User talk:Canley/Archive 2013–2016

Harrias ^talk 13:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some oversight at the weird Australia edit might be of help too...

satusuro 11:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Could you show me an example of where the coding was broken? I checked numerous examples and couldn't find a version that had gone wrong. Thanks, Number 57 07:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Odd. Could you give me a link to a page where the colours disappeared. In theory, changing to Wikitable class shouldn't make that happen. The discussion you spotted is something completely different - it's for overall results tables, not single constituency ones, and the change I made wasn't related to that discussion. Cheers, Number 57 12:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I worked it out - it was because {{Election box candidate AU party}} used "bgcolour" instead of "background-color". Some of the other subtemplates failed to show the colour because they used "/" instead of "|" in the code. {{Election box candidate with party link}} was not affected by this problem (it was used on the pages I checked when making the change in the first place). Hopefully all is well now. Cheers, Number 57 18:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Launceston Church Grammar School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Robson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Raymond Ferrall may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• After a stint as a journalist (which he would later chronicle in his memoir ''Partly Personal'', Ferrall took a position

Thanks,

Orlady (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good work with the maps, would it be possible if you could re-do these[1][2] I did a while ago? :) Timeshift (talk) 02:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sure, I'll see what I can do with the 2006 and 2010 maps. --Canley (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've realised I only just scratched the surface. Are you able to go over the tables again? Timeshift (talk) 02:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will check them all now. In that case the swing figure is the correct one (2.11) as it is from the AEC data [3], the 2.12 figure was from the ABC's results [4] (which as you'll see from the talk page was not accurate). --Canley (talk) 02:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Timeshift (talk) 02:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've re-checked all the tables: ACT was very wrong, so you're right, you just scratched the surface with that one—the ABC had omitted the Independent candidate Emmanuel Ezekiel-Hart entirely (518 votes) which was what threw those percentages out. The only other discrepancy was the Coalition percentage in NSW was off by 0.01%. --Canley (talk) 03:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you say we're free of errors now? ;) Timeshift (talk) 03:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aaahh, might check everything again tonight... ;) --Canley (talk) 03:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Honorary Fellows of St Antony's College, Oxford, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Sovereign Borders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Canley, the QPQ review has just been supplied by Gerda Arendt (which is allowed), so I was wondering if you could return to check whether this is ready for approval. Many thanks for your work on this review. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 Sep 2013 Careful, you appear to have accidentally deleted most of the content in Australian federal election, 2013. --Canley (talk) 23:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Oh ok sorry - I tried to update the Status of the Election and when I went to update the whole page with the new status my internet connection timed out and failed the upload Mbbuser (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How's progress? :) Timeshift (talk) 23:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did the table, but I hit some trouble with the colour templates. I'll try it now. --Canley (talk) 00:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hows the table coming along? Timeshift (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beat me by a heartbeat :P Timeshift (talk) 02:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! 149.160.173.168 (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did this and I noticed this... what a clown! Timeshift (talk) 03:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you incorporate your 2013 result table from the talk page in to the article? I've tried but I keep messing it up. Timeshift (talk) 23:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley. Re this revert: How do readers who want to know what happened in detail in the 2013 Senate election - which is what this part of the article is all about - find out? Why are we offering them only 3-years-out-of-date information and not the latest information as well?

