User talk:Billmckern

Greetings. Thank you for your attention to the article Democrat Party (epithet). Please have a look at Talk:Democrat Party (epithet)#Russell Baker criticism. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* On article talk pages, please

@Rjensen:, @Sangdeboeuf: -- Sangdeboeuf, YOU'RE the one who has the problem. You're NOT "willing to discuss specific changes". What you do is lay down conditions and make stuff up, and then change the conditions once the original ones have been met. You're being disrespectful of the work of others and insisting that only you are right, and that you get to have everything your own way.

That's a problem for others, so you should stop.

Billmckern (talk) 21:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You posted about Lyon's "Deciding vote for Jefferson?" and the post was placed on the GA Review page - Talk:Matthew Lyon/GA1. Wanted you to know that I moved the post/thread to the main talkpage Talk:Matthew Lyon as that seems to be a better/more appropriate location for the post. Shearonink (talk) 03:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shearonink: Thanks for moving my commentary -- I thought I placed it on the talk page. I guess I should have paid closer attention.

Billmckern (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie891 has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a fresh pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Great Work on Robert H. Jackson!†

Hello Billmckern. I was wondering if you could look at the Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant article. It's rather large. I have made some progress on the lede section. Do you have any suggestions on how to make the article better ? You are welcome to make any edits if you have time. Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 01:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		You have done an excellent job not only with the references here but also great writing. Hoppyh (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bill! I just read that you are based in Vermont: whereabouts? I move to Brattleboro a year and a half ago, and haven't met any Wikimedians up here. Sadads (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadads: Barre City. I don't spend much time there at present, as much as I'd like to, because I'm employed in Virginia. I go home every so often to see family and friends, pick up mail, etc.

Billmckern (talk) 14:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! But bummer: D.C. area suck you in end, end of career with the Guard/Military? My dad had a similar military career ending down there. If there is a window of time that you plan to be up here for a while: I want to get the Vermont Historical Society to run an editathon at some point, and they have a really good library in Barre. I have the contact for the state librarian, but have been super busy over the last few months: so haven't reached out yet, Sadads (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadads: I've been in the National Guard for almost 35 years. I was a full timer for 17, and then went to work as a contract employee last year. Remains to be seen how much longer I'll stay in uniform as a part timer.

I've been to the VHS library in Barre -- it's at the old middle school on Washington Street, which was the high school before that. I've been a NHS member for several years. Let me know if you follow up on the editathon. There are some Vermont-specific articles that could definitely use some work.

Billmckern (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds a lot like my dad's career :) Would be awesome to have more Wikimedians up here in the Vermont area, but I know what the D.C. area offers.

As for topics, definitely: sounds like a plan! Are you going to try to come to Wikimania? It sounds like they are doing a WikiConference North America PreConference before Wikimania proper, since its in Montreal. Sadads (talk) 16:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Presented to Billmckern for making corrections in numerous articles of U.S. Representatives -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Seneca Haselton!

Owlsmcgee (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Billmckern. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I've seen your contributions to Iowa's 2nd congressional district (thanks!) and I was wondering if you had an image available of John Parsons Cook to complete the list. Also, an image of Benjamin T. Frederick would complete the 5th district's list. Thanks again.

WhatsUpWorld (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WhatsUpWorld: I usually run through all the names for one Congressional district to find and add as many illustrations as I can. If I haven't added anything for Cook and Frederick, it probably means I searched but didn't find anything. I'll look some more and see if I can turn up something.

Billmckern (talk) 01:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! WhatsUpWorld (talk) 01:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind if I move this page to

@Lwarrenwiki: That's fine. Thanks for doing it. I used "Richard M. Blatchford (born 1798)" because there was an existing red link for it. Most of the wiki links I've added in the few minutes since creating the article were for Richard Milford Blatchford.

Billmckern (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lwarrenwiki:, @Galobtter: Thanks for your help with Richard M. Blatchford (attorney) and the rest of the Blatchford family. I found most of the content for the article pretty quickly, and created the content in one sitting. I appreciate the assistance with upgrading, cleanup and "prettifying" -- including coming to consensus on details like what the article should be named, and then making the necessary edits and re-edits.

