User talk:WikiEditor73

Hi there! WikiEditor73, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, talk) 17:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

You've been making a lot of edits to List of creatures in Primeval without any explanation for them. Many of the edits do not seem supported by episodes from the series, which is a story of fiction and does not have to follow real-world rules. Could you please explain your edits in edit summaries and provide sources for the changes? Thank you. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hollyoaks characters (2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jessica Fox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please stop changing this to Fiona "Tosh" Mackintosh without discussion. The character's

If you intend adding links to episodes, please ensure the links are correct. As should have been obvious by this edit and edit summary, the format that you are using is incorrect. For the correct method of linking, see that edit and the instructions for {{episode list}}. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wondered if you wouldn't mind refraining from updating the number of episodes after every episode, but instead perhaps doing it once a week, just to save on clogging up the page history and editors' watchlists. It's up to you though, but in the past it's always been left and updated weekly or fortnightly. Thanks. –anemoneprojectors– 10:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okays, sorry I'll begin editing it every Friday after tonight then — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor73 (talk • contribs)

Thanks, I do appreciate that you're updating it though. In fact there used to be times it wouldn't be updated for maybe 6 weeks, but that's too long in my opinion. –anemoneprojectors– 22:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondered if you see the irony in this edit. –anemoneprojectors– 21:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess not. Anyway, I do appreciate you updating my episodes list but could you follow the same format - i.e. only wikilink the first instance of each name per month, and use characters' full names the first time you mention them each time? Thanks. –anemoneprojectors– 18:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been looking for episodes of soap operas to update for a while, so I was thrilled to find your article. I will complete the edit summaries over the next couple of weeks.

Thanks. I didn't really start adding summaries until later in the year but wanted to keep them as brief as I could, whilst still giving the most essential plot details - about two lines on the screen is good, or three if it was a longer episode, but more is ok if a lot happened! I wanted to update them but for me it seemed a daunting task - easier to do it one episode at a time after I've watched it, which is what I was doing between June and September. There are more episode lists at User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes. –anemoneprojectors– 13:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I look on the BBC episode guide and put the plot in a very short summary of my own words.

Thanks, it should all be in your own words. Not sure if you quite got what I meant though - link the first mention of each character in each month, using their full name - so for example, "Mick Carter and his wife Linda Carter did something together" but then in the next episode just "Mick and Linda". I've had a look at some of your updates, and notice you put "Honey is left reeling by Billy's desperate actions to keep his children in his life" - I think it would be better to state what the actions actually are, if it's possible, and if they happened in that episode. I'm making a few updates now. –anemoneprojectors– 16:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now, and I will try and re-word certain sentences such as "Honey is left reeling by Billy's actions" to explain the character's actions to leave the other character's in shock.

Thanks, I will check it all anyway to see if there's anything that I think needs changing, I can always look up the episode myself if I need to. I find it much easier to update when I've just watched the episode - which is why I'm looking forward to 1 January 2016, so I can complete an entire list! –anemoneprojectors– 18:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could I ask how you found the amount of episodes each character has appeared in so that myself or you could add some missing characters (e.g

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hollyoaks characters (2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! – JuneGloom07 Talk 18:49, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't emphasise enough how useful edit summaries would have been for some of your latest edits, especially the ones where you removed large chunks of prose from articles. Please consider using them in the future. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have undone your edit to Linda Carter. Please note that EastEnders characters do not use the "born" field. This is because they are fictional characters created by a team of writers, therefore they created and not born. Thanks--5 albert square (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this applies to all soap characters - the soap character infobox no longer supports "born" or "died". –anemoneprojectors– 13:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure you are including

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hollyoaks characters (2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bryan Kirkwood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I thought I'd talk about why I put Ellie under recurring characters. I agree she has featured in highly publicized storylines, but it's more to do with the number of appearances. One month, she could do quite a few episodes and not be seen on screen for a long time after.

Take April and May, she was heavily featured and in June, July and August, she has appeared in very few episodes. Ellie is more of a recurring character like Simon and Amy due to the fact Ellie is a child actress under 16 and has her work hours limited etc. Thanks.