Cheers. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 07:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your help @ Wiki Reference Desk...! Joseph 08:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to include the names of the districts inside the boundaries? I tried updating on my computer these but without names to indicate what's what, it's just a sea of red blue and grey and not really helpful for the election article. They're fine for seat articles though, the intended purpose of pointing out where the seat is works fine :) Timeshift (talk) 01:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! I did the map colouring last night, but I agree it needs the district names so I didn't upload them, I'll add the names tonight. I'll do them manually because although the GIS program I'm using has an option to display the name, they are such weird shapes and sizes that they all jumble together. --Canley (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Timeshift (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you find the time to have a look? I increasingly don't like the 2010 boundaries/2014 results images I uploaded as it's incorrect, but no maps at all is even worse hehe :) Timeshift (talk) 00:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How about I upload the coloured maps which are ready now, then when I've added the names replace with the named version? (should be later today) And shall I overwrite your maps or just upload to different files/names? --Canley (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the old boundary images with names is more helpful than the new boundary images without names, but that's just me. Whenever you can get to it. Feel free to upload over the top of Metro/Rural14.PNG. Timeshift (talk) 01:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the maps with the names, it didn't take as long as I thought. Can you have a look and let me know if you spot any errors (wrong party colour, wrong name, etc.). I uploaded them to Commons and changed the thumbnail reference. If you want I can delete the old ones from Wikipedia, up to you... --Canley (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I like! One thing that puts me off a little is the darker colour on the rural map. Is there a way to make it less obvious compared to the rest of the shading in the maps? Timeshift (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the inset blocks, I have replaced them with outlines. --Canley (talk) 03:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you fix Morialta to Lib? I wish :P Perfect, thankyou! Timeshift (talk) 03:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --Canley (talk) 05:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed, the Kaurna label was missing. --Canley (talk) 05:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get the candidate names from an exported list? Just wondering where Hutn rather than Hurn came from, and Jasmin (coincidentally from the same seat). Also Lucy. Also not sure where Ken Ryan was at all in this election. There's more but i'll stop linking :) Also just a heads up, at some point I began making corrections to the articles only rather than articles and your draft page. Timeshift (talk) 07:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When the candidate nominations closed, there was a politics/psephology site that posted an Excel file with a list of candidates, and various pivot tables analysing the list by gender, "winnability", party and so on. So I think that was where I imported the list from as it looks definitive, but I later noticed there were 18 candidates missing... however I didn't notice the spelling errors and the mysterious Mr Ryan! I can't even find or remember which site I got the original file from now... Sorry about that anyway, I could have checked the names against the scraping of the ECSA site but they were in some weird format so I just went with what I had (which was fairly wrong in several places). --Canley (talk) 10:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't spose you'd be interested in updating the out of date SA federal maps/articles? Old Kingston/New Kingston etc. Timeshift (talk) 03:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure... I was going to do them last year, but I think I just left a message on the talk page of the guy who did them last time in the hope he would do it, but he seems to have been inactive for some time. Victoria had a federal redistribution as well so I should redo those as well I guess. Anyway, I'll have a look tonight and work on it soon. --Canley (talk) 03:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, in the meantime i've put the 2013 map in each SA article as a temporary measure. Timeshift (talk) 04:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the rural SA ones, I'll finish off the metropolitan seats tomorrow. Then I'll make a start on Victoria... --Canley (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley - a user keeps harassing me on my talkpage. Going right back to this, the user seems intent on disrupting my talkpage and insisting they will ignore the requirement to stay off a user's talkpage when said user requests them to. Can you please advise them, as an admin, that this behaviour is strictly not tolerated and continuing to harass in such a way will lead to a block from wikipedia? Timeshift (talk) 14:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you asking me for? It's not like we're Wiki-friends or anything! :) I'll put your talk page on watchlist, but it seems to have settled down for now. I didn't have time on the weekend to work out what the dispute was about... --Canley (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Commission Against Corruption (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You mention "education field" in your edit on Mike Baird but I can't see what you have added. I'd like to see alma mater removed from the info box and his school added. Can you help? Castlemate (talk) 07:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was mistaken, that field is in the Infobox Person template, but not officeholder. I added the field, then saw it wasn't part of the template in the preview, so I removed it, however when I resubmitted, my browser helpfully autofilled the edit comment field with the previous comment which mentioned the education field. --Canley (talk) 08:45, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How do we alter "alma mater" to the more general "education"? Castlemate (talk) 09:08, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you could use "field1 = Education", "data1 = whatever". --Canley (talk) 09:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley. I have seen that you've made and uploaded a couple of maps for roads in Australia. That's great, and there's definitely

