List of battlecruisers of Germany

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A line of large warships. Thick black smoke pours from their funnels as they steam through choppy seas.
Seydlitz leads Moltke, Hindenburg, Derfflinger and Von der Tann into internment in Scapa Flow

The

Kaiserliche Marine, the navy of the German Empire, built a series of battlecruisers in the first half of the 20th century. The battlecruiser type was an outgrowth of older armored cruiser designs; they were intended to scout for the main battle fleet and attack the reconnaissance forces of opposing fleets. Kaiser Wilhelm II insisted that the new battlecruisers be able to fight in the line of battle with battleships to counter Germany's numerical inferiority compared to the British Royal Navy
.

name ship
and Graf Spee—were launched but never completed, and the other two were in earlier stages of work when they were canceled towards the end of the war. Serious work never began on the three Ersatz Yorck-class ships.

Six of the seven battlecruisers completed before or during World War I saw relatively heavy combat, primarily in the

Turkish Navy until the 1950s; she was eventually broken up for scrap
in the 1970s.

The eventual successor to the Kaiserliche Marine, the Kriegsmarine of Nazi Germany, considered building three O-class battlecruisers before World War II as part of the Plan Z buildup of the navy. The outbreak of war in 1939 caused the plans to be shelved, and none of these ships were built.[a]

Key
Main guns The number and type of the main battery guns
Displacement Ship displacement at full combat load
Propulsion Number of shafts, type of propulsion system, and top speed generated
Service The dates work began and finished on the ship and its ultimate fate
Laid down The date the keel began to be assembled
Commissioned The date the ship was Commissioned

Kaiserliche Marine

SMS Von der Tann

A large light gray warship sits motionless in harbor. Two tall masts stand in the center of the ship.
Von der Tann

SMS Von der Tann was the first German

triple-expansion steam engines with more powerful steam turbines; Von der Tann was the first large German warship to be fitted with turbine propulsion.[1][2]

Upon entering service, Von der Tann joined the fleet's main reconnaissance unit,

scuttled with the rest of the fleet. She was raised in 1930 and broken up for scrap between 1931 and 1934.[3]

Summary of the Von der Tann class
Ship Armament[5] Displacement[6] Propulsion[5] Service[5][7]
Laid down Commissioned Fate
SMS Von der Tann 8 × 28 cm (11 in) SK L/45 guns 21,300 t (21,000 long tons) 4 (51.39 km/h; 31.93 mph) 21 March 1908 1 September 1910 Scuttled at Scapa Flow on 21 June 1919, wreck raised 1930s and scrapped, 1931–1934

Moltke class

A large, light gray warship sits in harbor, the two forward gun barrels are turned slightly to the left.
Goeben in port

Moltke and Goeben, improvements over the preceding Von der Tann, were ordered in 1908 and 1909, respectively. While their design was not as contentious as with the Von der Tann, there were still disagreements between Tirpitz and elements of the German naval administration over whether the main battery guns should be increased in number or caliber. Tirpitz and the Construction Office favored the increase to ten guns, while the General Office preferred repeating Von der Tann but with eight 30.5 cm (12 in) guns, to mirror the development from the contemporary

dreadnought battleships. It was eventually decided that ten 28 cm guns would be mounted, though new, longer-barreled versions were adopted. The longer barrels increased muzzle velocity, which in turn offered improved armor penetration. In addition to the increased main battery, the two Moltke-class ships were slightly larger and better armored than Von der Tann.[8][9]

Moltke joined Von der Tann in the battlecruiser squadron upon her commissioning, and saw action against the British in the North Sea, including the

attacked British forces outside the Dardanelles in 1918 and struck three mines. The ship continued in Turkish service until 1973 when she was sold for scrapping.[10]

Summary of the Moltke class
Ship Armament[5] Displacement[5] Propulsion[5] Service[11][12]
Laid down Commissioned Fate
SMS Moltke 10 × 28 cm SK L/50 guns 25,400 t (25,000 long tons) 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 28.4 kn (52.6 km/h; 32.7 mph) 7 December 1908 30 August 1911 Scuttled at Scapa Flow on 21 June 1919, wreck raised 1927 and scrapped
SMS Goeben 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 28 kn (52 km/h; 32 mph) 28 August 1909 2 July 1912 Transferred to the Ottoman Empire on 16 August 1914, scrapped in 1973

SMS Seydlitz

A large gray battlecruiser steams through choppy seas, thick black smoke pours from its rear smoke stack.
Seydlitz steaming to Scapa Flow