Grangehilllover (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just thought as Simon has been in the highly publicised domestic abuse storyline, Faye has had the teenage pregnancy plot and Amy has been trapped in the Victoria Court fire, I thought that was make them regular characters. Thank you for letting me know and I will keep them that way in the future.

Hi,

No problem.

Grangehilllover (talk) 16:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for adding the episode numbers that we have available and for updating my drafts with the full number of episodes. However, there's a discrepancy. For example, we know that 19 February 2010 was episode number 3952, and going on from there, all the numbers up to 30 December 2011 follow on, to episode number 4344. However, you've put 1 January 2012 as eps 4348/4349, meaning 4345, 4346 and 4347 are not accounted for. I know that 1 May 2012 was 4419, because I had a reference for it at the time. So there must be some mistake somewhere between 3952 and 4419. I had hoped that when the numbers were filled in, it would all work out, but it doesn't (and I hope that it still does when 30 years' worth of episodes have been listed). Can you help at all? –anemoneprojectors– 22:31, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please can you not "avoid" redirects when those redirects work perfectly well, for example, as you did here, there are very good reasons for using redirects and very good reasons for not changing them. Please see

Please stop doing this - for example, changing [[Kat Moon]] to [[Kat Slater|Kat Moon]]. The redirect from

Kat Moon, and then if we decided that all instances of "Kat Moon" needed to change to "Kat Slater", it would be easier to find which articles need this. That doesn't mean you should go around changing them back though, just leave them alone :-) –anemoneprojectors– 14:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm asking you again to stop doing this - this includes changing [[Stacey Branning]] to [[Stacey Slater|Stacey Branning]] or [[Sharon Mitchell (EastEnders)|Sharon Mitchell]] to [[Sharon Watts|Sharon Mitchell]], or anything else like this. AnemoneProjectors 12:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2022 revisit

It seems that after six years, you have still not learned how to follow WP:NOTBROKEN. Your editing is disruptive and should be stopped considering your month-long block has just recently expired. –

Hi. Could you provide some sources for your latest edits to this article, please? And perhaps take a little time to read

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ken Barlow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parental abuse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post the actress's last name as there is an OTRS request to have it removed. See also Talk:Janet Mitchell#Actor name and Talk:Janet Mitchell#Grace. Thanks. AnemoneProjectors 22:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hollyoaks locations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Pickard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Coronation Street actors, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Chase and Ted Sullivan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has been announced, there is just rumour in The Sun so far. Stephenb (Talk) 22:02, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Coronation Street characters (2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Phelan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, may I please ask where you got the count for the characters from? Did you work it out yourself? AnemoneProjectors 09:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes I looked through every episode of the year on the BBC website and kept adding episodes to each character. It took me a very long time to do! Is everything okay with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor73 (talk • contribs)

Yeah that's fine, thanks for doing it. I just wanted to check because we took some numbers from a forum before and they said we'd stolen their work. But if it's just from the BBC site then that's great. Thanks for helping. AnemoneProjectors 11:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hollyoaks characters (2016), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Coronation Street characters (1996), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Wilson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Outnumbered episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conspiracy and The Apprentice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you do me a favour and revert all your additions of EastEnders characters to this category? They are already all categorised there via Category:EastEnders characters, which is a cubcategory of Category:Fictional people from London, which is a subcategory of Category:Fictional English people, so they should not be placed directly in this category. Thanks. anemoneprojectors 14:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for other English soap characters if you have done the same with them. anemoneprojectors 14:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, should I do the same for the Coronation Street characters too? User talk:WikiEditor73

I've done a few Corrie ones already, actually. If they're Scottish, that's ok :-) Also sometimes characters don't need to be categorised as criminals if they're already categorised by their crime, i.e. fictional con artits. anemoneprojectors 14:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

by the way don't worry about any other characters if you didn't add the category, I'm sure I'll catch them at some point so no need to check :-) anemoneprojectors 14:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what about the Category:Fictional smokers, because I have added certain characters who smoke and they have been removed? Is it because the category is for characters who are well-known for smoking? User talk:WikiEditor73