Sorry if this comes across as a bit negative – your maps are definitely a huge improvement over no maps at all, and I really do appreciate your effort, so here are some cookies to enjoy! If you have any questions or want any help, you can post at the

]

		Cookies!
		Evad37 has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for the tips. It was a bit of an experiment really, a by-product of something else I was working on so I just uploaded the Great Alpine one as there was no map. I did look for some guidelines on map style on the project page but didn't find them (I found them now, I was looking for "maps" not "resources"). I can redo them in that standard style pretty easily. I have added the source attribution—sorry, I thought I had done it but I had typed them out but not pasted them in—they were Vicmaps Lite data released as CC BY 3.0 AU in 2010, I don't think the data is still available but the release page is still on the data.vic.gov.au site. --Canley (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Classified information in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eyes only (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reference Desk Barnstar
		For easily-breezily finding a film which I had been searching for a decent chunk of time without results! Well done, best wishes, ... and this! ---Sluzzelin talk 18:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)]][reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm wondering why you removed the date caption from beneath the photo on the

I was the one that removed it, and it's because that sort of caption is not helpful. If people on wikipedia want that sort of information on the photo they can click on it, but by default we do not have date taken captions under every or any politician's photo. It doesn't add anything substantially meaningful to the article. Timeshift (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for confusing the user names and thanks for your quick reply. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 00:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a quick fix in the meantime, but when you have the time can you re-do them? Timeshift (talk) 07:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For Waite? Ha ha, wow, amazing! OK, I've recoloured Waite in both maps. --Canley (talk) 08:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be a bother, but why would we want Waite re-coloured? It was won by the Liberals at the last election. Hamilton-Smith's independence doesn't change that; it's still a "Liberal" seat for the purposes of the maps, surely. Frickeg (talk) 09:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What Frickeg said! The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's now a seat represented by an independent MP! Certainly the 2014 article should and does remain as-is, but the 2018 article should have the maps coloured as per current MP affiliation. Timeshift (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Completely disagree, I'm afraid. If Hamilton-Smith wins it at the next election, it will be an independent gain. It's represented by an independent MP, yes, but it was won by the Liberal Party and remains a Liberal seat. Frickeg (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we agree to disagree. What about the pendulum, why is that different? Timeshift (talk) 00:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the pendulum too. In my opinion Waite should be listed in the Liberal column, but with Hamilton-Smith only coloured independent. I find this similar to redistributions. For example, should pre-election SA maps have been colouring Bright as Liberal (notionally) or as Labor (because it was held by Fox)? I would say as Liberal, and that the pendulums should list it as Liberal too. It's about how the relevant area voted at the last election. Not a single person in Waite cast a vote for an independent at the last election, so I think it's misleading to be colouring the map as though they did. Frickeg (talk) 03:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well in regards to the pendulum, we have much precedent in the federal sphere. I disagree with redistributions. If a seat were to become notionally Liberal and with that meant it was then held by a Liberal MP, i'd agree with you. But the MP would still be Labor so it should still be coloured as Labor. It's not misleading when the 2014 page remains as-is. And the 2018 page has an added text bit in the pendulum stating MHS became an independent, so that's not misleading either. I'm happy to continue discussion (if you wish) but perhaps we should leave Canley's talkpage? Timeshift (talk) 03:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, quite. Apologies for clogging up the talk page. Raised

here. Frickeg (talk) 01:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

It's hard to do maps without geodata like Shapefiles. Also I'm a bit worried about the legalities of using the boundary commission report so directly as it seems unambiguously copyrighted. It might take a bit longer after they are gazetted, but data.gov.au seems to update the PSMA data under a CC-BY licence quite regularly. --Canley (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carter Burwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Bourne Identity (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

I've come across boundaries for SA state going back to 1993 here (PDF) and back to 1997 here (KML). Would you be willing to do