Seydlitz represented an incremental improvement over the Moltke class; the limited nature of the improvements was in large part dictated by the Reichstag (Imperial Diet), which rejected the possibility of any increase in cost for the next battlecruiser. Improvements to the Moltke design were secured only through pressure Tirpitz was able to place on steel suppliers and the ship's builder for discounts, which provided the necessary budgetary room to alter the design. Tirpitz still pressed for a British-style battlecruiser with light armor and larger guns, but his views were again rejected. Seydlitz was slightly larger than the two previous ships, carried slightly thicker belt armor, and had a taller forecastle to improve seakeeping in bad weather. Seydlitz mounted the same ten 28 cm guns as in the Moltke class in the same arrangement.[13]

Upon commissioning into the fleet, Seydlitz became the flagship of Rear Admiral Franz von Hipper, the commander of I Scouting Group. The ship took part in most of the major fleet operations during the war. At the Battle of Dogger Bank, Seydlitz was hit in her after turrets by two or three 34.4 cm (13.5 in) shells from HMS Lion; the shells burned out the turrets and nearly destroyed the ship. By April 1916, she had been replaced as Hipper's flagship by the new battlecruiser Lützow.[14] At Jutland, Seydlitz and Derfflinger inflicted fatal damage on the British battlecruiser HMS Queen Mary early in the action. Seydlitz was badly mauled in later parts of the battle, receiving 21 large-caliber hits, suffering more than 150 casualties, and taking in over 5,300 t (5,200 long tons; 5,800 short tons) of water. Despite the immense damage, Seydlitz was able to make the trip back to Wilhelmshaven, where she was repaired.[15][16] As with Von der Tann and Moltke, Seydlitz was interned and eventually scuttled in Scapa Flow.[17]

Summary of the Seydlitz class
Ship Armament[18] Displacement[12] Propulsion[18] Service[18][19]
Laid down Commissioned Fate
SMS Seydlitz 10 × 28 cm SK L/50 guns 28,550 t (28,100 long tons) 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 28.1 kn (52.0 km/h; 32.3 mph) 4 February 1911 22 May 1913 Scuttled at Scapa Flow on 21 June 1919, wreck raised 1928 and scrapped

Derfflinger class

Several large gray warships sit motionless in harbor.
Hindenburg (center) and Derfflinger (left background) in Scapa Flow

The three Derfflinger-class ships were the last battlecruisers completed for the German navy. The ships' primary armament was radically modified compared to the older ships. The number of guns was reduced to eight, but their diameter was increased to 30.5 cm (12 in). They were also placed in two

name ship, was completed shortly after the outbreak of World War I. Lützow followed in August 1915, and Hindenburg joined the fleet in May 1917.[21] Derfflinger was involved in most of the fleet actions during the war. At Jutland she fired on Queen Mary and contributed to her destruction, along with Seydlitz. Derfflinger and Lützow later concentrated their fire on Invincible and destroyed her. However, during the battle, Lützow was severely damaged by at least 24 heavy-caliber shells and was unable to make it back to Germany. She was scuttled early the following morning. Hindenburg's career was much less eventful; she was completed so late in the war that she saw no significant action against the British fleet. She and Derfflinger were interned and scuttled in Scapa Flow with the rest of the fleet.[22]

Summary of the Derfflinger class
Ship Armament[23] Displacement[18] Propulsion[24] Service[21][23]
Laid down Commissioned Fate
SMS Derfflinger 8 × 30.5 cm (12 in) SK L/50 guns 31,200 t (30,700 long tons) 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 26.5 kn (49.1 km/h; 30.5 mph) 30 March 1912 1 September 1914 Scuttled in Scapa Flow on 21 June 1919, wreck raised 1939, broken up after 1946
SMS Lützow 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 26.4 kn (48.9 km/h; 30.4 mph) May 1912 8 August 1915 Scuttled after severe damage at the Battle of Jutland, 1 June 1916
SMS Hindenburg 31,500 t (31,000 long tons) 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 26.6 kn (49.3 km/h; 30.6 mph) 1 October 1913 10 May 1917 Scuttled in Scapa Flow on 21 June 1919, wreck raised 1930, scrapped 1930–1932

Mackensen class

Plan and profile drawing of the Macksensen design

Following the realization in February 1915 that the war would not be won quickly, the Navy department decided to replace the six armored cruisers that had been lost thus far.[25] The ships were improved versions of the Derfflinger class; the primary alterations being the adoption of the 35 cm (13.8 in) gun for the main battery, along with a full-length forecastle deck. Four ships were ordered and laid down, but only two of them, Mackensen and Graf Spee, were launched.[26] None of the ships were completed, as work had been diverted to U-boat construction.[27] All four ships were broken up in Germany between 1921 and 1924.[26]

