User talk:Marchjuly/Archives/2016/February

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Marchjuly. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives

2025;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

The licencing is at the image. The book is part of the article IQ125 (talk) 13:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

This image is of book cover(s), and the copyright for it is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers to illustrate an article discussing the book in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marchjuly/Archives/2016/February true

@

WP:NFLISTS because the contextual significance required by NFCC#8 is lacking so its usage fails the NFCC. All it takes for a particular usage of a non-free image to be non-NFCC compliant is for it to fail a single criterion and the usage of this file in the list article fails two. I've opened an FFD discusison about the file's usage in the list article at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 6#File:Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess.jpg, so please feel free to explain why you feel the image satisfies all 10 of the non-free content crtieria there. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear Marchjuly Could you please guide me back to your talk page. A very important scientific article was published last November stating safety of silicone implants not proven. I think it deserves a reference and a line as it contradicts NYT saying 1993 safety was unanimous. Thanks Robert Lewy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.54.216.170 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2016‎ (UTC+9) (Note: Moved post accidentally placed on userpage to user talk -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC))

Hi Robert (108.54.216.170). I think you should discuss any new sources you have found at Talk:Robert Ira Lewy so that other editors watching the article can also comment. Also, I think you should try and stick to using your Kingseason account if at all possible. Sometimes IP address are shared by many different people and if someone else with the same IP decides to start editing Wikipedia, things might get confusing. Since you've gone to the trouble of creating the account, you should stick to it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Why do you keep removing the Salisbury F.C. club logo from the Wiki page? Whites2015 (talk) 14:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi

Enforcement

".

Based upon the Salisbury F.C.'s official website, it does seem as if they use the logo, so use Template:Non-free use rationale and fill in the template's parameters as instructed in the template's documentation. Use "Salsibury F.C." for the |Article= parameter, "Infobox" for the |Use= parameter, and "http://salisburyfc.co.uk/" for the |Website= parameter. Once you've added all the relevant information to the template, check to see whether there are any errors using the "Preview" button and then click "Save page" if everything is in order. You can try practicing first in your user sandbox if you want and then just copying and pasting the final version into the "Summary" section (just below the other non-free use rationale" on the file's page.

One final thing to consider about adding the logo to "Salisbury F.C." is that doing so may mean that it can no longer be used in "Salisbury City F.C." per numbers 14 and 17 of

WP:NFCC#3). The does not necessarily mean "one use per file", but it does make additional usages a little bit harder to justify and in some cases impossible to justify. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I awaiting to have exact cites yet but the Brown Unjversity Surgical Dept in nov9' 2016, concluded twenty years of trials had not proven silicone safe and a larger study was needed. author Balk in Annals of Internal Medicine.. I should have exact cite today.Rod Rohrick of UT southwestern says essentially same in February editorial in Annals. Cite today. What I foresee is the two references added after Career and an additional line there quoting the conclusions of the two articles. These contradict the NYT but people can fill that out themselves., Shall I provide these data to you later? I wrote suggested test and references and To The Editor in the article and Fyddlstex erased it all within minutes.meant to be seen by you all. Says she moved it elsewhere but i can't find. It. Anyhow I don't feel wronged in any way and it's just 2015 science proves at least in a the absence the article written 20'years ago. Thanks Long-Term Health Outcomes in Women With Silicone Gel Breast Implants: A Systematic Review Ethan M. Balk, MD, MPH; Amy Earley, BS; Esther A. Avendano, BA; and Gowri Raman, MD, MS [+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information See Also: Silicone Gel Breast Implants: What We Know About Safety After All These Years Working Toward a Solution: The Unanswered Questions About Silicone Gel Breast Implants Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(3):164-175. doi:10.7326/M15-1169Kingseason (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingseason (talk • contribs) 10:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi

notification/alert

that they have been mentioned in the post.