I'll see what I can do when I have some time—the ABC ones aren't vector boundaries so could be tricky, KML should be OK though. --Canley (talk) 23:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Timeshift (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Ireland (author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakemba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley. Sorry to have to post directly on your talk page, but you may have noticed (on the WP:Elections and referendums talk page) that I am trying to get all the election and referendum articles tagged for the project. Unfortunately this is not making any progress, as people are claiming there is no consensus to do this, as no-one has responded on the Project talk page. Could you possibly comment on the proposal at

Did you happen to catch it? Did you notice Niki Savva was acting... different, to usual? Timeshift (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely, I did notice that when I was watching it. --Canley (talk) 23:45, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's like she was trying to look less like a Liberal cheerleader so she could attempt to scrape back a little bit of credibility in which to crap all over PUP. Still waiting for Abbott to appear on Insiders... and no, the MH17 appearance doesn't count. I found that insulting. Timeshift (talk) 03:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Canley/Archive 2013–2016! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

Hey - as previously discovered, Heysen is classed as metro and Light is classed as rural. As such, i've changed the images/captions for metro/rural. However, MS paint fill doesn't quite do a job as clean as your maps. I've temporarily uploaded new ones, but would you be able to re-do them for me? Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 03:36, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will do it tonight. --Canley (talk) 03:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! Timeshift (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about an RFC on the article Ayers Rock (band). A previous RfC received little participation, so we're giving it a second run and contacting individual editors who might be interested. If you have a moment, we'd greatly appreciate your participation at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Ayers Rock (band)#RfC. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 08:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard Flanagan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ... An immense achievement"<ref name=theaus>{{cite news|title=Poetry without a shred of pity|url=[http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/books/poetry-without-a-shred-of-pity/story-e6frg8nf-
• and Bruce Baxter,(2010) The Ever-Varying Flood. A History and Guide to the Franklin River. (2nd ed. Preston, Vic. ISBN 0-9586647-1-4 p.57</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Electoral district of Brighton may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• File:Electoral district of Brighton.tif|thumb|District of Brighton 1856]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding these - they're a real improvement to the articles and must have taken a fair bit of work. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:01, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. They look great. Frickeg (talk) 07:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruby and Rata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I went to look for this page 8 minutes after I saw the tweet from ABC News - and you'd already created it! Great work! -- Chuq (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I had actually written a stub draft when she was awarded the AM in January, so it was ready to go when I read the same tweet! --Canley (talk) 02:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Voice for the West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balance of power. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Please stop censoring the page for Heidi Victoria. Personal opinions are not welcome on WP, only facts. Please refrain from removing useful, cited information in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.37.66 (talk • contribs)

There are at least three editors of good standing reverting these dubious and minor "controversies" you insist on adding, so it is hardly "personal opinions" or "censorship". Surely you can see that repeated assertion of "controversy", from an anon account, during an election campaign is going to be questioned and challenged. Feel free to discuss on Talk:Heidi Victoria if you wish to convince others of the necessity of including these "facts" rather than continuing to revert. --Canley (talk) 01:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Election campaign is irrelevant. The facts are published through reliable sources, and it's not your role to censor WP. Everything is useful information. I'm assuming you're being paid by the ALP or HV directly for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.37.66 (talk • contribs)

Ha ha ha, how ridiculous – why would the ALP pay anyone to censor, protect or sanitise an article about a Liberal MP? I would revert similar negative, yet utterly inconsequential, "controversy" sections for politicians of any party or side, and have done in the past. I think my edit history speaks for itself regarding my impartiality – can you say the same? Your edits appear to be focused on only two subjects: Heidi Victoria and Peter Sunde, is it too much to hope that your professed devotion to presenting "facts" will extend to other politicians, other parties or other biographical subjects? Please discuss and gain consensus for your edits at

