User talk:Onel5969/Archive 86

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 80

←

Archive 84

→

Archive 74:January 2021

Unknown page

I did not create the page Pär Sundberg, which you proposed for deletion. You did send me a message about it, though. This page has never been known by me. Did something go wrong? Joostgriffioen (talk) 00:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Joostgriffioen

Happy New Year, Onel5969!

Happy New Year!

Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010^Talk 00:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Right back at you, Davey2010, keep up the good work. And may your 2021 be happy, healthy, and prosperous. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey Onel5969, Many thanks and you keep up the fantastic work up too!, Many thanks, Lets hope 2021 will be a much better year for us all!, Take care and stay safe mate, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 00:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

about GEO

We can expand this article by referring to the German wiki.--Htmlzycq (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Htmlzycq, hi and Happy New Year. Not sure what you're talking about... please provide a link. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year! Gene Expression Omnibus, in the wikidata d:Q17321881.--Htmlzycq (talk) 16:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Htmlzycq, thanks. I agree it can be expanded, although there isn't much more in the German article. But until it is, I think the redirect is appropriate. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Deprodding of Kimberly Ritchie

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Kimberly Ritchie, which you proposed for deletion. Hi there! I'm a marine biologist and even though the page wasn't descriptive enough, Kimberly Ritchie's name is associated with coral microbiomes and I think an article on her would be beneficial to readers. If the author can expand on what makes her research significant, having this wiki page will be a useful link to the pages on coral holobionts and microbiomes. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Mochamedusae (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Tweiulfse

Regarding you revert in this edit.

That page was created by a new user who moved the page

UP10TION discography. I know that the page history shows that it was created by an experienced editor but it is clearly a test page created by a new user. Apologies if my explanation didn't make any sense. EN-Jungwon

15:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:RCSD, which this clearly didn't. And as a redirect, doesn't qualify for a prod. At best, it should go through the RfD process. The redirect was created by Ss112, who I can not point to a single bad redirect they've created. That being said, there does not appear to be a mention of Tweiulfse on the target page. I've pinged SS112 to see if there should be a mention at the discography. If not, then it should probably go through RfD.Onel5969 ^{TT me}

15:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Diriliş: Ertuğrul (season 5)

Hi, I noticed you added a copyvio-revdel tag to my article, does that mean that my article can get deleted? Limorina (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Limorina, hi. WP takes copyright violations very seriously. So be careful in the future, as if you continue to do this, you could get blocked from editing. But in this instance, no, your article will not be deleted. I've removed the part which was a copyright violation, and asked an admin to do what is known as a "revdel", where they remove the offending edits from history so no one can see them. So please be careful. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Omar Al-Saadoun

- Hi , please wait don't delete Omar Al-Saadoun, he was famous person in Iraq and Icon for Iraqi protesters in Nassiriyah ,,,Hamaredha (talk) 15:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

PE With Joe Article

Hi. I saw you just converted the PE With Joe article to a redirect due to lack of notability. I disagree with this. While I agree the article didn't have sufficent coverage currently, the topic certainly has reliable, third party sources. Reputable sources such as the Independent, The Evening Standard, the BBC, the Telegraph, the Financial Times and Sky Sports have covered the topic. Therefore, I think the article should be reverted back to an article and tweaked to include these reliable sources. Have a nice day :)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squid45 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

Have you looked at how many references there are to Norwegian Institute for Nature Research ? Why misled the public with link to article that has nothing to do with this subject ? There are many similar articles: Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Norwegian Institute for Air Research Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research

Norwegian Institute for Crop Research

Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies Norwegian Institute for Social Research Norwegian Institute for Strategic Studies Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research Norwegian Institute for Water Research to name just a few ... Please provide more arguments for your action. Thanks ! User:Abune (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC) P.S. Close to 4000 (3783) publications !!! many has been cited in Wikipedia if you look at links !!! according to https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research "The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) is Norway’s leading institution for applied ecological research, with expertise on the genetic, population, species, ecosystem and landscape level, in terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. NINA addresses a wide variety of interdisciplinary issues involving both ecologists and social scientists, and plays an important role in European and other international research cooperation." according to https://www.fondationsegre.org/norwegian-institute-for-nature-research/ User:Abune (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Abune, the issue was sourcing and no indication of notability. There were zero reliable references from independent sources.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

I see... What about these two : https://www.fondationsegre.org/norwegian-institute-for-nature-research/

https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research ? will you consider that sufficient ? User:Abune (talk) 16:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:OSE. Hope this helps.Onel5969 ^{TT me}

16:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

I see ... Simple Google search produced more than 140 references in various independent sources and majority NOT from Norway. It will take some time for me to work through this list to find most appropriate. I personally have no doubt that this is one of the major organizations in it field (e.g. Pallas's cat‎, Asiatic cheetah ).