Oh yeah, for smokers it has to be a defining characteristic, such as Dot Cotton, where we have a whole section about her smoking. But for someone who is just seen smoking every now and then, they probably shouldn't be added. Thanks for being so cooperative by the way, I felt a bit out of order asking you to do it! But it's probably easier for you to know what you've done than for me to check. For now, you only really need to worry about the English category. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 15:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's fine. Thank you for informing me of my errors. User talk:WikiEditor73

Cool :-) Don't worry too much about making mistakes, especially in EastEnders pages, as they're all on my watchlist and I will always correct things when I get to them on my watchlist! It was just that in this case there were a large number of pages and I haven't caught up on previous edits to those pages just yet ;-) anemoneprojectors 15:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, also be careful with the fictional shopkeepers and fictional market stallholders categories - they are for those who own and run the business, not those who work there, so for example, Pam Coker is a stallholder, Paul Coker is a salesperson. Denise Fox and Honey Mitchell are also salespeople, not shopkeepers, but someone like Dev Alahan in Corrie would be a shopkeeper. Just something I've noticed a few times. anemoneprojectors 19:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiEditor73. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just going to let you know the reason I reverted most of your edits to my draft, but in looking for the relevant Wikipedia guideline, I discovered that the manual of style had been changed by consensus, and I was unaware of this. I will therefore revert my edits. If you had used an edit summary at any point, it would have saved a lot of trouble for me, so please use edit summaries in future. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 16:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it back again because it was making some of the columns wider than they should be, and the MOS does say it can still be that way if space is limited and it's used consistently, so I hope you're ok with that :-) anemoneprojectors 16:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you restored this edit: [1]? You've made several of these edits across Wikipedia, but you have left no explanation as to why. If it's part of

I appreciate you might be busy, but if you could find a little time to respond to this, that would be great. - JuneGloom07 Talk 22:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further to June's messages and my comments on the edits, could you kindly reply, so we can understand why the edits were made? Thanks. Adamiow (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As no comment has been made on this, I will revert the edits made on the infoboxes. If you still wish to implement the changes, please discuss here or on the relevant page's talk page rather than editing again. Adamiow (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Linda Marlowe

added a link pointing to The Mirror

List of EastEnders characters

added a link pointing to The Mirror

List of EastEnders characters (2014)

added a link pointing to The Mirror

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of EastEnders characters (2014)

added a link pointing to Stratford

List of births, marriages, and deaths in Coronation Street

added a link pointing to Ornament

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Coronation Street timeline

added a link pointing to Daniel Osbourne

List of Hollyoaks characters (2005)

added a link pointing to STI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Coronation Street characters (1999), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerry Hopkins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I really think you should read

This [2] is too much. Please stop performing these types of edits and read through WP:OVERLINKING first. And again, edit summaries and communication with other editors would be a big help. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure we need to say EastEnders is both BBC and British, because the BBC is British by definition, but mass changes like that, affecting every article, ought to be discussed on WT:EE first. Thanks. anemoneprojectors 09:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also I should add that if a redirect works, as the link

Actually I'm going to revert your edits because the first B in BBC already stands for British. And we don't need a link to Television in the United Kingdom because it doesn't add to the understanding of any of the articles, except maybe one, EastEnders. anemoneprojectors 10:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued to make these edits after I've explained why they're not needed, so please stop. anemoneprojectors 12:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Colin Russell (EastEnders). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. anemoneprojectors 12:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maxim Baldry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E4. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It is now well over a year since I asked you to read

Also can you stop changing "The Vic" to "The Queen Vic"? As long as the first mention says "The Queen Victoria pub (The Vic)", that's all that's needed. You're wasting your own time and Wikipedia's resources by making unnecessary edits all the time. And mine, because I have to keep telling you what you've done! —:anemone:projectors:— 09:36, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders cast members, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 02:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiEditor73, please can you explain why you made that edit in my userspace, especially as you made the exact same edit in December 2016 as well, and it was not appreciated then either? Thanks. —:anemone:projectors:— 14:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hurt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

