Siege of Temeşvar (1716)
Siege of Temeşvar (Timișoara) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Austro-Turkish War (1716–1718) | |||||||
Siege of Temeşvar, anonymous engraving | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Habsburg Monarchy | Ottoman Empire | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Mustafa Pasha | |||||||
Strength | |||||||
45,000 | 16,000 | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
2,407 killed 4,190 wounded[1] |
3,000 killed 3,000 wounded[2] |
The siege of Temeşvar took place from 31 August to 12 October 1716 during the
Background
Towards the end of the 17th century, the
On 5 August 1716, Eugene of Savoy won
Siege
The fortifications were always in a state of repair and enhancement. Most were made of earth hardened by palisades of whitewashed tree trunks, which were ineffective against 18th century cannons. The only masonry buildings were the castle, the mosques and the
The siege began on 31 August. Between 1 and 15 September, the armies prepared for the battle. 3,000 people dug zigzag and parallel trenches alongside Palanca Mare. On 5 September, the first two batteries with nine cannons were installed and on 6 September there was another battery with five cannons whose fire covered the military works. On 8 September, the trenches almost reached the palisade and began the filling of the moat with fascines. To prevent this, on the night of 9 September, the Ottomans attacked the trenches with torches to ignite the fascines but they were repulsed because the torches indicated the target's position. On 10 September, the Schönborn Dragoon Regiment fought off another Ottoman attack.[5][16][17][18]
Beginning 16 September, the bombardment spread on the battlefield, growing in intensity as the cannons arrived and were installed. The first proposition to surrender was addressed on 17 September and was refused by the Ottomans. Between 20 September and 22 September the first breaches appeared in the walls and the wife and two sons of the beylerbey had been killed in their own house during the bombardment.[5][16][17]
In the meantime, another army corps consisting of 14 cavalry squadrons, 4 infantry battalions, 3 companies of grenadiers and 2 regiments of cuirassiers fighting under the command of General Count Étienne de Stainville, the commander of the imperial troops arrived in Timișoara from Alba Iulia. At the time, Eugene of Savoy controlled 70 regiments; 32 of which were infantry (69 battalions), 10 dragoon regiments (60 squadrons), 22 cavalry regiments (134 squadrons) and 6 hussar regiments (31 squadrons).[5][16][17][18][19][20][21]
On 25 September the bombardment from both sides was very intense. The following day, the Ottoman troops from Belgrade arrived; they attempted to supply the fortress and attacked three times from the south to break through the encirclement. Simultaneously, the defenders of the fortress attacked but the rescuing troops attacked before the agreed time and, with no help from inside the fortress, were pushed back. The attack from the fortress had also been repulsed because of the lack of organization, so the rescuing party was forced to turn back.[5][16][17][18]
On 30 September the counterguard was conquered at the cost of 455 deaths – of which 64 were officers – and 1,487 wounded, including 160 officers. Between 1-10 October, new preparations were being made and cannons were being placed. On 11 October, a new, massive bombardment with the aim of destroying the fortifications began. The attack was carried out by 43 pieces of heavy artillery and continued throughout the night.[5][17][22][23]
Aftermath
On 12 October at 11:30, the white flag of surrender appeared on a bastion.[5][17][22][23] The terms of surrender were:[1][2][24][25][26]
- The Ottoman army could leave with their families and belongings;
- The Ottoman army could leave with their weapons and make their way to Belgrade in eight stages () under escort until reaching Borča if they left hostages in Timișoara until they crossed the Danube;
- The Ottoman army would be provided with 7,000 wagons for transportation – an unrealistic request as ultimately they were provided with what could be found, namely 1,000;
- The Ottoman army would be provided with food along the way at a decent, proper price (not profiteering);
- The Ottoman army convoy would be safe from attacks en route;
- The Ottoman army could not take the artillery and ammunition, which were considered spoils of war; all of the cannons – of which about 120 had the Habsburg emblem on them, won over during the years – as well as 280 tons of gunpowder and 170 tons of lead, were left behind;[27][28]
- All of the other individuals would be allowed to leave or to stay – permitted for deserters;
- The Kurucs were also allowed to leave or stay;
- Those individuals who chose to leave were allowed to sell whatever they wished;
- The guarantee of this understanding.
