User talk:FatalSubjectivities
Welcome!
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Anatheism (January 27)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anatheism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anatheism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Anti-Plantinga!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 15:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Anatheism
Hello, I noticed this draft that was declined. If independent sources that have significant coverage of the topic cannot be found, a suggestion would be improving the main author's article (
]Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our
{{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of your user talk page. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Concern regarding Draft:Anatheism
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Your draft article, Draft:Anatheism
Hello, Anti-Plantinga. It has been over six months since you last edited the
".In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
A Kind request to Unblock user
FatalSubjectivities (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Accept reason:
As the blocking administrator, no objections from me. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
May 2022
Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Elizabeth Stuart (theologian)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 11:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, David Bentley Hart, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 03:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David Bentley Hart. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 03:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Removed my edits. Thanks for reminding me FatalSubjectivities (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Doug Weller talk 15:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Links to draft articles
About deleting redirects
I noticed that you recently tried to {{
Disambiguation link notification for November 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Cyril O'Regan
- added a link pointing to David Walsh
- Jainism and non-creationism
- added a link pointing to Transmigration
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Buzzwords
- That's precisely my point. I wholeheartedly agree that sociologists can be able to use the standard definition. But the term social construct in many cases is a mere eye-catching WP:PLAINENGLISH could have been used. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 06:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)]
Help me with merging Template:Exceptionalism and Template:Ethnocentrism
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with with merging Template:Exceptionalism and Template:Ethnocentrism FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- While the two topics overlap in a few respects, they are different enough to merit separate templates. What is your reasoning for wanting to merge them? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- As in, the topics page links that are listed inside them. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 06:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think their overlap is very substantial. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Help me with post-Bejahung
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Below is what I see and I cannot do it:
_____________________________________________________
Jump to navigationJump to search
The page "Nietzschean affirmation" ()
Please clean up after your move:
|
A redirect has been created.
Your move should now be reflected in the Wikidata item language link.
- The page Talk:Nietzschean affirmation has been moved to Talk:Bejahung.
FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- On a related note, Is my IP address revealed? WP:IRCHD says yes, if one uses it. Did I use it? FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)]
- Pages that link to "Nietzschean affirmation" - Wikipedia FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- A bot should take care of any dangling redirects to the old name. Check again in a few days to see if anything was missed. Other than that, it doesn't look like anything still remains to be done after the move, but you might want to post your move justification on the talk page in addition to the edit summary. You'll be able to explain more fully that way. I'd have thought a page that has been hanging around since 2007 would have merited a requested moves discussion, but now I guess we'll see if anyone even notices.
- I did not see you mention your on-wiki username on IRC; that would be how someone might connect your username and the IP address you were using at the time. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you FatalSubjectivities (talk) 05:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyril O'Regan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Walsh.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Help with Deletion of redirects
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I think this could be deleted : Absolute (philosophy - Wikipedia
There is already Absolute (philosophy) - Wikipedia
______
This could too be deleted DeconstructionIsm - Wikipedia
There is already Deconstructionism - Wikipedia
I clicked "(See § When should we delete a redirect? for more information.)" on
And I was not allowed to put
Thanks.
FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- WP:RFDHOWTO describes how to nominate a page for deletion. Twinkle can also be used to assist in the process. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)]
- Also remember to state your reasons for deleting the redirect. Most redirects exist because someone thought there was a justification for them, such as the missing close paren. I think that reasoning is possibly faulty, but it's incumbent on you to address the original reasoning, not just stand on the mere reasonableness of removing the redirect. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 16:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
A suggestion
I find some of your Edit summaries over-long, epecially those with references. Perhaps keep the ES's short and refer to evidence you put on the Talk pages. David notMD (talk) 15:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Noted
- Tks for informing FatalSubjectivities (talk) 15:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, why ought they be short? i want to be able to more easily track my edit histories. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Is it because they are taking up wp:weight FatalSubjectivities (talk) 09:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)]
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean Baudrillard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfinite.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunny Side Up (Singaporean TV series) (January 7)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunny Side Up (Singaporean TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
February 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from John Searle into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 11:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Will give a go. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Many users were involved. WikiBlame (ramselehof.de)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=106217729
- The version history of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John Searle">John Searle</a> is being searched for Derrida as plain text
- 498 versions found
Derrida was already present in the oldest revision searched dating from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=692287524">17:51, 24 November 2015</a>.