Once I update list of references to satisfy

WP:ORGDEPTH I'm going to restore this article. Will take a day, two or entire week depending on how busy I'm in "real life". Take care ! User:Abune (talk

) 16:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Abune, if you want, I can move it into draftspace, so you can take your time to work on it.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for offering. Either way works for me ! I’m here since 2006 or so ... User:Abune (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Deprodding of Ibero-American Cultural Centre

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Ibero-American Cultural Centre, which you proposed for deletion. There are now more reliable references. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Miguel913 (talk) 18:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Star Gold

I wished to discuss with you about the edits you made to

Star Gold. I have reverted them and wish to discuss this minute conflict with you. I have made this article based on the article of its sister-channel: Star Bharat. I have used similar content, and would like to state that it is one of the most prominent channels in India

at present.

I have also made sufficient edits to make sure that it isn't promotional. So please view the article and kindly reply.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 04:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the review!

Once again, Thanks a lot Sir for your utmost generosity. These flowers are a small return to give you for my gratitude. Thanks a million for giving your review on the article Kaatelal & Sons.--Aleyamma38 (talk) 04:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Sofia Barclay

Heyup

I'm trying to work out what Sofia Barclay would have to do to become notable. From my view, she's had several major roles (including as Selina in the BBC drama Defending the Guilty, who is a pivotal role) and has a major role in the upcoming Text for You. That would pass NACTOR, surely? The role of Adela Zal in NYPD Blue would add to that.

Stui (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:NACTOR, but it would be borderline at best. And only after that upcoming film is released. I do agree with you that the redirect made no sense, since she's not mentioned in the target article. Is she the granddaughter of those two? Onel5969 ^{TT me}

15:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

She is the granddaughter of David Barclay, although I'm really not sure who her parents are. I'm not sure why the redirect was there, either, but it looks like the person who created the page did so as a sort of "these people are linked so I'm making the page in case they're notable at some point" hedge.

The TV show is 6 eps long (admittedly half as long as Fawlty Towers) and I believe it has been recommissioned (although Covid is making it hard to do).

Ultimately, I think she's getting somewhere in the acting world, and the presence of the original page for three years clearly hasn't done any harm. It seemed prudent to fill it out with actual information rather than having an irrelevant redirect.

Stui (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hay Chutima

Hi, just a head's up. You PROD'd this one but the creator removed it without comment or adding a source. Spiderone 08:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Reverting your redirects

Onel, I don't know if you're cursed or something, but I keep seeing your name in the page histories of redirects changed into articles. This time I've seen:

Have a look at them, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:NACTOR, and without his father, he is completely unnotable (you can tell by the fact that most of the articles contain something along the lines, "Tom Hanks son..."; and the comic, with 3 PR pieces and 1 unreliable source, doesn't have enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

12:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Organized labour project

Thank you for joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's user space without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Goldsztajn, thank you for the kind message. I belong to very few projects, and organized labour is not one of them. Good luck, however. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969, you joined WikiProject Organized Labour in June 2015, sorry to see you no longer interested. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 13:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Goldsztajn, no worries. As I said, good luck. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Reason

Hello, please explain why you reverted my edits for Zee Bangla programmes. As the programming shows was huge in number, i created a separate page. Also the was redirect by giving an improper reason. As per Star Jalsha, i created programming list. Please sir let the details be in separate one. Kboomika33 (talk) 11:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Kboomika33, I have no idea what you're talking about. If you leave a message on someone's talk page, please provide a link to what you are asking about. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Sorry for not providing the link. As you revert my edits of List of programs broadcast by Zee Bangla - this page. I already mentioned the suggestion abouve. So please sir let the details be in separate one. Kboomika33 (talk) 10:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:SPLIT. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

22:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Apple ID for Advertisers

Hi,

I'm writing to you because you recently removed a bunch of content from

Talk:Apple_ID_for_Advertisers. For now, I returned the content back. Feel free to delete it again, but preferably with more sound explanation this time.Anton.bersh (talk

