CO2 fertilization effect
The CO2 fertilization effect or carbon fertilization effect causes an increased rate of
Terrestrial ecosystems have reduced atmospheric CO2 concentrations and have partially mitigated climate change effects.[10] The response by plants to the carbon fertilization effect is unlikely to significantly reduce atmospheric CO2 concentration over the next century due to the increasing anthropogenic influences on atmospheric CO2.[3][4][11][12] Earth's vegetated lands have shown significant greening since the early 1980s[13] largely due to rising levels of atmospheric CO2.[14][15][16][17]
Theory predicts the tropics to have the largest uptake due to the carbon fertilization effect, but this has not been observed. The amount of CO2 uptake from CO2 fertilization also depends on how forests respond to climate change, and if they are protected from deforestation.[18]
Changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide may reduce the nutritional quality of some crops, with for instance wheat having less protein and less of some minerals.[19]: 439 [20] Food crops could see a reduction of protein, iron and zinc content in common food crops of 3 to 17%.[21]
Mechanism
Through photosynthesis, plants use CO2 from the atmosphere, water from the ground, and energy from the sun to create sugars used for growth and fuel.[22] While using these sugars as fuel releases carbon back into the atmosphere (photorespiration), growth stores carbon in the physical structures of the plant (i.e. leaves, wood, or non-woody stems).[23] With about 19 percent of Earth's carbon stored in plants,[24] plant growth plays an important role in storing carbon on the ground rather than in the atmosphere. In the context of carbon storage, growth of plants is often referred to as biomass productivity.[23][25][26] This term is used because researchers compare the growth of different plant communities by their biomass, amount of carbon they contain.
Increased biomass productivity directly increases the amount of carbon stored in plants.[23] And because researchers are interested in carbon storage, they are interested in where most of the biomass is found in individual plants or in an ecosystem. Plants will first use their available resources for survival and support the growth and maintenance of the most important tissues like leaves and fine roots which have short lives.[27] With more resources available plants can grow more permanent, but less necessary tissues like wood.[27]
If the air surrounding plants has a higher concentration of carbon dioxide, they may be able to grow better and store more carbon[28] and also store carbon in more permanent structures like wood.[23] Evidence has shown this occurring for a few different reasons. First, plants that were otherwise limited by carbon or light availability benefit from a higher concentration of carbon.[29] Another reason is that plants are able use water more efficiently because of reduced stomatal conductance.[30] Plants experiencing higher CO2 concentrations may benefit from a greater ability to gain nutrients from mycorrhizal fungi in the sugar-for-nutrients transaction.[31] The same interaction can may also increase the amount of carbon stored in the soil by mycorrhizal fungi.[32]
Observations and trends
From 2002 to 2014, plants appear to have gone into overdrive, starting to pull more CO2 out of the air than they have done before.[33] The result was that the rate at which CO2 accumulates in the atmosphere did not increase during this time period, although previously, it had grown considerably in concert with growing greenhouse gas emissions.[33]
A 1993 review of scientific greenhouse studies found that a doubling of CO2 concentration would stimulate the growth of 156 different plant species by an average of 37%. Response varied significantly by species, with some showing much greater gains and a few showing a loss. For example, a 1979 greenhouse study found that with doubled CO2 concentration the dry weight of 40-day-old cotton plants doubled, but the dry weight of 30-day-old maize plants increased by only 20%.[34][35]
In addition to greenhouse studies, field and satellite measurements attempt to understand the effect of increased CO2 in more natural environments. In
Depending on environment, there are differential responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 between major 'functional types' of plant, such as
Experimentation by enrichment
The effects of CO2 enrichment can be most simply attained in a greenhouse (see Greenhouse § Carbon dioxide enrichment for its agricultural use). However, for experimentation, the results obtained in a greenhouse would be doubted due to it introducing too many confounding variables. Open-air chambers have been similarly doubted, with some critiques attributing, e.g., a decline in mineral concentrations found in these CO2-enrichment experiments to constraints put on the root system. The current state-of-the art is the FACE methodology, where CO2 is put out directly in the open field.[44] Even then, there are doubts over whether the results of FACE in one part of the world applies to another.[45]
Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments
The ORNL conducted FACE experiments where CO2 levels were increased above ambient levels in forest stands.[46] These experiments showed:[47]
- Increased root production stimulated by increased CO2, resulting in more soil carbon.
- An initial increase of net primary productivity, which was not sustained.
- Faster decline in nitrogen availability in increased CO2 forest plots.
