Talk:Daf
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bulgaria Low‑importance | |||||||
|
improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
daf vs. dap?
Daf and dap are used interchangeably in the beginning of the article; Google searching revealed little as far as which is more popular, so can an expert make a judgement as to which is more widely-used in English? Little.spoon 18:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
daf vs. dap?(Answer)
Both are right but Dap is the old name while Daf is the name whsich is used these days. Actually no one uses Dap these days and all the Iranian call it DAF.
Dap history
2 weeks ago when i check here it was long history of Daf but now!!!!! nothing who did remove it?
quiz of the year
concerning the edit I would like to ask the editors of this page: how important is mentioning "A daf is depicted on thebank note X of country Y". If it is why not putting: Book X in the year Y in page Z pictured a Daf. I am sure we find many references. Or more interestingly, the company A made a
- In my opinion, the fact that the Azerbaijani government considers this musical instrument of enough symbolic significance to depict it in its currency is interesting to our readership, and worthy of mention in a single, short sentence.
- You cannot sensibly compare a government's decision to showcase the instrument as a symbol of a culture (for that is what the banknote depiction connotes) with everyday depictions in random books or products.
- To be honest, I cannot understand why this fact wouldn't belong in the article.
- I'm not sure whether it should be mentioned in the history section (diff.); I would prefer to do it at the end of the lead section (diff.). But that can be discussed, and a new section on "Daf in Azerbaijan" can always be created. - Best, Ev (talk) 18:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I've given a third opinion over at
]File:Goblet drum 01.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Goblet drum 01.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 12:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC) ]
|
Origin
Daf belongs to Canaan tribes, why do Persians think it is their own instrument. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.51.181.43 (talk) 22:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Good point. Daf is prevalent throughout the middle east, and has been there got thousands of years. How could it be defined as a Persian instrument? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1205:C0BB:4085:D69F:1C49:C39F (talk) 14:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090414230520/http://www.nba.az/default.aspx to http://www.nba.az/default.aspx
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.nba.az/default.aspx?go=178&lng=en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Merger proposal
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to silence gives consent. Wildhorse3 (talk) 20:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)]
- The result of this discussion was to
I propose to merge
Daf in Punjab
@
- Though given that it is also used in Rajasthan, writing "Punjab region in India" would also be incorrect, maybe "Punjab and otger regions in India". --UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- The source you cited is from an unreliable publisher, please try to find source from a bit more reliable publisher. No, I dont have any issue if you write Northwestern india if the source says so. The source which you cited talks specifically about the Punjab state of india while the northwestern india includes, Rajhastan, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Utter Pradesh and union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. --Wildhorse3 (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Wildhorse3:The publisher has not been flagged as unreliable on reliable sources noticeboard. If you would like for the source to be flagged as such, you are free to begin a discussion on the noticeboard. Until then, it doesn't appear to be unreliable to me. __UnpetitproleX (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- The source you cited is from an unreliable publisher, please try to find source from a bit more reliable publisher. No, I dont have any issue if you write Northwestern india if the source says so. The source which you cited talks specifically about the Punjab state of india while the northwestern india includes, Rajhastan, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Utter Pradesh and union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. --Wildhorse3 (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Added two references, and also added a paragraph to the history section with those definitely reliable sources. Shouldn't be a problem anymore. UnpetitproleX (talk) 02:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC)