User talk:SCB '92

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, fellow Hip Hop WikiProject members!

This message is being sent out to let all listed members of the project know to re-add your name to the members list, as all current names on the list have been erased in order to find out who is still active on the project. WikiGuy86 (talk) 19:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ok, You're Right, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ok, You're Right. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits (moving Plot after Gameplay), as I feel that introducing people to the names and concepts of the world makes it easier to use them in the Gameplay section (as it was, the use of Andy and Nell in the COs section implied that readers knew who they were). - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Popping Cherry, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.foxcrimeasia.com/series/dexter/guide/1. As a copyright violation, Popping Cherry appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Popping Cherry has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Popping Cherry and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Popping Cherry with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the
  CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Popping Cherry
  .

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Popping Cherry, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sliceoflife.emsportal.info/season1.shtml. As a copyright violation, Popping Cherry appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Popping Cherry has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Popping Cherry and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Popping Cherry with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the
  CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Popping Cherry
  .

]

I was wrong to add both of those templates, silly of me, please forgive. However, the

Talk to the hand!) 13:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Further copyright violation

If you continue to copyvio, you may be blocked from editing. Please write the plot yourself.

Talk to the hand!

) 14:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Additional: This is the third time that you've inserted copyright material into the article, do not do so again. Thanks.

Talk to the hand!) 14:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Air Cavalry (video game)

The suspected copyright violation website cited in the tag for this article was broken but alternately, the text was taken from http://www.gamefaqs.com/snes/588191-air-cavalry. Do not

paste text from other websites into Wikipedia or remove maintenance tags, particularly when you probably understood why it was tagged. If you have any questions, let me know.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Quality reviews of VG articles

Hello, I noticed some of the articles that you've placed up for quality review at GAN and FAC. Specifically:

• Super Mario Sunshine
• The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
• Super Mario Bros. 3
• GoldenEye 007
• Super Mario Galaxy 2
• Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars
• Jet Force Gemini

While your enthusiasm is very apparent from your edits (and appreciated), I feel I should suggest that you slow down a bit. Quality reviews, specifically FAC and A-class, are quite time consuming. Placing multiple articles up for review is sure to stretch you thin and minimize your effectiveness in meeting the criteria. Many review processes have limitations (many unwritten rules) to restrict the number of requests from a single editor. Other considerations are whether or not you've made significant contributions to the article. This is typically a good indication that the editor is familiar with the topic and article content, as well as shows that the editor has already made strides to meet the criteria.

All that being said, I'd like to invite you to post questions and comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. This is where the more active and experienced VG editors discuss matters related to article improvement. I also suggest that you reach out to some of the regular contributors there, as they have a wealth of knowledge to offer if you'd like to bring some articles up to GA and FA. Let me know if you have any questions. I'm not very active anymore, but I'll certainly do what I can to help you reach whatever goals you may have for video game articles. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 03:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Air Cavalry (video game)

Dude, since you created this page

Air Cavalry (video game)

, you should write a summary (using your words) about the game. --Hydao (talk) 08:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About your GAN on Super Mario Galaxy 2

I noticed that you nominated

Good Article. I read the article for a bit and there was an image of the cover of the game, but there is no screenshot of the game as to illustrate the gameplay, graphics or whatever. Good articles must include not only the cover of the game, but a screenshot of the game as well. Some free images are optional to put in the article. So what i would've done is add a screenshot of the game before nominating it as a Good Article. (TheLoverofLove (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC))[reply

]

Re:Thanks for telling me this

Your Welcome. I may also put a screenshot of the Map screen in the sub section Setting and level design. Do you mind if i put the screenshot there? (TheLoverofLove (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Re:Reviewing GA-nominees on video games

Hey, I noticed them there. Someone will get to them eventually, but I'll certainly consider giving them a look over next time I'm doing some GA reviewing. J Milburn (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top importance VG articles

Hello. I noticed that you recently changed the importance rating of several video game articles to "top". However, the designation should be discussed at

WT:VG per the guidelines outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Assessment#Importance scale. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 04:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC))[reply

]

Your

Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars

The article

Talk:Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars for comments about the article. Well done! Robin 14:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Good Article promotion

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making Super Mario Galaxy 2 a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell (talk)

GAR

Hi. I am letting you know that I have placed

Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars up for a community GAR here. GamerPro64 15:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Don't You Wanna Stay

Thanks for approving the article! I wasn't notified it was passed but anyway thanks! —

talk) 14:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Edit summaries

Hi- Just popping in for some unsolicited advice. When editing, there is an option to leave an edit summary of the changes we make. It is a good practice to leave an edit summary as a means to communicate with your fellow editors. It can help provide quick information to others when looking at an article's edit history or the latest changes on a watchlist. Something I do is to avoid accidentally leaving blank edit summaries is to select the "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" option on the Editing tab of my user preferences. Let me know you have any questions. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 03:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:P's and Q's.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  helpme
  }} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your

GA nomination of Fallout_3

An article you proposed for

GA nomination is currently on hold. Please see the review accessible through the article talk page for details. ~ Don4of4 ^[Talk] 15:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Agustín Ross Cultural Centre

