Cañadón Asfalto Formation

Coordinates: 43°24′S 69°12′W / 43.4°S 69.2°W / -43.4; -69.2
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Cañadón Asfalto Formation
Ma
↓
Dubious assigantion of the Puesto Almada Member of likely Callovian-Oxfordian age, that can be part of the Cañadón Calcáreo Formation or the Sierra de la Manea Formation instead
Cañadón Asfalto Formation near Cerro Cóndor, Chubut, Argentina
TypeGeological formation
Unit ofSierra de Olte Group
Sub-units
  • Las Chacritas Member
  • Puesto Almada Member?
Underlies
Overlies
Approximate paleocoordinates
40°30′S 29°18′W / 40.5°S 29.3°W / -40.5; -29.3
RegionChubut Province,
Patagonia
CountryArgentina
ExtentCañadón Asfalto Basin
Type section
Named forThe Cañadón Asfalto in Chubut River region
Named byStipanicic, P.N., Rodrigo, F.O.L., & Martínez, C.G[1]
Year defined1968

Formation map and location, shaded horizontally

The Cañadón Asfalto Formation is a

rift basin in the Chubut Province of northwestern Patagonia, southern Argentina.[2] The basin started forming in the earliest Jurassic.[3]

The formation is composed of fluvial-lacustrine deposits, typically sandstones and shales with a saline paleolake carbonate evaporitic sequence of limestone in its lowest Las Chacritas Member.[4] Interbedded with these are volcanic tuffites. It is divided into two members, the Las Chacritas Member, and the overlying Puesto Almada member, but the latter has also been assigned to the overlying Cañadón Calcáreo Formation by other authors.[5]

The exact age of the formation has been controversial, with uranium-lead dating of the volcanic tuff beds having given various different ages.[6] Recent work has suggested that the base of the formation was formed around 171 Ma, during the upper Aalenian, with the main age for the Lower Las Chacritas Member being around 168 Ma, during the Bajocian, Bathonian and Callovian, while the overlying Puesto Almada Member seems to be around 158 Ma, or Oxfordian in age.[7] But that changed thanks to the discovery of zircons near the location of the discovery of Bagualia, allowing a precise dating of the Las Charcitas Member as Middle-Late Toarcian, 178-179 million years.[8] And a more advanced dating constrained the age of the formation as Middle-Late Toarcian, contemporaneous to the Chon Aike volcanic activity, making it a local equivalent to Antarctica's Mawson Formation (Ferrar Volcanic Province) and the South African Drakensberg Group (Karoo Volcanic Province).[9]

This unit belongs to the

Ellsworth-Whitmore terrane isolated granitoids.[15]

The Volcanic-Lacustrine interbeds found in units like the Ellsworth Land Volcanic Group of the Antarctic Peninsula are not only coeval with, but also continuations of the biozone seen in the Chacritas member.[16]



History

The study of the Jurassic deposits of the Cañadón Asfalto Basin started with Alejandro Matveievich Piatnitzky in 1936, who studied the zone from the Genoa River to the Chubut River, dividing it into several stratigraphic units. In doing this he described the first layers that can be included within the Cañadón Asfalto Formation, the so-called "Capas de Estheria", recovered in places like the Cañón de Bagual. This layer is associated with plant remains such as Arthrotaxites, which allowed them to be assigned to the Jurassic interval.[17] His works were followed by several authors, including M.A. Flores, who studied the layers in between Chubut River, Sierra Cuadrada and Valle del Sapo in 1948–1957.[18]

Flores defined these layers, the Estheria unit, as bituminous Shales. He found remains of sauropod dinosaurs and floral remains, which led to the suggestion of a referral of this section to the upper middle Jurassic, constraining its known age.[18] In 1949, the unit was referred to the Sierra de Olte Group by J. Frenguelli, who also described some floral remains.[19] It was the team led by Stipanicic that named the Cañadón Asfalto Formation, referred to back then as a Callovian-Oxfordian unit.[1] Following this definition, Tasch & Volkheimer published the main initial faunal review of the strata in 1970, with a clear focus on the spinicaudatan fauna, though it also included the first regional correlations.[20] This work was followed by that of others, such as C. Nakayama in 1972, F. Nullo & C. Proserpio in 1975 and J.M.C. Turner in 1983, all focused on the geological aspects of the unit.[18]

