Talk:Kingdom Hearts Coded

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article nominee
Not listed
April 6, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Revisited revisited revisited

"Do not start an edit war", says someone intently interested in an edit war instead of actually looking at the article or even going through a search engine for a minute.

MOS:TM doesn't cleanly cover this, only mentioning names that begin with a lowercase letter. However, it does make a statement about using what sources do, which is how we got things like eBay and iPad. As it turns out, a lot of sources actually prefer to use "coded", particularly with Re:coded, simply because it's easier. Many of the sources actually in the article do, particularly Metacritic. IGN does, GameSpot does, Nintendo Life does, Eurogamer does, etc. In light of this, I'm not actually sure why it was moved back to "Coded" in the first place? Despatche (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was moved because of the discussion above. Pinging those editors as well @
IDV, and Judgesurreal777:. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Capitalize trademarks, being proper names.
— First sentence of

ping}}) czar 20:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Open world?

Would anyone consider this to be an open world game?

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20110128172700/http://nzgamer.com/ds/reviews/1278/kingdom-hearts-re-coded.html

talk) 08:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Open-world?

What is the consensus as to whether this game is an open-world game? Heres a sources that states such: http://web.archive.org/web/20110128172700/http://nzgamer.com/ds/reviews/1278/kingdom-hearts-re-coded.html

talk) 21:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]