) 18:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Gerard Way discography

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gerard Way discography, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: User was not banned/blocked when this page was created. Thank you. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Barkeep49, this was a weird one. While the master wasn't blocked on 1/4, one of his socks was blocked on 12/20. Initially I filed an SPI on the puppet as the master, without realizing the master account had been created first. Shouldn't the prohibition go back to the earliest block? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok that is weird. Do you have the SPI handy? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Here's the SPI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bcbryar643/Archive. I began it on 1/6, thinking that Ronnieradkerockgod was the Master, since they were already blocked (you can see that in the history). I was roundly chastised somewhere for getting it incorrect...not sure where, can't find it now. And then Dreamy Jazz moved the SPI to Bcbryar643 as the master (also seen in the history). And you can also see that Ronnieradkerockgod was blocked back on 12/16. And yes, very weird. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey there Barkeep49 - have you had a chance to look into this yet? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I checked back once, didn't see a reply and forgot to come again. Thanks for the ping. So the block on the sock account was for DE editing. I think by the strictest reading of G5 they'd be eligible. But I'm not terribly enthused about using it in an edge case on a topic that appears to be notable (haven't checked referencing but it makes a clear claim to passing NMUSIC). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Barkeep49, thanks for the response. Strict is good. But I understand your viewpoint. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

MLL-PLL merger article redirect

Hello. I see you just converted the

MLL-PLL merger article to a redirect (to Premier Lacrosse League). I disagree with this. The article had multiple reliable, third party sources. Additionally, the topic meets all other notability guidelines and represents a pivotal event in the history of professional lacrosse, parallel to other major sports mergers. Therefore, I think the article should be reverted back to its independent form. ThatWikiAl (talk

) 21:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)ThatWikiAl

ThatWikiAl, it's fine to disagree with, but it's the merger of two minor sporting leagues, it is best served by handling it in a section of the surviving league, and linking to that section from the now defunct league. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

NHL–WHA merger, or PSL–PVL merger, all of which are unique pages. Redirecting does a disservice to the sport and the vast implications this merger has on the landscape of professional lacrosse and emerging team sports in North America. ThatWikiAl (talk

) 04:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)ThatWikiAl

Actually, it's quite dissimilar to at least 3 of those mergers, if I looked into it more, I bet that the 4th, PSL–PVL merger would also not warrant its own article, but merely mentions at the two current articles. At the time of the first 3 mergers, both leagues were receiving significant national press, something woefully missing regarding professional lacrosse.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Onel5969, at the time of the AFL-NFL merger, the AFL was in just the 2nd year of their first big television contract with NBC. The PLL just so happens to also be in their second year of a major television contract with NBC. Yes those other mergers received press at the time, but no one then truly imagined just how much those leagues would take off and how large they would become. We look back at those mergers now as a turning point for those sports. Just the same as what this MLL-PLL merger represents. Professional football salaries were lower then, and many players were just finally becoming full-time athletes. Professional lacrosse players are at that junction today. As for specific PLL press, this merger was clearly covered by NBC, AP News, Sportico, Sports Illustrated, and the Washington Post among other news outlets. Again, it seems that this article meets all Wikipedia requirements. If I need to add more sources to the page in your opinion, I would be happy to. ThatWikiAl (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)ThatWikiAl

GNG

Hello. In case you did not see it, I left a note for you here. I think that your assertion that the article does not meet GNG is very much incorrect. It has multiple articles, devoted to the subject, by RSs such as the FT, the NYT, the NY Post, and the NY Daily News. Its a premier example of an article satisfying GNG. I would urge you, if you still maintain that in your view it does not (which I admit surprises me greatly), that you take it to AfD. But I expect you will if you do so see that editors in general do not sure your view as to what satisfies GNG. Stay safe. --2603:7000:2143:8500:9D0F:6A81:4224:6C2A (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Sorry that I just made you do a lot of clicking with those redirect reviews lol. Have this kitten as a solace :)

Curbon7 (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Curbon7, no worries. Glad to see you had the issues with your compromised account fixed. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Why?

Hey, I just wanted to ask. Why did you move

Draft:Pande Eftimov to draftspace? Even when you moved it, there were a number of reliable Bulgarian and Macedonian news references in the article. Silver seren^C

03:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Silver seren, when it was moved to draft, virtually the entire article, absent the lead sentence, was uncited. I felt it was better to move it to draft where it could be worked on, rather than leave it and delete 98% as uncited. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Do you think it's better now? I see that Jingiby has submitted the Draft to AfC, but I really don't think that's necessary. Silver seren^C 18:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969! May you really take a look to the article now. Thanks in advance. Jingiby (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Jingiby, did. Nice job. In mainspace now. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Unjustified erasures