WP:BLP and other policies, and your relentless and singular focus on one person's biography appears quite suspicious and almost obsessive. As I said above, there are three long-standing editors reverting you, with an extremely broad range of edits and interests between them, so frankly your accusations of lack of neutrality, censorship and paid editing are laughable. --Canley (talk) 03:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Hate to say it Canley but you just showed your lack of professionalism and childish attitude. I agree with 14.202.37.66. Stop censoring WP, you're the aids that is infecting the internet. Also, he was obviously trolling you by mentioning ALP on a clearly liberal candidate page. Think before you type and feed the trolls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.19.233 (talk • contribs)

Yes, IP, by all means play the wise sage, because you are totally a different person from the first one. Frickeg (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ding dong, you have a new

I've temporarily updated the maps, can you do the pro job? Thanks! Also, no matter how many of the image sizes and direct image links I ?action=purge, I can't get the initial image upon clicking to update. Any ideas? Timeshift (talk) 02:36, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-rendered and optimised the maps. I'm not having any problem with the old version caching, I see the new one straight away. --Canley (talk) 04:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Turns out I needed to clear my cache despite doing a force refresh with no success. Timeshift (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that'd be great. I'm up to Mill Park at the moment. I'll wait until you've done the script for the rest and finish whatever needs to be finished. Kirsdarke01 (talk) 09:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaclyn Symes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ken Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to take a look at my first view of a 2014 Vic result and came across your edit... take a look at the 2CP figures you entered. Whoops! It would be a fluke that the first and only one i've looked at is the only one to have an issue. When you have time could you take a quick look at the results you've added to the other electorates? Timeshift (talk) 09:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's only that one. They were imported from the ABC, and matches the swing on Antony Green's page. I know that's not "the way we do things around here" (i.e. swing from 0 for a new party/independent) and I did notice it and mean to go back and adjust it, but I forgot as I made a major error with the turnout swings somehow so I had to fix all of them. But the TPPs all been very carefully checked (except for Shepparton). That was also the only non-classic seat I did I think, the Greens ones had already been done and I did from Mill Park onwards. --Canley (talk) 09:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the reply :) Timeshift (talk) 09:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how Green worked out that swing (28.5) though... I think Shepparton in 2010 was between the Nationals and Country Alliance. --Canley (talk) 09:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this comes from the notional Nat/ALP margin (it would've been counted in Shepparton in 2010). Frickeg (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Electoral district of Ringwood (Victoria)

added a link pointing to Electoral district of Ringwood

Scott Morrison (politician)

added a link pointing to Kevin Andrews

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and Happy New Year! I started editing these articles because the use of tense was inconsistent (mostly present, but some past). My reading of

)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your great work on improving the electorate articles! Kerry (talk) 21:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion and can you re-do a map for me?

Take a look here. I've noticed a similar type of Green image in other articles and wonder if it was worth having? Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 14:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version over yours, hope you don't mind. Revert it if you like and I'll upload under another name. --Canley (talk) 11:22, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that reshuffle and updating all the articles - I'd missed that one! The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I changed a couple of the tables you added into prose. This made the article shorter and more accessible to readers who aren't already familiar with the NSW system. Readers who are interested in the figures as distinct from the outcomes can always click through to each electorate's results page. I hope that's OK. Mqst north (talk) 03:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's fine with me, I like what you've done with the table to prose conversions, good job. --Canley (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley, I saw your comment on the Tallyroom blog (I'm Charles on there!) Your comment about Wikipedia make me think that Wikidata would be an appropriate location for such information. I haven't worked with Wikidata at all so it is only at the "thinking out loud" stage at the moment - but if we could get an experienced Wikidatan(?) to help - what do you think of the concept? -- Chuq (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would you like to help us with the lead section oft the article :

