest National Trail (this distinction used to belong to the {{convert|1014|km|mi|adj=on|disp=flip}}<ref>{{cite web |url=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

As for trains, something along the lines of the automobile section seems appropriate, but you've added entirely too much detail, and probably not about the most notable railways. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The US is part of the Americas in the political sections; why should the UK not be part of Europe. I'm not going to revert you again, but yuo have not supplied credible justification for separating out the UK. Furthermore, the nonstandard header level used for Europe makes it impossible to put the UK at a sub-level, where it would belong, if separated. I'm going to put a content tag on the articles you've (IMO) damaged. Please self-revert until consensus can be obtained, as information is likely to get lost when putting it back.

You're probably correct about railroads, though. I'll ping Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains for more input.

Finally, you should reply in this thread. You are not using the agreed communication conventions by (1) replying on my talk page, (2) not signing your statements, and (3) not using proper header conventions. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read

WP:SEAOFBLUE. Please comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#Decades, the UK and Europe, and trains, if you can do so without damaging the structure. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

You haven't read any of my suggested reading. You're also not supplying the correct header level. Politics must remain level 3, making continents level 4, and the countries (including the UK) level 5. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you refuse to discuss the matter on any talk page, I have no choice other than to request you be blocked. To do other than just revert all changes in the sections, including any additions made by others, would take more time than maintenance of the articles is worth. See centralized discussion in

WT:YEARS. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English language in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, we appreciate your determination and good faith in editing the 2010s page but please be mindful in what you edit. Major edits, for example, giving the United Kingdom its own section in the prominent political events, is contradictory to page's format and should not be edited without discussion. Said discussion can be made in the Talk:2010s page. Also, additional United Kingdom events should be discussed on the talk page so as to not overflow the section with unnecessary events. For now, your edits will be undone to keep with the article's format. Thank you. ProjectHorizons (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I have noticed that you have changed a heading in the Limehouse entry to Rail Nationalisation 1949-1994. Over the past months (years maybe I lost track) I have been updating various East Anglian and South Eastern station history sections and consistently using British Railways as this sub-heading title. It generally fits with other operators LNER (1923-1947) and GER (1862-1922) in the other time periods. I am not going to go through and change all my edits to Rail Nationalisation as I am far more interested in posting historical detail on what are generally poor entries rather than this type of repetitive activity. In the spirit of Wikipedia friendship and co-operation would be grateful if you could re-consider your alteration here and revert it so there is a consistent format. If you do feel this is a better way of representing the historical periods then feel free to change all my other entries - I have no interest in edit warring just consistency. Cheers.--Davidvaughanwells (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IkbenFrank, I've reverted your addition of the Category:Deutsche Bahn to Arriva divisions as there's been no consensus to add it and seeing as there's been multiple warrings over it it's best you go to Talk:Arriva and get consensus, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 10:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlingford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honeybourne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Rail Class 43. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prayer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grace. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Godewaersvelde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nord Department. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please get consensus before adding Deutsche Bahn to any article and infobox, You've been told before to get consensus for it, Keep adding it and you could end up blocked for disruptive editing, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 18:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm sure you believe you are editing in good faith but please refrain from making superfluous additions about railways to Wikipedia articles. We are now working to revert many of your edits. Please note that there are now around 80 complaints on your talk page already, many of which are administrative warnings. If you continue your disruption you may find your editing privileges will have to be restricted. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prynhawn da! Adding to this, I have have had to copy-edit your overlong additions made to Pembrokeshire today. — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard |  15:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IkbenFrank. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Glastonbury. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Referring to your addition [image] immediately below the Info' box. — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard |  13:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Worth Way, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 10:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Smog into Commuting. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rail Safety and Standards Board. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 23:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Link is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: IkbenFrank continual mild disruptive editing over a number of articles. Djm-leighpark (talk) 02:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An admin on that discussion has indicated I have incorrectly raised that ANI-notice so plase accept my apologies. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see Talk:Quedgeley#Segregated_Bicycle_Path_entry for discussion of Bicycle path and apparent issues.
• Please also consider contributions with regards to cycling carefully. Your recent contribution https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cheltenham&type=revision&diff=783370440&oldid=783283067 appears to be forcing something about bicycles onto an article rather than genuinely improving an article. I am minded in this case the contribution is superfluous and has dis-improved the totality of the article.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• A discussion for concencus about the Cycling contribution has been begun at Talk:Cheltenham. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The use of gallery seems at odds with
  WP:GALLERY guidelines and seems to have been used to shoehorn cycling and railway interests, particularly one image previously removed. I accept this may have been a good-faith work-around edit however #June 2017 should have let you to the discussion on the talk page. Please review on [[[Talk:Cheltenham]] and discuss. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=6ybvGHdBVVUDi1D_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_57rnLKaLyg0bGSN&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Communication problems with IkbenFrank. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

Hello, IkbenFrank. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ikben, could I ask you to please stop changing Meuse to Maas. Although both are used in English, "Meuse" is about twice as common in book sources and so we don't prefer "Maas" over "Meuse". Thanks. Bermicourt (talk) 06:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

Emission standard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Diesel

MOT test (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diesel

Vehicle emissions control (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diesel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IkbenFrank. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making edits like this. The category page states, right at the top, "This category is for railway stations in Great Britain first opened by British Railways or British Rail, i.e. between 1 January 1948 and 31 March 1994". Please observe the words "first opened". For reopened stations we categorise by original company, and this particular one already has Category:Former North British Railway stations. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sandycove and Glasthule railway station has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ages ago you added references to Rhys 1901, pp. 520–2 & Mommsen 1898 p.217 to the Turkdean. I was wondering if you still had the relevant books and could add the full details?— Rod ^talk 19:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Botanic Avenue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources or even asserted beyond bare existence

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the