User talk:Mr. Guye/Archive 11

This

]

I'm at a loss as to how you can interpret the discussions about

]

Please respond. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also User talk:Coffee#Isle of Man. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 21:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pigsonthewing,Philosopher. I apologize if you thought those decisions were incorrect. I made them because, in the Signpost Corner debate, no one other than the nominator voted for deletion, one person voted to merge, and everyone else voted some form of keep argument. The other two debates were similar. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought they were correct - I only posted here because Andy brought the topic up on other users' talk pages as well. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 02:11, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human rights in Northern Cyprus. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please remind you again that we don't relist AFDs just because the discussion is finely balanced. We relist them when there has been insufficient discussion to accurately gauge consensus. An example is your relist of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PVS-Studio; this should have been closed (by an admin) as no-consensus, as nearly a dozen editors had contributed with no consensus in any direction. The relist button is not a tiebreaker option when the discussion is tied. Stifle (talk) 10:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Stifle: As I have heard, you can relist a discussion twice without a rationale if the discussion is even. That discussion has only been relisted once before I had relisted it. What did I do wrong? --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Section title says it all, but thanks once again. You always have a good reason when you list them (except for "gawd", which you immediately withdrew, and that is a mark of your honesty and good faith.) Thanks for helping make WP better. Si Trew (talk) 19:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks, no need. I am somewhat wordy and also harsh at RfD, others moreso. Oddly compared to AfD and so on, we do not stand on ceremony on rules (I was told off for kinda trying to when I forgot a "not" when I was "not" trying to), but all you bring are sensible, even if the consensus makes you a minority.

I like RfD a lot because it is a springboard for me to look at articles to improve them, and as Louis MacNeice put it, "The drunkenness of things being various". One minute we are discussing what a Greek theta looked like in Mesopotamic runes and the next what to do with Penguinone, and since I am a jack of all trades it just kinda suits me that I can have this roving contract. I think you do too, so just bung 'em in when you fancy, I tend to mop up and do the research and then others come in with considered opinions.

I don't win very often though. But what matters is to make the encyclopaedia better. This is an amazing, brilliant, resource, that we made. On our own, out of love, and not a penny paid, because it's important. I really believe the vision, not when I am shouting at the screen saying WHEN I PUT AN

work avoidance now. The thanks are genuine, though. Si Trew (talk) 23:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gun show loophole. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr. Guye, I am a paid editor who is working hard to come into compliance with the rules of Wikipedia as I have been doing a lot of things wrong. I need someone who can help me keep the straight and narrow and who can maintain church and state and someone I can run changes by before I make them to sanity check them and whatnot. I would appreciate your consideration. I hope I am not toxic. PS: I used to be a coder, Python & Perl, and was 100% vi and vim and not Emacs Chrisabraham (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chrisabraham, I'm sorry but I think I have to decline. I am a really new adopter, and I don't think I am ready to take on a paid editor. Sorry. --Mr. Guye (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Julian calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have had some experience, although I want to learn more about Wikipedia, I am interested in vandalism patrol and correctly tagging articles for CSD, Xfd etc. since I patrol recent changes with twinkle and undo. Thanks - Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa¹²³|

]

And I would like a relaxed style of do when I can and want to, since my schedule is somewhat erratic. - Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa¹²³|

(talk) 07:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Andrei Marzan: Thank you for coming to me. I accept you as my adoptee. --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Unofficial Guides to Medicine

Hi there Mr Guye,

I am working on a fundamental rewrite of my previous article "The Unofficial Guides to Medicine" However, it is now completely deleted on wikipedia, even in the drafts folder. Is there anyway i can access my previous text do you know?

Thanks in advance for your help

best wishes

Zeshan — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeshanQureshi (talk • contribs) 11:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Altough I am not Guye, I would be happy to answer your question, you can ask an administrator to undelete it for you, however, make sure it complies

(talk) 12:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Fun with Templates?

Hi, I'm not sure what your intention was with

]

Thanks! – Fayenatic London 23:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Idaho giant salamander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Costal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Neo-feudalism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in

. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:People convicted of murder. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lucky Wikipedians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 23:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bob Simon. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. Yes, this is a different Guy Livingston than the food scientist, whose real name was Gideon, but nicknamed "Guy".