Thanks again.

Billmckern (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, I should be thanking you for creating a (very nice) article. :) Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Blatchstar for you!

	The History Barnstar
	For your dedicated and impressive work on articles relating to the Blatchford family. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your significant contribution to the John I. Slingerland page.

I'm changing his son's name back to Harmon once again. Harmon is my great-great grandfather, I have his personal records including his death certificate, I lived in his house & I visit his grave. I definitely know his name which is wrong in Burhans Genealogy on both pages referenced. It is correct in the death index. Please leave it as Harmon.

Thanks, Slvirgilio (talk) 02:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to get this article to B-class at some point soon. Over the weekend I'm goikg to check for more sources and go through the books to ensure the information is accurate and that nothing was left out. _{Vermont | reply here} 17:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'll add another rank insignia in his infobox for his position in the Vermont Militia. _{Vermont | reply here} 17:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vermont: Sounds good. Jewett's article popped up in my watch list the other day and I had some idle time on my hands, so I figured I'd try to make some improvements to the article. Fortunately there were a few pretty comprehensive sources available that were easy to find.

Billmckern (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I edited, however, I'm new and probably did it wrong. So figured I'd let you know since you're great at this. Nauertzy (talk) 05:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help with John Randolph of Roanoke. Brooks v. Sumner is famous enough, and unique in that nobody ever talks about other cane fights between congressmen, that I couldn't trust any assertion of another such fight without sources like you provided. Nyttend (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the plot of "Winner", you described the lab as being of Gale's design. But I thought Gale said something like, "We need ventilation, but I could make it work for a rudimentary cook." I got the impression Gus was bringing in Gale after the lab was designed. It's not a big deal, but I'm wondering if I missed something? Hoof Hearted (talk) 12:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoof Hearted: According to this review. "The most stunning new information imparted was that Lavandería Brillante’s transformation into an criminal-architectural marvel was, schematically, Gale’s design..."

This one reads "Gale Boetticher (David Costabile), who meticulously designed the lab per his specifications as lead cook, claims that he can work in the premises anyway, but Gus, ever the perfectionist, counters, "Not until it’s ready.""

I'll check the episode out in detail later today to make sure these reviews are accurate.

Billmckern (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those are good sources, but I suspect they're jumping the gun a little bit. Not trying to put too fine a point on it, but perhaps this episode revealed that the lab will become Gale's design. I think the sources you give could be interpretted that way too. It really seemed like that was the first time Gale was even aware of the "superlab". I'd be interested in your take on it after your review. Hoof Hearted (talk) 13:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoof Hearted: I don't see how the reviewers would be jumping the gun, since they're talking about the events in the present tense. "Is revealed", not "will be revealed", for example.

I'm sold on the idea of the lab being built according to Gale's plan as reasonable description. At the start of the scene, Gale tells Gus "I feel like we've been talking about this forever and now... here it is." Then he says "I mean, it's not exactly what we talked about, but it has possibilities, even unfinished." He adds "Ventilation at this point is the main hurdle", meaning he knows what the lab should have in terms of equipment and sees that it doesn't yet have everything.

To me all of that makes clear that Gus and Gale planned the lab's construction before Gus hired Werner, and since Gale is the expert, he would have provided detailed information about what would be required for a lab like that to be operated successfully. Gale's not coming in to the project at the tail end of the construction, he's clearly been there from the beginning. Sure, Gale doesn't explicitly say "You have constructed this lab according to my specifications", but in context, I think it's obvious that's what happened.

