Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 14

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

January 14

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 14, 2018.

Triple Gate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Triple Gate is too confusing for specific gate Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the term used on Southern Wall where the linking is coming from. If you think that may be confusing, you should look into the references and discuss it on that page. Tomdo08 (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2018
PS: ... also defined as such on the target side of the links: Huldah Gates Tomdo08 (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch, made notes to both talk pages about this. Tomdo08 (talk) 02:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep A couple of links where the terms ('Double Gate' and 'Triple Gate') are used as known identity:

Tomdo08 (talk) 02:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Double Gate

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 24#Double Gate

Slaughterhouse rules

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Deletion suggested. This is a recent (triple?) redirect - see

Slaughter house rules - and makes no sense whatsoever. Nothing within the target article suggests any reason for the redirect. Googling "Slaughterhouse rules" and "Slaughter House Rules" offers no clues. A new article has now been created, a film (presently a preview) named Slaughterhouse Rulez which is how I arrived at the redirect, dropping down in the 'search' field. Confusing and unnecessary for these redirects to exist, IMO. -Semperito (talk) 19:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Retarget to
(Je vous invite à me parler) 20:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
That's good, thank you,
PinkAmpersand. I am inexperienced in this so it is a learning process for me.-Semperito (talk) 20:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Okay. I've added them. My !vote for them is the same as for the first one: retarget. —
(Je vous invite à me parler) 20:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
A look at their contributions for 13 January alone shows 26 new redirects, with many nonsense minor variations on song lyric-lines, spelling, capitalization and punctuation.--Semperito (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kriken

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned in the article. Unnecessary redirect - delete. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to
    (Je vous invite à me parler) 14:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Enemies in the Metroid Prime series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned in the article. Unnecessary redirect - delete. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Striking my vote, given that the Characters article explains who the antagonists are, especially the Metroids. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to
    Characters in the Metroid series#Antagonists. -- Tavix (talk) 18:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Tavix. —
    (Je vous invite à me parler) 20:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Abhilash Pudukad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was draftify. It will be found at Draft:Abhilash Pudukad if anybody cares to work on it. -- Tavix (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target - unclear piggy backing PRehse (talk) 12:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It may be worth reading the talk page. In the last hour or two there has been discussion about making some sort of mention in the target. - Sitush (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 03:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was created as a rather spammy article about a person who, judging from the comments on the talk page, might be just past the notability threshold, so I'm not sure if RfD is the best place to make a decision on that. The most "proper" course of action seems to be restoring the article, then trimming the puffery and taking it to AfD. Anyone's got the time for that? A move to the draft namespace (without leaving a redirect) would be an easier alternative. – Uanfala (talk) 21:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify per Uanfala. Anyone who wants to work on it can work on in draft space there, and if that doesn't happen in a reasonable amount of time it gets deleted as stale without further drama. More likely to produce a useful outcome than restoring in mainspace and sending to AFD – which will likely result in either a bunch of people voting for
    WP:TNT regardless of the merits, or not wanting to deal with it at all (a la Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of Final Fantasy V). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

User:Fryedk

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to
(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect from user page to unconnected Article Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marte (planet)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at

WP:FORRED: no connection to any of the languages listed here. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 08:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Déjà vous

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#Déjà vous

Dajavu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Implausible misspelling. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 08:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mexican'

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by
speedy deletion criterion G6. Steel1943 (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Ends with an apostrophe. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 08:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amercia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Implausible typo. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dlorah Nadroj

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. This is "Jordan Harold" spelled backward. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 07:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fryeeday

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A weird misspelling. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete note there are several claims by people and companies for Fryeday just not with the two e's. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - it would be a stretch to call this a misspelling of Frîjatag or any of the Germanic variants of Friday, and they would probably fail
    WP:FORRED anyway. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dick (American Slang)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed disambiguation, so can’t redirect to Dick (slang). LaundryPizza03 (talk) 06:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Misspellings of Tryptophan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep all except for Trypthophan. -- Tavix (talk) 14:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some, if not all, of these are implausible. Definitely the third to last. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all obvious phonetic spellings for when the word is heard and not seen. --RAN (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Trypthophan as highly unlikely due to the use of "th". Keep The rest. Yes, this is surprisingly a difficult word to spell. Steel1943 (talk) 17:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all but Trypthophan per Steel1943. Double sharp (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all. Trypthophan seems like a plausible spelling when the word is read at speed, making it hard to differentiate the "to" and "tho" sound. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 08:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all but the last two. The rest are plausible misspellings. —
    (Je vous invite à me parler) 11:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yittrium (element)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to disambiguate from. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 06:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - unnecessary disambiguation from a probably likely misspelling but which still creates a word unlikely to be confused with anything else. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Ivanvector. Double sharp (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Element LXXIX

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible use of

Roman numerals. In chemistry, Roman numerals indicate oxidation states, not atomic numbers. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

30-verti

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 24#30-verti

Ninja Turtle Food

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weird redirect based on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Article does not mention this. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 06:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mario Kart 3D

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#Mario Kart 3D

Dumpster® diving

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 08:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible. -- Tavix (talk) 03:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.