User talk:Rahil1610

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Gangubai Kathiawadi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Aaron Liu (talk) 19:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You are hereby requested to stop edit warring and using journalistic language on BLP articles. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fansite, not a film magazine. The article's lead should stand as it is, and if you have ideas about how it should poissibly be written, you should use the talk page. Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I must let you know that what you did on

pointy on your part, so please do not do it again. Use the talk pages to discuss content and offer your suggestions. Thank you, Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Dear friend, you are hereby requested to discuss your suggested additions on Talk:Madhuri Dixit. No further changes to the lead should be made. Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, it's not a matter of sourcing - your sources are reliable but no high quality. Secondly, it's never just about sources but

WP:NOT - we all know that Dixit is indeed a huge star and film icon. There should be other ways to express it on her article, not by using "influential". Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Shshshsh she is undoubtedly an influential actress, Don't know what kind of other so called strong source you need more. She is probably the most popular and influential actress since 80s with Sridevi. Rahil1610 (talk) 14:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahil1610: Of course she is influential, but that's not the language we use on Wikipedia. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shshshsh what language we use then?? go and Aishwarya Rai page and see then. Rahil1610 (talk) 10:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The fact that other articles aren't good, doesn't mean we have to replicate their poor quality. I've changed Rai's article, anyway. Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Shshshsh well ok. i have edited dixit's page as per her popularity and reception Rahil1610 (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahil1610: I'vr edited it myself now. "Accormplished" is even worse, by the way - it's blatant POV. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There it is, please respect the editing process now, and if you want to suggest changes, use the talk page. I think the current version is the best one so far. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding? Are you up again with all that influential fancruft? You are asked again to kindly use the talk page and stop adding it on the page. Please consider it a warning. I'm trying to be nice but this is too much. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shshshsh what's ur problem when those lines are already added in many places???? I know you are very senior editor but doesn't mean you are always right. influential word has been added in many persons page. it's not new things you have known I think. does it kind of ur personal hate just for dixit ? Rahil1610 (talk) 15:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:PUFFERY. If you want to add it, use Talk:Madhuri Dixit for discussion, and please spare me this "hate" nonsense used by fans. Please do not edit the lead until discussion is used to reach consensus. For now, I've added a part based on sources. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Shshshsh she is not going the first person to gain influential word in the lead. so what is the problem. or is it ur ego that is why u don't let other user add the words according to her status. Rahil1610 (talk) 15:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, please read

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS

. If other pages have film magazine language, it doesn't mean this one should. For the record, I've removed this part for Aishwarya's article.

I've added a factual sentence on Madhuri Dixit's and it is the following one:

"Noted by critics for her beauty, dancing skills, and characters, Dixit attained nationwide stardom that was often singled out for allowing her to lead star vehicles and was said to challenge her male contemporaries."

It's more than enough, and if you want to keep discussing it, please use the talk page. Now, accusations of "ego" are considered to be a personal attack. Please don't do it, read

WP:NPA. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, what you did on Tabu's page is

pointy behaviour which won't be accepted and is considered disruptive. You don't get to go and change articles' leads based on disagreements on other ones. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Shshshsh Baseless explanation. Just for not adding influential word in Madhuri's lead, you removed Rai's page too. but then you don't want to add accomplished also. when i removed accomplished from Tabu page then you gave another excuse. You are just being biased. Do whatever you want. Keep ur hate and biasedness Rahil1610 (talk) 16:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahil1610: Dixit is a superstar, Tabu is known to be an actress, who has won two National Film Awards. They are not appreciated equally in terms of acting. Dixit's stardom is now well-expressed in her page, with professional and encyclopedic language:

"Noted by critics for her beauty, dancing skills, and characters, Dixit attained nationwide stardom that was often singled out for allowing her to lead star vehicles and was said to challenge her male contemporaries."

As I said, accusing people of hating and being biased is a personal attack. Please refrain from making such accusations which are baseless and unaccepted. Discuss content, not people. I've been very nice to you so far, please alter your conduct and respect people. I'm writing to you detailed messages and making my best to explain how the process works.

If you have any other thing you want to discuss regarding either Dixit or anyone else, please use their talk pages and reach consensus. Wikipedia is free for editing, but not for contentious additions like those you've added. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shshshsh Will you say Stanley Kubrick who never won oscars isn't greatest and most influential film directors??? Awards don't define any one's greatness and credibility to be good in their field . Rahil1610 (talk) 03:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahil1610: True, but it was just an example. I didn't say Tabu is influential, but strictly in terms of acting she is more highly regarded than Dixit, and I think you know that. It's like comparing Shabana Azmi to Hema Malini. Dixit is a superstar, an icon, and indeed, influential. It's just that we do not use such words since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a film magazine. In my opinion, Dixit is also a very good actress, and she's one of my favourites, but she is acknowledged more as a star. I wrote it, she "attained nationwide stardom that was often singled out for allowing her to lead star vehicles and was said to challenge her male contemporaries". It shows exactly how strong and influential she was. And just as I suggested - you have other ideas for the lead? Use the talk page. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rahil1610! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for actually adding sources. Contrary to your edit summary, yes, something like that DOES need to be sourced or it's liable to be removed. Please read

@Ravensfire welcome 😁 Rahil1610 (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Don't edit war on Jawaharlal Nehru.

