User talk:Redhanker

Why was this speedy deleted? It is a category so it doesn't need any content, just an explanation of what it is. Could you please restore it? An article does exist for the term, this would be a category. Redhanker (talk) 22:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus has developed that in most cases articles should not be tagged for deletion under this criterion moments after creation as the creator may be actively working on the content; This clearly does not apply to category: articles:

A3. No content. Any article (other than disambiguation pages, redirects, or soft redirects) consisting only of external links, category tags and "see also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, chat-like comments, template tags, and/or images. This also applies to articles consisting entirely of the framework of the Article wizard with no additional content beyond the above. However, a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. Similarly, this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox, unless its contents also meet the above criteria. Caution is needed when using this tag on newly created articles. {{

(talk page stalker) The article Pro-Iranism has never been deleted. Category:Pro-Iranism has never been deleted. It is just conceivable that you are talking about Catetory:pro-Iranism which obviously qualified for speedy deletion as a straightforward spelling mistake. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely correct - thanks RHaworth. The article contained a typo (Catetory) and therefor ended up in the article space rather then the category space which is why i removed it. Seems that the editor who tagged it with a CSD template used an A3 tag as opposed to a G6 tag (Housekeeping) it was supposed to have.

Twinkle automatically uses a CSD template's warning during a page removal, thus the somewhat incorrect removal summary. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 06:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Hi. When you recently edited Mark Dankof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitution Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Redhanker ... You really need a specific citation in order to claim that Yockey 'revered Hitler'. I have read most [or all?] of Yockey's [important] writings, and have never seen any evidence to support what you say. By way of contrast, Yockey does praise Mussolini, but Hitler is never mentioned at all in "Imperium", nor in any of Yockey's "Four Essays", etc. (I have,incidentally, had an article accepted by "Comparative Civilizations Review" (USA) which quotes Yockey quite extensively). Regards, --DLMcN (talk) 05:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This section of code was taken directly from another article in Wikipedia which has been there quite a long time. I don't think there are any credible sources to support the claim he did not revere hitler, rather most sources indicate he was a seminal neo-Nazi if not an actual Nazi agent according to some reports. That he continues to influence people still active in politics such as David Duke and Willis Carto makes Yockey and his views, particularly towards National Socialism, of considerable importance today. Redhanker (talk) 13:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying > [I do not deny your very last sentence^]. What "other article" in Wikipedia are you referring to? ... I would be interested to see what sources it uses. Wikipedia procedures require that we quote 'reliable citations' in order to make a point - rather than the other way around - (i.e., we are not justified in assuming something purely on the grounds that nobody has asserted the contrary). However - surely the fact that Yockey never ever mentions Hitler - anywhere in his writings - is evidence that (like Spengler) Yockey had reservations about him?

So I am going to remove those claims from the main article: (I did something similar some months ago). I hope it does not lead to an edit-war with you ... rather, let us see what other editors say. I will also copy this discussion into the Yockey Talk-File. Regards --DLMcN (talk) 16:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pro-Iranism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 11:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of ZF transmissions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford 500 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Willis Carto, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mark Dankof has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources do not appear to establish notability of subject. Just collection of this individual's fringe viewpoints.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plot Spoiler (talk) 15:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redhanker. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Keφr 21:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Dankof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Dankof until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Plot Spoiler (talk) 07:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Habilian Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habilian Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Plot Spoiler (talk) 05:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your editing habits. Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Consistent_WP:OR.2FWP:RS_violator. CarolMooreDC 20:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. PamD 15:40, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the policy on WP:Biographies of living persons, which includes:

"Contentious material about living persons... that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."

Even with sourcing, see also the sections

WP:BLP1E. JohnCD (talk) 15:52, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Genesis Communications Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redhanker. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Politically related deaths of Iranians. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 06:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I must ask you to stop your ethnic Wikipedia:Edit warring on the page. I will create a report should you still do it. Again, once many sources say the shooter was a terrorist and this was a terror plot at the school, I will back you 100%. Kennvido (talk) 04:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with

talk) 04:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

There is absolutely no difference between this attack and the other attack on an Israeli school by an Arab gunman other than everybody knows one was motivated by the Arab / Israeli conflict, and the other everybody pretends it has nothing to do with shooting a lot of innocent people. The whole killing the father and brother is seperate for any motive for going on a terrorist attack spree. Redhanker (talk) 04:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I checked, Wikipedia wasn't intended as a reference to complaints by pundits about inappropriate talk. It's an encyclopedia. To your second point, so far the only thing the events you mention have in common is the ethnicity of the shooter (and we're still unsure to what degree his ethnicity was a major part of his identity). To lump them together because of that alone is no more appropriate than creating linkages of all crimes committed by Catholics or by people with red hair.

