User talk:Masonpatriot/Archive 2
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiProject College football January 2008 Newsletter
The
Al Wistert GA
WP:LOTD ) 16:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Green Bay Packers Wikiproject!Small College CoachesHey, I really appreciate your work on the small college coaches, specifically Dave Clawson and the Fordham navbox! If you'd like to coordinate on small college football programs, please let me know!--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Cornell Coaches templatePop's first name was added because the template includes multiple Warners (Pop and brother Bill). I thought it important to differentiate between the two Warners. Do you disagree? Cornell2010 (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC) Baseball HOF templatesNice work! :) And thanks for categorizing them so I won't have to do it later. :) --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC) HOF Templatesyou know how you made the baseball hall of fame templates, do plan on doing the same for the pro football hall of fame--Yankees10 17:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football February 2008 NewsletterThe The template which i linked in the heading; you reverted my edit on that template. I have no problems with the format that you put the other templates in, but i just thought that my change made it more aesthetically appealing. Plus not everyone of those coaches is exactly notable. I know Wikipedia is not about aesthetics, but just wanted to mention it. The Little Corporal (talk) 03:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC) WikiProject College football March 2008 NewsletterThe InviteJccort (talk) 03:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC) NCAA Tournament bidsI noticed you did some editing on the NCAA tournament bids article. I was hoping you might be able to contribute some in this article. Josh (talk ) 01:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
template:2008 Kansas BasketballStop removing the names of roster players from the template. Just because some of the players were walk-ons or didn't play significant minutes does not mean that their names should not or would not be included on a template. Wikipedia is about providing the best and most information possible, not ignoring or trying to remove information about the players who won't be NBA players. The team is part of history, all the players should be recognized. Demoares (talk) 07:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Since your concern rests in some players not meeting the notability requirements you should have stated that immediately instead of just undoing the edits and leaving the original navbox, which contained individuals who also would not meet notability standards. I have removed those players who do not have a page from the navbox. Demoares (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Stanley Cup Champion templatesI've noticed that you have begun making templates for the teams that win the WT:HOCKEY. Kaiser matias (talk ) 00:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi MasonP, I see you've added to the Infobox that Gehrig was elected to the Hall of Fame by the Veterans Committee. I don't believe that's correct. According to the HOF article, the Veterans Committee wasn't formed until 1953. It is true that Gehrig was elected to the HOF in 1939 and the 5-yr period was waived, but as I recall from various books on the subject, he was voted by the sportswriters. Also, the cited reference does not say he was elected by the Veterans Committee. At the moment, I'm just checking my Watchlist on my Blackberry while waiting for a tow truck (long story), so I can't really look into this further at the moment, but I figured the best course would be to bring this to your attention in the meantime. JGHowes talk - 20:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
InviteMilk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 20:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC) WikiProject College football May 2008 NewsletterThe DisambiguationJust something I noticed you doing once or twice and realized you might be unaware of the proper way to disambiguate. When it comes to disambiguating names, its policy to always use the middle name before you use brackets such as (baseball). Anyways just thought I would let you know since I noticed you moving things from the middle name version to the bracket version. Brackets are a last resort if you cannot disambiguate any other way. -Djsasso (talk) 14:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Roberto ClementeThis edit summary was misleading, do not remove the nationality field from an infobox unless its already mentioned in the lead. - Caribbean~H.Q. 20:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
|
Please Vote For Change We Can Believe In Or Even No Change at Obama Article | ||
Requesting your final opinion on the Bill Ayers language
|
P. J. Brown
Hi MasonP, are you sure that
Yeah, I've noticed those inconsistencies. I'm surprised that nobody's been bold enough to make all the changes according to NCP. You're the second person to move the article back to "P. J. Brown" since I moved it to "P.J. Brown" on June 4, so I don't want to be very fussy about it. —LOL (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
Done! You should be all set with rollback. Let me know if it is not working, in the event the settings did not take. If you have not yet, take a few minutes to read up on rollback at
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: Andrews
No hard feelings. I didn't even notice you were the editor; if I did I would have gone a bit easier on ya. ;) But I have to cleanup a lot of punctuation-, capitalization-, and spelling-challenged (otherwise good) edits from IPs on a daily basis, so I do get annoyed. But again, it wasn't meant in a mean-spirited way, just kind of me grumbling as I drag in my mop and bucket. :D Pats1 T/C 00:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football July 2008 Newsletter
The
Cornell Law
That whole section about the "consistently outranking Columbia/NYU Law" is preposterous to say the least. To the best of my knowledge it has occurred once in the past decade or so. Also, the statistics it cited were from the July 2005 bar exam. Hardly breaking news. Check out http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/ if you would like some updated statistics. I see you have a JD and went to Cornell. I don't know that Wikipedia needs that kind of revisionist history. Rms869 (talk) 06:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
I adjusted my error. Before you want to start throwing around assumption of good faith, I know that I'm allowed to call people out for conflicts of interest, which you clearly have. Rms869 (talk) 15:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Nearly every edit I've made on this site, save for one or two, has been adjusting punctuation or spelling errors. Is it necessary for me to put a summary for that? Just out of curiosity. Rms869 (talk) 16:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Baseball Newsletter
The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter | |
This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept. |
The Greatest [football] Game Ever Played" was battled out there, John Philip Sousa lead a band there, George Costanza worked there; but what do all these events have in common? They fail to reach the level of greatness that the baseball that was played there did.