- Change in plant community structure, with minimal change in microbial community structure.[48]
- Enhanced CO2 cannot significantly increase the leaf carrying capacity or leaf area index of an area.[48]
FACE experiments have been criticized as not being representative of the entire globe. These experiments were not meant to be extrapolated globally. Similar experiments are being conducted in other regions such as in the Amazon rainforest in Brazil.[45]
Pine trees
Duke University did a study where they dosed a
Impacts on human nutrition
Changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide may reduce the nutritional quality of some crops, with for instance wheat having less protein and less of some minerals.[52]: 439 [53] The nutritional quality of C3 plants (e.g. wheat, oats, rice) is especially at risk: lower levels of protein as well as minerals (for example zinc and iron) are expected.[54]: 1379 Food crops could see a reduction of protein, iron and zinc content in common food crops of 3 to 17%.[55] This is the projected result of food grown under the expected atmospheric carbon-dioxide levels of 2050. Using data from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization as well as other public sources, the authors analyzed 225 different staple foods, such as wheat, rice, maize, vegetables, roots and fruits.[56]
The effect of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide on the nutritional quality of plants is not limited only to the above-mentioned crop categories and nutrients. A 2014 meta-analysis has shown that crops and wild plants exposed to elevated carbon dioxide levels at various latitudes have lower density of several minerals such as magnesium, iron, zinc, and potassium.[50]
Studies using
Empirical evidence shows that increasing levels of CO2 result in lower concentrations of many minerals in plant tissues. Doubling CO2 levels results in an 8% decline, on average, in the concentration of minerals.[50] Declines in magnesium, calcium, potassium, iron, zinc and other minerals in crops can worsen the quality of human nutrition. Researchers report that the CO2 levels expected in the second half of the 21st century will likely reduce the levels of zinc, iron, and protein in wheat, rice, peas, and soybeans. Some two billion people live in countries where citizens receive more than 60 percent of their zinc or iron from these types of crops. Deficiencies of these nutrients already cause an estimated loss of 63 million life-years annually.[61][62]
Alongside a decrease in minerals, evidence shows that plants contain 6% more carbon, 15% less nitrogen, 9% less phosphorus, and 9% less sulfur at double CO2 conditions. The increase in carbon is mostly attributed toSee also
References
- ^ PMID 35238668.
- ISSN 1748-9326.
- ^ S2CID 134286531.
- ^ PMID 30588740.
- ^ Cartwright J (Aug 16, 2013). "How does carbon fertilization affect crop yield?". environmentalresearchweb. Environmental Research Letters. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
- ISSN 1758-678X.
- ISSN 1680-7324.
- .
- S2CID 2861520.
- S2CID 228084631.
- S2CID 230526366.
- PMID 21088226.
- ^ "Global Green Up Slows Warming". earthobservatory.nasa.gov. 2020-02-18. Retrieved 2020-12-27.
- ^ Tabor A (2019-02-08). "Human Activity in China and India Dominates the Greening of Earth". NASA. Retrieved 2020-12-27.
- S2CID 7980894.
- ^ Hille K (2016-04-25). "Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds". NASA. Retrieved 2020-12-27.
- ^ "If you're looking for good news about climate change, this is about the best there is right now". Washington Post. Retrieved 2016-11-11.
- PMID 25548156.
- ^ Mbow C, Rosenzweig C, Barioni LG, Benton TG, Herrero M, Krishnapillai M, et al. (2019). "Chapter 5: Food Security" (PDF). In Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner HO, Roberts DC, et al. (eds.). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.
- ^ Milius S (13 December 2017). "Worries grow that climate change will quietly steal nutrients from major food crops". Science News. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
- S2CID 91727337.
- ^ Calvin M, Benson AA (March 1948). The Path of Carbon in Photosynthesis (Report). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. pp. 884–922.
- ^ PMID 32789857.
- ^ "Forests and Climate Change". www.fao.org. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
- PMID 10773334.
- JSTOR 2937143.
- ^ PMID 24844873.
- PMID 30765702.
- PMID 18267901.
- S2CID 51814113.
- S2CID 199448766.
- PMID 21395963.
- ^ a b Krotz D (2016-11-08). "Study: Carbon-Hungry Plants Impede Growth Rate of Atmospheric CO2 | Berkeley Lab". News Center. Retrieved 2016-11-11.
- ^ Poorter H. "Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentration" (PDF).
- S2CID 24541633.
- PMID 15720649.
- S2CID 7980894.
We show a persistent and widespread increase of growing season integrated LAI (greening) over 25% to 50% of the global vegetated area, whereas less than 4% of the globe shows decreasing LAI (browning). Factorial simulations with multiple global ecosystem models suggest that CO2 fertilization effects explain 70% of the observed greening trend
- ^ Hille K (2016-04-25). "Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds". NASA. Retrieved 2018-02-04.
- ISSN 0006-3207.
- PMID 10322518.
- .
- ISSN 1978-3019.
- S2CID 24847776.
- PMID 24867639.
- ^ a b "Amazon FACE Experiment". Mar 28, 2015. ORNL. Archived from the original on August 9, 2017. Retrieved Nov 23, 2019.
- ^ "Oak Ridge Experiment on CO2 Enrichment of Sweetgum: Experimental design". ORNL. Jun 29, 2009. Archived from the original on January 9, 2018. Retrieved Nov 23, 2019.
- ^ Norby R. "Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE)". ORNL. Retrieved Nov 23, 2019.
- ^ S2CID 85977324.
- ^ "Duke Study Shows Carbon Dioxide Boosts Pine Tree Reproduction". Sciencedaily.com. 16 August 2000. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
- ^ PMID 24867639.
- hdl:10044/1/78069.
- ^ Mbow C, Rosenzweig C, Barioni LG, Benton TG, Herrero M, Krishnapillai M, et al. (2019). "Chapter 5: Food Security" (PDF). In Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner HO, Roberts DC, et al. (eds.). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.
- ^ Milius S (13 December 2017). "Worries grow that climate change will quietly steal nutrients from major food crops". Science News. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
- ^ Bezner Kerr, R., T. Hasegawa, R. Lasco, I. Bhatt, D. Deryng, A. Farrell, H. Gurney-Smith, H. Ju, S. Lluch-Cota, F. Meza, G. Nelson, H. Neufeldt, and P. Thornton, 2022: Chapter 5: Food, Fibre, and Other Ecosystem Products. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.007.
- S2CID 91727337.
- ^ Davis N (27 August 2018). "Climate change will make hundreds of millions more people nutrient deficient". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
- S2CID 16074723.
- PMID 29806023.
- Sciencenews.org. Retrieved 2 July 2018.
- S2CID 52262618.
- .
- PMID 24805231.