Billmckern (talk) 15:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work. I had forgotten about Gale's initial comments, and have come to agree with your analysis. It was probably the first time Gale was seeing it with his own eyes, which I mistook for discovery. Hoof Hearted (talk) 15:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Billmckern. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC) ==Seasonal Greetings==[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Billmckern, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:38, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the amazing work you've done on Sumter de Leon Lowry Jr.. I noticed you added "url-access=subscription" to a number of references, which seems like useful information. I haven't seen this before, does it make the page act differently? Thanks! Jacona (talk) 10:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jacona: "url-access=subscription" is a new parameter and replaced "subscription=yes". Now instead of seeing the text that a subscription is required, readers see the icon of a locked padlock. it's supposed to let the reader know that a subscription is required in order to view the actual content of the citation.

The old "subscription=yes" parameter was deprecated about two weeks ago. The new "url-access=subscription" parameter replaced it in articles automatically over the last several days thanks to the work of a bot. For articles that already had "subscription=yes" removed manually, or didn't have it included initially, editors will have to enter the new parameter manually. That's what I did with the Lowry article.

Billmckern (talk) 11:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	原星章
	Thanks for your work on the 1948 Senate election. Wikipedia needs this article, and I'm shocked Wikipedia didn't have it yet. Thanks again! Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Geographyinitiative: Likewise. I'll probably do a bio article of Porter in the near future. I'm also trying to find a decent illustration of him. Everything I've seen so far is too low quality for Wikimedia Commons.

Billmckern (talk) 05:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We are here only for a brief time. Thought you might appreciate the award on your user page. Btw, thank you for your service to our nation. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 04:58, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gwillhickers: Thanks for the kind words.

Billmckern (talk) 05:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't thank you enough for all of the help you have given me with the recent articles I have made on former Burlington mayors. I would give you a barnstar, but it seems that you have already been recognized enough. :) Jon698 Jon698 21:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon698: Thanks. My particular interests are US military and political history, especially Vermont and New York. I've done bios for Vermont's adjutants general, statewide officeholders, and Supreme Court justices. I'm currently working on and off on bios for Vermont's US Attorneys. After that, maybe Vermont's US marshals.

Billmckern (talk) 08:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On

Medal of Honor Legion of the United States, at the age of 18? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Theodora Agnes Peck. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Theodora Agnes Peck), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Amo Houghton, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen got here before I did, but good job with updating this article Billmckern. - Indefensible (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	For promptly cleaning up Thurlow Weed and finding and adding some excellent citations, you are worthy of the Citation Barnstar. Keep up the excellent work! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man- thanks for your great work on the 1948 United States Senate election in Texas page. The lawyer's son told us how the scam would be done in 1946 and got a Master's degree for it! Is there anything outside of Caro that tells us more about this thesis paper? There are some details in the paragraph on Wikipedia that are not found on page 321 in Caro's book. Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The thesis is called "Political conditions among Texas Mexicans along the Rio Grande". He did a republishing in 1974. I haven't found an online copy yet. I'm in Taiwan and the Amazon seller doesn't send stuff here, but if I could I would send you the money to buy this (like 6 dollars) and read it for us! Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Geographyinitiative: I found it on Ebay. The list of excluded countries for shipping does not include Taiwan. Does that help?

Billmckern (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to buy it, but ebay said, "This item does not ship to Taiwan. Here is what you can do: Change address Pick a different item that ships to you". Thanks for the advice ebay! Anyway, I will get it when I get stateside unless you get it first. Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Geographyinitiative: I pulled up the quote in the Google Books version and found the page number. I added the details to the reference.

Billmckern (talk) 10:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for all of the hard work you put in helping getting all of the mayors of Burlington covered. When I started less than 5 had articles and now only six lack articles. In the next few days I will start working on those six. Thank you for all of your help. - Jon698 talk 00:21 13 May 2020

With my recent edit, I was mostly motivated by the disconnect between the History of the Republican Party (United States) article, which says, "The Republican Party launched its first national convention in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on February 22, 1856." and the 1856 convention article, which claimed the same for the Philadelphia convention. Also, the convention article doesn't say that it was the first nominating convention, it says it was the first "national convention". I guess this is one of those calls where we need to see what the secondary sources have to say, and even then it's a judgement call. Brianyoumans (talk) 22:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianyoumans: The source cited in the article on the history of the Republican Party is a Pittsburgh newspaper from February 1856. I think sources from after early 1856 would indicate that the first national convention was the nominating convention in June. When sources talk about a party's convention, as far as I can tell they always mean the convention that nominates candidates for president and vice president. If you're going to look into this further, please let me know what you think.

