User talk:Mamayuco

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! — Gorthian (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for editing! Reading quickly over your article it seems that there are a few SPAG (spelling, punctuation and grammar) mistakes, because it is a young article there is no point in tagging it so I'm just letting you know. Also if this article exists in another language please consider connecting it using the "Add links" hyperlink on the left-hand-side column. Many thanks again, and if you need any help please let me know on my talk page at User:Nicnote. Best, --Nicnote (talk) 21:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Subduction erosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transgression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ranquil Formation page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

On 31 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arauco Basin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Arauco Basin is an uplifted part of the continental shelf of Chile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arauco Basin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arauco Basin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Subduction erosion, Mamayuco!

Wikipedia editor Herostratus just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your erudition in creating this article!

To reply, leave a comment on Herostratus's talk page.

Learn more about

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Negra Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fractional crystallization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caleta Herradura Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonconformity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article La Negra Formation, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Jurassic La Negra Formation in northern Chile contains products of submarine volcanism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/La Negra Formation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, La Negra Formation), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Uruguayan dyke swarms, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that swarms of dykes have intruded into Uruguay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Uruguayan dyke swarms. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Uruguayan dyke swarms), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mamayuco. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Space Infinite. Mamayuco, thanks for creating Pan de Azúcar Formation!

Lithopsian has just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cola de Zorro Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volcano-sedimentary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miocene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transgression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patagonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transgression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see muy edit to to correctly wikipipe to a more specific term. Simply piping from a general term to a more specific one is a confusion for readers. Please see

Thanks Staszek Lem, I got it. Mamayuco (talk) 20:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mamayuco. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I closed and implemented the CFD anniversary managing to rename multiple categories from "igneous petrology" to "magmatism", see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_17#Magmatism_not_igneous_petrology. There are several parent categories that now do not match, see Category:Igneous petrology, so please follow up the last set. Also, Category:Eoarchean igneous petrology was apparently omitted from the nomination. – Fayenatic London 14:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fayenatic, thank you. Las time I saw the discussion it had turned into a dead point, but Im glad the renaming went on. I will check parent categories. Mamayuco (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tectonic evolution of Patagonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Backstop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've provided a definiiton for a Backstop. Doesn't make much sense to me. You say "a backstop is the transition between deforming rock or sediment that is pushed by a coherent mass of rock". Normally, when one uses the word "between", one defines the x & y that the thing described is between. So from your definition we know the x is "deforming rock or sediment". Is the y "a coherent mass of rock"?

Could you take a longer look at the article and see if you can explain the concept a little more fully, such that non-geologists might have a clue. thx. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Backstop (geology).

Please only create articles with references.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello, Mamayuco. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help

). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add more references and expand.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Backstop (geology)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Mamayuco! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello, Mamayuco,

Thanks for creating Osorno–Llanquihue Basin! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

]

Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

Nomination of

Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 07:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pampean flat-slab, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Pampean flat-slab is an area of low angle subduction in South America, associated with a large volcano-free gap in the Andean Volcanic Belt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pampean flat-slab. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pampean flat-slab), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mining referendum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Pica, Chile

added a link pointing to Shaft

Puquios

added a link pointing to Shaft

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antofagasta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salpeter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atacama Desert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Porphyry copper deposit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cerro Colorado.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mamayuco,

Thank you for creating André Sougarret.

The sources provided contain only brief mentions of the subject. They do not establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง , this is pure nonsence. Please read again, being president CEO of Codelco and having led the world-famous 2010 do imply notability. Breifness and notability are two different things. Mamayuco (talk) 15:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is disputing that Sougarret might be a noteworthy individual. However, the brief mentions in the sources do not establish notability per the very strict requirements for

WP:BLP. Is there any reason why you are unable to provide multiple, more substantial sources that discuss the Sougarret in depth? Sources must be independent and verifiable but they do not not need to be in English. Unfortunately, at NPP we only assess what we are given, it's not within our scope and time would not permit us to improve articles and provide additional sources. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

You are wrong

WP:BLP. There it reads If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. Mamayuco (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm sorry but I can't do more to help you. Notability (people) is only a guideline whereas Biographies of living persons is a policy and overrides it. In fact it's one of the strictest policies on the English Wikipedia. In my opinion, the article certainly has potential but I cannot pass it for general indexing so it will stay in the queue for another reviewer to assess. You might be able to obtain help at the Teahouse, or bring it up at the BLP noticeboard (see the article's talk page). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:André Sougarret
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Guayacán, Chile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 24#Guayacán, Chile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 03:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

André Sougarret, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System

to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 22:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]