Please, please read and follow

WP:NOTBROKEN. Not all redirects need "fixing". And please start communicating, it really does help out everyone. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders cast members.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't edit another editors' userspace without asking first. It's just common courtesy. – JuneGloom07 Talk 13:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you regularly vandalising my userspace? Please stay out of it from now on. —anemoneprojectors— 11:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 May 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Noakes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wondered if you could undo all your additions of the word "death" to departure sections for EastEnders characters (and any others?). Fictional characters don't die - they live on in their episodes because they aren't real people. They are simply created and written out. Therefore, "departure" is all that's needed. Thanks. — anemoneprojectors 09:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To add to this, please could you also undo all additions of a cross symbolising death. As AnemoneProjectors has stated, fictional characters don't die. Soaper1234 - talk 09:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please undo all your little crosses. I reverted a bunch but you need to do the rest. Cause of end of marriage is not required in infoboxes and if it was, a meaningless symbol would not be the way to do it. Thanks. — anemoneprojectors 10:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm sure you are aware, given your 2 years of editing, nearly 9,000 edits, and my previous note here,

To add to this, I have reverted some of your edits but if you could continue to revert others please as they are not helpful. Thank you, Soaper1234 - talk 06:27, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders cast members, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. You have been asked (more than once) not to edit User:AnemoneProjectors' userspace, so please do not edit it again. – JuneGloom07 Talk 18:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are banned from editing my userspace, and the next time you do so you will be blocked. — anemoneprojectors 13:54, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, you're still banned from my userspace, to be honest I don't care which page in my userspace it is you edit or how good the edit is you make. I won't block you this time but just leave my userspace alone. You may use my user talkspace to suggest edits, but that's all. Thanks. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 11:08, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joel Dexter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nutnut39 (talk) 15:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiEditor73. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders cast members. I already banned you from editing my userspace, so please note that this applies for all time and the next time you make an edit to any page in my userspace, no matter how big or small, I promise I will block you. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 13:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're so lucky I didn't realise you had made this edit back in May and didn't block you for editing my userspace after I banned you and gave you this final warning... hopefully that's the last edit. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 11:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Hollyoaks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clare Cunningham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to List of Coronation Street characters (2015) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Two years later and you're still not using edit summaries. I know what you were doing by removing the names from that article, but others editors might not. Help them out, please. – JuneGloom07 Talk 22:26, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leslie Grantham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you STOP making the same edits to the 'List of current Coronation Street Characters' page? It has been mutually agreed that, while the actual articles SHOULD hold the most common names, the characters listed should have their current names - due to it being a list of CURRENT characters. There is no current character called Rita Sullivan, there IS a current character called Rita Tanner. Connorguy99 (talk) 23:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Connorguy99 (talk • contribs)

@Connorguy99: Where has this been "mutually agreed"? I do not believe there has been a discussion about this issue, so there is no consensus. Happy to be proven wrong though if you can provide links. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Several different editors have reversed this user's edits, as can be seen on the history. That is pretty mutual to me. Where has there been a discussion that the current names shouldn't be used for the CURRENT character's list? Please don't tell me about WP:COMMONNAME, this has nothing to do with the subject - it is talking about using the common names for the actual articles (which I agree with) not pages like this. Connorguy99 (talk) 22:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will stop reverting these links to the character's individual article name. However, may I ask why on the Current Characters pages for EastEnders, Emmerdale and Hollyoaks do not follow the same structure, and instead aim to keep the article names?

@Connorguy99: Your conclusion is not a consensus. There is currently a discussion about this issue on the talk page of the list. WikiEditor73 please also join in, as you make a valid point. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus has now been agreed so please can you stop changing the character's names. Connorguy99 (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jackie Dobbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiEditor73. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought I would mention that I have noticed mass changes on here coming from an IP address. It concerns adding categories to fictional character articles. I assume this is you and just wanted to remind you that it is advised you use your account.Rain the 1 18:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the head's up. Will do from now on.