Regards,

Billmckern (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does seem to be a popular claim in Pittsburgh - see here]. Also see this. We could simply change the word "national" to "nominating" in the 1856 convention article lead, and that would be completely accurate. Brianyoumans (talk) 23:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incidently, I got here from writing an article on Edward D. Gazzam, who was at the 1856 convention in Philadelphia. I'm not sure whether he was at the Pittsburgh meeting, although he was from Pittsburgh. Brianyoumans (talk) 23:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianyoumans: Maybe call one the first organizing convention and the other the first nominating convention? those would seem to be two accurate statements that we could easily provide references for.

Billmckern (talk) 00:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm totally ok with that. Brianyoumans (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! :) I translated an article from the Russian Wikipedia. Please, if it does not bother you, check it and remove the machine translation if there is one. Article:

So are you saying the content was redundant? :) S0091 (talk) 21:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: Yes. the passage about the election for local leader was included in consecutive paragraphs. I deleted it from the first and left it in the second.

Billmckern (talk) 21:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry. I really meant this as a lighthearted comment because of your edit summary, rather than an actual concern. I do appreciate the reply. :) S0091 (talk) 21:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: Thanks for your reply. Yeah, I got it. I could have called it the Department of Redundancy Department.

I just get annoyed at editors who seem to know that Robert Byrd was in the KKK for a few years in the 1940s - and nothing else about him.

And of course, those same editors will never be found discussing the racism of the subjects in the articles about Thurmond, Helms, etc. Kind of an obvious double standard.

Billmckern (talk) 21:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is interesting. I have not thought about Jesse Helms in years and too young at the time to understand politics (not that I have a great understanding now). Well now you have piqued my curiosity. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 21:52, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Billmckern, unfortunately I don't have time tomorrow to review whether these recent edits at Nantucket about the municipality and county being a consolidated entity are true and properly sourced. Perhaps you could look into it. I suggested that the editor use the talk page. My continued reversion might start an edit war. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 02:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have any problem with my GA nomination of Bruce Magruder do you? Would you rather I left it to you since you are the creator and sole editor of the page? REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@REDMAN 2019: Feel free. I have no issues it it. Thanks for letting me know.

Billmckern (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say that—lucky for you—I was (ironically) glad to see that you had reverted my edit, as, in the meantime I had a chance to read Morgan's "exposé" (note the quotations), and realized that—bereft of any actual scandalous secret-revealing concerning the nefarious nature of your cult—the entire plot was a ruse by your "society" to create the Anti-Masonic Party as controlled opposition. Anyway, have a nice day! WikiEditorial101 (talk) 02:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiEditorial101: I have no idea what you mean with this comment.

As I explained in the comment for the revert, I reversed the edit because the organization that said it had paid Morgan to leave wasn't saying that they had been accused of killing him and were denying it. They were denying only that Morgan was dead.

Billmckern (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. WikiEditorial101 (talk) 02:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article on a descendant of Jonathan Fairbanks. I have nominated it for Good Article. Take a look. --Doug Coldwell (talk)

Not sure what you are doing with your sfn additions on George C. Marshall. Is there a timeline somewhere? There is something missing there - or I am missing something. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 01:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I was missing something. When I clicked on the footnote, my page barely moved so I didn't see the citation at the top. Sorry to bother! --John (User:Jwy/talk) 01:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jwy: OK - as long as you're all set.

Billmckern (talk) 01:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be good if there was some way to combine footnotes 8 and 12, actually. That's what confused me. I'll look into when I'm more awake. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 02:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jwy: Fixing up the Marshall article is something I've wanted to do for a while. I'll probably make it my next project - adding content, filling in bare references, adding references where they're needed, combining duplicates, etc.