In 1923, a man named New Yankee Stadium. So I'll sum it up by saying that we can remember these great moments by adding them to this place we've gathered at for future generations to read about, to learn about, to dream about; but more importantly we can watch tonight and we can remember how baseball is unlike anything else that we will encounter in our lives. — Blackngold29
|
-- jj137 (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
'Virginia Commonwealth University', not 'Virginia Commonwealth'
Regarding
WikiProject College football August 2008 Newsletter
The
WikiProject College football September 2008 Newsletter
The
Re: Category: Oklahoma City NBA players
I reverted your edits and restored the category because, since they're on the team's roster, that officially makes them players for that team (if it doesn't, what does?)-Should any of them get traded or released before playing a single game for OKC (highly unlikely), you can remove that category from the page. Tom Danson (talk) 17:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I added a few names to the
October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter
The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter | |
All the Way (Eddie Vedder song), Cy Young, Dan Brouthers, Harmon Killebrew, Rickey Henderson, Billy Pierce, Kinston Indians, Three Rivers Stadium, Bill Lange, Calgary Cannons, Hugh Daily, Homer at the Bat This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept. |
We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue. The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the NL Championship Series . Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages!
|
-- jj137 (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football October 2008 Newsletter
The
Why Would You Add a Template to a Player That is Obviously Not the Same Person?
Why would you include a template for the KC Chiefs Superbowl appearance to the article
I noticed that you've added several navboxes to John McGraw, an article near and dear to me. There seems to be quite a few of them on this particular article. Is there any policy or guideline on how many navboxes constitute too many navboxes? S.D.D.J.Jameson 19:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football December 2008 Newsletter
The
YOB instead of DOB. Check instructions
Hi. Concerning this edit of your I would like to inform you that for article pages we use Category:Year of birth missing instead of Category:Date of birth unknown. The latter should be used only in Talk Pages. Please read the instructions given in the categories pages. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 09:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Joe Gordon
Gordon has been elected to the Hall of Fame but will not be a member until he is inducted in the summer. This is comparable to Obama being elected president in November, but he won't actually be president until he is sworn in. Gordon should not be added to the Template:Baseball Hall of Fame second basemen until he is a full member. This whole issue was hashed out on Wikipedia when Cal Ripken and Kirby Puckett were voted in. If you go to the official Hall of Fame website, they make it quite clear that someone is not a member of the Hall until induction. 24.106.223.2 (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football January 2009 Newsletter
The
Naismith Player of the Year
As you add the template, you might want to remove the successor/predecessor links in the articles (the women, at least, have it). (John User:Jwy talk) 21:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
WP:3RR
WikiProject College football February 2009 Newsletter
The
Super Bowl Template addition
You recently undid a change to the Super Bowl 43 template. I feel that the change may be valuable to the template. I've added a note to the template's talk page to discuss. Please share your opinion there. Thanks.--Deejayk (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Template: Baltimore Orioles owners
The Jerold Hoffberger entry is still loaded with inaccuracies and needs to be fixed. Hoffberger and his National Brewing Co. didn't become the Orioles' largest shareholder until 1965. Clarence Miles held total control of the team in its first two years. He was replaced by James Keelty Jr. as president and Joseph Iglehart as chairman of the board. Lee MacPhail later succeeded Keelty. Iglehart actually held the largest stake in the franchise before his departure in 1965. All of these facts are detailed in The Baseball Business by James Edward Miller. Read more about this book here, and here.
