User talk:Panini!/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Daily pageviews of User:Panini!/Archive 3 A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Archives

Archive 1

A bot does it after 24 hours :P — ImaginesTigers (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

ImaginesTigers, W H A T

I've been hassled by SandyGeorgia to remove talk page clutter all this time. Are you paying for Wikipedia Premium?

^[🥪]

00:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I was asking Lee how to do it earlier and he was like, a bot'll come along and do it soon, hahaha. Next time one of us finishes up a PR, let's determine the truth with the ol' scientific method

PS. No. Wikipedia Premium is a scam and not worth the £29.99/month — ImaginesTigers (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

ImaginesTigers, After looking at the Animal Crossing: New Horizons DYK, I have the answer: It adds a template to the talk page, but the user has to organize the templates manually.

Bot revision: [1]

What it should look like: [2]

Panini^🥪

13:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

On 11 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paper Mario: Color Splash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Paper Mario: Color Splash was accidentally playable two weeks before its launch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Mario: Color Splash. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paper Mario: Color Splash), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

On 12 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paper Mario: Sticker Star, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the developers of Paper Mario: Sticker Star de-emphasized a proper story because fewer than one percent of players found the plot of the previous game interesting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Mario: Sticker Star. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paper Mario: Sticker Star), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

For those lovely userboxes, from a fellow addict, I raise my glass of sweet cold Cherry Coke in your direction! Cheers! Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

^[🥪]

15:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

There's never enough of a good thing, at least if you've got "Georgia on your mind"! (Is that a valid euphemism for drinking too much coke? If not, I'd like to trademark that use here and now!) Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I just wanted to ask why on my peer review for the above game several hours ago you'd removed our most recent responses? Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

^[🥪]

16:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I thought it probably was. No worries. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

^[🥪]

16:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, it does work doesn't it! Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

@

Le Panini: I pinged you at the time but wasn't sure if you'd seen my most recent comments in the peer review in response to some of yours? Wikibenboy94 (talk

) 10:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

^[🥪]

10:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

@

Le Panini: I'd yesterday commented re. another source (not already mentioned) sympathising with the bundle, but again didn't know if you were getting round to it. Sorry, don't mean to nag. Wikibenboy94 (talk

) 12:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

^[🥪]

12:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm certain I did sign initially anyway, but unless I'm mistaken I thought editing it again to re-sign doesn't result in a ping? Wikibenboy94 (talk) 12:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

^[🥪]

12:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DocFreeman24 -- DocFreeman24 (talk

) 07:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

In appreciation

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears, and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

@

Panini^🥪

14:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

If I had realised that, I would have given you a harder time . I am already looking forward to your next nomination. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, Le Panini! The article you nominated, Paper Mario: The Origami King, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	Congrats on the Paper Mario featured article! Toa Nidhiki05 01:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@

Panini^🥪

01:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the article, "about the sixth entry of the Paper Mario series. This game was considered one of the best games of the franchise (except Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door because people can't move on) and is on track to be the best-selling game in the series." Good Job! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Precious

Paper Mario series

Thank you for quality articles around the Paper Mario series, such as Paper Mario: The Origami King and Paper Mario: Color Splash, all on their way to good topic, for serving delicious food and good spirits ("I'll get to it for you!"), for Good Job! - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.

Panini^🥪

10:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

That's what you have friends for ;) - FA veterans don't look at all, all day, and repair the next day, but I am not one of them. There's a strong correlation between number of vandalism and number of views so expect something above the normal 35k. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

10:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

just practical observation over some years, - and congrats! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

The article

On 24 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Good Job!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before the creation of Good Job!, Paladin Studios had wanted to collaborate with Nintendo for about a decade? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Good Job!), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

The article Good Job! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Good Job! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DocFreeman24 -- DocFreeman24 (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Thank you for mentioning that the FA star was bronze and not gold. talk ) 20:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

@

Panini^🥪

22:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

For being such a good sport, can you leave some comments for

talk

) 04:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok. That was me. I guess we can just keep it the way ya wanted. I just read your reasoning; I really am quite a stickler for details Terad2909 (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry bout that Terad2909 (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

23:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey. Random message alert. Any chance you could give my TFA blurb a quick read-through to see if there's anything that needs changing? Would appreciate a support or oppose either way. Thanks. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 01:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

01:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello Panini!, I came across your profile while scrolling through the current list of peer reviews. I wanted to drop by and ask if you'd be willing to leave comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Lights Up/archive1? The article passed GA a week ago, and my GA reviewer has made comments on how to improve the page, which I've implemented. I would really appreciate it if you could leave some additional comments, and give some advice on how to improve it. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 12:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey @Panini!: I noticed that you are currently working on turning all the Mario RPGs into GAs/FAs and the list into an FL. In your peer review for the Mario RPGs list, I noticed a topic that would probably fail immediately if it was submitted for GTC. I'm working on fixing these articles as well, and I have a great suggestion on the topic should actually look like! KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 17:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

edit | discuss

Mario role-playing games

17 articles

Super Mario RPG

Puzzle & Dragons Z + Super Mario Bros. Edition

Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle

Paper Mario

Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door

Super Paper Mario

Paper Mario: Sticker Star

Paper Mario: Color Splash

Paper Mario: The Origami King

Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga

Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time

Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story

Mario & Luigi: Dream Team

Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam

@

WP:VG

. With this in mind, the topic is looking like this:

To do

• Refresh Paper Mario to meet current GA standards
• Refresh Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door to meet current GA standards
• Promote Super Paper Mario to GA
• Promote List of Mario role-playing games to FL

Completed

• PM:TOK
  were recently promoted by me, so they're all set.

Also, I see no evidence that you have recently edited one of these articles. I would like to hear your thoughts, though.

• @
  Paper Mario (series) article probably will not be created anytime soon (same for most of the other small spinoff series) and it won't be that easy either. So we can put all of the Mario RPGs to one topic. Give it a few weeks (probably by the end of March) and all of them could become GAs at least. I also think Super Smash Bros. Ultimate could easily become a GA. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs
  ) 00:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

  Panini^🥪

  01:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

  Panini^🥪

  03:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

Hi Panini, I was wondering when you're going to leave comments for Mood Swings at FAC? I'm in no rush but Pop Smoke's one year anniversary of his death is on February 19, and I really want the article to become FA before it passes.

The Ultimate Boss, Yep, it's on my today-to-do list. After I review Microsoft Flight Simulator, I'll get to your FAC.

Also, a couple of comments before I begin.

1. You already have a couple of supports. Don't back down now! It'll most likely make all the FAC delegates and regulars frustrated. FAC requires commitment. Don't take this note the wrong way; only good intents from everybody. FAC is one of the hardest things to do on Wikipedia.

1. Before the article can be promoted, it needs an image and source review. This might take a while because nobody likes doing it. I'll leave a message on the talk page in hopes somebody will do it. Due to my lack of experience in this field, I can't do it myself, but hopefully, someone else will.

1. I wish I could promise the article will get promoted by February 19, but there's a very little guarantee. To make it up to you if it doesn't, however, you can nominate it for
   WP:TFA
   if the article is promoted. I'll help you with the process after the FAC if you would help.

Best of luck,

Panini^🥪

12:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Panini!. You have new messages at BlueFalling's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Could you tell me what the best way to use these "talk backs" are? Thank you! --Signed BlueFalling(talk, contribs) I fix grammar and spelling errors. 22:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

To be honest, I've never seen these in use. To notify somebody in a much easier way, I'd use the ping template. Here's how it works:

Before you leave a reply, put this:

{{u|Insert Name Here}}

It will then look like this:

BlueFalling (you will be notified because of this)

When this template is used, it will leave them a notification, which will appear in the top right corner. For more information, check out

Congrats on the Triple Crown! You might be interested in a userbox I made, {{User crown}}:

This user has been awarded a Standard Triple Crown.