In 1979, Bonaparte published the first description of dinosaurian remains from the location, including the sauropods Patagosaurus and Volkheimeria and the theropod Piatnitzkysaurus.[21] Towards the 90s, the Cañadón Asfalto Formation was subdivided into lower and upper sections, with the lower being equivalent to the Puesto Gilbert Formation and the upper coeval with the Cañadón Calcáreo Formation.[22] E.G. Figari established the two actual members in 2005, following his 1990's works, and formally called them the lower and upper member.[23] In 2012, these two were respectively named the Las Chacritas Member and the Puesto Almada Member.[3] Recent works such as Cúneo et al. in 2013 have proven that the formation is older than previously thought, and that some of the sections that form the Puesto Almada member belong to the Cañadón Calcáreo Fm.[6] Beyond the U-Pb and Lu-Hf zircon datings, the main focus of ongoing work has been on the discovery of new fossil sites like the "Canela" and "A12" sites, and revision of both floral and faunal discoveries of previously discovered ones, especially on the "Queso rallado" site.[9][3]

Geology

Geologic map of the Chubut Province, including the Cañadon Asfalto Fm

The Cañadón Asfalto Basin (whose full name is Somuncurá-Cañadón Asfalto rift basin) represents among the most extensive exposure of Jurassic rocks in South America. It limits to the northwest with the Subcordilleran Patagonian Batholith+Ñirihuau Basin and to the south with the Alto de Cotricó, a structural element that separates it from the San Jorge Gulf Basin.[3] It was developed over a Paleozoic basement, whose composition is dominated by plutonic and metamorphic rocks, that, along the Tria-Jurassic layers are part of a local succession of three megasequences, being the Jurassic ones linked with a mixed mosaic of volcanic (was likely linked to the Chon Aike Silicic Large Igneous Province) and sedimentary rocks (fluvial and lacustrine).[24] The Jurassic section can be correlated with an extensive tectonic regime for the central units in the basin, with also the presence of "pull-apart" models. This "pull-apart" model evolved based on the combined presence of diverse structural and depositional features that include lake-derived layer associated with vaporite horizons and various types of synsedimentary deformation, all with the presence of intercalations of basaltic strata. In this basin, towards the southern sector three microbasins are defined: Cerro Cóndor, Cañadón Calcáreo and Fossati.[3][25] The rotation of the Chubut Jurassic blocks is documented, yet the lateral components seem to have been linked to oblique extension.[25] The Chubut Province was in the Jurassic part of a local Rift that was a result of the fragmentation of Gondwana, associated in extension with the opening of the Weddell Sea and to the migration towards the south of the Antarctic Peninsula, developed in a similar way to the rift seen in the coeval deposits of the Transantarctic Mountains (Specially the Mawson Formation in the Queen Alexandra Rangue). This basin was later affected by a regional contractional phase during the Early Cretaceous (seen in the deposition of the Chubut Group).[25]

Local vulcanism was linked with the Chon Aike Igneous Province, or Chon Aike-Antarctic Province. The Vulcanism was product of initial rifting, what also led to the Karoo-Ferrar (South Africa And Antarctica), where the Early Jurassic facies in Patagonia and Larsen Basin deposited influenced by the pushing the Wedell Sea basin did over the surrounding plates, as can be seen in the similarities between the Sweeney Formation and the Lonco Tapial Formation.[16] In the Cañadón Asfalto Fm is found on thin layers of tuffs produced by distal ash falls within the lacustrine layers of the lower Chacritas Member, with the presence of sectors with scarce pyroclastic flows and basaltic flows. The interdigitation between carbonate and volcaniclastic deposits is clearly evident in the surroundings of Estancia Fossatti and in the Navidad Sector.[3][24] Other Volcanic sectors nearby that may have influenced this formation include the Subcordilleran & Cordilleran Patagonian Batholiths in the west.[26]