Billmckern (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great! He's one of my favorites. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 04:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the "Subscription required" tags you added at

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sumter_de_Leon_Lowry_Jr.&diff=897007395&oldid=896406663

Subscription is not required for any newspapers.com url that contains the wird "clip". Thank you. deisenbe (talk) 11:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deisenbe and Deisenbe: Thanks for the reminder. I forgot to do that after I changed the original references from the pages on Newspspers.com to the clips of the relevant articles.

Billmckern (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of University of Arizona people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TJRC: Fixed.

Billmckern (talk) 10:16, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Trump tweet. Please see:

Billmckern (talk) 00:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is information here which might be of interest to you. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your re-edit of Ambrose Kingsland. The source, re that Kingsland "remained active in Whig politics", was an XLibris publication. When I first inserted that citation, I got a Wikipedia pop-up that XLibris was among publishers Wikipedia considered "unreliable". So I dropped it but omitted to delete the associated text. I then decided to delete that whole sentence, because the NYT article re the Constitutional Union Party merely listed Kingsland as an officer of the NY Cooper Union meeting in support of the Constitutional Party, which (on second thoughts) might be a leap to construe as being "active" in the Constitutional Union Party. Sorry my edit explanation was confusing - could have worded it better.Nkings12 (talk) 14:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you did such a great job on Lesley J. McNair, I was wondering if you could be persuaded to rewrite Omar Bradley? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hawkeye7: Let me see what I can do. I'll try to get to it if I have time.

Billmckern (talk) 10:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's no hurry. The article has been this way for twenty years already. It has some interesting bits, but is largely unreferenced, and my experience with unreferenced sections of articles is that they usually have to be completely rewritten. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am improving the

@Cmguy777: If I have any edit or improvements I'll make them when I have time or suggest them to you.

Billmckern (talk) 10:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am new to this, so forgive me if this is not the right medium to communicate. But, I was looking at George Anson Starkweather (Michigan) is a nephew of George Anson Starkweather (New York). Is there a connection to George Anson Starkweather (Pennsylvania) that you are familiar with.

ty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtstommy (talk • contribs) 01:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gtstommy: Take a look at the note near the bottom of the article on George Anson Starkweather (New York politician). "There were several George Anson Starkweathers, all related and living in the same time period, including Starkweather's son George Anson Starkweather, nephew George Anson Starkweather, of Plymouth, Michigan, and third cousin once removed George Anson Starkweather, a lawyer and merchant in Waymart, Pennsylvania.

Billmckern (talk) 02:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

re: Robert Byrd# Ku Klux Klan

19 May 2021‎ Billmckern‎ Undid revision 1024033099 by Lindenfall. "I don't believe the adjudication on this topic has been finalized yet."

What's the verdict, then?

Recruiting is well-evidenced in the KKK section, linked above, and is included on Ku Klux Klan members in United States politics#Robert Byrd.

Thanks, Lindenfall (talk) 21:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lindenfall: This was sorted out a while ago. The second sentence of the second paragraph was the agreed upon addition.

Billmckern (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your outstanding efforts improving the Roger Wheeler article. As a matter of 'personal policy', I will be aggressive employing the formal policies on unsourced information in an article, particularly when it has mouldered, challenged, for eons. Since I'm not a topic expert or even particularly invested, I'm not a good match for performing anything more than this most cursory action of removing the unsourced material. But, sometimes, it has the desired effect of drawing the attention of someone capable and willing to invest the effort, and in this instance, it yielded an embarrassment of riches. Thank you! cheers. Anastrophe (talk) 21:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I saw your comment on the George C. Marshall page questioning maintenance tags in the lede of the article. This was done after a failed try to upgrade the article to B-Class in WikiProject Military history. The reviewer did not approve the upgrade due to a lack of citations in the article, specifically in the first lede paragraphs. Hope this helps answer your question! General George Marshall (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@General George Marshall: I've never understood references in the lede to be a requirement, given that the lede summarizes the article, and the references are included in the article's main body. But if the reviewer wants references in the lede, that's not an insurmountable problem.

