User talk:HM2021

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Spider-Man: No Way Home, you may be blocked from editing. WuTang94 (talk) 04:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What the Movie studios are saying is because of Spider-Man No Way Home, they don't believe movies they release in Monoscopic 2D will make any money. Nightmare Alley + The King's Man + Matrix Resurrections all release in Flat 2D Only, while Spider-Man N Way Home has made almost $900 million from 3D Screenings. This trend has been happening all year in 2021 starting Godzilla VS. Kong which made $500 million ($450 million from 3D Screenings), and continued with Black Widow and Jungle Cruise and Free Guy and Shang-Chi and Venom 2 and No Time To Die and Dune and Eternals, which all made 80% to 90% of their Global Box Office from 3D Screenings per movie. Even Domestic Box Office never saw less then 70% of screenings for a 3D movie coming from 3D Screenings. StarHakimi (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cats (2019 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shoestringnomad (talk) 05:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at West Side Story (2021 film), you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned numerous times about adding uncited material. When you add information, you must cite it, even if every newspaper has what you're including on the frontcover. Shoestringnomad (talk) 05:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Violet SXSW 2021.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Violet SXSW 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you adding

]

Orphaned non-free image File:On the Count of Three Sundance 2021.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:On the Count of Three Sundance 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two things:

• STOP copy-and-pasting lead sections when splitting articles.
• SORT accolades tables by award, not date (see example).

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Ariana DeBose has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Shoestringnomad (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Boy 2007 Oscars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at All the Old Knives, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 04:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WestSideStoryJets2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Rhain ☔ 01:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:On the Count of Three Sundance 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1917 (2019 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Logan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 18:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for following up on your Music Man edits. Please remember to add citations when you add new facts to Wikipedia articles. All citations should include, at a minimum, the author's name, title of the article, publisher name or name of work (newspaper, magazine, etc.) and the date of publication, to the extent that the information is available. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Three Thousand Years of Longing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney Live Action Pinocchio logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kathleen Kennedy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:She Said 2022 film logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per

WP:TOOSOON

, I would recommend waiting for more information to come out closer towards release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Barbarian (2022 film)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Barbarian (2022 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everything Everywhere All at Once, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniels.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sonic the Hedgehog (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nope Soundtrack.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Matthew - (talk) 12:57, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CyranoSoundtrack.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Orphaned non-free image File:FabelmansSpielberglogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FabelmansSpielberglogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Little Mermaid live-action remake logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Almost Famous, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Max Hechtman has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DoubleCross (‡) 18:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Woman King that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Indagate (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. I see that you have received multiple notices about this in the past. TompaDompa (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Parade2023Broadway.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Fabelmans, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Also see Talk:The Fabelmans#Article issues to discuss further. There's no need to go back and forth in the article. Join the discussion. --GoneIn60 (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your update to Prestige picture constitutes original research and so was reverted. Original research includes use of published sources in a way to advance a position that none of the sources explicitly say. Nowhere in the NPR article does it say that the nominated films’ losses are a direct result of low box office, release date, or their perception as Oscar bait, nor does it say that prestige fare was brought to an end simply because of EEAAO’s win. Spectrallights (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Little Mermaid (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. Mike Allen 00:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Gabriel LaBelle.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 02:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Fabelmans. Sundayclose (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a minor edit. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Inappropriately marking an edit as minor is deceptive and rude to other editors. Read Help:Minor edit for more information. Sundayclose (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MGM Leo the Lion logo 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fabelmans ILM Before and After.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not

The Little Mermaid (2023 soundtrack), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 20:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Little Mermaid Soundtrack 2023.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --jonas (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sammy Fabelman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1917 Schofield Run scene.webm, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. :3 F4U (they/it) 23:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:EyesofTammyFayeSoundtrack.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in

MOS:TVPRODUCTION

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Hansen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding an awards banner to a film’s page, please be sure to verify that you are adding the template to the correct film. You added Hurricane Streets to Sundance Film Festival Audience Award: U.S. Documentary when it did not win that award. The correct film is Paul Monette: The Brink of Summer's End, which I have since fixed. Spectrallights (talk) 23:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 18:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:American International Pictures 2020.png