There are probably older revisions. 500 versions found
Derrida was already present in the oldest revision searched dating from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=323168974">21:26, 31 October 2009</a>.
There are probably older revisions. 500 versions found
Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=153074897">03:43, 23 August 2007</a> between 250 and 251 while coming from 499:OO
Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=62578579">16:31, 07 July 2006</a> between 374 and 375 while coming from 250:XX
Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=112746961">05:31, 05 March 2007</a> between 312 and 313 while coming from 374:OO
Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=93783645">09:54, 12 December 2006</a> between 343 and 344 while coming from 312:XX
Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=106217729">02:32, 07 February 2007</a> between 327 and 328 while coming from 343:OO
Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=98136444">08:27, 03 January 2007</a> between 335 and 336 while coming from 327:OO
Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=95426948">01:28, 20 December 2006</a> between 339 and 340 while coming from 335:XO- Insertion found between <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&oldid=95334557">17:07, 19 December 2006</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&oldid=95426948">01:28, 20 December 2006</a>: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=95426948">here</a>
<a href="http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php?project=wikipedia&article=John+Searle&needle=Derrida&lang=en&limit=500&offjahr=2006&offmon=12&offtag=20&offhour=01&offmin=28&searchmethod=int&order=desc&force_wikitags=off&user_lang=en">[Search from here]</a>
Execution time: 8 seconds
http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php?project=wikipedia&article=John+Searle&needle=Derrida&lang=en&limit=500&offjahr=2023&offmon=2&offtag=10&offhour=23&offmin=55&searchmethod=int&order=desc&force_wikitags=off&user_lang=en&ignorefirst=0 FatalSubjectivities (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Milbank–Žižek debates (February 18)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Milbank–Žižek debates and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Manualism in moral theology (March 13)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manualism in moral theology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Manualism in moral theology has a new comment
Using the talk page for the Meta-historical fall article
Thank you for your continued input with the Meta-historical_fall article, and please note the two most recent comments on the article talk page in relation to your additions:
I'd like to review most additions together on the talk page as the length and sprawling nature of this article has been a serious concern in the past, and I do not want it to grow to be a concern again. --Jjhake (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Male and Female He Created Them
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Male and Female He Created Them, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
Your submission at Articles for creation: Manualism in moral theology (April 26)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manualism in moral theology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Recent PROD at Applied postmodernism
Just wanted to let you know that I have removed the PROD tag you placed on the redirect Applied postmodernism - that tag is not applicable to redirects. I also notice that your reason provided was a notability concern, please note that notability is not an issue with redirects, which are only designed to guide readers to a more suitable location anyway (often, non-notable articles are converted to redirects, as well). If you're still looking for the page to be deleted, please list a new discussion at
]May 2023
Hi FatalSubjectivities! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Onion that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 06:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
The page Category:Christian continental philosophers and theologians has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
- The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
]CS1 error on Reification (Marxism)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Reification (Marxism), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
Concern regarding Draft:Milbank–Žižek debates
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Your draft article, Draft:Milbank–Žižek debates
Hello, FatalSubjectivities. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong hatnote
you shouldn't be using this template. 204.209.132.57 (talk) 19:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Manualism in moral theology
Hello, FatalSubjectivities. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Article reorganisation proposal for Pope Francis and LGBT topics
There is currently a discussion at Talk:Pope Francis and LGBT topics regarding a reorganisation of the article. The thread is Article reorganisation proposal. Thank you.
I am seeking consensus for a significant reorganisation of the article. I would be grateful for your comments, as an experienced editor who has contributed to this article before. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
?
I genuinely do not see a pun. DS (talk) 02:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Merge proposals
I note that with this edit, adding a merge proposal, you missed a few steps that would be really helpful for those considering merge proposals:
- The reason should go on the discussion page of a target, not in the template (even though this is technically feasible)
- You have not indicated a direction in the template, but this should be included wherever possible
- You have not tagged the other page
Adding these steps ensure that the relevant readerships see the proposal and understand exactly what is expected, while provign a forum for discussion. See
]