I find it unacceptable that you quick failed the good article nomination without even notifying me that you were reviewing it; the issues certainly wouldn't take a lot of time to fix. I will proceed to ask for a reassessment.  Diego  talk  18:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Specially since all the problems you pointed out were purely of consistency, which wouldn't take much of my time.  Diego  talk  21:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Notified.  Diego  talk  22:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive2

Please strike issues at

WP:FOUR) 12:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

• Also, please keep things organized with signatures
  • Please consider striking your issues. I can not tell where I stand.--
    WP:FOUR) 21:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]

GA promotion

Thank you for having promoted the article I had nominated and for your message on my talk page! Cheers, --Europe22 (talk) 22:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for Super Mario RPG

The Video game Barnstar

---

Congratulations are in order for the hard work you've put into

Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars. Personally, I'm always happy to see former Good Articles return to form. And even happier to see articles about older video games get some attention. Just wanted to let you know that you efforts do not go unnoticed and are appreciated. Please keep up the good work. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:11, 10 September 2011 (UTC))[reply

]

Halo 3

Hi SCb '92 - Would you have a few minutes to revisit your comments at the FAR for Halo 3 (review page at WP:Featured article review/Halo 3/archive1)? The FAR appears to be getting close to being able to close, but it would be great to get any final comments you have, and if you feel the article can now be kept or if it still needs more work. Thanks, Dana boomer (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agustín Ross Cultural Center

An article you reviewed has been taken to GAR. You may wish to comment there Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Agustín Ross Cultural Center/1 AIRcorn (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry did not notice the notification above. AIRcorn (talk) 02:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Risk parity GA Review

Thanks for your detailed evaluation of the article. I have made all the changes and upgrades that you have suggested. Please have a look when you have time. Thanks again, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. The sources spell risk parity in all lower case, so I have corrected the article to conform with the sources. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		A beer on me!
		a pleasure working with you! — Keithbob • Talk • 17:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FAC withdrawn, unprepared per peer review I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions.

Please see the peer review and address issues raised before approaching FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Talk:Spanish general election, 1933/GA1.
You can remove this notice

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

• Now done. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 10:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SCB '92. You have new messages at NuclearWarfare's talk page.
Message added 03:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

NW (Talk) 03:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for this.

♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 12:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

WPHILHIST

An article you did a GA review of is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Is the shooting down of 1 aircraft during the Vietnam war notable? Does it deserve GA status? you may wish to participate.Jim Sweeney (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your

GA nomination of Caesars Palace 2000

The article

talk) 04:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Done templates

Hey SCB, just a reminder that per the instructions at the top of

WP:FAC, you shouldn't use  Done and similar templates in FAC reviews. I've refactored the ones at the Oblivion review, and replied to one of your comments. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Are you sure...

Are you sure there are no problem with the references here? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SCB '92. You have new messages at Talk:Pon de Replay/GA1.
Message added 18:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 18:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited

Sandstorm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Super Meat Boy FAC

Hi, you reviewed the Super Meat Boy FAC last month. That nomination died due to a lack of response and has been restarted; would you consider coming to the new one to restate your opinion? Thanks! I'll swing by the Oblivion FAC later today, if I can. --PresN 19:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Talib Kweli-Hot Thing.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caesars Palace 2000 GAN

Talk:Caesars Palace 2000/GA2 is on hold. Thanks, bridies (talk) 03:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do the final source checking within a day or two, hopefully tonight. bridies (talk) 03:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. BTW, as I noted in the review, GameFAQs gets it release dates from GameSpot (or vice-versa, I forget) and they tend not to be very accurate. I don't think that's an issue with this article any longer, but you might want to double-check. bridies (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Risk parity

Hi SCB'92 and happy new year! The Risk parity article that you reviewed and approved for GA status in Sept 2011 has been placed under reassessment. Seeing as its only received a dozen or so minor changes (ref improve, spelling and grammar) in the interim, this appears to be a challenge of your GA review. Therefore, I thought I'd invite you to the reassessment page in case you'd like to comment. Thanks for all your work on WP. Best, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1

2013

, the project has:

154 Featured Articles 53 Featured Lists 7 Featured Topics 5 Featured Pictures

43 A-Class Articles 589 Good Articles 9 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

Feature: "A-class: Is It Worth It?" Interview: Teancum

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 10 Pin Bowling

The article 10 Pin Bowling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After searching for reliable sources and only managing to find two, I feel that this article is not notable enough. While there may be coverage in print, GameRankings shows nothing and it's unlikely that a game that received virtually no coverage on the Internet would have gotten attention in limited-space print works. By the way, assuming you read this, I do hope you continue editing on Wikipedia. You seem to make good contributions from what I've seen.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 09:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ozumo 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Public enemy-night of the living.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Backyardfootball10.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dawnofdestiny.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling video listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of best-selling video. Since you had some involvement with the List of best-selling video redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:101in1partymegamix.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

"Queen of Pop" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

Queen of Pop. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17#King of Rock and Roll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Neel.arunabh (talk) 03:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Speed Power Gunbike cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rainy Dayz.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rainy Dayz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:101-in-1

Template:101-in-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:La Di Da Di.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:La Di Da Di.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Championmanage0203.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Championmanage0203.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and Wikipedia

Your edit to I Gotcha Back (GZA song) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Gotcha Back (GZA song) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to I Gotcha Back (GZA song). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:I Gotcha Back (GZA song)

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 04:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SCB_%2792&oldid=1225856826"