Oaxaca Valley

Coordinates: 16°57′03″N 96°25′16″W / 16.95083°N 96.42111°W / 16.95083; -96.42111
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Regions and districts of the state of Oaxaca, with the Valles Centrales in the centre

The Central Valleys (

archaeological sites are found in the Oaxaca Valley, including Monte Albán, Mitla, San José Mogote and Yagul. Today, the capital of the state, the city of Oaxaca
, is located in the central portion of the valley.

History

The Zapotec dominated the valley and much of the Oaxacan highlands from the Early Formative through the end of the Classic period. They were succeeded by the Mixtec culture during the Postclassic period.

Formative period

Prehistoric Caves of Yagul and Mitla in the Central Valley of Oaxaca
UNESCO World Heritage Site
LocationOaxaca, Mexico
CriteriaCultural: (iii)
Reference1352
Inscription2010 (34th Session)
Area1,515.17 ha (3,744.1 acres)
Buffer zone3,859.74 ha (9,537.6 acres)
Coordinates16°57′03″N 96°25′16″W / 16.95083°N 96.42111°W / 16.95083; -96.42111
Oaxaca Valley is located in Oaxaca
Oaxaca Valley
Location of Oaxaca Valley in Oaxaca
Oaxaca Valley is located in Mexico
Oaxaca Valley
Oaxaca Valley (Mexico)

One of the earliest settlements in the Oaxaca Valley was San José Mogote, located in the northwestern part of the Etla arm. Initially a permanent agricultural village during the Early Formative, it eventually developed social stratification where elite social positions were ascribed, i.e., sociopolitical prominence was achieved at birth, rather than earned.

It is clear that the Formative inhabitants of the valley interacted with the

Olmec influences on Mesoamerican culture
is still under debate.

While San José Mogote functioned as a small center in the northwestern arm of the valley, a number of other contemporaneous centers existed in the Oaxaca Valley. These were

Tilcajete in the Valle Grande and Yegüih in the Tlacolula arm. Through the end of the Middle Formative, population in the valley was dispersed and centered around these three separate settlements. Interaction between the three settlement systems was likely high, as a general homogeneity of ceramic styles and iconography
is evident.

Substantial cultural changes become evident during the Late Formative, including a dramatic population shift and the

capital of Monte Albán. There is no evidence that Monte Albán existed as of 600 BC, but by 400 BC the site, which is located atop a 400 m tall artificially leveled mountain and completely lacking in easily accessible water sources, had a population of ca. 5,200. Within 200 years, the settlement's population had grown to approximately 17,200, quickly making it one of the most populous Mesoamerican cities at the time. This inordinate population growth occurred simultaneously with the rapid abandonment of the other major centers occupying the three arms of the Oaxaca Valley (San José Mogote, Tilcajete, and Yegüih). The rapid shift in population and settlement, from dispersed localized centers to a concentration in a previously unsettled area, has been referred to as the “Monte Albán Synoikism” by Marcus and Flannery.[2]

Throughout the remainder of the

political power and administrative activities in the Oaxaca Valley, forming a state-level society. This Zapotec state subsequently expanded into the Oaxacan highland areas outside of the Oaxaca Valley and towards the Pacific lowlands to the south. As such, it became a prominent regional polity
in Mesoamerica.

Classic period

Throughout the Early Classic period (AD 200-650), Monte Albán and also the Oaxaca Valley formed the nucleus of the Zapotec polity. Interaction with other Classic period polities, specifically Teotihuacan, is evident. Monuments and murals at Monte Albán depict the arrival of visitors from Teotihuacan,[3] while there is evidence that a Zapotec “barrio” existed at the central Mexican city.[4]

Monte Albán's prominence lasted through to the end of the Early Classic. Perhaps too reliant on Teotihuacan, the decline of Monte Albán's influence appears to correlate with the collapse of the Teotihuacan polity. During this time other centers, once subjects of Monte Albán and incorporated within the Zapotec state, began to assert their own autonomy. These include Cuilpan and Zaachila in the Valle Grande and Lambityeco and Mitla in the eastern Tlacolula arm. By the time of the Terminal Classic (ca. AD 900), it is clear that the former capital had been abandoned.[5]

Looking southwest over the site of Monte Albán. Situated on a mountaintop, Monte Albán overlooks much of the Oaxaca Valley.

Postclassic period

During the Postclassic period (roughly AD 1000–1520), the Oaxaca Valley was still occupied by Zapotec people, but often fell under the political provenience of the

Aztec defeat of the Mixtec, the Zapotec were likewise conquered by the Aztec under the emperor Ahuitzotl, between 1497 and 1502. Although, they were not fully conquered. The Mixtecs and Zapotecs allied together and were able to survive. The Oaxaca Valley was subsequently subsumed within the Aztec Empire
.

Colonial period

The Aztec empire collapsed when their capital,

Marques del Valle de Oaxaca
.

In 1521, the Spanish settled in a community known as Segura de la Frontera, located in the central part of the Oaxaca Valley and approximately 9 km (5.6 mi) east of Monte Albán. Later known as Nueva Antequera, it was officially raised to the category of a "royal" city in 1532 by decree of Emperor

Oaxaca or Oaxaca de Juárez. Following the initial settlement of this community, the Spanish quickly introduced new agricultural crops and methods of cultivation into the Oaxaca Valley. For example, Cortés ordered the cultivation of wheat in the Etla arm and the construction of mills
.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Oaxaca: Región Valles Centrales". Enciclopedia de los Municipios de México. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
  2. ^ Marcus and Flannery (1996:140-146); Synoikism refers to the dramatic settlement of a new community that was previously non-existent and that incorporates communities that were separate or independent prior to the site's formation. As Marcus and Flannery mention, it is applied to the eventual formation of Sparta.
  3. ^ Marcus 1983.
  4. ^ Paddock 1983.
  5. ^ Blanton, et al. (1999)

References