Even though Hoffberger was the greatest franchise owner in the history of professional sports, mentioning one person's name multiple times in a template is redundant and visually awkward.The Ink Daddy! (talk) 00:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
2009 NIT
At first I was against the overlinking, but I later read the following sentence in
NAIA and NCAA DII Men's Basketball
Hey, I noticed you were the creator of the NCAA DII tournament pages. Keep up the good work! I am trying to get pages for the NAIA tournaments. I'm generally done with 1938-1959, and 2000-present. Any ideas for me? I'd like to do some table with teams by berth add something more information than just a bracket. But it is pretty time consuming. At this point I have a basic frame for all 1960s lined up. If you have any suggestions, tips or tricks to make it easier, let me know. The sources and everything should all be on there. I'm trying to make it consistent all throughout the years. Also I add a portal link for your discussion tabs. (WikiProject College basketball|class=start|importance=mid) And if you could kindly, or maybe I will if you don't mind me adding it to the DII pages, a like the the respective year in the See also section. like
96
The box is called 1996 World Series champions, not roster. Each of the players added have 1996 World Series rings (Example: Dwight Gooden and Pat Kelly), and while maybe not on the World Series roster, they nonetheless played a factor on the 1996 team. Beast from da East (talk) 18:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Each member of a specific World Series champion deserves credit for his part and not all of them are September Call-ups, Dwight Gooden had the greatest moment for the Yankees during 1996, Pat Kelly had been with the team since 1991, Ricky Bones arrived via trade, Jorge Posada, who was on the original template, was a call-up and wore 55 not 20, but all received rings and are part of the 1996 World Series champions. Beast from da East (talk) 20:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think they should be treated different, but the Yankees are my favorite team and the only team I really care about, I'm all for Cesar Crespo of the Sox, Ricky Bones of the Yankees and any other small time player for any team getting the recognition they rightly deserve because they were on the team.Beast from da East (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- The fact is they are all considered World Series Champions, everyone from Derek Jeter and John Wetteland to Ricky Bones and Matt Howard are considered a part of the 1996 World Series Champions. How much time they played doesn't matter, the fact that they played for the team during the 1996 season is all that matters and is why both men have World Series rings.Beast from da East (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- I already told you that each navbox should be the same, I just did the Yankees one because they are my favorite team, but I will do a few others in the near future.Beast from da East (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Look, I really don't understand your stupid methods, They Are Champions, It Doesn't Matter How Many Games They Played They Will Alway Be Considered Champions. Look at Jared Lorenzen of the Super Bowl Champion, he didn't play in the playoffs, but is he a Super Bowl Champion? Yes he is. So can you stupidly reverting the teamplates when those players are clearly champions with rings to prove it.Beast from da East (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- How many games they played doesnt matter they were part of a World Series chamionship team. Let me ask you this do you have any proof that they weren't part of the team? Maybe you should look at a player's transactions to see if they were indeed still part of the team. And if you happened to get traded (Ex: Garciaparra) then they are clearly not on that team of in the organization. At least Bones was still in the organization and could have been called up if he was needed. I still don't understand what in God's name you are trying to do, these men are clearly champions and who are you to denie men like Ricky Bones or Jim Mecir their rightful spot on the World Series Champions.Beast from da East (talk) 23:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you happen to view the 2000 World Series Champion New York Yankees photo, Roberto Kelly, Chris Turner and Allen Watson are all in that World Series photo, but according to you they aren't worthy enough to be included, but the New York Yankees team clearly recognizes these players as part of their World Series Champion roster. Why because dispite their lack of playing time, they were part of the 2000 New York Yankees.Beast from da East (talk) 10:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Are blind or just plain stupid? The New York Yankees themselves clearly count these players as a part of their World Series Championship team, I don't understand why you can't just let it go, what are you getting paid for your edits? I trust the New York Yankees alot more then I trust a Boston Red Sox fan who clearly has no idea what a champion is. Kelly, Watson, etc., etc. are all champions, just let it go.Beast from da East (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you happen to view the 2000 World Series Champion New York Yankees photo, Roberto Kelly, Chris Turner and Allen Watson are all in that World Series photo, but according to you they aren't worthy enough to be included, but the New York Yankees team clearly recognizes these players as part of their World Series Champion roster. Why because dispite their lack of playing time, they were part of the 2000 New York Yankees.Beast from da East (talk) 10:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- How many games they played doesnt matter they were part of a World Series chamionship team. Let me ask you this do you have any proof that they weren't part of the team? Maybe you should look at a player's transactions to see if they were indeed still part of the team. And if you happened to get traded (Ex: Garciaparra) then they are clearly