Recently, I noticed that you have completely deleted the geography section of some articles on the rivers of Quebec (eg: Rivière du Monument, Petite rivière du Monument ...). Let's put in perspective that a lot of research and writing work has been done to inform the public well about the description of the rivers. The writing of these sections is based on generally accepted methods. These sections of articles are well sourced by the Atlas of Canada (Toporama) which is published by the federal government; this involves using the geographic instrumentation available on the site. The information published is accurate and properly informs the public. Anyone can access the Atlas of Canada (Toporama) through the Internet and check by using the geographic tools. For the public, it is not necessary to have a doctorate in geography. With regret these erasures impoverish the encyclopedia.--Veillg1 (Veillg1) 10:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Veillg1, will respond to your disruptive behavior on your talk page, where there is an ongoing discussion, which you continue to ignore. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Please leave alone the article The Absurdity of Human Existence

The album The Absurdity of Human Existence is from an established artist (Danz CM) and soon to be released. Please leave it alone and respect my work. Thanks.Deepblue1 (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Deepblue1, please understand WP's notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

You should have told me earlier

You should've told me before moving my article to a draft page. Now there's no use telling me when you've already done it. It seems you didn't check the external links as a source for references. You could have left a template box indicating that article needs more references instead of outright moving it to a draft. Never mind though, I'm too tired for editing it all over again. I feel like I've wasted my valuable time. Since you've moved it to a draft, now the onus is on you to expand it. Good luck and have a nice day/night! — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 23:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Hemant Dabral, you were notified, back on 12/19 by John B123, who did exactly what you suggested and left the ref improve template. Which you chose to ignore. There's no onus on me, I could care less about the subject, if you want to work on it, then that's you're prerogative. If you want to contest the draftification, I'll move it back to mainspace, and remove all the uncited material, which will virtually empty the article. Let me know. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Laos

I'm working on citing the stubs and expanding the articles regarding the politburo and the Central Committee. Please stop until you see my work is finished! :) --Ruling party (talk) 17:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm going skiing :) BUT I will reference those lists, expand the Politburo and the Central Committee. I will also try—somehow—how to reference properly.... Could you teach me that last one? :) I've added references to the 2nd, 3rd and 4th politburos --Ruling party (talk) 17:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Semaphore signal (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion

, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);

disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or

is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the

see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

re. Yu Wensheng prod

Hey, hope you're having a good day! I'm on PROD patrol and noticed your prodding of

WP:BEFORE, but I don't want to remove the PROD without assuming and possibly cast unintentional aspersions. Can you read Chinese or understand spoken Mando/Canto (both seem potentially relevant to a mainland subject involved with HK)? If I missed any language userboxes on your page, all apologies! Vaticidalprophet (talk

) 16:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:BIO1E. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

16:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

My concern here is that the article's introduction mentions apparent high-profile law cases that may serve to further establish notability, but on which little seems to be written in English. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Vaticidalprophet, even if correct, participating in a high profile case does not denote notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Restore Kingman Hall issue

Hi Onel5969, can you tell me the specific issue with citation? I'm working on the cite that you restored the redirection back to, and it most likely has the same citation issues in other sections. There's so much to do there that the format of citations was not my #1 problem. The primary issue is that its subsections should have pages of their own, as there are too many of these subsections for it to be navigable. Rybkovich (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:CITE on how to use footnotes, how to format them, and what information needs to be included. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

18:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Good points! Will fix this no problem. I see that you have a lot of edits! Rybkovich (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

WP 20

Thank you for good wishes! - Happy Wikipedia 20, - proud of a little bit on the Main page today, and 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, look: create a new style - revive - complete! I sang in the revival mentioned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

... and today Jerome Kohl, remembered in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of
The Success Principles
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The Success Principles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Success Principles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Arnold Schoenberg Institute

I was trying to help my uncle set up a page for the Arnold Schoenberg Institute which used to be at USC, before my grandfather's archives were moved to the Arnold Schönberg Center in Vienna. You deleted it right away. Can you please let me work on it? There are plenty of sources. It is a different entity than the Center in Vienna. --Randols (talk) 02:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:GNG. If you would like that, let me know and I'll take care of it. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

03:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes please Randols (talk) 06:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Randols,

Done. Good luck with it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Pusa Road

Hi, and best wishes for 2021. This is to request you to remove the PROD tag. I am working on the article. I have more material, which I will add over the coming days. I am also hoping that other editors will help me with the History. Before starting the page, I looked up some existing articles on roads, and I believe this road is as notable as many of them. I just need a little time. Thanks a lot! Amuk (talk) 05:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

I've expanded the lead and added a couple of references, so do take a look.Amuk (talk) 07:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969. Please take a look now. Thanks! Amuk (talk) 05:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:GEOROAD. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

12:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:GNG, but helped to improve the article as a whole. I will now remove the PROD since the one-week deadline gets over in a few hours. Thanks a lot! Amuk (talk

) 01:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Takkoku!!!