talk) 04:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Redhanker, I hope you will see that your OWN personal feelings are entering the article. Your opinion is skewing your entries. Once that light goes off, you will see. And you starting your own article is a great idea. Then you will see what many have to say. Kennvido (talk) 05:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was serious when I suggested you might start a bio page on Zawahri. I might not (very likely won't) agree with everything you introduce there, but at least IMHO it would belong there. Be prepared for it, however, to become a vector for extremists on all sides of these questions.

talk) 12:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

In the mean time, if Zawahri had an agenda (other than suicide), it seems he missed his best and last opportunity to let us know what it was. http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/14/us/california-santa-monica-gunman/index.html?hpt=hp_t2 --

talk) 22:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Police believe the attack was pre-meditated because of the amount of preparation, but they did not believe Zawahri was connected to any terrorist organizations whether domestic for international. [1] ^[2] John Zawahri's parents were immigrants from Lebanon, a nation torn by war and conflict^[3][4]

The American Muslim was critical of a number of bloggers who tried to associate the tragedy with Muslims, Arabs and terrorism. TAM and other websites noted a source that stated the Zawahri family belonged to the "Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church", and confirmed that that Zawahri was a Christian who parents came from Lebanon.^[5][6]

One conservative blogger Debbie Schlussel tied the incident to Arab immigrants by comparing it to another carjacking / shooting spree by comparing it to the February 19, 2013 rampage of Ali Sayed who murdered 3 and wounded others before killing himself. ^[7]

Dr Nancy Hartevelt Kobri noted that Zawahri is an alternative spelling of the surname of Ayman, the head of Al Qaeda, though Ayman is Egyptian. Ziad Jarrah of the 9/11 attacks also grew up in Lebanon and attended a Catholic School. She believes there was a lethal combination when mixed with a history of mental illness and domestic violence, calling one of a series of "hybrid transformational terrorist acts". ^[8] The incident also has spawned its own conspiracy theories that the casualties were a hoax, sometimes from the websites that promoted Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories ^[9][10]

Hello, Redhanker. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 02:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The article Murder of Joseph Griffin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ONEEVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TKK ^{bark !} 13:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Joseph Griffin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Joseph Griffin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TKK ^{bark !} 20:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments at that link. Bearian (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debbie Schlussel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syed Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

]

Nomination of

Fuaed Abdo Ahmed

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuaed Abdo Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mashregh News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashregh News until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Transcendence (talk) 02:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Seevakumaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Seevakumaran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Transcendence (talk) 02:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Transcendence (talk) 02:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Sheldon Foote is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Sheldon Foote until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Transcendence (talk) 02:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Transcendence (talk) 02:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish bomb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Transcendence (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redhanker,

I've noticed you've been making comments of a personal and speculative nature regarding my edits. I would appreciate it if you cease making such statements and consider

]

Nomination of

Antoinette Tuff

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoinette Tuff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Transcendence (talk) 19:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redhanker, You've made personal comments again at

Category:George Soros, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Transcendence (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thanks for trying to improve the

ok I see this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dennis_Bratland/Motorcycle_hooliganism Redhanker (talk) 21:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is the draft; I expect it to become a full fledged article in days to weeks.

talk) 22:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your comment may indeed have merit. The editor who started that hasty AFD may have acted in good faith - yesterday this did look like an intemperate student shooting his professor. But I think his editing record and aggressive attitude bears examination, I have tried to call him on it on his talk page, although he often deleted comments calling attention to his behavior. He is certainly in a category of editors who wish to minimize, obscure violent attacks. And, unlike most of us, appears to have the resources to devote many hours every day to editing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should look at

List of school shootings in the United States it has now been revised to " excludes incidents that occurred during wars or police actions, as well as murder-suicides by rejected suitors or estranged spouses, and suicides or suicide attempts involving only one person. Mass shootings by staff of schools that involve only other employees (such as famous Amy Bishop case) are covered at workplace killings. A lot of significant attacks and plots have been deleted if you check the edit history Redhanker (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Redhanker. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redhanker. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redhanker. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redhanker. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The Third Terrorist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Third Terrorist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]