not on that team of in the organization. At least Bones was still in the organization and could have been called up if he was needed. I still don't understand what in God's name you are trying to do, these men are clearly champions and who are you to denie men like Ricky Bones or Jim Mecir their rightful spot on the World Series Champions.Beast from da East (talk) 23:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Look, I really don't understand your stupid methods, They Are Champions, It Doesn't Matter How Many Games They Played They Will Alway Be Considered Champions. Look at Jared Lorenzen of the Super Bowl Champion, he didn't play in the playoffs, but is he a Super Bowl Champion? Yes he is. So can you stupidly reverting the teamplates when those players are clearly champions with rings to prove it.Beast from da East (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- I already told you that each navbox should be the same, I just did the Yankees one because they are my favorite team, but I will do a few others in the near future.Beast from da East (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- The fact is they are all considered World Series Champions, everyone from Derek Jeter and John Wetteland to Ricky Bones and Matt Howard are considered a part of the 1996 World Series Champions. How much time they played doesn't matter, the fact that they played for the team during the 1996 season is all that matters and is why both men have World Series rings.Beast from da East (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think they should be treated different, but the Yankees are my favorite team and the only team I really care about, I'm all for Cesar Crespo of the Sox, Ricky Bones of the Yankees and any other small time player for any team getting the recognition they rightly deserve because they were on the team.Beast from da East (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Forget the Call-Ups and Bones, what about players who clearly had an impact on the team such as 1996's Dwight Gooden, who had the defining moment in the 1996 season with his no-hitter?Beast from da East (talk) 23:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Luis Castillo
Hi ... I didn't understand the reason for your last edit to
- Tx. That was the explanation on you edit, but in fact you delinked stolen bases ... I thought the link was appropriate as was. Tx.--Ethelh (talk) 02:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tx.--Ethelh (talk) 18:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tx.--
Request
Please dont combine the years in the MLB player infoboxes. For example it was agreed to at
- Los Angeles Dodgers (1978, 1981–1983)
- Texas Rangers (1983–1985)
- Philadelphia Phillies (1985–1986)
- Oakland Athletics (1986–1992)
- Toronto Blue Jays (1993–1994)
- Oakland Athletics (1995)
Not
- Los Angeles Dodgers (1978, 1981–1983)
- Texas Rangers (1983–1985)
- Philadelphia Phillies (1985–1986)
- Oakland Athletics (1986–1992, 1995)
- Toronto Blue Jays (1993–1994)
--Yankees10 22:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Im having a hard time finding it since theres like 12 pages of stuff, but Ill leave you the link when I find it.--Yankees10 23:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Leading the league in wins; Deletion of material
Hi ... can you please give us some guidance as to your thoughts on the issue discussed at [1]?
In short, I input a sentence that pitcher x was leading the league in wins. That is mentioned in more than one article, and in fact the focus of at least one -- as reflected by its title.
A fellow editor believes the sentence should be deleted now. I am happy with it being deleted when out of date, but believe that deletion is not mandated now. Analagous to our having stats in infoboxes, that turn sour with time (and are replaced, in time). Many thanks.--
Milwaukee Brewers categories
I understand your point, but even if I accept that my title can cause as much confusion as yours did, I'm not sure that trading confusions is the solution. Perhaps there's a compromise? "Milwaukee Brewers (American Association) players" isn't an option, because there were of course two teams with that name. If that's not an option, and neither my name nor yours can accurately describe the team without potentially confusing somebody, what other options do you see? SixFourThree (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)SixFourThree
- Looking at your examples, there is only one San Diego Padres minor league club with a category, and Baltimore Orioles category] under that name (did I mess up the search? No sign of one on Babe Ruth's page). What's different about the Milwaukee Brewers is that there were several distinct minor league franchises which used that name, and players have already been misclassified as a result of this confusion. So how do we separate the pages so Connie Mack and Eddie Mathews don't end up getting lumped together in the same list? SixFourThree (talk) 16:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)SixFourThree
- I think I might do that, not because I'm trying to be difficult but because I think there's got to be a better solution than lumping in players from different eras and organizations in one cat. Thanks! SixFourThree (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)SixFourThree
Stats in Infobox
Because according to the
- Fine. My personal reason for not having these statistics is that I think it should be the players most important stats in this order: batting average, hits or home runs depending on which was more, RBI, and then stolen bases if they had a lot in there career. And in the case for Pie Traynor he was not known for home runs or stolen bases and did not finish with a high total in either category, therefore there inclusion is not necessary. Thats just my opinion.--Yankees10 18:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Changed opinion
You are undoubtedly watching the Navbox deletion page, but I wanted to note that I've changed my opinion - I agree that current roster nav boxes aren't appropriate.--SPhilbrickT 16:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Hola!