Guy Livingston (pianist) seems like a good title for the article.

thx Openpiano (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lizabeth Scott. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the comments on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Julie_Mintz
2 questions:
The small section that you turned into a WP:LEAD, I expanded it by using a recent referenced quote I was able to find. Will the changes suffice for the LEAD?
And should the CHARITY section be deleted, since it is unsourced?
Thanks for the help. (Bonmee (talk) 02:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC))[reply]

@

verifies that she is a volunteer for the Make-A-Wish Foundation would the section have to be deleted. After these things are fixed, I'll publish the article. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I attempted to clean up the informality and attributed the biased statement. Does that help with the POV issue? I deleted the "Charity" section, as I could only find evidence of that on her social media, but no reliable source. Thanks (Bonmee (talk) 03:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I’m sorry, but I cannot accept your opinion of my draft of Practical Phonetic Training. The article attempts to summarize the process whereby people become trained as expert phoneticians, an area of essential importance in the subject and one which is currently overlooked by WP. Your judgment implies that I have written something that is like a personal essay, that my sources are not secondary, reliable sources and that the article contains original research. What I wrote is in no way a statement of my personal views, but a synthesis of what has been written on the subject by the most influential phoneticians of the 20th century (Daniel Jones, David Abercrombie and Peter Ladefoged), and in all cases I have quoted from what they have written as general surveys rather than as advocacy for a particular point of view. As regards your accusation of writing OR, what I wrote was what any university department that teaches phonetics might put in its prospectus; its tone is entirely neutral and factual. I have been a professional in the field of phonetics for nearly fifty years, and my published work includes contributions to encyclopedias and dictionaries, so I think I am capable of telling when I am writing original research and when I am not. RoachPeter (talk) 09:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, question. Why did you submit

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Winged unicorn. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I accepted it, after verifying the basic data, and am editing it further. I removed the MfD tag in order to avoid confusion , but you are of course welcome to use AfD. DGG ( talk ) 00:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joseph Kobzon. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Al lmembers of the National Academy of Engineering are notable, just like all members of the National Academy of Sciences. I accepted Andrew J. Ouderkirk despite the otherwise minimal information. DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This seemed like a pretty unlikely, and subjective, redirect to me. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  boldly, but there was a major Selma event yesterday where Obama pretty much outright said this. --Mr. Guye (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I'm recreating it. Take it to
  WP:RfD if you still think it should be deleted, retargeted, etc. --Mr. Guye (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I think it falls under R2 (recently created implausible redirect). I don't think anyone is going to be using this as a search term. It's also subjective in that it implies that this is the President's only hero. I will make those points at RFD. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Obama's hero. Since you had some involvement with the Obama's hero redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Largest cities of Israel. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kokuchūkai. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr Guye. I am new to Wikipedia and created my first page - Shopmgd. It was already rejected once, after which I made the edits following the remarks of the editor. The page was rejected a second time by you. I read your friendly note saying you could help out with the edit. Could you please help me with how I can improve my page so that it gets approved? It has been over 2 months and I am not getting any success with this!

I look forward to hearing from you

Narendramotwani (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC) talk:Narendramotwani 122:44 p.m.; 11-Mar-15[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Liberty. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Advertisment Conflict

Template:Advertisment Conflict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Somalis in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philadelphia Fire Department. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you take the time to read my article or did you just reject it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Singlepole (talk • contribs) 01:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Singlepole It doesn't really matter, a subject like this cannot pass without good sourcing. You cited Wikipedia which is not a reliable source. Please source the draft better. --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Despotism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sadism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 1GodDude (talk · contribs)
  • User:1GodDude/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

We have many many changes since the last review. Please let us know if this is now acceptable and what other modifications we should make if needed. This is our first attempt at Wikipedia and we are very dedicated to mastering the art and to belong with Wikipedia :) Please advise. Thank you. 1GodDude (talk) 15:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

                    THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD CALLED GOD!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.90.112.161 (talk) 21:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply] 

Will you delete my page or can you make a redirect to the correct spelling of the name. The creator of the game has spelled the name Pokémon 4in1, however, they've left multiple spelling mistakes in their game, so it's up to you whether you want to delete the article Pokémon 4-in-1 or leave a redirect. Storm Machinine (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that per

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Guye,

A deletion request for the article titled "Forrest Wheeler" was overturned on 13 March. When the article was re-instated, its accompanying photo was not. Can you tell me how to re-submit the version of the article that existed on 11 March, prior to the deletion request? I am not sure how to re-instate that version of the article.