Canley, the photo is in the public domain via twitter and various papers, so no copy violation. And while there may be no explicit need for the helicopter photo, the same could be said of any wiki content. What is your reason for not having it there?Osito321 (talk) 00:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC) Thanks - I'll bow to your experienceOsito321 (talk) 00:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a couple of references and a Filmography table based upon the NY Times, probably missing a couple of titles[5]. I'm out of time, but wanted to help save the article from the vultures. BTW she is also credited as Amy Stock and Amy Stock-Poynton, which seems to yield the best results. --Cheers-- 009o9 (talk) 04:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Canley - full credits to anyone who finds better photos, ie: Bill Shorten. I had a look at the Flickr user stream and found one with the same camera and same event but with better composition. I've uploaded/edited as appropriate, I hope you agree the newer one is better. Timeshift (talk) 10:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. --Canley (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nauru Regional Processing Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudd government. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Knott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goods and services tax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice the edit summary comment you left. Is there somewhere on ABC/VEC that says results are final? Seems unusual that results are final less than a week after a/the by-election(s)... Timeshift (talk) 00:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley.
Unfortunately the sections of

See also my comment on the editors talkpage here with an example of copied text, bar 2 deleted words. I had brought it up with Moonridden girl here.

I was going to go in and revert the edit/s, but it's a little more complex to do so now. Just FYI. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 04:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no way I could have known as there was no template or talk page note. Bad timing I guess, but the article was almost certain to get considerable attention and activity this week. --Canley (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. I should have noted it on talk page too. I was going to update re latest 'troubles', then saw it had been expanded greatly. Investigated and found the problem. --220 of ^Borg 05:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Leaders of the Australian Labor Party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Graham (talk) 01:29, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi Canley, I have nominated the recently-undeleted article on Trent Zimmerman at DYK and listed you as an author. You can see the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Trent Zimmerman and make any changes / comments you think are appropriate. Regards, EdChem (talk) 08:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Infobox Wikipedian
|name = [[User:Canley|Canley]]
|honorific-suffix = [[Massively Productive|MP]]
|thanks-from = [[User:Kerry Raymond|Kerry]]
}}

+1. Frickeg (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+2. just noticed Christiane Floyd, now also featured on Portal:Germany, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article might have some issues. If you can fix them, I'll approve the nomination. --George Ho (talk) 19:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

0zero9nine (talk) 05:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canley, I noticed that you had made edits to resolve some earlier issues with this DYK nomination. Factorylad has not edited on Wikipedia for nearly four weeks, which means no response to the latest issues raised back on January 24. If there isn't a response soon to deal with these issues, the nomination will have to be closed. Would you be interested in doing more work here? If so, you can respond on the nomination page, if not, you can let me know here, and I can start to take steps to close the nomination. Whatever you decide, thank you very much for your work thus far. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sonia Humphrey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sonia Humphrey took the ABC to the Anti-Discrimination Board in 1984, after the broadcaster removed her from an on-air role, citing her pregnancy as a "visual overload" to viewers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sonia Humphrey. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful article, thank you! I expanded her introduction, do change it if it's rubbish! Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 11:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For helping me with Big Kap. talk) 00:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply ]

Hey, could you go easy on (or at least document) the changes you're making to Campbell Newman? That random LNP dude has done so much damage to the article that it really needs a straight revert and for any changes of his to be specifically discussed before going back in, but it's getting more unsalvageable because you're intermingling good and sensible edits with his dreck, and I can't revert him without reverting you. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did a straight revert earlier to 10 February. My changes were all tagging POV, weasel words and referencing issues, although I did some minor tense fixes this morning—I don't care if they are lost. --Canley (talk) 01:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad! Sorry to bug you! The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christiane Floyd, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Christiane Floyd was the first female professor of computer science in Germany? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christiane Floyd. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Has he actually formally tendered his written resignation to the President of the Senate yet? I see no evidence of it. Just because the replacement senator has been preselected does not automatically mean his seat is suddenly vacant. He still has to resign. Agree? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 05:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

