Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Review Team

Wikipedia 1.0 — (talk) FAQ — To do
Release version tools Guide — (talk) — (stats)
Article selection process (talk) Version 0.8 bot selection Version 0.8 feedback
IRC channel ( IRC )
Release criteria
Review team (FAQ)
Version 0.8 release (manual selection) (t)
"Selection" project (Talk) schools selection Offline WP for Indian Schools
Core topics - 1,000 (Talk) (COTF) (bot)
TORRENT (Talk)
"Selection" project for kids ((t))
talk )
Pushing to 1.0 (talk)
Static content subcom.

The work of this group is awaiting the start of the next offline release

The goal of this group is to review articles nominated for one of the WP:1.0 releases, according to the appropriate criteria. If a reviewed article meets those criteria, it is then removed from the nominations list and added to the version article list, and the talk page template is updated accordingly.

If you are new to reviewing, please take a look at the Reviewing FAQs.

These criteria can be summarized as follows:

Importance

We may choose not to include even a featured article, if the topic is too specialized for the particular release. Importance is of course both subjective and relative - for our purposes at the 1.0 project, the importance should be in terms of the whole of Wikipedia. In early releases we will focus on "Top" and "High" importance subjects, but the scope will widen as the size of the release grows.

The

Quality

An article on an important topic may be rejected if it is considered to be of poor quality. Articles are often assessed according to the

WP:1.0 assessment scheme

, and articles are usually expected to be B-Class or higher for anything other than very important topics.

The reviewer's job is to evaluate and process nominations. For