Hi, there! I noticed you do a lot of university article-editing. You should consider joining us over at
- Well done, with all the template cleanup. I just noticed that discussion now, but I would've voted delete per talk) 14:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Steroids
UM You mean NPOV as in Written by a Red Sox Fan?
As a Yankee Fan I think I was pretty damn fair, including numerous sources. TWO OF THEM FROM BOSTON EG The Boston Herald, & Boston Globe. I also went on to say any wins or records that may have been obtained by the Red Sox, with Players whom MAY have used PED's DO NOT deserve to have an asterisk added to them, see article talk page unless you deleted that as well. I would say I have been very fair considering. YOU on the other hand, the Deleting an entire section on Possible Steroid use by certain Red Sox players, by a Red Sox fan is about as far from neutral as you get.--Subman758 (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Please note that I did not bring up rooting interests (and I challenge you to find any edit in my entire editing history which shows such a tendency), and coming at me like that shows a lack of WP:BASEBALL (by a non-Red Sox fan who didn't think the section was appropriate, and I agreed). Bring the discussion there if you wish to address it with a broader audience. Thanks. - Masonpatriot (talk) 19:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Hi Masonpatriot/Archive 2,
I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in
Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.
- Each casebook will have a subpage.
- Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
- It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
- Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
- I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbookas our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.
What you can do now:
- 1. Add Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
- 2. If you're a law student,
- Email http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Hornbook to your classmates, and tell them to do the same.
- Contact me directly via talk page or email about coordinating a chapter of "Student WP:Hornbook Editors" at your own school.
- (You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
- 3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.
Regards,
Section Writing
I've been thinking about your new section on my discussion page and I thought in some ways it is correct, but I honestly enjoy editing and updating the stats as it is being done even if it takes me 30 or 40 edits to do it. It would be much less work to do it all at once (for example, at the end of the day), but I still enjoy updating at the time a strikeout or home run is recorded. I just wanted to tell you my opinion.
- Sorry! I didn't read your directions! Jonathansuh (talk) 03:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Hello, Masonpatriot. You have new messages at Jonathansuh's talk page.c Jonathansuh (talk) 03:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Article Editing Conflict
Hi I've seen you undo my edits on the
- I understand where you're coming from, but keep in mind that neither of us WP:BASEBALL where some other editors agreed with the points I addressed with you in our previous conversation (while noting that policing it would be very time-consuming). So no, I don't plan on editing other stat lists for the time being, but that may change or someone else may come along. The most important issue is making a better and more coherant encyclopedia, not our editing preferences. Thanks. - Masonpatriot (talk) 05:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Council of Independent Colleges
Thanks for the cite; I'm simply surprised that its existence is never mentioned on campus, as I never heard of it during my four years there.
I need your help --Σύμμαχος (talk) 00:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Sports TFDs
I imagine an effort to pare down sports templates is an extensive one. However, if you want to be consistent about redundant templates, in addition to athletic team and coaches templates, templates such as retired numbers templates should be removed. You may want to consider nominating templates such as Template:Wolverines Football Retired Numbers, which I modeled off of another similar template. There is probably a bunch of these and there should probably be a group TFD.--76.193.20.156 (talk) 13:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
You Need to Start Checking Your Work
Regarding this edit:
- {{WP:DEFAULTSORT#Default_sort_key. Ergo, adding {{DEFAULTSORT:University Of Rochester}} to the University of Rochesterarticle is unnecessary.
- While "Goerge → George" may be correct, you changed "Goergen → Georgen", which is patently not how Robert B. Goergen spells his name.
- -- DanielPenfield (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the mess-up, as it was an honest mistake through good faith edits as "damage" in your edit summaries helps no one and infers that I am engaged in vandalism. Thanks. - Masonpatriot (talk) 17:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Your edit of Syracuse University
Your good faith edit to
Wikipedia
How did you get a job editing for Wikipedia - Is it a full-time position? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MedailleOne (talk • contribs) 02:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Top Strike Out Pitchers
I really don't know how to use WP. I think this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_100_Major_League_Baseball_strikeout_pitchers should add another section. Most strikeouts is not the perfect barometer for the best strikeout pitcher. In my opinion K/9, K/BB, and K per 27 atbats would be a better indicator of true strikeout dominance.