Thanks for uploading File:American International Pictures 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Wish (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not quite enough independent, significant coverage listed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:This Wish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I'm Just Ken.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:I'm Just Ken.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitzi Fabelman (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This should remain a redirect as there is no significant coverage of the character to employ a stand-alone entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mitzi Fabelman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Percy jackson and the olympians disney.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Percy jackson and the olympians disney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Walt Disney Pictures Logo as of 2022.ogv listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walt Disney Pictures Logo as of 2022.ogv, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 00:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disneylogo2022.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using bare URLs as references

Thanks for your contributions to Percy Jackson and the Olympians (TV series). In this edit seen here, you added bare URLs as references. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources if you are unsure on how to properly make citations. Thanks and 𝓜𝒆𝗿𝗿𝛄 𝓒𝒉𝗿𝖏𝙨𝙩𝒎𝝰𝙨 - Isaidnoway (talk) 15:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding original research on Little Women (2019 film)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Little Women (2019 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 15:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disneylogo2022.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:LIIFE logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:LIIFE logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disneylogo2022.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect citation on several articles about films which recently entered the public domain

I saw that the citation on Lights of New York (1928 film) for the film's public domain status referred to a page from 2019 talking about works from 1924, which did not mention the film the Wikipedia article is for. I replaced the citation with one that mentions the film, but I saw that you put the same citation on several articles about works that entered the public domain this year. Could you look into it an correct the mistake, if it is indeed a mistake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.186.95.57 (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will correct some of them. HM2021 (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Oppenheimer (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Globe for Best Supporting Actor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nightmare before christmas 30th anniversary.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nightmare before christmas 30th anniversary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello! I'm 98Tigerius. Your recent edit(s) to the page Saltburn (film) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 05:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Semi-autobiographical films

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-autobiographical films

On the page you created, you defined the category as "film titles, for films that purport to tell the life story of an individual, but alters the events and changes the names of people and places to make the story more fictional." However, many of the films that would fit this description appear to have been placed by you in the category Autobiographical stories. For example, the introduction section of Almost Famous literally says "The film is semi-autobiographical." It would be autobiographical if the main character had the same name as the director, which he does not. There are multiple films in the Autobiographical category you erroneously listed as such.

Also, can you please properly format your references? You consistently use

WP:CITEWEB on how to do so. Spectrallights (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Will send those that are semi-autobiographical films to the category page. Will remember to fill in references. HM2021 (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oscars 96 Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Oscars 96 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Draft:E.T. (character). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

AFI Top 10 navbox

Thank you for putting that together (by the way, you may want to place it on the American Film Institute page), a very informative and easily comprehended navbox. Now, some editors may want to get rid of it, like they did the Sound and Sight poll navbox in a "vote" by three editors (in a deletion which should really be formally review-challenged, even months after the fact). Hopefully it won't be challenged or removed, but at least be aware of that Sound and Sight poll that seems closely related in relevancy. Thanks again, nice work! Randy Kryn (talk) 04:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked soundtrack

There seems to be a alot on the web about the release of the soundtrack(s) for Wicked coming out as two separate volumes (part one and part two). The information is also giving the list of the track sequences for each of the albums. This means that the list of the new songs not featured in the original stage soundtrack can be identified and listed in a new Soundtrack section for the production and development section of the article. Any thoughts? HenryRoan (talk) 02:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say yes. All the music of both parts was produced all at the same time but the soundtracks of both parts will be released separately. HM2021 (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the original playlist for the stage production: [4]. Here is the playlist for Volume 2 (though something better than the IMDB version might be needed) here: [5]. Here is the playlist from Volume 1 for the film version here: [6]. It looks like "Defying Gravity" does make it into Part One. I am still trying to learn about doing tables on Wikipedia and do not know how to implement it in that way in a new Soundtrack section; maybe you can help? HenryRoan (talk) 04:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous edit is being discussed on the Wicked Talk page. HenryRoan (talk) 00:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wicked Part 1 Poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Wicked Part 1 Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E.T. (character) has been accepted

E.T. (character), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page

I am working on a new page see Draft:List of removals from Disney+ abd wondering of you want to help P+T

Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 11:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:This Is the Thanks I Get?!

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 19:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elliott Taylor (character) has been accepted

Elliott Taylor (character), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Adam Carter Rehmeier

Template:Adam Carter Rehmeier has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hugh Jackman as Valjean in Les Miserables 2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hugh Jackman as Valjean in Les Miserables 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, HM2021. Thank you for your work on

page curation process

, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:This Is the Thanks I Get?!

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "This Is the Thanks I Get?!

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]