Age

The Age of the sediments of the Cañadón Asfalto Formation has been debated for decades. It was initially Piatnitzky in 1939 who noted the over lain position of this sediments over the basement, and suggested possible Jurassic to Earliest Cretaceous age based on regional correlations. In the description of the Cañadón Asfalto Formation in 1968, Stipanicic et al. defined that both Cañadón Asfalto and Los Adobes where of "Dogger" (=middle Jurassic) age.[1] In 1984, there was a work that correlated the unit with the Ferrarotti successions, finding differences with the Cañadón Asfalto and upper layers lumped initially on it, suggesting there can be an Upper Jurassic or Lower Cretaceous distinctive unit.[27] Based on the Microfossils and flora, Toarcian to Callovian was assigned to Las Chacritas member, while Callovian-Tithonian was assigned to the Puesto Almada member.[25] However, this wasn't followed by the appearance of numerous radiometric datings obtained from outcrops from different depocenters: starting in 2007, where a K/Ar age of 170 ±4.4 Ma was obtain for the Las Chacritas Member, followed in 2010 of a younger 147.1 ± 3.3 Ma for the Puesto Almada Member, that was later reassigned to 161 ± 3 Ma by U/Pb dating on zircons in the locality Estancia La Sin Rumbo.[25] Then, in 2013 Cúneo et al. provided the considered most controversial datations to date: Toarcian, 176,15 ± 0,12 and 178,766 ± 0,092 Ma at Cerro Bayo and Cerro Cóndor respectively, yet this was initially contested (with 168.2 ± 2.2 Ma for Chacritas member) and Puesto Almada constrained latter in 2017 to 160.3 ± 1.7-158.3 ± 1.3 Ma (Callovian-Oxfordian).[7] Yet, it was a more recent dating, the one that fully constrained Las Chacritas Member to Middle-Late Toarcian age (179,4 ± 0,059 Ma, 179,4 ± 0,13 Ma & 177,2 ± 0,4 Ma), age that was supported with the discovery of zircons of the same range in the Bagualia layers (Cañadón Bagual) and in other outcrops, including detailed age constraint in the uppermost level of the member proving a definitive age constraint of all the biota recovered in this layers to 179.17 ± 0.12 Ma-178.07 ± 0.21 Ma.[9][28] The Puesto Almada member is in a more complex situation, as seems some or all of its layers can belong on reality to the Cañadón Calcáreo Formation.[25] A separate unit in between the two has been even suggested, the Sierra de la Manea Formation, and this last one can include a great part of the Puesto Almada layers.[29]

Paleoenvironment

The Cañadón Asfalto formation represents a continuous inland sector on lacustrine and terrestrial habitats far from the nearest coast. The closest marine settings where recovered at the west in the

Echinoidea, leaf remains (Elatocladus hallei; Conifers) and traces of bioturbation (ichnogenera Rhizocorallium and Lapispira), indicating that at this time the Paleopacific Ocean flooded the basin hosting benthic macroinvertebrate associations in a carbonate-elastic ramp, however, none of the measured transgressions flooded the Cañadón Asfalto Basin (although it is estimated that in the upper Toarcian the coast was very close to Paso de Indios), although it was influenced by the volcanic events of the latter, as shown by the traces of volcanic tuffs in the Toarcian part of the Paso de Indios formation.[30] Beyond this sector, the Ordovic-Devonian North Patagonian Massif and the Deseado Massif gave a montane influence to the deposition of the formation. This can be seen in the so-called "Navidad district section" recovers similar Pb isotopic compositions to the ores found on this massifs.[31]

Back in the Early Jurassic the Patagonian region was marked by distinct geological features, including the

Syn-rift megasequence, correlated and connected with the Magallanes Basin.[35]

The type locality of the Formation at Cañadón Asfalto creek records strata accumulated in rift-related, lacustrine-fluvial-alluvial environments intermittently subjected to volcanic input, resembling the same conditions in the modern

Forest fires. Deep lacutrine bodies show abundance of Charales.[36]

Chacritas Member

The Chacritas Member hosted and hypersaline and alkaline lake similar to modern Lake Magadi in Kenya, while nearby environments where developed in a similar way to modern Waimangu Volcanic Rift Valley of New Zealand, with nearby volcanic influence of the Chon Aike Province that likely developed in a similar way to modern California volcanic fields