Single Season Dominance. http://mlb.mlb.com/stats/historical/leaders.jsp?c_id=mlb&baseballScope=mlb&statType=2&sortByStat=K9&timeFrame=3&timeSubFrame2=4
Best strikeout pitchers with control Single season
http://mlb.mlb.com/stats/historical/leaders.jsp?c_id=mlb&baseballScope=mlb&statType=2&sortByStat=K%2FBB&timeFrame=3&timeSubFrame2=4
Adding Citations to Agnes Scott Wiki
Hi, I noticed that you updated the ASC wiki several times recently and was wondering if you had time and inclination to help me get started with editing this entry. There is a lack of references in several places. I have a relative that attends the school, so I have an interest in the subject matter.
This is my first attempt to do anything in wikipedia, so I don't even know where the bathroom is yet. I thought I might try making one example citation to get started. If I got the hang of it, I would continue to add the missing citations until the problems were cleared up.
Example
I have the book, A Full and Rich Measure - 100 Years of Educating Women at Agnes Scott College, 1889-1989. On page 6 is this sentence, "In 1907, the Southern Association awarded full accreditation, and the eighteen-year-old school in Decatur became the first accredited college or university in Georgia." This could be the citation for the middle paragraph of the ASC History section. (The middle paragraph should be rewritten slightly to more fully coincide with this reference.)
Question I like the way the Reference section is done in the Jane Austen wiki. Would it be ok to change the Agnes Scott Reference section along those lines? i.e. Citation No/Book Name, copyright, etc/Page No.
Concern I hesitate because I read in one of the Wikipedia getting-started pages that footnotes should be added in the style of the existing article. But this existing ASC article is deficient in that regard. So, is it ok to change the style?
GPBurdell2009 (talk) 03:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Stolen base list
Hi. I've seen you editing the
- I redirected the article you referenced to the more comprehensive list. A standard length is preferable to an arbitrary statistical milestone. Please note that the more comprehensive list is updated at the start of play and should not be updated in real time. Thanks. - Masonpatriot (talk) 00:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Lasorda's Kingman rant
I noticed something interesting about the Tommy Lasorda Kingman rant, and brought it up for discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball. I think you might want in on this discussion.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
The article Tucson Theological Seminary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This article was created by an editor who may have had a COI. The subject of the article has not been shown by third party sources to be notable (at this early point in the institution's history).
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
AfD nomination of Tucson Theological Seminary
An article that you have been involved in editing, Tucson Theological Seminary, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucson Theological Seminary. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Novaseminary (talk) 22:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
List of Major League Baseball leaders in career ERA
Hi I saw that you renamed and greatly expanded the
- Well, you just said that you don't own the page, but this very much sounds like a WP:Baseball have shown that other editors are of the same opinion. Once you create an article, list or whatnot, it belongs to the project with no conditions. I'm happy to discuss this issue more when spring rolls around. - Masonpatriot (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I agree with you on this article. It's very hard to edit a pitcher's ERA real-time. Jonathansuh (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Bill Dickey
Hi, nice work on the baseball items I've come across. Just did a edit sweep on the Bill Dickey article (Hall of Fame mention to stand-alone second graph, created sections for the page, etc.) and removed a paragraph (See discussion page). Would you mind taking a look at it for accuracy etc. Thanks. Another item, I've noticed quite a few Hall of Fame pages have no photos, even as major as Ford and Paige--maybe a group of baseball editors can list the pages without photos in one place to be worked on. Thanks again, Randy Kryn (talk) 11:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
TFD
Just bringing to your attention that Template:2009 New York Yankees has been listed for deletion. Discussion here. --Muboshgu (talk) 13:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Tony Taylor
I think that the 2,007 hits should be there but not the stolen bases. 234 stolen bases over a 19 year career is not notable. Stolen bases should be in the infobox only if they were known for stolen bases in their career and have a high total.--Yankees10 21:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Like I said, I put it back in because it was in your propviosu edit. I'm fine with hits taking it's place though. I know we both do a lot of work on similar areas, and that you do a lot of good work on the infoboxes, so I don't want to just needlessly butt heads. Just want to be on the same page, that's all. I think sometimes the navboxes (not necessarily your edits) only use stats to portray players in the most positive light possible, where that should be the role and is pushing a POV. So keeping with Triple Cornw stats (as decided at WP:Baseball) and maybe one or two other notable stats avoids that issue. Thanks. - Masonpatriot (talk) 21:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok so should I add the hits and remove the stolen bases.--Yankees10 22:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- I already removed the stolen bases, feel free to re-add the hits at your leisure. - Masonpatriot (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok so should I add the hits and remove the stolen bases.--Yankees10 22:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks.--Yankees10 16:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if I agree that they had to be on the postseason roster. Nady and Wang weren't left off by choice, as were players like Edwar, Albaladejo, and others. Nady and Wang were honored in the parade specifically, while others who were left off by choice weren't at the parade. I think that counts for something. --Muboshgu (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- That's a pretty subjective standard, anybody can be honored at a parade and each team woul probably do their "parade" differently. If you go back to the discussion we had about these issues at WP:Baseball that I referenced can be found here. Thanks and let me know if you have other thoughts or suggestions. - Masonpatriot (talk) 05:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Universities COTM