— Bilorv (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

In the case you mentioned where there is already a redirect at the target, and the redirect points to a third page title, the only way to move is if you have

Panini^🥪

15:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

17:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

I created the List of fictional bisexual characters last year, so I'm moving some of the entries there, but that video games page needs some work, which I'll try to get to at some point in the coming year. I am glad that a new page for bisexual characters in television was created too, which is great, as well, springing from a recent splitting apart of the formerly named "List of LGBT characters in television and radio" (now it only focuses on radio and podcast characters). --Historyday01 (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, Panini!, I created a new section on the Media portrayals of bisexuality page about bisexual characters in video games. Its only a start, but feel free to add more to it if you'd like, as it definitely should be expanded.

I do not have any personal interest in the topic, sadly, I just wanted to give my insight; good luck on the project!

Panini^🥪

19:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Kirby Star Allies you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kirby Star Allies for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Namcokid47 -- Namcokid47 (talk) 01:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk

Panini^🥪

12:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm not trying to be weird, but I could just eat you up! Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

12:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

@Wikibenboy94:

The article

The article Paper Mario you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paper Mario for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
• Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
• Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
• Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
• The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
• Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
• Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
• Le Panini
  , another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
• Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Great job, Panini!! I'm cheering for you to win!

Panini^🥪

01:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

The article

The article Super Paper Mario you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Super Paper Mario for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed in your recent

Panini^🥪

00:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

• I just wanted to let you know. A good rule of thumb would be to not edit other people's comments in any way (i.e. striking them out, collapsing them, etc.). It is just not a good idea anyway, and I do not think that is a good solution to addressing length issues.
  Aoba47 (talk
  ) 02:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

On

Mario & Luigi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Mario. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paper Mario), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for that GA, and best wishes for the FAC. I took the liberty to adjust some of your indenting there, according to Wikipedia:Colons and asterisks, please check. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

21:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

It's insane on how you made a good article about every paper mario game. It would be awesome if you made Mario a GA also, since paper mario, a character itself is that. 180.194.138.138 (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Panini, today an article you authored and submitted was featured on the front page. Congratulations!

This might have already been touched upon, so feel free to redirect me to any previous answers if so.

Are you in any way related to any company related to the development or publishing of the featured videogame? Do you have any other Wikipedia accounts,or is this your first one?

Please don't take these questions personally, it's just due dilligence.

Kind Regards!--TZubiri (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

18:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

16:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

That is totally fine. I’m sorry to ask... But I was wondering if you could leave some comments for the "Cups (song)"? The nomination is dedicated to my love on who passed away from covid. I really want this article to be FA before I graduate high school in June and head to college.

talk

) 03:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

17:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I have granted you

WP:IPBE. I see no reason why you wouldn't qualify for a longer duration IPBE; I'm granting a short duration only because your request was made over email, and because I hope there's a way for you to disable your vpn/proxy. :) To be clear, I would expect the reviewing admin to grant you IPBE for perhaps a year if it turns out to be necessary, unless they see something I've missed. Sorry for all the hoops you've been jumping through. I now expect you can sign in and edit any page you wish, while being unaffected by your prior block. Please let me know if that's accurate. --Yamla (talk

) 15:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

15:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Panini!, I see Paper Mario is in the older nominations section. Would you be interested in a review trade with me for my Die Hard nomination? It's not had any activity in a few weeks and I'm a bit confused tbh given it's one of the best action films ever! If you're interested let me know, and I can get to reviewing your article by the weekend. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Sure! I won't be able to do it today, but maybe tomorrow. I'm assuming the article isnt getting much attention because the only top reviewers we have only care about medical content, wars, ships, and billiards.

And extensive themes sections about how randos think a film is about some abstract concept like pollution or undiscovered tribes in a deep forest somewhere. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 11:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Panini!. I'm just posting to let you know that

Panini^🥪

20:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

I noticed your CSD nomination for a certain page that doesn't take kindly to being deleted. I think that merits this:

whacked with a wet trout . Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 18:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

18:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Someday hopefully Twinkle will be better; don't give up on it haha! {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 18:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Panini^🥪

18:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)