This member is mostly made of two major depositional settings: lacustrine and fluvial deposits, that have intervals of tuffaceous materials, suggesting this environments coevolved with volcanic activity.[4] Palustrine littoral environments levels are seen at Cerro Cóndor and Estancia Fossati, characterized by the presence of lacustrine limestones interbedded with shales, tuffs and sandstones.[37] The lacustrine section has been called the "Chacritas Paleolake", and seems to have been a rather saline or even hypersaline hydrologically closed pan lake, shallow in deep, with marginal zones and palustrine subenvironments made of low-energy ramp-like margins.[38][33] This can be seen on several sections such as the Cañadón Carrizal, where layers that how aerial exposures, and so a regression tendency in a low-energy lake, what changued the biota locally (ex. microbial activity on surfaces).[38] The lacustrine facies can be seen in other locations, as in Quebrada de las Chacritas, where at least 5 types of different facies, with both lacustrine and Stromatolite bioherm origin were described, showing this last ones a microbial belt.[39] The increased amount of algal matter and microbial bioherms suggest highstand levels of the lake, while on layers where mudcracks and pedogenesis occurs shows likely a lowstand of the water level that killed the microbial matter.[39] It has been determined that the main lacustrine body existed in the so-called "Cerro Cóndor Biohermal Belt", while Cañadón Las Chacritas facies show progradations towards the south until it face basaltic materials in southern area of Cerro Cóndor, reflected in the flooding of the belt and increased algal fossils.[39] This lake was clearly influenced by the volcanic activity, as well was likely a product of the rifting that the Cañadón Asfalto basin suffered back in the Toarcian. This can be seen on the abundance of chert like the one recovered in modern Lake Magadi in Kenyan section of the African Rift.[38] This chert is indicator of high alkaline settings in shallow lacustrine units, thus temporal increasing of Magadi-like mineralization in the lake may have been possible.[38] An identical type of lake, known as "Carapace Lake", also developed in a rift system was located in the coeval Mawson Formation of Antarctica, what suggest that both, Carapace and Chacritas were likely alkaline lakes that had notorious influence of hydrothermal fluids.[40] This type of lacustrine facies is seen also in the Antarctic Peninsula Sweeney Formation and in the Larsen Basin, that represent a continuation of the same Biozone both Lonco Tapial and Cañadón Asfalto are included.[16]

The abundance of organic matter in the lacustrine facies, great presence of microinvertebrate fauna together with the rare presence of mudcracks, low breccia presence and pedogeniclayers suggest that the immediate setting along the lake had between arid and sub-humid conditions. Nearby emerged settings have abundant

Classopollis spp., key genera for thermophilic settings, what can suggest the nearby emerged lands had warm and dry conditions.[4] Other species suggest a warm to warm-temperate climate, with markedly seasonal (monsoonal) characteristics that coincide with the presence of the Seasonally Dry Subtropical Biome.[41] Overall this flora, as recovered in the Cañadón Lahuincó and Cañadón Caracoles sections suggest the presence of fluvial (riparian) and coastal lacustrine floras, along with inland dry settings dominated by Conifers, overall in a similar distribution that the one seen in coaeval layers in Australia, as well the Mawson Formation in Antarctica.[41] Data from local cuticles of Araucariaceous and Cheirolepidicaceous conifers have been put under microscope, what can lead to future deeper interpretations of local climate fluctuation.[42] Initial revisions of Brachyphyllum spp. cuticles has led to know the presence of common environmental stress on local conifers during the deposition of the Chacritas member.[43]

Puesto Almada Member

This member was originally described as being mostly a fluvial transition where the local lacustrine settings disappeared, yet, locations such as Cerro Bandera show that it hosted lacustrine, palustrine, and pedogenic deposits.[44] Alluvial facies are the main indicators of the sediment supply, while the lacustrine facies suggest a second water filling locally, where a smaller body of water known as "Almada Paleolake" was developed, creating also several coeval wetlands that are more notorious towards the uppermost section.[45] Tuff intrusions are more scarce than in the underlaying section and seem to be derived from ash directly falling into water.[44] Despite its name, the "Almada Fish Fauna", including genera such as Condorlepis groeberi, has been proven to belong to the Cañadón Calcáreo Formation, as well the crocodrilian genus Almadasuchus, all of this is due to the uncertain difference and limit between both units.[46] Overall climate conditions where similar to the underliying section, yet with a more marked seasonality and a more humid touch.[44]

Paleobiota

Main article: Paleobiota of the Cañadón Asfalto Formation

The rocks of the formation preserve a diverse biota, including plants, dinosaurs, invertebrates, mammals and pterosaurs, among others. Notable named dinosaurs include theropods (Asfaltovenator,[47] Condorraptor, Eoabelisaurus,[48] and Piatnitzkysaurus[49]), sauropods (Bagualia,[8][verification needed] Patagosaurus,[50] and Volkheimeria[51]), and ornithischians (Manidens[52]).

