Mambawakale
Mambawakale | |
---|---|
Holotype skull of Mambawakale | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Reptilia |
Clade: | Archosauria |
Clade: | Pseudosuchia |
Clade: | Paracrocodylomorpha |
Genus: | †Mambawakale Butler et al., 2022 |
Species: | †M. ruhuhu
|
Binomial name | |
†Mambawakale ruhuhu Butler et al., 2022
|
Mambawakale is a genus of large sized basal
History and naming
In 1963, following the independence of Tanzania,
The name Mambawakale is a composite of the
Description
Based on a skull length of 75 cm, Mambawakale would have been a large sized
Based on comparison with the South American Prestosuchus, Mambawakale may have had a skull length of up to 75 cm and would have been one of the largest Pseudosuchians of the middle Triassic, comparable in size with Etjosuchus.[1]
Phylogeny
The strict consensus tree of its type descriptionrecovered Mambawakale as a basal paracrocodylomorph in a polytomy with two other Manda Bed Pseudosuchians, Poposauroidea and Loricata. The inclusion of Nundasuchus did not affect this placement in the phylogenetic tree. However, overall its position within Archosauria is only weakly resolved and poorly supported. It was clearly identified as an archosaur, however its placement in Pseudosuchia was regarded as less certain, given that many traits that would nest it in the group are more broadly found across other archosaur clades.[1]
Archosauria
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A later study from 2024, focusing on Schultzsuchus from the Santa Maria Formation of Brazil, suggested an alternative placement. In said study's phylogeny, Mambawakale was recovered as the earliest branching member of the clade Poposauroidea, which was a diverse group containing several morphologically distinct pseudosuchians such as the bipedal Poposaurus, the sail-backed ctenosauriscids and the superficially ornithomimosaur-like Shuvosauridae. This placement was in large parts supported by three anatomical characters all relating to the maxilla. However, it is noted by Desojo and Rauhut that it would only take one step for Mambawakale to be recovered as a basal loricatan, meaning its placement was not without question.[4]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
- ^ hdl:10919/111401.
- doi:10.1038/201445a0.
- ^ Appleby, R.M.; Charig, A.J.; Cox, C.B.; Kermack, K.A.; Tarlo, L.B.H. (1967). "Reptilia" in "The Fossil Record". The Geological Society of London. pp. 695–731.
- doi:10.1002/ar.25401.