Hi, may I ask why you have carried on editing when logged out?-- 5 albert square (talk) 21:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you may notice I have undone your mass changes without you inflicted on the soap opera articles without discussion. I am not sure why you feel the need to introduce "see also" sections to these articles. The mobile edition of Wikipedia offers readers suggestions of related articles so I think these are just redundant.Rain the 1 08:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition you are still editing while logged out. Your performing mass changes and switching from your user account to random IPs. [3] and [4] and [5] and [6]Rain the 1 08:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 19:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are consistently ignoring

WP:NOTBROKEN and editing logged out. Myself and other editors have brought this up on your talk page and not had a response - you've just carried on. Enough is enough. Wikipedias policies and rules are not there for you to follow just when you want to. 5 albert square (talk) 19:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

You also edited my userspace after I banned you from doing so indefinitely. I will never hesitate you give you further blocks in the future without warning. You've had enough warnings about all kinds of behaviour now. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬

Hi, I have taken the last few days off editing and reevaluated my editing style. I shall now edit with more caution, and shall begin to login in order to carry out edits. Apologies for inconveniences. WikiEditor73.

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who#Mass change from "The Doctor" to "the Xth Doctor" by User:WikiEditor73. SoWhy 12:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have added a similar discussion regarding your mass changes of "Sarah" to "Sarah Jane". I think the consensus should at least be tested among other editors. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop removing the plainlist template from infoboxes. It should be used over line breaks (<br />) where there are three or more entries, per

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

Hey WikiEditor73. I've not checked all of those individual bio details, but... some folks might argue that Category:People with anxiety disorders was a parent Cat for Category:People with obsessive–compulsive disorder? Cheers. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:17, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add these unless the genre has been reliably sourced in the infobox or musical style section. Robvanvee 12:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Anjli Mohindra, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of EastEnders characters (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Coronation Street characters (1994), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Armstrong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EastEnders theme tune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Dean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing "–present" from every Hollyoaks and Emmerdale character without discussion? In case you were unaware, there is a manual of style that states "–present" is required on Wikipedia (see

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of EastEnders characters (2010), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Jarvis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the ones I could find, since it seems you do not reply to any posts on your talk. Cheers, - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Oz\^InterAct 12:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The British Soap Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcus Christie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, can I ask, what were you trying to achieve when removing a space from the cast changes list on the soap articles? Please use edit summaries. Thanks! 😊 Blanchey 💬 • 📝 08:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Paulpat99 (talk) 21:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your feedback! I shall try and remember to fill this out in future.

Thanks again 👍 WikiEditor73 (talk) 21:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, may I ask why you are still not using edit summaries please? Blanchey (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also started a talkpage section on this, just wanted to let you know. Malerooster (talk) 22:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WikiEditor73, I see that you are adding this to a number of bios. Rather than reverting all these, are you seeing that this is done "normally" or is part of some MOS? I would/might bring this to the BLP project and see if there is any consensus for this type of addition. Your thoughts? Thank you, Malerooster (talk) 23:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Malerooster,

Thank you for your message. If you wouldn’t mind raising this with the BLP project, that might be useful. If we can add the dates / lifespans of these people to add additional information to the articles, I personally think we should, but obviously let me know your thoughts / what the feedback is. Thank you! WikiEditor73 (talk) 23:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I posted at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. I would not add this information, but would provide a link if one exists and people can click through if they are that interested. It seems that most well written bios do not add this. I do not believe it adds to our understanding of the article subject in any meaningful way. I'll keep you updated. --Malerooster (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#Should_biographies_include_the_dates_of_birth_of_parents_in_the_Early_life_section?.--Malerooster (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Samantha Womack, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Suonii180 (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Okay, thank you! I shall look at revisiting these edits once a reliable source has been found.

Thank you again. WikiEditor73 (talk) 00:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please see

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EastEnders theme tune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donna Yates.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RuPaul's Drag Race UK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]