Thank you and regards,

Alice Vpellc (talk) 05:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

proposed deletion template accidentally removed the infobox (which includes the image) with it. I've added the infobox back. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nazi Germany. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

83.185.92.57 (talk) 21:06, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joel Osteen. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of cities proper by population. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

03:37:18, 25 March 2015 review of submission by Conceptual-Aesthetics

• Conceptual-Aesthetics (talk · contribs)
  • User:Conceptual-Aesthetics/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sorry, but none of the citations were written by the subject (Audrey Capel Doray) herself. Please explain why you think so. Conceptual-Aesthetics (talk) 03:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Conceptual-Aesthetics[reply]

Conceptual-Aesthetics (talk) 03:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Conceptual-Aesthetics: No, none were.--Mr. Guye (talk) 03:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with the "Peer reviewer gadget" how many links would the body require in order to be considered not underlinked? I would like to get rid of the tag, I'm sure I could add plenty more links if needed. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Or alternatively you can stop attacking other editors with tags and just be

talk) 07:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

20:42:29, 25 March 2015 review of submission by Rm360

• Rm360 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:John DeLucie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Mr. Guye! Thank you for your feedback on this. I would love to make your suggested improvements and would like your advice as to how to go about it. In your message, you advised that the article did not “adequately show notability” and that I should add more “secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject”. Can you clarify what these sources might be? I have already included many secondary sources from established publications – do you recommend adding more of the same or a different kind entirely? There is a wealth of published information on Mr. DeLucie so I am sure I will be able to locate the required information with your guidance.

Thank you again, Rachel

Rm360 (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr. guye I tried to improve the the Article Marco Marchi & the mojo workers ( peacock words) and I took away the youtube link. Is it OK now?

thank you

(Bloezen (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC))[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discrimination. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of economic thought. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Capital accumulation. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of cities in Israel. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You set up your April Fool's Day AfD at

says:

"Editors creating a joke AFD page must immediately remove the line "{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}}". Otherwise a bot will add the deletion notice to the article."

You failed to remove the template (I did so for you don't worry). I also removed the deletion notice from World, because it's a joke.

If this is not an April Fool's Day joke (which I hope it is), then don't hesitate to tell me. Thank you. Pyrotle {^T/_C} 02:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Also, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (3rd nomination)...enough, please. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for all your intelligence and hard work that you do at

. I will not always agree with you, but your intelligence shines out of you. Wish I could play a musical instrument, I can tell you how to play one, but never somehow can connect my brain to my hands, not bad on the bugle or the comb and paper, wind stuff, but that's a doddle, strings are really tricky. Had a nice 1930s piano for a couple of years and managed to balance a pint glass on top of it. Well well, we can't all do everything. It's weird isn't it, i am excellent at carpentry and can do that which is brain hand coordination, but somehow can never connect them to a bit of catgut. Well, nice to listen to though, Strauss is good on the strings, and sounds better than a tenon saw (although if you know the trick for playing the saw, that will get you a few bob, I can do that, that is easy, you need the saw well greased and basically it acts harmonically up and down the saw so you get kinda a top A at the front and a low C at the back, depending on the size of saw, of course). I am also good at working a fiddle, but that's another story....

I didn't realise you were so young, you are so intelligent. You are going to be a star in whatever you choose to do. I kinda missed my boat, but i am content with what I have. Don't miss yours. Whatever you aim at, go for it 100% and just do it. do it. Don't harm anyone else but don't let them stand in your way. When my missus gets back from work, she will have dinner on the table. that's my job. And if you think that it will be crappy tea, you think again. Yesterday it was slow roast beef with onions, carrots, sweetcorn, and a mournaix sauce, served with a choice of wines and champagnes, all done for about a quid. I am fed up people putting me down on Wikipedia. They don't know how I live. They don't have to pull a three course meal out of a one room flat, with a cat in it. That gets fed properly. Si Trew (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tonight actually it is honey roast pork with rosti potatoes and and probably apple sauce. Made, as always, from scratch. Not the packet rubbish. Si Trew (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Si Trew: I am pleased to receive such praise from an editor far more experienced than I. I honestly believe that you put more analysis, more effort into your work than I. Thank you, for your encouragement, I really appreciate it. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