The Ottoman army left the fortress on 17 October; Mustafa Pasha, the commander of the fort, in gratitude for being allowed to withdraw his forces undisturbed, presented the prince with a horse.[29] The following day, Eugene of Savoy entered the Timișoara Fortress. 466 Romanians and Orthodox Serbians, as well as 144 Jews and 35 Armenians, remained in Timișoara.[17][27][30]
After Belgrade's conquest by the Austrians in 1718, the Austro-Turkish war ended and the Treaty of Passarowitz confirmed that Banat of Temeswar – including Timișoara Fortress – belonged to the Habsburg Monarchy.[13] The city remained under military administration until 6 June 1778, when it was handed over to the Hungarian administration.[31][32] The fortress, however, remained under the Austrian military command until 27 December 1860, when the Banat was incorporated into the Kingdom of Hungary.[33]
Citations
- ^ a b Preyer, Monographie..., pp. 184–185
- ^ a b Hațegan, Prin Timișoara..., pp. 206–209
- ^ Ilieșiu, Monografia..., p. 65
- ^ Hațegan, Cronologia..., pp. 259–285
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Hațegan, Cronologia..., pp. 307–310
- ^ Hațegan, Prin Timișoara..., pp. 141–149
- ^ Preyer, Monographie..., p. 181
- ^ Hațegan, Cronologia..., p. 287
- ^ Hațegan, Prin Timișoara..., p. 157
- ^ Hațegan, Cronologia..., p. 305
- ^ a b c Preyer, Monographie..., p. 182
- ^ Hațegan, Cronologia..., p. 307
- ^ a b Hațegan, Istoria..., p. 59
- ^ Hațegan, Timișoara..., pp. 187–191
- ISBN 978-973-1958-28-6, pp. 43–45
- ^ a b c d e Hațegan, Prin Timișoara..., pp. 178–183
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Hațegan, Istoria..., pp. 60–62
- ^ a b c Preyer, Monographie..., p. 183
- ^ Cernovodeanu, P. and Vătămanu, T. N. (1977). (in French) Un médecin princier moins connu de la période phanariote: Michel Schendos van der Bech (1691–env. 1736) Archived 31 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Balkan Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, January 1977, ISSN 2241-1674, p. 15
- ^ Feneșan, Costin (2010) (in Romanian) O încercare nereușită de unire religioasă în Banatul de munte (1699), Banatica, nr. 20/2, Annex, p. 196
- ^ (in German) Krieg zwischen den Türken, dem Kaiser und Venedig: Einzelne kriegerische Vorfälle: Schlachtordnung der Kaiserlichen im Lager vor Temeswar, 20. September 1716[permanent dead link], Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (DDB), Karte VHK 17-14
- ^ a b Szentkláray, Temesvár ostroma, Általános roham
- ^ a b Hațegan, Prin Timișoara..., p. 204
- ^ Szentkláray, A kapituláczió, A török elvonulása
- ^ Ilieșiu, Monografia..., pp. 65–73
- ^ Hațegan, Istoria..., pp. 62–63
- ^ a b Hațegan, Cronologia..., p. 312
- ^ Hațegan, Prin Timișoara..., p. 187
- ISBN 9783702800048.
- ^ Ilieșiu, Monografia..., p. 73
- ^ Preyer, Monographie..., pp. 94, 210
- ^ Hațegan, Istoria..., p. 93
- ^ Preyer, Monographie..., pp. 114–115, 227–228
References
- Preyer, Johann Nepomuk (1995). (in German and Romanian) Monographie der königlichen Freistadt Temesvár – Monografia orașului liber crăiesc Timișoara, Timișoara: Ed. Amarcord, ISBN 973-96667-6-0
- Jenő Szentkláray (1911). (in Hungarian) Temes vármegye története – Temesvár története, Magyarország vármegyéi és városai cycle, Budapest (online version)
- Ilieșiu, Nicolae (1943). (in Romanian) Timișoara: Monografie istorică, Timișoara: Editura Planetarium, 2nd ed., ISBN 978-973-97327-8-9
- Hațegan, Ioan (2005). (in Romanian) Cronologia Banatului: Vilayetul de Timișoara, vol. II, part 2, Timișoara: Ed. Banatul, ISBN 973-7836-54-5(online version)
- Hațegan, Ioan (2006). (in Romanian) Prin Timișoara de odinioară: I. De la începuturi până la 1716, Timișoara: Ed. Banatul, ISBN 973-97121-8-5(online version)
- Hațegan, Ioan and Petroman, Cornel (2008). (in Romanian) Istoria Timișoarei, vol. I, Timișoara: Ed. Banatul, ISBN 978-973-88512-1-4