You are removing "Social democrat" without explanation.

There is no need to put "political leader" on lead because the wording like "anti-colonial nationalist", "statesman", "central figure in India during the middle of the 20th century" already define him well enough. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 16:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Govinda (actor) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Hut 8.5 18:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rahil1610,

You need to stop with these useless, redundant page moves to the wrong namespaces. If you continue, I will block you for disruptive editing. Stop now. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz I beg pardon.. Rahil1610 (talk) 07:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Annamalai K. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Annamalai K. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing More sources to establish? K annamalai is popular leader of Tamil Nadu and president of opposition party BJP there. What else notability Wikipedia need. Make his page. there's a page exist K. Annamalai and he was a MLA in 2001. what credibility and notability he has?. Rahil1610 (talk) 09:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whether he is 'popular' etc. is completely immaterial. Party officials are not inherently notable, whereas MLAs and other elected state-level legislators are.

Besides, this is just pure spam, and has been created over and over under different names so many times that most of the name variants are now protected. Which I expect you know, since you went for this 'Annamalai K' variant. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Akshay, you may be blocked from editing. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 08:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pankaj Tripathi filmography into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for telling me. But it was already redirect. I was unavailable to move the page. Now you can do as you are senior editor. So please change it as allahabad is already chaanged to Prayagraj. Rahil1610 (talk) 10:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some pages are protected from being moved. This usually means that the move is contentious. So use the process at

WP:RSPM.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:09, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Kumbh mela is famous for Prayag. and also it's already changed the name of Allahabad. Prayag Kumbh Mela is original name Rahil1610 (talk) 01:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Prayagraj. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise Rahil1610 (talk) 12:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rahil1610! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Allahabad High Court that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bharat, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Winston Churchill. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DDMS123 (talk) 06:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Abecedare (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rahil1610! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Don't mark change in description as minor edits as you did here [1] which needs to be checked by editors watching that page. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 16:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Winston Churchill, you may be blocked from editing. DDMS123 (talk) 03:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SubtleChuckle. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SubtleChuckle (talk) 04:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When making edits to the

Rahil1610, have you heard of the (1) bold, (2) revert, (3) discuss process? It might help you with this. The place to discuss edits to the article on W.S. Churchill is the article talk page, because this makes it easier for other editors to contribute.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well, yeah. But afterall wikipedia is all about America and British point of you. So it doesn't matter anymore to change anything. Thankyou. Let it be the way you want. Rahil1610 (talk) 12:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not "all about America and British point of view". It is about: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Civility. Users who peddle fantasies about being a victim because they are unwilling to abide by these eventually get blocked. Have a nice day.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you want. afterall you are big user, can preach anything to anyone. While Churchill is popularly known for his racial views and gets critisism over the world. Rahil1610 (talk) 14:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i apologise if i broke any rules of wikipedia Rahil1610 (talk) 14:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coolie (1983 Hindi film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Akshay Kumar into Akshay Kumar filmography. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was added earlier but somebody removed it. So i recovered it. Thankyou Rahil1610 (talk) 11:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rahil1610 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I basically didn't understand why i have been blocked. I always edit with sources, always be calm and civilised. I have edited more than 800 times. I know the twitter rules. Please unblock me and tell me the guidelines and reduce the time of unblock period like as warning for just few days. I love wikipedia.

Accept reason:

accept collateral damage should clear -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see no block. What message do you get when you try to edit?-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra It shows that my account has been blocked (disabled). it will be unblocked on 15th April 2026. Kindly unblock it 😭 Rahil1610 (talk) 15:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need to know the IP. Once again, this account is not blocked directly -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra it shows the account has been blocked from editing. Rahil1610 (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look HERE, there is no block on this account. If there is an underlying IP that is blocked, I would need to know what is says. Please copy and paste the entire message you see. Please do not summarize. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Can you help us? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe an open proxy

WP:UTRS — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Rahil1610@DaxServer No need, fixed it. Doug Weller talk 18:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes it takes a while to work through. Doug Weller talk 18:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Might need to wait 24 hours for the system to forget the block -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:52, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller please fix this. Rahil1610 (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahil1610 see my reply and Deepfriedokra's above. Nothing we can do that hasn't been done. Doug Weller talk 06:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have made 6 edits to Varanasi and all are in the nature of reverts and all were made this year.

I have made 127 edits beginning in 2021. I have written every sentence of the lead. Please be warned that facilely edit-warring with longstanding, competent, edits could lead to penalties.

This is not to assert that I am infallible, but I have written most of the FA India. I know a thing or two about Hinduism. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 10:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly as you say, you know only one or two things about Hinduism. For your knowledge, Varanasi is place like Jerusalem and Mecca for Hindus, it is considered a Holi city for Hinduism throughout the world and popularly known as Kāshi. About city's other factors are should have mentioned in below as i have done. I haven't removed anything, i just sorted according to the importance of matters.:) Rahil1610 (talk) 11:10, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]