Billmckern (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bill- you ask in your edit summary/ reversion "Why say the same thing twice?"; the answer as far as I see it is "it's standard article format", but since it bothers you, I'm not interested in pushing it, just thought I'd clear up your apparent confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.197.34 (talk) 15:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the improvements! I tidied up a few places, but you added a lot to it. Brianyoumans (talk) 20:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for work on Joab Hoisington who is my 5th great grandfather on mother's side, and a Rev War patriot. I went to Woodstock, VT, last year just to see it, because of him. Arfy4545 (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for finding the reference for that quote. I was searching for like an hour and a half for it, and for some reason the only reference it appeared under was the Ken Burns doc. I now realize it was because I was searching for it with that specific punctuation -- and correcting for that, the Mayes source appears immediately (I also looked through his text, and I must've skimmed over it!). I did think the quote was probably real, but I wanted a more solid reference, which you nicely provided. Thanks again! PoliticsIsExciting (talk) 20:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thanks for your edit here - I am curious how we know his name is spelled as "Brattan" vs. "Bratton" - the only source on

@Engineerchange: Sources I checked include:

https://books.google.com/books?id=v-ckAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA123

https://books.google.com/books?id=yRTxpknOiGUC&pg=PA51

https://books.google.com/books?id=_ZkFAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA409

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/7856004/robert-franklin-brattan (gravestone photo)

I also informed the office of the Historian of the US House. The staff there concurred with my assessment and updated his online official Congressional bio accordingly. Billmckern (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Billmckern: This all looks good to me. I just made some edits to the page to reflect a number of details I got from those sources and others. Good find! --Engineerchange (talk) 23:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Alaskan Barnstar Thank you for the upload of the public domain File:B._Frank_Heintzleman_(Alaska_Territory_governor).jpg, thus providing a free image for B. Frank Heintzleman! Wishing you the best.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Happy New Year!

Billmckern,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You brought up an important point about the conservatism of southern Democrats in the Southern strategy. I am actually about to add that into the section. I also plan on including the dramatic rise of Republican officials starting in the 60s and early 70s. Jon698 (talk) 17:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lennie Briscoe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lennie Briscoe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I don't appreciate you removing what I added, and I am telling the truth Kurt Busch did indeed win a cup race after bypassing Xfinity, bypassing meaning skipping Xfinity all together, sure his Xfinity debut came in 2006 at Texas where he won which was the only time he had rookie stripes, but Kurt Busch is definitely 100% the first NASCAR driver to win a cup race after going from trucks to cup by skipping Xfinity, if you don't believe me do your research more, I'm going to give you until tomorrow 3:00 p.m., I hope you realize that I am right.

Sincerely mad blade MadBlade 2 (talk) 01:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MadBlade 2: CITE A SOURCE. You find a reference, you find a reference template, you use the template to add the reference. That's how this works. Billmckern (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you sure?, I mean there might be one, but I do know Kurt is the first NASCAR driver to win a cup race after bypassing Xfinity. MadBlade 2 (talk) 13:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is concerned with reliable sources, not an individual's firsthand knowledge. If you can't cite a source, the item you want to include is probably not encyclopedic. Billmckern (talk) 13:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

...for your substantial improvements to James Hartness! Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Billmckern!

• The
  New Pages Patrol
  is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read
  project talk page
  with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider
  applying here
  .

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, great addition of citations to John A. Buchanan. The last few edits that you've made have pushed citations that already cited the details to after the cited statement.

E.g., this edit makes it seem that "bio" and "scva" only cite that he lived on a farm, when the intention prior to your edit was that "bio" and "scva" cite when he was elected and when he retired as a judge, as well as when he lived on the farm. Your addition of in-line citations have impacted the integrity of the prior in-line citations.

Hope this makes sense. --Engineerchange (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Engineerchange: Keep an eye out for the finished product. I've done this a time or two, so I think I'm reasonably proficient. Billmckern (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]