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Stipanicic, P.N.; Rodrigo, F.O.L.; Martínez, C.G (1968). "Las formaciones presenonianas en el denominado Macizo Nord patagónico y regiones adyacentes. Revista Asociación Geológica Argentina". 23 (2): 67–95.
  2. hdl:11336/182449
    .
  3. ^ a b c d e f Figari, Eduardo G.; Roberto A. Scasso; Rubén N. Cúneo, and Ignacio Escapa. 2015. Estratigrafía y evolución geológica de la Cuenca de Cañadón Asfalto, Provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis 22. 135–169. Accessed 2018-09-10.
  4. ^
    hdl:11336/182449
    . Retrieved 29 July 2022.
  5. S2CID 134945437
    .
  6. ^
    ISSN 1342-937X
    .
  7. ^
    hdl:11336/36240
    .
  8. ^
    S2CID 226982302
    .
  9. ^
    S2CID 225120452
    . Retrieved 27 August 2021.
  10. ^
    ISSN 0012-8252
    .
  11. ISSN 1460-2415
    .
  12. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.03.016
    . Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  13. ^ Cabaleri, N.; Volkheimer, W.; Armella, C.; Gallego, O.; Silva Nieto, D.; Páez, M.; Koukharsky, M. (2010). "Estratigrafía, análisis de facies y paleoambientes de la Formación Cañadón Asfalto en el depocentro jurásico Cerro Cóndor, provincia del Chubut". Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina. 66 (3): 349–367. Retrieved 2022-09-05.
  14. ISSN 0012-8252
    .
  15. ISSN 0016-7606
    .
  16. ^
    S2CID 130465133
    . Retrieved 5 September 2022.
  17. ^ Piatnyzky, A. (1936). "Estudio geológico de la región del río Chubut y del río Genoa". Boletín Informaciones Petroleras. 12 (137): 83–118.
  18. ^ a b c Figari, E. G. (2005). "Evolución tectónica de la cuenca de Cañadón Asfalto (zona del Valle Medio del Río Chubut)" (PDF). (Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales). 1 (1): 1–198. Retrieved 2 August 2022.
  19. ^ Frenguelli, J. (1949). "Los estratos con "Estheria" en el Chubut (Patagonia)". Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina. 4 (4): 11–24. Retrieved 27 December 2021.
  20. ^ Tasch, P.; Volkheimer, W. (1970). "Jurassic conchostracans from Patagonia". The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions. 50 (3): 24–48. Retrieved 29 July 2022.
  21. S2CID 34854458
    . Retrieved 2 August 2022.
  22. ^ Cortés, J.M. (1990). "Reactivación tectónica JurásicoCretácica en el Chubut Central, Argentina". XI Congreso Geológico Argentino, Resumenes. 11 (2): 315–317.
  23. ^ Figari, E.G. (2005). "Evolución Tectónica de la Cuenca de Cañadón Asfalto". Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Biblioteca Digital FCEN-UBA. 3896 (1): 1–198.
  24. ^ a b Figari, Eduardo G.; Roberto A. Scasso; Rubén N. Cúneo, and Ignacio Escapa. 2015. Estratigrafía y evolución geológica de la Cuenca de Cañadón Asfalto, Provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis 22. 135–169. Accessed 2018-09-10.
  25. ^ a b c d e f Allard, José Oscar; Paredes, José Matildo; Foix, Nicolás; Manuel, Sánchez Federico (2021). "Estratigrafía de la Cuenca de Cañadón Asfalto". Relatorio XXI Congreso Geológico Argentino. 21 (3): 187–267. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  26. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2011.03.011
    . Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  27. ^ Cortiñas, J.S. (1984). "Estratigrafía y facies del Jurásico entre Nueva Lubecka, Ferrarotti y Cerro Colorado. Su relación con los depósitos coetáneos del Chubut central". IX Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas III: San Carlos de Bariloche. 3 (4): 283–299.
  28. S2CID 248368302
    .