Hi, and thank you for your time. I see you've recently erased the entire Takkoku article which I worked on. I felt that was a little drastic, but what did you find wrong with it and is there anyway I can fix this and learn to prevent future mistakes? Thank you.

talk

) 18:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Malcolm L. Mitchell, hi. It's not erased, simply redirected. The issue was that there wasn't a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable source. I looked at two of your other articles, and they have the same issue (Kaiō Dante and Giji Harem ). Sources need to be independent, in other words they can't have anything to do with the subject of the article. They also have to be reliable. Commercial sources selling the product do not qualify (e.g. Amazon). And sources which are simply blogs, or pseudo-news sources which accept user content are not reliable either, like Anime News Network. All 3 of these might meet notability requirements, but the sourcing needs to be from reliable sources. Hope this helps. And if you would like to work on them, I could move them to draft for you. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

19:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Onel5969 I can most likely fix them in due time. If you would, could you please move them to draft? Thank you.

Done. Good luck. Also, feel free to ping me here if you want me to take a look at them when you feel they're ready. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Onel5969, pinging you. Hope it looks a little better now with some references.

Speedy deletion declined:
Valerii Makovetskyi

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

Valerii Makovetskyi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. SmartSE (talk

) 22:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Smartse, thanks for letting me know. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Please Protect The Following Pages From Heavy IP Vandalism

I Don't Knew How To Protect Pages So I Am Asking You

Please Protect This Pages From Heavy IP Vandalism

Please Protect This Pages Heavy Vandalism Is Been Made In This Pages By Some IP Users Dev Adhi (talk) 06:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Dev Adhi, do you have Twinkle? If so, it has the RPP function. Simply go to the page and click RPP and then fill in the reason for your request. If not, go to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection and follow the instructions there. I am not an admin, and cannot do page protections. Sorry. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

New article

@Onel5969, hi, last day i made a Labiodental ejective affricate page ([1]) and i did add 2 sources to it, what else do you want? AleksiB 1945 (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of
10 Lives
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

10 Lives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Lives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FalconK (talk) 05:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Unknown page

Happy New Year, Onel5969!

about GEO

Deprodding of Kimberly Ritchie

Diriliş: Ertuğrul (season 5)

Omar Al-Saadoun

PE With Joe Article

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

Deprodding of Ibero-American Cultural Centre

Star Gold

Thanks a lot for the review!

Sofia Barclay

Reverting your redirects

Organized labour project

Reason

Apple ID for Advertisers

MLL-PLL merger article redirect

Categories

GNG

A kitten for you!

Why?

Unjustified erasures

Please leave alone the article The Absurdity of Human Existence

You should have told me earlier

Laos

Speedy deletion nomination of Semaphore signal (disambiguation)

re. Yu Wensheng prod

Restore Kingman Hall issue

WP 20

Nomination of The Success Principles for deletion

Arnold Schoenberg Institute

Speedy deletion declined: Valerii Makovetskyi

Please Protect The Following Pages From Heavy IP Vandalism

New article

Nomination of 10 Lives for deletion

Splitting discussion for 1983 Upper Voltan coup d'état attempt

New Page Patrol School

Daniel Vladař

2018 Northeast Conference Tournament

Tatsuki Fujimoto

Good news

Re speedy deletion of Bejay Mulenga

More "not ready for mainspace"

Sorrels Field

Draft:2020–21 Amateur National Championship

Please explain your Speedy Deletion request.

America's Frontline Doctors CSD declined

Lothlorien

Michael Weirsky

Mikhail Lebedev

Claude Mélançon

Jake Puckerman

Memories (Kim Woo-seok and Lee Eun-sang song)

Wikimedia Incubator

Reverse Copyvio

To keep you in the loop

Cuisine of Odessa page

A goat for you!

Speedy deletion nomination of Buiu (disambiguation)

Redirect of "One Thousand Pictures"

Fila (hat) reversion to “Aso Oke Hat”

Again, in a more civil tone

Starveling

About Laudi Khela article

AMSCOL notability tag

moved landmine article to draft space due to lack of sources

Nomination of SDSU Sports Deck for deletion

Nomination of
The Success Principles
for deletion

Speedy deletion declined:
Valerii Makovetskyi

Nomination of
10 Lives
for deletion

Splitting discussion for
1983 Upper Voltan coup d'état attempt

About
Laudi Khela
article

Nomination of
SDSU Sports Deck
for deletion