That's just age, really, who was it who said on his death bed "The night is young, but I have read all the books"? What I have is an extremely varied experience, I think, I have lived and worked in four different countries, I speak about six languages extremely badly, I know the difference between a

mandril and a mandrel, and that kind of thing. I am not by any means great, and don't think I am, but I have an extremely good memory, just fortune, things just go in and I remember them without needing to try. So I can pull the rabbit out of the hat on occasions, but that doesn't make me better than anyone else. Oh now I am turning into Uriah Heep, "I am so very umble". Hehehe better get back to RfD. Si Trew (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

AFD jokes

Hi Mr. Guye, Sorry to be a party-pooper,
Whilst I see the funny side to the AFDs some here don't (I've already been threatened with being dragged to ANI!) so I've closed your AFDs and I'd ask that you stop with nominating for jokes otherwise I think you're gonna end up being blocked and some here are I think tempted to block as it is!,
By all means ignore this and carry on but I don't think it'll end well , Anyway happy editing :) –Davey2010^Talk 21:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Child sexual abuse. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you put it as a possible hoax yet there is a very huge page on the Portuguese page...so what is exactly going on? Wgolf (talk) 01:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

YGood job with your edit to the article hello. Συντάκτης (talk) 02:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deaths in 2015. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to AFD, but expanded

]

Thanks

...for the kind words. They haven't found me out yet, so I'm still here! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lecrae you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lecrae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Jacedc (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Minority language. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Proper noun. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mark Ghuneim. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brian Sylvestre. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr. Guye. Thanks so much for your assistance in continuing to move this through the process. Would reallly appreciate some further feedback if possible. In your message declining the article it mentions the sources used; however, only 2 of the 27 sources are owned properties of ZS Associates. And those sources are only used to verify office locations and leadership. Was this the only issue you saw? Just seeking some clarity, as we are happy to make any needed changes. Thx again, SusanChana (talk) 11:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just checking back on this. I have resubmitted for your consideration. Unsure what else needs to be changed. Would appreciate any feedback. Thx! SusanChana (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr. Guye, just an FYI re: this edit. You're not required to notify people that you suspect them of sockpuppetry. In fact, it's typically a good idea to not notify so that they don't get tipped off and start ramping up whatever vandalism they intended to commit, or jump to another sock. Since the user wasn't deemed a sock, you might consider removing the notice. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MyWikiBiz. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Franklin D. Roosevelt. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aaron Schock. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elizabeth Warren. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hapa. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I wonder why there's an orphan tag for the article Lai Ying Tong. I've already linked the article to different websites and wiki pages to support the article. Thanks! tvchan 01:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@

dead end. What the orphan tag is talking about is that no other Wikipedia articles link to Lai Ying Tong. You have to go to other Wikipedia articles and add links to Lai Ying Tong. I'll help you by adding incoming links. Read Wikipedia:Orphan. --Mr. Guye (talk) 03:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@Mr. Guye: Thanks for your explanation! I've linked the page to some wiki articles, please check if there's any problem, thanks! tvchan 03:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr. Guye: Thanks so much for helping to link pages and removing the orphan tag! Appreciated! tvchan 03:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Genocides in history. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Daniel Kawczynski. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Simon Collins. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Meghan Trainor. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Billy Crystal. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When removing <ref>s using blacklisted links, as you did in this edit, please be sure not to leave orphaned refs behind (e.g. these). An easy way to check is to see if the page ends up in the hidden category Category:Pages with broken reference names after your edit. Thanks! jcgoble3 (talk) 03:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agatha Barbara. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Scott Walker (politician). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Traian Vuia. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dinnerbone. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most widely spoken languages (by number of countries). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Thank you

Thank you for reviewing Jackalope. I had a lot of fun working on the article, and I hope people enjoy reading it. Finetooth (talk) 23:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you for the Quarter Million Award. Working usually on obscure topics, I've paid little attention to reader statistics over the years. I had no idea that Jackalope was so popular. I wondered at first how you had determined the statistic, but following the link to the award page, I now understand. Finetooth (talk) 23:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Please comment on

Talk:Campus rape

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]