personalities

Thank you for quality articles about politicians, artists and scientists, such as Trent Zimmerman, Gerry Scott and Christiane Floyd, for lists such as Members of the Victorian Legislative Assembly, 1921–1924, for gnomish work to wikify and monitor recent changes, and for "I am constantly amazed and astounded at how the Wikipedia works." - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1346 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internode. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1949 in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Proctor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Ellis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Ellis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley, thanks for fixing my errors on Candidates article. I was going to suggest adding a note for others to avoid same error but you have already done so. So thanks for that too. JennyOz (talk) 08:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canley you do a great job on this page. What is notable for inclusion, anything with an article? What about anniversaries such as Beaconsfield and Pt Arthur? Anzac Day etc? JennyOz (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just added some questions to (what I thought was) the talk page for

Looks like a page move half done, or half-undone. Someone moved the Shadow Cabinet of Australia page to Shadow Cabinet of Tony Abbott (to retain that information), then the Shadow Cabinet of Australia was changed to remove the redirect and fill in Shorten's shadow cabinet–however the redirect was not removed from the Talk:Shadow Cabinet of Australia page. I have fixed it up I think. --Canley (talk) 06:15, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I shouldn't've panicked. I now understand it was nothing I'd done, except to not notice the page name. JennyOz (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ALA candidates House of reps

NSW 

Ron Pike Farrer Peter Kelly Bradfield Steve Roddick Lindsay Qld Shaun Spain Forde Mathew Durragh Griffith

Senate Qld

Chelle Dobson I can confirm each has been endorsed by the ALA board please stop linking ALA to the Q society they are entirely different entities

http://australianlibertyalliance.org.au/about-us \thanks Nucopia (talk) 09:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)nucopiaNucopia (talk) 09:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley, new to add pls - I'm not confident to do.

Senate NSW - Shayne Higson - Voluntary Euthanasia Party (VEP)

per http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/mothers-deaths-convince-rachel-friend-tracey-spicer-to-back-voluntary-euthanasia-campaign-20160507-goosvy.html http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2015/s4469375.htm Thanks JennyOz (talk) 04:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, done! --Canley (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JennyOz (talk) 05:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you pls add a pup column for qld senate for these 2 fellows? http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-08/two-former-clive-palmer-employees-to-run-as-senate-candidates/7493312 JennyOz (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Canley. Inserting one in a row (rather than adding one at end) was too much for me. JennyOz (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I accidentally overrode your start on Qld with my NSW update (there was an edit conflict with someone else but I think it must have been with you too). Sorry about that! Agree with making FFP the fourth column, too. Frickeg (talk) 09:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I had saved it in a text file. I have made FFP the 4th column. --Canley (talk) 10:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Current Events Barnstar
		for your awesome marathon at Candidates! JennyOz (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canley, in the Tamworth, New South Wales climate section I was surprised to see they'd had a record 42.5 degree day in July. I found 2 mischievous edits from April 2015. What is the proper way to fix such old edits - go back and Undo or simply do new edit to rectify? (I can see this IP has done nothing else and also that undoing won't affect newer edits.) Just wondering for future if there is a preferred/correct action. JennyOz (talk) 08:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JennyOz (talk) 09:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting! I thought it might be a legal issue because he wasn't the only Coalition candidate to do this - Kevin (Kyung) Hong in Wills did the same thing. Frickeg (talk) 09:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for fixing up those minus signs in the electoral results pages! Frickeg (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't articles on wikipedia be objective ? You are the main contributor of AUS federal election 2016. It seem t me very subjective that only 3 of the 5 candidates that win a house seat are listed.

62.46.248.125 (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Division of Cook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Morrison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per your update you're saying Vic Senate confirmed. VTR still has "Victoria [Not yet available]". Can you provide me the source you're using? Not that I don't believe/trust you or anything, I just want to know if there's somewhere with quicker updates than the official VTR link. Timeshift (talk) 05:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AEC on Twitter. --Canley (talk) 05:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh thanks. Damn Twitter...! Timeshift (talk) 05:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]