For example, if I add the markup  {{u|Kingseason}}  or  {{ping|Kingseason}}  to a post, you should receive an alert at the very top of screen where the bell icon is located next to your account name. You may not get an immediate response from the editors you ping because people get

busy, but they will at least know they've been mentioned. You need to be a little careful and make sure you get the username right when you use these templates (they are case sensitive) because they won't work if you don't or you'll ping the wrong person. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Much prefer you enter the reference and conclusion after Career since I've admitted I wrote previous versions. And it gets wiped out. Thank you Roberto Ira Lewy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingseason (talk • contribs) 16:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I went ahead and made the changes in the Robert Ira Lewy site based on references but don't expect into last so please check it.

Best

Robert Lewy— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingseaon (talk • contribs) 02:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC+9)

Hi again

sock puppetry. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

They were removed by LeadsongDog not sure why as they are the very most recent data.

Thanks

Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingseason (talk • contribs) 09:05, 11 February 2016‎ (UTC +9)

@Kingseason: LeadSongDog explained their reasons for removing the citation you added at Talk:Robert Ira Lewy#Most recent publication regarding silicone breast implant safety. You should post there and ask them for further clarification and discuss things with them. For reference, their concerns seem valid to me. Specific concerns about article content should be discussed on the article's talk page because it allows more editors the chance to participate. Discussing such things on a user talk page is not bad per se, but editors who are interested in "Robert Ira Lewy" the Wikipedia article are more likely to notice such a post made to "Talk:Robert Ira Lewy" than a post made to "User talk:Marchjuly".

Now some general things to try and remember. I understand Wikipedia's way of formatting talk page posts, etc. is confusing and a bit hard to get used to when you don't post regularly, but remebering these things will serve you well: always

WP:REDACT

.

I do think you're making good faith attempts to discuss things, but the rush you seem to be do so which is starting to become counterproductive. Maybe try slowing down a bit and using the "Show preview" button before clicking "Save page" will help? All of this may seem like nitpicking, but avoiding such things will make it much easier to communicate with other editors via talk pages and edit in genreal. You might find the information in Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines helpful as a general overview. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Are you saying you recommend adding the two references as suggestions in the talk box of the whole article or just add them into references myself? I had forgotten my logon. They must be mentioned somewhere because Rohrbach and Balk articles (see below) aren't below anywhere. Your recommendation I take it is talk box. Surprised LeadDog didnt see discrepancy. When this is done a current knowledge of this issue will emerge.

Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingseason (talk • contribs) 02:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi again

Thanks Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingseason (talk • contribs) 16:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

I just want to warn you like I've warned

Thanks for the heads up

WP:ELN#Drexel Dragons men's lacrosse because clicking on it starts to download a file (at least it does for me). The link itself might be OK content wise, I think the downloading is not. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

No problem... That link does download on mine as well. When I need outside opinions in sports-related articles, I go to a couple of people who know more than I do... easier than going to a noticeboard, etc. Unfortunately with this user, there won't be a consensus, and I can guarantee you that all of the edits will be reverted... he's shown that he is taking

ownership of this article. 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 05:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

I find noticeboards helpful since you tend to get a wider variety of opinions, which might seem more neutral when dealing with tricky topics. As for

let the other editor be the one to screw up. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

This logo stuff has me confused. The Power Ranger logos for the other Power Ranger seasons were removed from the "list of episodes" articles but kept in the main article because they were considered fair use for the main article, but for the "list of episodes" articles they were removed because it was deemed the logos did not meet fair use due to WPNFCC#10c and possibly WPNFCC#8. So how come the the exact opposite is true for the MMPR 2010 logo? The MMPR 2010 logo was removed from the "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" article, which is the main article pertaining to MMPR (both the original and the re-version) as a whole. "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)" is merely the "list of episodes" page for the re-version, nothing more. 74.83.112.14 (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi 74.83.112.14. I didn't see your post here until after I posted at User talk:74.83.112.14#File:MMPR 2010 New Logo.jpg. I cannot give you the exact reasons why Explicit closed as they did. Administrators have some discretion when it comes to closes, so it's probably best that discuss this with them on their user talk page. I don't think, however, that Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version) is like the other "list of episodes articles". It seems to me to be an article about a particular season of the series like Power Rangers Jungle Fury, etc. which does include a list of episodes, but which could possibly be expanded to include other information as well and the logo is particular to that specific season which is why it should be used there. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)