Summary of the Mackensen class
Ship Armament[28] Displacement[28] Propulsion[28] Service[28]
Laid down Commissioned Fate
SMS Mackensen 8 × 35 cm (13.8 in) SK L/45 guns 35,300 t (34,700 long tons) 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 28 kn (52 km/h; 32 mph) 1914 Broken up, 1922
SMS Graf Spee 1915 Broken up, 1921–1922
SMS Prinz Eitel Friedrich Broken up, 1921
SMS Fürst Bismarck Broken up, 1922

Ersatz Yorck class

Line-drawing of Ersatz Yorck

The three ships of the Ersatz Yorck class were originally ordered as Mackensen-class ships, but the design was modified in January 1917 to increase the armament to eight 38 cm (15 in) guns. The Ersatz Yorcks were otherwise similar to the Mackensens, with the exception of the funnels. The Ersatz Yorck-class ships were modified to trunk the two smoke uptakes of the previous design into one large funnel. Only the lead ship was laid down, and work did not proceed far; only about 1,000 metric tons of steel had been assembled by the time work ceased. The other two ships were assigned to shipyards, but work never began.[29]

Summary of the Ersatz Yorck class
Ship Armament[30] Displacement[30] Propulsion[30] Service[30][31]
Laid down Commissioned Fate
Ersatz Yorck 8 × 38 cm (15 in) SK L/45 guns 38,000 t (37,400 long tons) 4 screws, Parsons steam turbines, 27.3 kn (50.6 km/h; 31.4 mph) June 1916 Broken up on the slipway
Ersatz Gneisenau
Ersatz Scharnhorst

Kriegsmarine

O class

Line-drawing of the O class

The O-class battlecruisers were designed in 1937 to supplement the P-class cruisers then planned for the new German fleet. The three ships were armed with six 38 cm guns in three twin turrets, similar to the arrangement of the main battery of the Scharnhorst-class battleships. They were intended for use as long-range commerce raiders, with the goal of forcing Great Britain to disperse its battleships as convoy escorts. The ships were never laid down due to the outbreak of World War II in September 1939.[32]

Summary of the O class
Ship Armament[33] Displacement[33] Propulsion[33] Service[33]
Laid down Commissioned Fate
O 6 × 38 cm SK C/34 guns 35,400 long tons (36,000 t)[b] 3 screws, 8 × diesel engines, 1 × steam turbine, 35 kn (65 km/h; 40 mph) Canceled after the outbreak of World War II
P
Q

Footnotes

Notes

  1. ^ The two Scharnhorst-class warships have been referred to as battlecruisers, especially in British works. The Kriegsmarine classified them as battleships, and a significant majority of scholarly works refer to them as such; hence, they are not included in this list.
  2. ^ Figures here are reversed intentionally; following the signing of the Washington Naval Treaty in 1922, the use of long tons to calculate ship displacement was standardized.

Citations

  1. ^ Staff 2006, pp. 3–5.
  2. ^ Dodson, pp. 77–80.
  3. ^ a b Staff 2006, pp. 9–11.
  4. ^ Tarrant, pp. 97–102, 119.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Gröner, p. 54.
  6. ^ Gröner, p. 53.
  7. ^ Staff 2006, p. 5.
  8. ^ Staff 2006, pp. 11–12.
  9. ^ Dodson, pp. 82–83.
  10. ^ Staff 2006, pp. 16–20.
  11. ^ Staff 2006, p. 12.
  12. ^ a b Gröner, p. 55.
  13. ^ Staff 2006, pp. 20–21.
  14. ^ Staff 2006, pp. 23–24.
  15. ^ Tarrant, pp. 100–101, 113, 118–119, 126, 137, 296, 298.
  16. ^ Staff 2006, p. 33.
  17. ^ Herwig, p. 256.
  18. ^ a b c d Gröner, p. 56.
  19. ^ Staff 2006, p. 21.
  20. ^ Staff 2006, p. 34.
  21. ^ a b Staff 2006, p. 35.
  22. ^ Hore, p. 73.
  23. ^ a b Gröner, p. 57.
  24. ^ Sturton, p. 37.
  25. ^ Herwig, p. 200.
  26. ^ a b Campbell & Sieche, p. 155.
  27. ^ Weir, p. 179.
  28. ^ a b c d Gröner, p. 58.
  29. ^ Campbell & Sieche, p. 156.
  30. ^ a b c d Gröner, p. 59.
  31. ^ Staff 2014, p. 324.
  32. ^ Sturton, p. 49.
  33. ^ a b c d Gröner, p. 68.

References

Further reading