Hi Masonpatriot. I've seen your name a lot on page histories for university articles, so I know you're pretty active. Just in case you haven't heard already, the
Happy editing! -Mabeenot (talk) 04:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
The article Derby Braves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non notable university sports team which fails WP:GNG as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durham Saints
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
The article Leicester Longhorns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non notable university sports team which fails WP:GNG as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durham Saints
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
and a few others of the BUAFL teams as per the Durham Saints afd... Petepetepetepete (talk) 05:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
- Ken Boswell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Solent Redhawks
Hi Masonpatriot. I've seen you created the majority of the BUAFL wikipedia pages, I attempting to create one for my Solent Redhawks (a new team in the BUAFL) and would be grateful for any help you could give me. I am currently having trouble uploading the Logo, but the rest of the page is pretty much done. I am new to this so please let me know if i've done anything wrong, and how you can see the work before it goes live. Thanks Midnightrx (Midnightrx (talk) 17:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC))
Big Jim Gaffney
Hello Masonpatriot -- I am working on a bio of James E. Gaffney as part of a book project on the 1914 Braves. I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide with the sources where you found put about his parents and wife, please. Thank you. Rory1262 (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi and thanks for the message. I checked out the page you were referring to, and I was not the editor who included the information about Gaffney's family. I merely created the page with rudimentary info about his ownership of the Braves franchise. Please check out the editing history and see which editor added that info. Thanks. - Masonpatriot (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
College Football Project request
Hello! You are listed as an active member of the College Football Project! We have a large number of unreferenced biographies of living persons, but it works out to be just two or three articles per active participant. I've divided up the articles that need help and put them in a table on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Unreferenced BLPs. Please assist the project by researching and sourcing the articles that have been "assigned" (so to speak) to you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
all-time saves leaders
Can you specifically identify what aspects of my editing were not complete? I put a lot of work and effort into it to make sure it was up to date.74.70.251.20 (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Pittsburgh Pirates owners
Hi there.
We seem to have a bit of an issue. According to
- From this:
- Inherited Pirates from husband,Barney Dreyfuss,upon his death, Feb. 5,1932, and sold team to group(Aug.8,'46) headed by Frank McKinney of Indianapolis includ. Bing Crosby, who was made VP, for an estimated $2.75 million. m. Dreyfuss(Oct.16,1894).
- Works for you? Keegan (talk) 08:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
1997 Michigan Wolverines football team
I am contacting you based on your extensive involvement in
Nomination of List of college athletic programs by U.S. state for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article List of college athletic programs by U.S. state, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of college athletic programs by U.S. state until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Rogers Hornsby
On behalf of
Service award level
There has been a major revision of the the
Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
Herostratus (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nupe 001.jpg
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WCHA.jpg
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
GA Thanks
On behalf of
The article Calvin Chan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- 'Fails WP:V, couldn't find any source both on wiki and my baseball sources off wiki (primary the Sporting News archives) to indicate that he even existed. The Orioles had 5 owners in 1901-1902, John McGraw, Ban Johnson, Wilbert Robinsonand two others. Delete'
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 03:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Infobox National Invitation Tournament
I added a Type parameter to the main NCAA tournament box, so we don't need to keep two separate infoboxes. I hope you don't mind. now that we can support more tournaments with one box, I have nominated a couple of them for deletion in this discussion. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 21:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | ||
---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England !
|
Message delivered by
Hack Wilson GA
On behalf of
Interested in creating an article?
