User talk:Redhen334

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Redhen Railcar SAR!
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Donama (talk) 03:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Riverton Railway Station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

talk) 09:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, Redhen Railcar SAR. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Riverton Railway Station
.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Unreferenced additions to Marree railway station

Information icon Hello, Redhen Railcar SAR. I'd like to suggest some background reading to advance your knowledge of the workings of Wikipedia – I remember all too well how daunting it was when I started off.

I mentioned in the Summary when I reverted your edits to Marree railway station:

"Unreferenced material. (You'll need reliable, published sources for additions such as these; Wikipedia isn't a fanzine.  ;-) The last 2 amending sentences give too much detail, and I'd suggest they be omitted."

If you'd like to include a citation and re-add your material, please do so. However, I suspect it's early days for you, and you aren't yet familiar with what's required when writing for an encyclopaedia. Help:Your first article is a good start (even if you are only amending other articles), especially the section on gathering references. The aspect you ran up against is:

In general, sources with no editorial control are not reliable. These include (but are not limited to) books published by vanity presses, self-published 'zines', blogs, web forums, Usenet discussions, personal social media, fan sites, vanity websites that permit the creation of self-promotional articles, and other similar venues. If anyone at all can post information without anyone else checking that information, it is probably not reliable.

If there are reliable sources (such as newspapers, journals, or books) with extensive information published over an extended period about a subject, then that subject is notable. You must cite such sources as part of the process of creating (or expanding) the Wikipedia article as evidence of notability for evaluation by other editors. If you cannot find such reliable sources that provide extensive and comprehensive information about your proposed subject, then the subject is not notable or verifiable and almost certainly will be deleted. So your first job is to go find references to cite.

In an instance such as this, I normally look to see if I can fix the problem, but the source of your information was a dead link, so I couldn't verify it. And I believe it is (or was?) a site where "anyone at all can post information without anyone else checking that information".

If you need any guidance on this, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or ask a question at the Help desk – I find the people there are very, er, helpful! – or you can leave me a message on my talk page and I'll be glad to help or at least point you in the right direction.

PS: The best thing to do straight away is to create an account, which has many many advantages.

Best wishes, SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬  at 08:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robertstown railway station has been accepted

Robertstown railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Laplorfill (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/SAR left/Robertstown

Template:S-line/SAR left/Robertstown has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Callington railway station
(September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
––FormalDude (talk) 12:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Redhen334! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ––FormalDude (talk) 12:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Callington railway station, Australia
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Callington railway station, Australia. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Callington railway station (Adelaide Hills)
has been accepted

Callington railway station (Adelaide Hills)
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Redhen334. Thank you for your work on

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]