  29. ^ Figari, E.G. (2011). "The Sierra de la Manea Formation (Titho- Neocomian) Composite- Stratotype, Cañadon Asfalto Basin, Patagonia, Argentina". XVIII Congreso Geológico Argentino. 18 (2): 1012–1013. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  30. ^ Ferrari, S. M.; Bessone, S. (2015). "A new Early Jurassic marine locality from southwestern Chubut Basin, Argentina" (PDF). Andean Geology. 42 (3): 349–363. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  31. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.03.016
    . Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  32. ^
    ISSN 0020-6814
    .
  33. ^ a b Cabaleri, N.; Volkheimer, W.; Armella, C.; Gallego, O.; Silva Nieto, D.; Páez, M.; Koukharsky, M. (2010). "Estratigrafía, análisis de facies y paleoambientes de la Formación Cañadón Asfalto en el depocentro jurásico Cerro Cóndor, provincia del Chubut". Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina. 66 (3): 349–367. Retrieved 2022-09-05.
  34. ISSN 0016-7649
    .
  35. ISSN 0016-7649
    .
  36. ^ Scasso, Roberto; Escapa, Ignacio; Cúneo, N. Rubén; Ramezani, Jahandar; Fantasia, Alicia; Karl, B. Föllmi; Adatte, Thierry; Spangenberg, Jorge E.; Schoene, Blair (2019). "The type locality of the Cañadón Asfalto Formation revisited: new stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental considerations". Simposio; VII Simposio Argentino del Jurásico. 8 (1): 23.
  37. ^ Cabaleri, Nora; Volkheimer, Wolfgang; Armella, Claudia; Gallego, Oscar Florencio; Monferran, Mateo Daniel; Cagnoni, Mariana; Silva Nieto, Diego; Páez, Manuhel (2010). "Humedales jurásicos y del J/K en la Cuenca Cañadón Asfalto, río Chubut medio. Argentina". 4º Simposio Argentino del Jurásico. 4 (2): 18.
  38. ^
    S2CID 129090656
    . Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  39. ^ a b c Cabaleri, N.; Armella, C. (1999). "Facies lacustres de la Formación Cañadón Asfalto (Calloviano-Oxfordiano) en la quebrada Las Chacritas, Cerro Cóndor, provincia del Chubut" (PDF). Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina. 54 (4): 375–388. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  40. hdl:2262/96280
    . Retrieved 8 March 2022.
  41. ^ a b Olivera, D. (2012). "Estudio palinológico y palinofacies del Jurásico Medio y Tardío de la Provincia de Chubut: Sistemática, Bioestratigrafía y Paleoecología" (PDF). CONICET: Universidad Nacional del Sur. 1 (1): 1–284. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  42. S2CID 136038597
    . Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  43. ^ Sender, Luis Miguel; Escapa, Ignacio H; Cunéo, Rubèn (2015). "Diversidad de coníferas de la Formación Cañadón Asfalto (Jurásico Inferior- Medio) en la Patagonia central Argentina: aplicación de nuevas técnicas en el estudio de cutículas fósiles". Ameghiniana. 52 (4): 39. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  44. ^
    hdl:11336/2418
    .
  45. hdl:11336/2418
    . Retrieved 18 August 2022.
  46. ^ López-Arbarello, Adriana; Sferco, Emilia; Rauhut, Oliver W.M. (2013). "A new genus of coccolepidid fishes (Actinopterygii, Chondrostei) from the continental Jurassic of Patagonia" (PDF). Palaeontologia Electronica. 16 (1): 7–23. Retrieved 18 August 2022.[permanent dead link]
  47. PMID 31827108
    .
  48. PMID 22628475
    .
  49. ISBN 978-0253352897
    .
  50. S2CID 237537773
    . Retrieved 1 August 2022.
  51. ^ Holwerda, F. M. (2019). "Revision of basal sauropods from the Middle Jurassic of Patagonia and the early evolution of sauropods" (PDF). (Doctoral dissertation, lmu) Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität München. 2 (1): 1–250. Retrieved 1 August 2022.
  52. S2CID 22636871
    .

Bibliography
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cañadón_Asfalto_Formation&oldid=1220621756"