Internet Protocol
Internet protocol suite |
---|
Application layer |
Transport layer |
Internet layer |
Link layer |
The Internet Protocol (IP) is the
IP has the task of delivering
IP was the
The first major version of IP,
Function

The Internet Protocol is responsible for addressing
Each datagram has two components: a header and a payload. The IP header includes a source IP address, a destination IP address, and other metadata needed to route and deliver the datagram. The payload is the data that is transported. This method of nesting the data payload in a packet with a header is called encapsulation.
IP addressing entails the assignment of IP addresses and associated parameters to host interfaces. The address space is divided into
Version history


In May 1974, the
IP versions 1 to 3 were experimental versions, designed between 1973 and 1978.[5] The following Internet Experiment Note (IEN) documents describe version 3 of the Internet Protocol, prior to the modern version of IPv4:
- IEN 2 (Comments on Internet Protocol and TCP), dated August 1977 describes the need to separate the TCP and Internet Protocol functionalities (which were previously combined). It proposes the first version of the IP header, using 0 for the version field.
- IEN 26 (A Proposed New Internet Header Format), dated February 1978 describes a version of the IP header that uses a 1-bit version field.
- IEN 28 (Draft Internetwork Protocol Description Version 2), dated February 1978 describes IPv2.
- IEN 41 (Internetwork Protocol Specification Version 4), dated June 1978 describes the first protocol to be called IPv4. The IP header is different from the modern IPv4 header.
- IEN 44 (Latest Header Formats), dated June 1978 describes another version of IPv4, also with a header different from the modern IPv4 header.
- IEN 54 (Internetwork Protocol Specification Version 4), dated September 1978 is the first description of IPv4 using the header that would be standardized in RFC 760.
The dominant internetworking protocol in the
Versions 2 and 3, and a draft of version 4, allowed an address length of up to 128 bits,[6] but this was mistakenly[citation needed] reduced to 32 bits in the final version of IPv4.
Version number 5 was used by the Internet Stream Protocol, an experimental streaming protocol that was not adopted.[5]
The successor to IPv4 is
The assignment of the new protocol as IPv6 was uncertain until due diligence assured that IPv6 had not been used previously.
Reliability
The design of the Internet protocol suite adheres to the
As a consequence of this design, the Internet Protocol only provides
All fault conditions in the network must be detected and compensated by the participating end nodes. The
IPv4 provides safeguards to ensure that the header of an IP packet is error-free. A routing node discards packets that fail a header checksum test. Although the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) provides notification of errors, a routing node is not required to notify either end node of errors. IPv6, by contrast, operates without header checksums, since current link layer technology is assumed to provide sufficient error detection.[14][15]
Link capacity and capability
The dynamic nature of the Internet and the diversity of its components provide no guarantee that any particular path is actually capable of, or suitable for, performing the data transmission requested. One of the technical constraints is the size of data packets possible on a given link. Facilities exist to examine the maximum transmission unit (MTU) size of the local link and Path MTU Discovery can be used for the entire intended path to the destination.[16]
The IPv4 internetworking layer automatically fragments a datagram into smaller units for transmission when the link MTU is exceeded. IP provides re-ordering of fragments received out of order.[17] An IPv6 network does not perform fragmentation in network elements, but requires end hosts and higher-layer protocols to avoid exceeding the path MTU.[18]
The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is an example of a protocol that adjusts its segment size to be smaller than the MTU. The User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and ICMP disregard MTU size, thereby forcing IP to fragment oversized datagrams.[19]
Security
During the design phase of the ARPANET and the early Internet, the security aspects and needs of a public, international network could not be adequately anticipated. Consequently, many Internet protocols exhibited vulnerabilities highlighted by network attacks and later security assessments. In 2008, a thorough security assessment and proposed mitigation of problems was published.[20] The IETF has been pursuing further studies.[21]
See also
References
- )
- ^ Charles M. Kozierok, The TCP/IP Guide
- ^ "IP Technologies and Migration — EITC". www.eitc.org. Archived from the original on 2021-01-05. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
- ISSN 1558-0857.
The authors wish to thank a number of colleagues for helpful comments during early discussions of international network protocols, especially R. Metcalfe, R. Scantlebury, D. Walden, and H. Zimmerman; D. Davies and L. Pouzin who constructively commented on the fragmentation and accounting issues; and S. Crocker who commented on the creation and destruction of associations.
- ^ a b Stephen Coty (2011-02-11). "Where is IPv1, 2, 3, and 5?". Archived from and-5/ the original on 2020-08-02. Retrieved 2020-03-25.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ Postel, Jonathan. "Internet Protocol Version 2" (PDF). rfc-editor. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ "IPv6 Adoption in 2021". RIPE Labs. Retrieved 2021-09-20.
- ^ "IPv6 – Google". www.google.com. Retrieved 2023-05-19.
- ^ Mulligan, Geoff. "It was almost IPv7". O'Reilly. O'Reilly Media. Archived from the original on 5 July 2015. Retrieved 4 July 2015.
- ^ "Version Numbers". www.iana.org. Retrieved 2019-07-25.
- RFC 1606: A Historical Perspective On The Usage Of IP Version 9. April 1, 1994.
- .
- ^ "internet protocols". hfhr.pl. Retrieved 2020-12-04.[permanent dead link]
- RFC 1726section 6.2
- RFC 2460
- ISBN 978-81-219-4055-9.
- ISBN 1-56205-714-6
- ^ Bill Cerveny (2011-07-25). "IPv6 Fragmentation". Arbor Networks. Retrieved 2016-09-10.
- Symantec. Retrieved 4 May 2014.
- CPNI, archived from the original(PDF) on 2010-02-11
- .
External links

- Manfred Lindner. "IP Technology" (PDF). Retrieved 2018-02-11.
- Manfred Lindner. "IP Routing" (PDF). Retrieved 2018-02-11.