Hi Masonpatriot - A couple of us are looking at trying to complete all college basketball conference player of the year artcles. One I was hoping that you might have an interest in creating is Mason's Ryan Pearson, the 2012 CAA winner. Let me know if you think this is something you'd be willing to take on. Even just starting it would be appreciated (and fill in the last redlink in the CAA POY article/template). Regards! Rikster2 (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Category:St. Boniface Saints players
Category:St. Boniface Saints players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 03:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:AADA logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard
U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
---|---|
Now in its fourth year, this page to do either. 00:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
College sports coaching record tables
Masonpatriot, I noticed some of your recent edits to add head coaching record tables for college basketball coaches, e.g. Edward J. Hickox. A few items:
- Team fight names should appear in the subheadings.
- Individual basketball seasons should be expressed in the form of 1940–41, not 1940–1941.
- Also endashes, not hyphens, should be used to punctuate records and tied conference finishes. See Phog Allen for good example the preferred formatting.
Let me know if you have an questions or issues with this stuff. Thanks for your contributions and all the best, Jweiss11 (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
NCAA D-II tournament infobox
Mason, I noticed you created a new template for NCAA Division II basketball tournaments. Not bad, but I noticed one change that needs to be made.
Unlike the D-I and D-III tournaments, in which four teams advance to the final site, the D-II tournaments for both men and women have eight teams reaching the finals site. The NCAA doesn't even use "Final Four" to describe the semifinals—but does use (and has trademarked) "Elite Eight" to describe its D-II final rounds.
My suggestion:
- Keep the "Champions" and "Runner-Up" fields the same.
- Replace "Final Four" in the "Semifinalists" field with "Elite Eight".
- Add a "Quarterfinalists" field (listing all four), including a tag indicating Elite Eight counts.
Think this is OK? — Dale Arnett (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
A Barnstar For You!
The Running Man Barnstar | ||
Awarded for creating and maintaining countless sports related articles Rushton2010 (talk) 23:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC) |
A Barnstar For You!
The Template Barnstar | ||
A small token of thanks for the ENORMOUS amount of Templates you have created Rushton2010 (talk) 23:28, 19 June 2013 (UTC) |
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
GA Thanks
WP:WAWARD ) 18:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Masonpatriot. Voting in the The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference logo.png Thanks for uploading Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:American Academy of Dramatic Arts (logo).jpg Thanks for uploading Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Lift Autoblock Request
This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Block message: Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Pleckpruvto". The reason given for Pleckpruvto's block is: "Violations of the biographies of living persons policy".
IP blocked is a college and affects all users there. WikiProject Western Governors UniversityArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Masonpatriot. Voting in the The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Prairie View A&M University logo.png Thanks for uploading Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Association of College and University Housing Officers-International.png Thanks for uploading Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC) Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the lawHello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, Nemo 21:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:PlayerUSTemplate:PlayerUS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 14Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject .)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 9An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1996 Boston Red Sox season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justin Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter messageInvite to Join WikiProject for Spoken WikipediaSent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia at 11:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC). Updates to Spoken Wikipedia
Hello Masonpatriot! I hope this message finds you well and healthy! I am working this weekend on the Spoken Wikipedia project pages to get them in line with other projects. I just wanted to inform you in advance that some pages may be created. deleted, moved, or otherwise. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them on my talk page.
"Sheffield Sabres" listed at Redirects for discussionA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sheffield Sabres. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 8#Sheffield Sabres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff ) 21:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Dallas RangersArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageSubpage appears in categoriesHello. Isn't it customary to suppress the categories on pages like User:Masonpatriot/Working page 2? It's showing up on several categories. Normally it is done by adding a front colon like this in markup Thank you for your time. --DB1729 (talk) 04:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Hello again. I now see that user Kaovf added the leading colons on your other user subpage here and then you later removed them while also removing a bracket from each here. I am going to assume this is the way you prefer and I am now going do the same at User:Masonpatriot/Working page 2. All the best and have a great day! DB1729 (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Connecticut Technical Conference (July 31) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomination for deletion of Template:Universities Research AssociationTemplate:Universities Research Association has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Drmies (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageCategory:Mexicali Aquilas players has been nominated for renamingCategory:Mexicali Aquilas players has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 23An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1993 Boston Red Sox season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bob Welch and Scott Sanderson. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC) Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox NCAA Division II basketball tournamentTemplate:Infobox NCAA Division II basketball tournament has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox college basketball tournament. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. fuzzy510 (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|