{{help me
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 04:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Francisco Franco, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. General Ization Talk 04:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Vandalism of art. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Nick Fuentes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Groypers, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
For additional information, please see the
GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please get consensus before changing infobox images, especially in bios of legendary people. You cannot make such decisions unilaterally. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 16:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~~~
Your recent editing history at Marilyn Monroe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
John Spencer (died 1522), you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I actually thought I was using the sandbox but accidentally made an edit to the main page. Still trying to gain consensus. Thankfully I caught it quickly.
Category:American Statesmen has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Wikipedianempire! Your additions to
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to America First Political Action Conference has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Veggies (talk) 03:38, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Richard C. Macke, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Connormah (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]